Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00224840DOJ Data Set 9Other

July 9, 2008

July 9, 2008 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein TOMMY trYriP,i • JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY JACK A. GOLDBERGER JASON S.WE1SS Board Cer Mk(' Cr tribal Trial Attorney t Member of Now form & Florida Bar I Thank you for your letter to me dated July 8, 2008 and the draft document dated, c-mailed and faxed to me at my office on June 30, 2008, styled "Notification of Identified Victims." I would like to address a few related issues. First, please note that we have several requests concerning any such notification. Specifically, we request that: (a) Any notification be sent to any individual by mail (or served upon their attorney, to the extent known), and we respectfully object to any service by hand, a method of service which carries the concomitant risk of conversations regarding the notification that potentially would place the federal authorities in a position of being advocates for civil litigation; (b) Any notification be effectuated by a separate mailing to each individual without the

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00224840
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

July 9, 2008 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein TOMMY trYriP,i • JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY JACK A. GOLDBERGER JASON S.WE1SS Board Cer Mk(' Cr tribal Trial Attorney t Member of Now form & Florida Bar I Thank you for your letter to me dated July 8, 2008 and the draft document dated, c-mailed and faxed to me at my office on June 30, 2008, styled "Notification of Identified Victims." I would like to address a few related issues. First, please note that we have several requests concerning any such notification. Specifically, we request that: (a) Any notification be sent to any individual by mail (or served upon their attorney, to the extent known), and we respectfully object to any service by hand, a method of service which carries the concomitant risk of conversations regarding the notification that potentially would place the federal authorities in a position of being advocates for civil litigation; (b) Any notification be effectuated by a separate mailing to each individual without the

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
July 9, 2008 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein TOMMY trYriP,i • JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY JACK A. GOLDBERGER JASON S.WE1SS Board Cer Mk(' Cr tribal Trial Attorney t Member of Now form & Florida Bar I Thank you for your letter to me dated July 8, 2008 and the draft document dated, c-mailed and faxed to me at my office on June 30, 2008, styled "Notification of Identified Victims." I would like to address a few related issues. First, please note that we have several requests concerning any such notification. Specifically, we request that: (a) Any notification be sent to any individual by mail (or served upon their attorney, to the extent known), and we respectfully object to any service by hand, a method of service which carries the concomitant risk of conversations regarding the notification that potentially would place the federal authorities in a position of being advocates for civil litigation; (b) Any notification be effectuated by a separate mailing to each individual without the inclusion of any language that appeared on the second page of your June 30, 2008 memorandum; i.e. rather than including in each notification a large section listing "identified individuals" with redactions other than the name of the recipient (which we contend would be a clear and impermissible signal to any individual that the notification is a broad notification to numerous other alleged victims). Rather, a simple one page notification directed only to the recipient, and limited to the information currently on the first page of your draft memorandum would suffice. Ono Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Fl. 33401 p 561.659.8300 f 561.835.8691 www.agwpa.com EXHIBIT B-61 EFTA00224840 (c) You eliminate from any notification any language that is currently contained in the "acknowledgment" section of the June 30, 2008 memorandum; and (d) You supplement the notification with the Government's previously made representation that it is not vouchin for the veraci of any claim by any identified individual. See Letter from J. 10/25/07). Second, please note also that we do not understand your request that Mr. Epstein and his attorneys execute the rider / acknowledgment contained within your June 30 hand-delivered draft. Specifically, we do not believe that the Non-Prosecution Agreement requires Mr. Epstein's execution of any such additional stipulation. Because we want to ensure that Mr. Epstein continues to strictly comply with the letter of the parties' agreement, we respectfully ask that you explain why you believe that the Non-Prosecution Agreement requires execution of your stipulation. Our understanding of the Non-Prosecution Agreement is that it does not require Mr. Epstein to "acknowledge" anything not already contained within the four corners of the written agreement. The agreement certainly contains no written term obligating that he "waive any evidentiary challenge to the introduction of a copy" of any "Notification of Identified Victims" in "any judicial proceeding between any identified individual" and Mr. Epstein, as your memorandum currently requests. Further, please note that your June 30 stipulation, as drafted, is not limited to Section 2255 proceedings. Rather, your June 30 draft requires Mr. Epstein to waive evidentiary challenges in "any judicial proceeding" - - which clearly exceeds the bounds of the parties' written agreement. Third, I would respectfully request that you provide me with the names of the "pro bono lawyers" who, you indicated to me at our June 30 meeting at my office, were intending to represent certain persons identified on your June 30 draft notification, as well as any knowledge that the Government has as to how they were selected, and what communications the Government has had with them to date. Finally, please know that it is Mr. Epstein's firm intent to fulfill strictly each term and condition of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Government. Nothing in this letter should be construed, however, as waiving any defense that may be available to Mr. Epstein under the parties' written agreement. I look forward to your response. Until then, I remain, trul yours, A. Goldberger cc: Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00224841

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.agwpa.com
Phone561.659.8300
Phone561.835.8691

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:28:18 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Letter to A. This attachment has been sent to you on behalf of Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire. Regards, Legal Assistant Atterbuty, Goldbe er & Weiss, P.A. EFTA00215569

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Allegations of Prosecutorial Interference in Jeffrey Epstein Child Abuse Investigation

The passage suggests possible undue influence on a state attorney's office by high‑profile lawyers (e.g., Dershowitz, Goldberger) to down‑grade Epstein's alleged crimes to a misdemeanor. It names spec Detective James Patterson recounts a shift in case handling after Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers, possibl A suggestion was made to issue a misdemeanor notice to Epstein rather than pursue felony charges.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10Financial RecordUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
House OversightUnknown

Parents sue Jeffrey Epstein for $50M over alleged sexual assault of 14‑year‑old

Parents sue Jeffrey Epstein for $50M over alleged sexual assault of 14‑year‑old The passage confirms an existing civil suit against Epstein and adds a minor new angle – the claim that the victim’s parents have prior financial‑crime arrests, which the defense is using to argue the lawsuit is financially motivated. While it provides concrete names, dates, and a filing amount, the core allegation is already public and offers limited actionable leads beyond standard follow‑up on court filings. Key insights: Civil suit filed by attorney Jeffrey Herman on behalf of a 14‑year‑old victim (Jane Doe) seeking >$50 million.; Alleged assault occurred in 2005 at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion.; Epstein scheduled to enter a plea on a prostitution solicitation charge on March 10.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.