Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00030476DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00030476

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00030476
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office 320 First St., NW Washington, DC 20534 June 22, 2020 Danielle Ivory The New York Times 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Re: NY Times. Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice. et al. Civil No. 20-cv-833 FOIA Request No. 2019-05665 Dear Ms. Ivory: Attached, please find the Bureau of Prisons' (BOP) release of the first set of records responsive to the above captioned case and corresponding FOIA Request No. 2019- 05665. After careful review of the first set of records, we have determined 10 pages are available for release in full; 9 pages are available for release in part; 1 page is duplicative and 434 pages must be withheld in their entirety. Copies of the releasable records are attached hereto. Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, the records are redacted and/or withheld under the following exemptions: (b)(5) - concerns certain inter- and intra-agency communications protected by the deliberative process privilege, the attorney work-product privilege, and/or the attorney-client privilege; (b)(6) - concerns material the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties; (b)(7)(A) - concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings; (b)(7)(B) - concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication (b)(7)(C) - concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third parties; (b)(7)(E) - concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions; (b)(7)(F) - concerns records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or personal safety of an individual. EFTA00030476 Sincerely, 4 ceeiro-1/4_, Eugene E. Baime Supervisory Attorney EFTA00030477

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY • U.S. Deparhnent of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, DC 20535-0001 ATTACHMENT B: FOIA Processing Comparison Chart FBI FOIA Exemption Application Comparison The routine application of FOIA exemptions to FBI files compared to the limited application of these FOIA exemptions as a discretionary release of DOJ/FBI information for this transparency project. Exemption (b)(1) (b)(2) Routine FBI FOIA Application Information properly classified by an FBI official pursuant to E.O. 13526. Information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency. (b)(3) Information exempt from disclosure by another federal statute. (b)(4) Trade secrets and commercial or financial information. (b)(5) Attorney work product privilege, attorney- client privilege, deliberative process privilege. (b)(6) / (b)(7)(C) Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes that could reasonably be expected

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 39 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 18

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 39 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, No. 20-CV-833 (PAE) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS. Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF KARA CHRISTENSON I. I am employed by the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"), as a Government Information Specialist ("GIS") for Central Office, stationed at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota ("FMC Rochester"). My background and employment history with BOP are described in my declaration filed in this matter on August 5, 2020. 2. The statements made in this declaration are based upon my personal knowledge and information available to me in my official capacity and about which I have become knowledgeable. 3. I submit this supplemental declaration in further support of BOP's motion for summary judgment in this case and in opposition to plaintiffs' cross-motion for summa

18p
Dept. of JusticeLegalDec 19, 2025

Case Number [EPSTEIN_TECS_RECORDS_2]

Case Number Created On:10/12/2010 10:49:45 AM Created By The source of the Query is The Query executed:EPSTEIN, JEFFERY DOB 1/20/1953 Result Result Text: EPSTEIN, JEFFERY 012053 011302 2059 INS NOMA AIR AJ01 N N A523-PALM BEACH, INTERNATION DOC: INSP: EPSTEIN, JEFFERY 012053 100299 1800 INS FREQ API...

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01699742

60p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 30

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, -v- FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor T - I . ../11".• EFTA00071554 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Search for Responsive Records 5 III. BOP's Withholdings Were Proper 6 IV. BOP Ha

30p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01267609

- - -. / D 1 0 SY Ft 2 Ad4rn ilg ■ AIRCRAFT CATEGORY AND CIA CONDITIONS OF FLIGHT TYPE OF PILOTING TIME AT!,,Ygno COUNTRY OAT SIGHT INsA43,11. .._,,m, IM.., LINN '3,,,,,„?2,å‹,; PILOT IN ,c1,,,,„°, ..._ ,.. SECOND IN 5111rINGPII LAND lAtINgiRr LAND 1 - f ") 18.571 ' .i'2._e.7, T i''' )/ 79 /9 19 C 1i /1 !l /1 1 / / / 7 1 / / rr .2 .2-C „2-0 ,2b _z_ j 3 33 3 3 3 3 3,.3 ,a- 7 ?- 7 02 "7 n2 -2 ! 3 (....3 1 3 . / 3 r - 1 3 I .? I 3 /' 3

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.