Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00610737DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 45

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00610737
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. STATUS REPORT Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Status Report, with concurrence of counsel for Petitioners, to inform the Court of the status of this matter. I. On October 28, 2010, the Court filed its Order reopening the matter and stated that it would "allow the parties to continue their attempt to resolve this matter. In the event that the parties cannot reach a resolution, the Court will schedule a status conference to determine how this case will proceed." (DE 44 at 1-2.) 2. The parties have continued to meet telephonically and in person in an attempt to resolve this matter but have not yet reached a resolution. 3. Based upon recent communications received from Petitioners' counsel, the U.S. Attorney's Office has determined that it must seek an opinion from the Justice Department regarding whether it can continue to represent the United States in this matter, or whether outside counsel from another part of the Justice Department is required. 4. The undersigned and have communicated this decision to counsel EFTA00610737 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2010 Page 2 of 3 for Petitioners, and have explained that this will necessarily suspend activity on the case until an opinion is obtained and, if necessary, new counsel is in place. 5. Petitioners have agreed with the filing of this Status Report to inform the Court of this development and to ask the Court to allow the parties additional time to determine whether resolution of the matter is possible. 6. Consistent with the Court's Order, (DE44,) once this interim question of representation is decided, the parties will continue their attempts to resolve this case. If the parties determine that resolution without court intervention is impossible, one or both parties will ask the Court to set the matter for a Status Conference. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Fax: E-mail: Attorney for Respondent CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 17, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. 2 EFTA00610738 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2010 Page 3 of 3 Attorneys for Petitioners SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissin Edwards Fistos Lehrman Fax: Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 3 EFTA00610739

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Du..ument 511 Entered on FLSD Docku, J3/29/2010 Page 1 of 11

11p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.