From: Lesley Groff <lesleyjee®gmail.com>

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00406918

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: Lesley Groff <lesleyjee®gmail.com> To: "Wakefield, Caitlin" < Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 02:10:30 +0000 I do!!! Sent from my iPhone On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:53 PM, "Wakefield, Caitlin" I should have paraphrased. But you get it... :) wrote: From: Lesley Groff <lesley,jeetagmail.com> To: Wakefield, Caitlin Sent: Tue Aug 07 20:49:12 2012 Subject: Re: Oh my!! Thanks. Sony to hear he had a bad day! I will pass along. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:25 PM, "Wakefield, Caitlin" FYI from Gov wrote: Tell jeffreys asst that today was a disaster area and I couldn't go see him and tomorrow I leave early in am for the cape. So thanks for the thought and we will see him next time in ny or sfe. Caitlin K. Wakefield Office of Governor Bill Richardson 202.203.8685 it 505.850.5441 ,‘ www.billrichardson.com <image001.jpg> EFTA00406918

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaingmail.com

Domainjeetagmail.com

Domainwww.billrichardson.com

Phone505.850.5441

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown