UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00308099

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 17 Civ 616 (JGK) JANE DOE 43, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AN Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Defendants Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and Lesley Groff ("Groff") (together, "Defendants"), upon the pleadings and prior proceedings had herein, and on the grounds stated below, intend to move this Court before the Honorable John G. Koeltl at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, for an Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(c), sanctioning Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel, together with such other relief as this Court deems just and proper. The grounds for sanction are as follows. First, on January 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above-captioned matter. Second, on May 15, 2017, the Defendants served a letter on Plaintiff detailing the many deficiencies in the Complaint, including, but not limited to, the failure of the Complaint to a) allege a legally sufficient claim as to either Defendant, b) identify the statutes allegedly violated by the Defendants, c) establish that the claims in the Complaint are not barred by applicable statute of limitations, d) establish personal jurisdiction over the Defendants, and e) establish that venue is properly laid in this District ("Deficiency Letter"). EFTA00308099 Third, on June 5, 2017, the Plaintiff filed and served the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). The FAC failed to correct any of the deficiencies in the Complaint that were described in detail in the Deficiency Letter, including, but not limited to, the following: a) the allegations in the FAC do not support a plausible claim that Plaintiff is a victim of sex trafficking, as opposed to a willing participant in an adult relationship in which she received an Upper East Side lifestyle and other benefits; b) the FAC fails to allege facts sufficient to support any violation of the statutes alleged; c) the claim in the FAC is barred by the longest possible statute of limitations; d) the FAC fails to establish that the Court possesses personal jurisdiction over the Defendants; and e) the FAC fails to establish that venue is properly laid in the Southern District of New York. Finally, Plaintiff's deposition testimony, and the documents that she produced, in the action captioned Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) (the "Giuffre action") further demonstrate that the FAC should be dismissed for the reasons set forth above and in the Deficiency Letter, and that Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel filed the FAC for improper purposes. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 11(c)(2), Plaintiff has a period of 21 days within which to take corrective action and voluntarily dismiss the FAC with prejudice before Defendants file their Rule 11 motion seeking all appropriate relief, including, but not limited to, an order dismissing the FAC and holding each of the Plaintiff and her counsel 2 EFTA00308100 liable for all of Defendants' reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the Complaint and the FAC and directing Plaintiff and her counsel to pay the same. Dated: July 21, 2017 STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP By /s/ Michael C. Miller Michael C. Miller Justin Y.K. Chu Michael Keough Attorneys for Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN & LESLEY GROFF To: FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Brad Edwards Attorney for Plaintiff Jane Doe 43 ALSTON & BIRD, LLP Alexander S Lorenzo John E. Stephenson, Jr. (Application for admission pro hoc vice pending) Attorneys for Defendant 3 EFTA00308101

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

States for illicit purposes. Epstein and Brunel allegedly housed the models in apartments located at

States for illicit purposes. Epstein and Brunel allegedly housed the models in apartments located at 2 Larry Visoski or "Lawrence P. Visoski" is Epstein's longtime pilot. EXHIBIT: TIMELINE OF PAYMENTS TO (OR ON BEHALF OF) POTENTIAL CO-CONSPIRATORS (PAYMENTS > $10,000) 1)xli 12/4/2013 lil NI I I( I \In N kut MC Model Management' k \10( \I $25,000 BENEFICIARY B %NE TD Bank BENEFICIARY WIRING ACCOUNT ACCOUNT # Jeffrey Epstein WIRING ACCOUNT # IN IRE DETAILS/ INSTRUCTIONS N/A 12/10/2013 MC2 Model Mana • ement $29,440 SunTrust Bank Jeffrey Epstein N/A 12/11/2013 Larry Visoski $225,000 Bank of America Jeffrey Epstein N/A 12/20/2013 Visoski $16,676 Bank of America Jeffrey Epstein Petty cash 1/21/2014 MC Model Maim • ement $25,000 TD Bank Jeffrey Epstein N/A 1/21/2014 $14,000 JP Morgan Chase Jeffrey Epstein N/A 4/10/2014 301/66 owners Co ° $182,219 Citibank Jeffrey Epstein N/A 5/2/2014 301/66 Owners Corp $50,000 Citibank Jeffrey

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00178386

EFTA00178386 United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Fti./No. OLY-80/z SUBPOENA FOR: PERSON X DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTISI YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: April 15, 2008 1:00pm YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following documents) or object(s): ANY AND ALL NOTES, LETTERS, CARDS, GIFTS, PAYMENTS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS YOU HAVE RECEIVED FROM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LESLEY GROFF, AND/OR OR ANY EMPLOYEE OF JEFFREY EPST IMI L. ANY AND ALL PHOTOGRAPHS, WHETHER PRINTED OR DIGITAL, OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LESLEY GROFF, AND/OR ANY AND ALL E-MAILS, INSTANT MESSAGES, CHATS, TEXT MESSAGES, VOICEMAILS, OR TELEPHONE MESSAGES THAT YOU HAVE SENT TO AND/ORRECEIVED FR

310p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302 (Rev. 3-8-10)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein house details and alleged MC2 trafficking links

The passage repeats widely reported allegations about Epstein’s activities and mentions known associates (Jean‑Luc Brunel, Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova). It adds a claim that Epstein gave $1 mi Alleged $1 million payment from Epstein to Jean‑Luc Brunel for MC2 startup Former bookkeeper claims MC2‑linked girls were trafficked on Epstein’s private jets Four staff members (Sarah Kellen, Adrian

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302(Rev.54.10)

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.