Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212042DOJ Data Set 9Other

Paul 6. Cassell, Esq.

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212042
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Paul 6. Cassell, Esq. January 25, 2010 United States Attorney's Office 500 East Broward Blvd. 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 [email protected] Re: United States v. Alfredo Rodriquez, No. 9:09-MJ-08308-LRJ-1 Dear Ms. Villafaria: I am writing to assert the rights of my clients as victims in the above-captioned case. It have tried to reach you several times by telephone, but have thus far been unsuccessful. You may already be treating my clients as victims. But in the interests of avoiding any confusion and to make sure that they don't miss notice of any future events in this criminal case, I am writing to formally notify you that my three clients (whose names are known to the government and who are identified in court pleadings a and Jane Doe) are all asserting their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. As you know from another case we have worked on together, the CVRA protects all those who have been "directly and proximately ha

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Paul 6. Cassell, Esq. January 25, 2010 United States Attorney's Office 500 East Broward Blvd. 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 [email protected] Re: United States v. Alfredo Rodriquez, No. 9:09-MJ-08308-LRJ-1 Dear Ms. Villafaria: I am writing to assert the rights of my clients as victims in the above-captioned case. It have tried to reach you several times by telephone, but have thus far been unsuccessful. You may already be treating my clients as victims. But in the interests of avoiding any confusion and to make sure that they don't miss notice of any future events in this criminal case, I am writing to formally notify you that my three clients (whose names are known to the government and who are identified in court pleadings a and Jane Doe) are all asserting their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. As you know from another case we have worked on together, the CVRA protects all those who have been "directly and proximately harmed" as the result of the commission of a federal offense. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e). My three clients were all pursuing civil discovery in the civil cases that Mr. Rodriguez obstructed by corruptly concealing a document with extremely important information in it that would help them prove their case (the so-called "black book"). My clients would like to exercise all of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, including the right to be notified of court events, to confer with the prosecutor as necessary, to be treated with fairness, and (if there is a conviction in this matter) to be heard at sentencing. As you know, the relevant case law gives crime victims the right to confer with prosecutors regarding any plea bargain that might be reached in cases such as this, even before an indictment has been filed. See, e.g., In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391(5'" Cir. 2008) (finding the Government violated the CVRA in not conferring with victims in case before filing a complaint and related plea agreement). I would like to speak with you about their rights as soon as possible. My clients have a right to "confer" with you under the CVRA. In particular, my clients are concerned about their right to be treated with fairness protected under the CVRA. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As you know, the Government currently has in its possession the black book, which contains vital information for my clients in EFTA00212042 connection with their civil suits. According to the criminal complaint in this matter, Mr. Rodriguez has described this information as the "Holy Grail" or "Golden Nugget" regarding their cases. If Mr. Rodriguez had not obstructed justice and had properly complied with their lawful deposition and document requests properly made in the course of civil discovery, they would now have that black book. They need a copy of this "Holy Grail" so that they can effectively pursue their efforts to obtain civil justice. They trust that, as part of protecting their right to fairness, the Government will do everything reasonably in its power to get it to them. Time is of the essence. The discovery deadlines for my clients begin closing on April 2, 2010. If they do not get the black book substantially before then, other attorneys and I may well be blocked from following up all of the hundreds of discovery leads that the black book apparently contains. My clients would also ask you to reach any plea agreement in this case that takes account of the seriousness of the offenses committed by Mr. Rodriguez. If things continue to stand the way they do today —with my clients unable to see the black book — it is quite clear that Mr. Rodriguez has committed an obstruction of justice offense that involves "substantial interference with the administration of justice." U.S.S.G. § 211.2(2). As things stand today, the April 2 discovery cutoff is apparently going to pass without giving them access to the names hundreds of victims who could corroborate their claims and, more important, provide ironclad proof that they have been the victims of a RICO enterprise. Motions to dismiss all of the RICO claim filed by my clients are currently pending in state and federal court. If these motions are granted, it could potentially result in my clients losing millions of dollars in damages and costs which they would have otherwise been able to obtain. If the case proceeds to a sentencing phase, I would request your office's help in communicating to the court the above mentioned victim impact information. Thanks in advance for adding my client's names into your victim notification system. I will be happy to receive the notifications on their behalf at the above address. And thank you in advance for calling me quickly to confer so that we can discuss how to treat these victims fairly and minimize any effects of the defendant's crimes. I know your office's great reputation (as well as your own) for working closely with victims. I look forward to working with you to see how best to protect my clients' rights in this case. Sincerely, /5/ Paul G. Cassell Paul G. Cassell, Esq. cc: David B. Brannon, Esq. (via e-mail EFTA00212043

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

j782epsC kjc

j782epsC kjc UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. 19 Cr. 490(RMB) Conference July 8, 2019 1:20 p.m. HON. HENRY B. PITMAN, APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG Attorney for Defendant MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant Also Present: Special Agent Detective FBI , NYPD Magistrate Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079704 j782epsC kjc 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE DEPUTY CLERK: Counsel, please state your name for the record. MR. : Good afternoon, your Honor. For the government, , and With us are Special

24p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department ofJustiee United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Bullefing One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 August 19, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Judge Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: As the Court is aware, on the morning of August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. On August 16, 2019, and after conducting an autopsy, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York issued a statement identifying the cause of death as hanging, and the manner of death as suicide. In light of the death of the defendant prior to a conviction becoming final, the Government must request the Court approve the attached proposed or

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.