EFTA00029275

From: ' To: "I Cc: "I (USANYS)" ctl >, ausANImMays,„ Subject: RE: RE: attorneys asking about confidentiality Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:06:33 +0000 Sorry, I just realized I mixed up and M. All three witnesses have not met with us but has indicated she won't come in, right? From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:50 PM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: RE: attorneys asking about confidentiality Is the following fair/accurate? If there are specific concerns they raised, feel free to add/edit as appropriate. Thanks Following comments about Prince Andrew on January 27, the team heard from counsel for several witnesses who had seen remarks and had concerns. Specifically, the team heard from counsel for and each of whom referenced comments about Prince Andrew and sough to confirm that their own communications with the team about their clients would remain confidential. =, as you know, has already met with us several times. and — both of whom are believed to have worked in some capacity for Maxwell/Epstein during relevant time periods — have never been interviewed before but have expressed a willingness to come in, and we have been working with their counsel now to arrange for interviews. From: Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:34 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) ca '*; Subject: RE: attorneys asking about confidentiality • Following up on our discussion earlier, the attorneys who have asked about confidentiality since the public comments about Prince Andrew include counsel for counsel for and counsel for Separately, just a reminder to please send us email on the Maxwell depositions? We're going through them separately as well, but would be helpful to know what jumped out to him in his read. thanks, Mi• Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00029275