IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Flietit0A ()MO D.C. ELECT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, [REDACTED - Survivor], and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORF CLERK D.S. DIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby remove this action' from Palm Beach County Circuit Court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and respectfully state as follows: Introduction Six months ago, this plaintiff filed virtually the identical lawsuit in this Court. See Jane Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-80069-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Doe v. Epstein et at, Case No. 50 2008 CA 006596 XXXX MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. filed Mar. 6, 2008). Lewis "Fein 1059 044.444vEleuf Skim 340, E0coRuT Go
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE [DE 121 Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby responds to the plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to preserve evidence, as follows: I. The Certificate of Compliance annexed to the plaintiffs motion states that plaintiff's "counsel conferred with counsel for [Mr. Epstein] . . . and [Epstein's] counsel advised that [Epstein] opposelS] this motion." DE 12 at 2 (emphasis added). That certification is inaccurate. 2. On August 21, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff called Kathryn Meyers, Esq. of the Lewis Tein law firm to elicit Epstein's position on this motion. Ms. Meyers responded that she would confer with Mr. Tein and call them back. Less than thirty minutes later, however, plain
EFTA02729648
ROY BLACK
ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS NOAH FOX JOSHUA SHORE E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we communicated to you during our February 3, 2010
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 100 nsor & Associates RepornnE sad Transcripoon. Inc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 75 Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires, did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and IIIIIII on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? A. Yes. Q. And that was a lie, wasn't it? A. It's the truth. Q. You told the police that there was someone in the car next to you and you specifically said y
hursda
From: Sent: hursda ul 17. 2008 9:39 AM To: fisd.uscourts.gov Subject: Jane Doe v. U.S. — I didn't want you to think that we had fallen down on the job. Mr. Edwards is away on vacation and will get back to us regarding our draft stipulation ‘s hen he returns. Assistant U.S. Attorney 464 EFTA00209107 From: Sent: To: Subject: Wednesda Jul 78 2008 4:57 PM RE: In Re Jane Doe I'm somewhat humored by the fact that he filed this originally as an emergency, which prompted the court to order the government to respond in 48 hours, and hold a hearing within two days of the filing of the response. From: Sent: Wednesda Jul 26 2008 4:55 PM To: Subject: Re: In Re Jane Doe Oh well. What can we do? .11 111.1 MIS From: To: Sent: Wed Jul 16 16:15:10 2008 Subject: FW: In Re Jane Doe Brad does not appear to be in any hurry to get back to the Court. From: Brad Edwards Sent: Wednesday. Julv 16. 2008 4:10 PM To: Subject: RE: In Re Jane Doe I got it. Thanks. I will talk wi
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.