Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
462
CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G.
CASSELL,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Defendant.
VOLUME 4
Pages 462 through 647
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
1:05 p.m. - 4:45 p.m.
Stenographically Reported By:
Kimberly Fontalvo, RPR, CLR
Realtime Systems Administrator
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615583
463
1
APPEARANCES:
2
On behalf of Plaintiffs:
3
4
5
6
7
8
On behalf of Defendant:
9
Dadeland Centre II - Suite 1400
10
I II.
P
IRIR
11
12
:
,
.
(Via phone)
il
13
--an --
14
15
16
17
--and--
18
WILEY, REIN
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.piiiiiiiiiiiiir.com
EFTA00615584
464
1
APPEARANCES (Continued):
2
3
On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein:
4
5
Sligi
BY: DARREN K. INDYKE, ESQ. (Via phone)
6
7
On behalf of
8
9
10
11
12
ALSO PRESENT:
13
Edward J. Pozzuoli, Special Master
14
Sean D. Reyes, Utah Attorney General Office
15
Travis Gallagher, Videographer
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615585
465
1
INDEX
2
3
Examination
Page
4
5
VOLUME 4 (Pages 462 - 647)
6
7
Certificate of Oath
645
Certificate of Reporter
646
8
Read and Sign Letter to Witness
647
Errata Sheet (forwarded upon execution)
648
9
10
11
12
No.
Page
13
19 Proposed Joint Letter to the Special
501
Master
14
20 Document reflecting entry for Bands,
548
15
Doug
16
21
562
17
18
22 Letter dated Jul 6 2007 from Gerald
612
B. Lefcourt to
First
19
Assistant U.S.
torney an o hers
22 pages
20
23 Document titled NewsRoom/Alan
623
21
Dershowitz to talk in Alburquerque
22
24
628
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615586
466
1
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.
2
The time is approximately 1:05 p.m.
3
MR. INDYKE: This is Darren Indyke. If it
4
would be okay with everyone, I would like to
5
clarify a couple of points for the record.
6
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead.
7
MR. INDYKE: First, I apologize for the
8
spotty reception during the morning session. I
9
was having difficulty hearing you folks, and I
10
think you were having some difficulty hearing
11
me. I think I've corrected it, but if I could
12
ask if you could move the mic closer to him
13
somehow or if I let you know that I can't hear,
14
if somebody could just speak up.
15
MR. SCAROLA: Did we turn that speaker
16
volume up?
17
MR. SIMPSON: Let's turn up the volume.
18
MR. INDYKE: Secondly, as to the argument
19
that work product belongs to the attorney and
20
not the client, I want to make sure that it's
21
clear that we disagree with that vehemently.
22
We believe that it is a client's every bit
23
as much as an attorney's and an attorney has no
24
right to waive that privilege over the
25
objection of a client. If that were true,
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615587
467
1
there would be nothing improper with an
2
attorney publishing his entire case file over
3
the objection of his client with the exception
4
of communications back and forth between
5
attorney and client. Strategies, witnesses,
6
things like that could be disclosed over the
7
objection of a client, and that's just not the
8
case.
9
So for the record, Mr. Epstein reasserts
10
the work product privilege and would continue
11
do so. And I would instruct Mr. Dershowitz not
12
provide any response to any question that would
13
require Mr. Dershowitz to invade that
14
privilege.
15
Third, I guess as to the joint defense
16
agreement, it is our position that any party to
17
the joint defense agreement may assert it, and
18
it doesn't require disclosure of all parties to
19
the agreement in order for the assertion to be
20
valid.
21
I would note that disclosure of the
22
parties to a joint defense agreement are often,
23
by the terms of a joint defense agreement,
24
subject to confidentiality and, thus, protected
25
by the privilege.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615588
468
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
And I would also point out that it's not
necessary for a person to be a party to a joint
defense agreement for the communications with
that person by a lawyer who is making those
communications on behalf of the client party to
the agreement to be subject to the joint
defense agreement.
And while we need to do some more
background research to get the full details of
the joint defense agreement, I would -- for
those reasons, to the extent that any
disclosure in response to any questions posed
to Mr. Dershowitz would require Mr. Dershowitz
to invade that joint defense agreement, we
would instruct -- we would object and instruct
that Mr. Dershowitz not respond. I think
covers everything that I have.
Let's proceed.
MR. SCAROLA: Before we
Thank you.
proceed, I
that
want to
note for the record that the various
transcripts of statements made by
Mr. Dershowitz that had been requested during
the earlier session of the deposition were
marked as Exhibit Number 1 to the prior
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615589
469
1
sessions of Mr. Dershowitz's deposition.
2
I believe that everything that was
3
referenced has been disclosed. To the extent
4
that opposing counsel identifies anything that
5
is not included in Composite Exhibit Number 1
6
previously marked, we would be happy to provide
7
a copy of that as soon as a copy --
8
MR. INDYKE: Is that Mr. Scarola?
9
MR. SCAROLA: It is, yes.
10
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on. Speak
11
up a little bit, Jack.
12
MR. SCAROLA: Certainly. As soon as a
13
copy that does not include work product
14
notations is available, and the portions of
15
statements made by Mr. Dershowitz not included
16
in Exhibit Number 1 are identified to us, we
17
will provide those.
18
MR. SCOTT: I think what we most want,
19
Jack, are the -- I think we have one
20
transcript, but I think there's another
21
transcript of the bench and Bar that we need.
