Case File
efta-efta00429569DOJ Data Set 9OtherDS9 Document EFTA00429569
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00429569
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To: Brad Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:15:19 +0000
Please see Mr. Epstein's message below.
CONFIDENTIAL - FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS ONLY
Brad,
I am truly sorry that we were not able to sit down face to face to continue our discussions. This is especially so
given the fact that I thought you and I had agreed that our discussions were at last productive, particularly as
there were no other attorneys involved. Just by talking, you and I resolved both the DK and CO claims in less
than thirty minutes. So, I have to admit that I am disappointed at your suggestion that I am somehow not acting
in good faith. I was quite surprised to have received a take it or leave it demand from Jack Scarola instead of the
proposal for a workable structure that we agreed. You and I have started a constructive dialogue that I hope will
continue. In that regard, I believe you might want to consider the fact that you told me that your lost wages for
billable hours were approximately $250K. Additionally, you thought that pain and suffering and damage to your
reputation could somehow get you to a million dollars in damages. You said that was without even considering
punitive damages. At the same time, however, you also suggested that you were unwilling to accept any
confidentiality obligations because you had already received an offer for a movie/book deal for a million dollars
or more. Moreover, ou have already settled a number of cases with me this year and are continuing to pursue
the
3771 case, so I am unclear how you can continue to assert that your ability to
bring in new cases has been damaged or that your income earning potential has been severely impacted. As you,
yourself, said to me, the publicity alone cuts both ways. All that being said, it appears that, with the insertion of
your attorne , thins have come to an unnceccsary halt. I am awaiting what you suggested was a thoughtful
idea on the
3771 case. If you would like to resume our dialogue in an attempt to
resolve everything, please feel free to call my secretary or Darren Indyke. Brad, I am sincerely disappointed that
we have come to this point so soon after we have been able to make some real progress, but I hope to hear from
you so we can resume our talks.
Sincerely.
Jeffrey Epstein
Sent from my iPhone
EFTA00429569
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02185896
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01994354
0p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
839p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02450811
3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
13p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01994809
3p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.