Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00594281DOJ Data Set 9Other

BURMAN. CRITTON

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00594281
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN,LLP YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA." ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA PARALEGAL/INVESTIGATOR ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR, PA ' JESSICA CADWILL BERNARD A_ LEBEDEKEP. BOBBIE M. MCKENNA MARK T. LUTTIER. PA ASHLIE STOKEN•BARING JEFFREY C. PEPIN BETTY STOKES MICHAEL J. PIKE PARALEGALS HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA RITA H. BUDNYK DAVID A. YAREMA Of COUNSEL IELORJ DA BOARD a KT MID CIVIL TRIAL. lAWYER. 2ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO January 12, 2010 Sent by E-mail and U.S. Mail G. Michael Keenan, Esq. 1532 Old Okeechobee Road Suite 103 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: v. Jeffrey Epstein CASE NO.: 502008CA028051XXXXMBAD Dear Michael: EDWARD M. RJCCI ;nag CONSUMER JUSTICE COUNSEL The court granted your client's Motion for Protective Order regarding his deposition. The stay has expired and I would like now to take Mr. Edward's deposition within the next ten (10) days. As you are aware, he was originally set for deposition on November 19, 2009. Please provide dates or we will unilaterally choose one. Cordially Robegt D. Critton, Jr. RDC/clz cc: Bradley Edwards, Esq. 303 BANYAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 400 • WEST PALM BEACH. FL 334W • PHONE: 561-842-2820 • FAX' 561-844-6929 • WWW.BCLCLAW.COM EFTA00594281 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Et Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB ORDER ON BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MOTION TO STAY THIS CAUSE, having come on io be heard upon BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE'S Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order and Motion to Stay on November 19, 2009. and the Court having heard the argument of counsel, having reviewed the file and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby considered ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 1. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE'S Motion for Protective Order be and the same is hereby granted. The deposition of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. ESQUIRE is continued pending the expiration of the stay entered in this cause. Defendant will be required to renotice Mr. Edwards for deposition subject to any further Motions or objections he or Plaintiffs may wish to set forth. 2. BRADLEY J. EDWARD, ESQUIRE'S Motion to Stay be and the same is hereby granted and this action, as well as the case of E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein In this Division is stayed effective as of November 19, 2009 for a period of 30 days. The stay will automatically be dissolved on December 21, 2009. This case and the case of E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein are removed from the Court's trial docket. The cases will be reset upon Motion filed by either party after the expiration of the stay. EFTA00594282 DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of Copies furnished to: G. Michael Keenan, Esquire 1532 Old Okeechobee Road Suite 103 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Braille Edwards, Esquire 1109 2no Street Hallendate Beach, Florida 33009 2°11GNED AND DATED NOV 3 0 2003 CIRCUIT COURT MIME DONALD W. HAFELE Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esquire David Yarema, Esquire Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Rorida 33401 Jay Howell, Esquire Jay Howell & Associates, M. 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Jack A. Goldberger. Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Rorida 33401-5012 Kendall Coffey, Esquire Coffey, Burlington Office in the Grove, Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Paul Singerman, Esquire Berger, Singerman 2000 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33131 EFTA00594283

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.bclclaw.com
Phone401-5012
Phone561-842-2820
Phone561-844-6929

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIM'S MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COMES NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, by and through their undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and file this motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement that has been provided to their attorneys under seal in this case. The agreement should be unsealed because no good cause exists for sealing it. Moreover, the Government has inaccurately described the agreement in its publicly-filed pleadings, creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims. Finally, the agreement should be unsealed to facilitate consultation by victims' counsel with others involved who have

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on F LSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS WITH INTEGRATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to a Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Documentation files this his Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Disclosure of Certain Correspondence and Discovery for the reasons set forth below: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT During the underlying litigation, Epstein vigorously sought protection from the Court that these and other documents produced would be used for purposes other than those contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for discovery; i.e., dissemination in the

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816

9p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020703

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court rejects litigation privilege claim for Jeffrey Epstein, signaling imminent public reckoning

The passage notes a court’s repeated rejection of Epstein’s attempt to shield himself behind litigation privilege, hinting at forthcoming mediation and potential exposure. While it identifies a powerf Trial court has repeatedly rejected Epstein's claim of litigation privilege. The rejection is described as well‑reasoned and unlikely to change. Lawyers listed (Bradley Edwards, Jack A. Goldberger, e

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

BURM.AN. CRITTON

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.