Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Notice Of Supplemental Authority In Support Of His Reply To Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action For Time Certain Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of his Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition (DE 54) to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint: 1. Ostrow v. U.S., 1986 WL 6855, *1 (M.D. Fla.Xrecognizing a defendant's constitutional rights and allowing for a stay of the civil case until the criminal aspects/investigation of Defendant's companion case are closed). 2. Severino v. Klvtie's Developments, Inc., 27 L 1782637, *2 (D. Colo)(recognizing that a stay is appropriate under simil ces as in the instant case). By: RO ER D. CRI ON, JR., ESQ. Certificate of Service WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this Cday of May, 2009. Brad Edwards, Esq. The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. EFTA00234815 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2009 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 Counsel for Plaintiff Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice Co-counsel fir Platntzll Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein MICHAEL J. PIKE. ESQ. AN. CRITTON. LUTTIER & COLEMAN (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, 2 EFTA00234816