Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00221751DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00221751
Pages
4
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 90-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Pag Vit JANE DOE NO. 2, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINITFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JANE DOE 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby resRonds toptefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as fo4oWs: General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendants Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any r

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 90-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Pag Vit JANE DOE NO. 2, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINITFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JANE DOE 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby resRonds toptefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as fo4oWs: General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendants Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved. 2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad. " A I V EFTA00221751 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 90-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 2 of 4 Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 8 9. Describe each injury (physical, emotional, mental) for which you are claiming damages in this case, specifying the part of your body that was injured, the nature of the injury, and as to any injuries you contend are permanent, the effects on you that you claim are permanent. Answer: Plaintiff has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries, including without limitation, anxiety, low self-esteem, feelings of guilt, self-blame, distrustfulness, burdened often by sadness and depression, suicidal thoughts, difficulty trusting others (particularly men), irritability, anger, feeling helpless and powerless, escapism through excessive partying, lack of confidence, loss of innocence. Plaintiffs psychological and emotional injuries will be analyzed by a forensic expert, whose opinions and related information will be disclosed in accordance with the expert discovery rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement this response in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 10. Please state each item of damage that you claim, and include in your answer: the count to which the item of damages relates; the factual basis for each item of damages; and an explanation of how you computed each item of damages, including any mathematical formula used. Answer: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as calling for an expert opinion and calculation. Subject to said objection, Plaintiff states that she seeks damages arising from her psychological and emotional injuries. These damages include pain and suffering, costs of psychological care and treatment, and loss of earning capacity. The pecuniary elements of these damages will be analyzed and computed by an appropriate expert. 11. List the names and business addresses of each physician (including psychiatrist, psychologist, etc.) or medical provider (including chiropractors) who has treated or examined you, and each medical facility where you have received any treatment or examination for the injuries for which you seek damages in this EFTA00221752 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 90-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 3 of 4 VERIFICATION being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing an ewers to interrogatories are true and correct to the best of her knowledge, information and belief. STATE OF FLORIDA ) ss COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) before me this ,LL day of 2009 by who is personally known to me or has produced the following identification ". 4 id P. which is current or has been issued within the past five years and bears a serial or other identifying number. E.-Jetty a CO-€5 e iti Print Name rx 27, ,b. Signature NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF FLORIDA Commission Number: My commission expires: (Notarial Seal) .5-4734 e. tr-PIL IR7;10 EFTA00221753 Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this Robert D. Critton, Jr, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax V VT IP '• WV V • Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Michael R. Tein, Esq. Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 305-442-1101 Fax: 305 442 6744 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein tein@liewisteinfnm Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 90-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 4 of 4 Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 16 Certificate of Service WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of t oregoing has been sent via U.S. day of January, 2009. EFTA00221754

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 69 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his Answer to the Second Amended Complaint and states: 1. Without knowledge and deny. 2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[fit would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege ba

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def

56p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIM'S MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COMES NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, by and through their undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and file this motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement that has been provided to their attorneys under seal in this case. The agreement should be unsealed because no good cause exists for sealing it. Moreover, the Government has inaccurately described the agreement in its publicly-filed pleadings, creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims. Finally, the agreement should be unsealed to facilitate consultation by victims' counsel with others involved who have

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Condensed Transcript

• ,I • • L.M., Condensed Transcript IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Case No. 502008CA028051 XXXXMB AD DEPOSITION OF LARRY EUGENE MORRISON TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF VOLUME I Pages 1 to 200 October 6, 2009 10:55 a.m. 515 N. Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4321 court reporter 0 ESQUIRE Toll Free: Facsimile: I MMIIM www.esquIresolutionS.com EFTA00181380 • • • EFTA00181381 Larry Eugene Morrison - Volume I October 6, 2009 • • 1 IN /NS CIRCUIT COURT Of TAR 15Th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND PM PAIN BRACH COUNTY. FLORIDA VOLONE I Pages 1 to 200 2 3 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL On behalf of the Defendant ATTEFOURY. GOLDBERGER A WEISS BY: JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER. ESO.. 4 250 Australian Avenue Suite 1400 5 act. FL 33401 Plaintiff. I 6 /Case No. 5020006020051 On behalf of the Defendant by telephone: IX/WM AD JRFPRRY DITHER. e BURMAN. CR

92p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 148 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves to amend his affirmative defenses as set forth in the attached Defendant EPSTEIN's First Amended Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009); Loc. Gen. Rules 7.1, 15.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009): 1. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., a party may amend his pleading "only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires." Plaintiff's counsel has consented in writing to D

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 66-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/26/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 11+ 1 DOCKET NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION VIA VIDEO PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney will take the deposition via video of: DEPONENT DATE & TIME LOCATION OF DEPOSITION Jane Doe #3 Tuesday, U.S. Legal Support do Stuart Mermelstein, Esq. April 14, 2008 444 West Railroad Avenue 18205 Biscayne Boulevard 9:00 a.m. Suite 300 Suite 2218 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Miami, FL 33160 Phone: 561 835-0220 upon oral examination, before U.S. Legal Support, a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for s ch other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.