Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00614455DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00614455
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA CASE NO: 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JANE DOE brings this Complaint against Defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and states as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. brings this Complaint under a fictitious name to protect her identity, because the Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse that she suffered while a minor. 2. She is currently over the age of Nand otherwise sui juris. 3. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently incarcerated in Palm Beach County, is a citizen and resident of Palm Beach County, Florida, has full intent to stay in Palm Beach County after his incarceration and is otherwise sui juris. 4. Defendant, is a citizen and resident of the State of New York and otherwise sui furls. EFTA00614455 5. This is an action for damages in excess of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000), exclusive of interest and costs. 6. Venue is proper in this Court under section 47.011, Florida Statutes, because the causes of action brought herein accrued in Palm Beach County, Florida, and one or more Defendants reside in Palm Beach County, Florida. Factual Allegations 7. At all relevant times, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male. Mr. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. Before confinement, he maintained homes in New York, New Mexico, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Palm Beach, Florida. The allegations herein concern Mr. Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach. 8. Upon information and belief, Mr. Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, and/or enterprise wherein he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his Palm Beach home and sexually assaulted the girls, or coerced or attempted to coerce the girls to engage in prostitution, and then gave them money. 9. In or about 2005, M., they■ years old, fell victim to Mr. Epstein's trap described above, at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach estate. 10. Upon information and belief, Mr. Epstein carried out this scheme/enterprise and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. 11. Integral conspirators in Mr. Epstein's Florida scheme/enterprise were Defendant; Page 2 of 7 EFTA00614456 and other Jane Does. Ms. Ms. and other Jane Does Under Mr. Epstein's plan/enterprise, =This was pivitol to Mr. Epstein's plan/enterprise. 12. Mr. Epstein's plan, scheme, and/or enterprise had a particular pattern and method. Page 3 of 7 EFTA00614457 Facts Specific to M. 13. Consistent with the foregoing plan, scheme, and/or enterprise, M., then.years of age, 15. At this point, Mr. Epstein specifically asked M. her age, to which M. honestly advised she was, years old. 17. was then allowed to get dressed, leave the room and go back down the stairs and into the kitchen. Mr. Epstein gave the other year old girl money and told M. that this girl "had her money" and then left. M. was given $200 by the other ' y e a r old girl. Page 4 of 7 EFTA00614458 18. As a result of this encounter with Mr. Epstein, the COUNT I Sexual Battery against Defendant Epstein 19. Plaintiff.. repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 18 above. 20. This is a count for sexual battery against Defendant, Mr. Epstein. 21. Mr. Epstein sexually battered In at a time when she was Wears old. 22. During this incident Epstein exploited his natural authority and trust as an adult with a minor. 23. Plaintiff M., because of her age at the time of this incident, did not have the legal ability to consent to the sexual acts as described above. 24. Mr. Epstein's actions amounted to a harmful, unapproved and intentional touching of 25. Epstein inflicted harmful or offensive contact on M. with the intent to cause such contact, alternatively, M. had the apprehension that such contact was imminent. 27. As a direct and proximate result of Mr. Epstein's assault on •., she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, M., demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Page 5 of 7 EFTA00614459 COUNT II Intentional and/or Reckless Infliction of Emotional Distress against Defendants Epstein 28. Plaintiff.. repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 18 above. 29. This is a count for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendant, Mr. Epstein. 30. The conduct of Defendant Mr. Epstein in subjecting M. to Mr. Epstein's actions as described above was intentional or reckless. 31. The conduct of Defendant, Mr. Epstein in subjecting M. to Mr. Epstein's conduct described above was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. 32. The conduct of Defendant Mr. Epstein, in subjecting to Mr. Epstein's conduct described above, caused M. Defendant knew or had reason to know that their intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to M. 33. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's intentional and/or reckless conduct, WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages, costs, attorney's fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Further, Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this Complaint to add a claim for punitive damages pursuant to Florida Law. JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action. Page 6 of 7 EFTA00614460 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by U. S. Mail, postage prepaid, this day of April, 2009 to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq./Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike= LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. By: SPENCER T. KUVIN, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 089737 Page 7 of 7 EFTA00614461

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Flietit0A ()MO D.C. ELECT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, [REDACTED - Survivor], and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORF CLERK D.S. DIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby remove this action' from Palm Beach County Circuit Court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and respectfully state as follows: Introduction Six months ago, this plaintiff filed virtually the identical lawsuit in this Court. See Jane Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-80069-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Doe v. Epstein et at, Case No. 50 2008 CA 006596 XXXX MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. filed Mar. 6, 2008). Lewis "Fein 1059 044.444vEleuf Skim 340, E0coRuT Go

100p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE [DE 121 Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby responds to the plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to preserve evidence, as follows: I. The Certificate of Compliance annexed to the plaintiffs motion states that plaintiff's "counsel conferred with counsel for [Mr. Epstein] . . . and [Epstein's] counsel advised that [Epstein] opposelS] this motion." DE 12 at 2 (emphasis added). That certification is inaccurate. 2. On August 21, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff called Kathryn Meyers, Esq. of the Lewis Tein law firm to elicit Epstein's position on this motion. Ms. Meyers responded that she would confer with Mr. Tein and call them back. Less than thirty minutes later, however, plain

4p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

ROY BLACK

ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS NOAH FOX JOSHUA SHORE E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we communicated to you during our February 3, 2010

49p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 100 nsor & Associates RepornnE sad Transcripoon. Inc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 75 Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires, did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and IIIIIII on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? A. Yes. Q. And that was a lie, wasn't it? A. It's the truth. Q. You told the police that there was someone in the car next to you and you specifically said y

100p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

hursda

From: Sent: hursda ul 17. 2008 9:39 AM To: fisd.uscourts.gov Subject: Jane Doe v. U.S. — I didn't want you to think that we had fallen down on the job. Mr. Edwards is away on vacation and will get back to us regarding our draft stipulation ‘s hen he returns. Assistant U.S. Attorney 464 EFTA00209107 From: Sent: To: Subject: Wednesda Jul 78 2008 4:57 PM RE: In Re Jane Doe I'm somewhat humored by the fact that he filed this originally as an emergency, which prompted the court to order the government to respond in 48 hours, and hold a hearing within two days of the filing of the response. From: Sent: Wednesda Jul 26 2008 4:55 PM To: Subject: Re: In Re Jane Doe Oh well. What can we do? .11 111.1 MIS From: To: Sent: Wed Jul 16 16:15:10 2008 Subject: FW: In Re Jane Doe Brad does not appear to be in any hurry to get back to the Court. From: Brad Edwards Sent: Wednesday. Julv 16. 2008 4:10 PM To: Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe I got it. Thanks. I will talk wi

100p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.