22
MR. SCAROLA: There are multiple
23
transcripts included in Exhibit Number 1.
24
MR. EDWARDS: If there are transcripts
25
that you need that are not included in Exhibit
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615590
470
1
Number 1, tell me. I'll get them to you, and
2
I'll get them to you tomorrow since we're here
3
again.
4
MR. SCAROLA: I just want the record to
5
reflect that I believe that everything that
6
we've made reference to is included in Exhibit
7
Number 1. If I'm incorrect in that regard, you
8
let us know what it is, we'll give it to you.
9
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Darren, anything
10
on your end? You okay?
11
MR. INDYKE: Yep.
12
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I would welcome
13
the parties just to get together to make sure
14
they have a complete set of what they need, and
15
we'll go from there.
16
MR. EDWARDS: Absolutely. Just for the
17
record, my only real objection was not turning
18
over what I had marked and my work product.
19
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I understood.
20
MR. EDWARDS: I'll get everything to him
21
tomorrow.
22
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I took it that
23
way.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Going back to testing the credibility of
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615591
EFTA00615592
472
1
A.
I imagine there would be if there were
2
videotapes. I've always said from the beginning, I
3
hope there are videotapes of every moment in
4
life, because they would exculpate
5
me completely. So I hope there are videotapes.
6
Q.
Aren't you aware that there were
7
videotapes that were taken within your client
8
Jeffrey Epstein's various homes?
9
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Work product,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Q.
Well, the statement was -- which I was not
17
going there. The statement was, if there are
18
videos, I want them all out there?
19
A.
Absolutely.
20
Q.
So, isn't it true that you know that there
21
were indeed videos taken from within your client's
22
various homes?
23
MR. INDYKE: Same objection.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Privileged or nonprivileged.
attorney-client. Common interest.
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Carve out the
privileged issue and non-privileged, if he
gained information through a nonprivileged
source.
BY MR. EDWARDS:
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615593
473
1
MR. SCOTT: Asked and answered in the last
2
depo.
3
A.
I hope there were videos. I hope there
4
are videos of every moment of
' life
5
from the time she allegedly met Jeffrey Epstein to
6
the time she left. I hope there were videos in
7
every bedroom. I hope there were videos in every
8
massage room. I hope there are videos all over.
9
And from day one, I categorically stated
10
that there could be no photograph, no video that
11
would demonstrate that what she said was true,
12
because I knew it was false. She knew it was false.
13
And you knew it was false.
14
BY MR. EDWARDS:
15
Q.
In representing a client, don't you try to
16
determine or ascertain what evidence does exist that
17
may incriminate or exonerate any particular client?
18
A.
Of course.
19
Q.
Okay. In making that inquiry in this
20
case, haven't you learned that there are --
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Which case?
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
In the case in which you represented
24
Jeffrey Epstein, haven't you learned that there were
25
video recordings taken from within Jeffrey Epstein's
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615594
474
1
various homes as well as his airplane?
2
MR. INDYKE: Objection, same objection.
3
Instruct him not to answer.
4
A.
I hope there were.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
Will you then assist us
7
A.
Yes.
8
Q.
-- in obtaining those videos from your
9
client?
10
A.
I will assist you in getting any possible
11
videotapes of
r any of the
12
13
made. I would be thrilled to have videos of every
14
moment of my life during that period of time, and
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Mr. Epstein is not waiving any of his
22
objections as to any such information to the
23
extent that it exists.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Okay. Well, this video or photograph --
locations where the false accusation against me was
every moment of her life. Because they would prove
conclusively that which I know to be conclusively
false, namely that she made up the stories about me.
Q.
Okay. Just so I understand your
agreement, is that --
MR. INDYKE: Just so we're clear,
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615595
475
1
if there are videos or photographs of
that have been taken or recorded from
3
Jeffrey Epstein's home, is that -- is that evidence
4
that you will assist us in obtaining?
5
A.
I will try my best to try to get every
6
possible
7
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
8
A.
-- photograph -- I'm entitled to say what
9
I'll try to best to do. I will try my best to get
10
every possible video, photograph, and any other
11
piece of objective evidence because I know it will
12
all completely prove beyond any doubt that I wasn't
13
there.
14
BY MR. EDWARDS:
15
Q.
And if that information has already
16
exchanged hands -- that evidence has already
17
exchanged hands from Jeffrey Epstein's hands to the
18
hands of his attorneys, as part of their work
19
product, would you agree to waive your work product
20
privilege to produce that evidence?
21
MR. SCOTT: Objection.
22
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
23
A.
I don't have any such evidence. I wish I
24
did.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615596
476
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
With respect to the search warrant that
3
was executed on Jeffrey Epstein's house, isn't it
4
true that just before that search warrant was
5
executed, the -- Jeffrey Epstein's legal team
6
ordered that three computers be removed from Jeffrey
7
Epstein's home that contained pornographic images,
8
including those of
9
A.
I made no such order.
10
MR. INDYKE: Same objection. And instruct
11
not to answer.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
I didn't ask if you made the order. Isn't
14
it true that that occurred?
15
MR. INDYKE: Same objection.
16
MR. SIMPSON: Darren?
17
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I'm not so sure
18
you can waive that objection.
19
A.
I wish I could.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Didn't the U.S. Attorney's Office issue
22
grand jury subpoenas to the investigators that were
23
working on Jeffrey Epstein's behalf and were holding
24
those computers, and those grand jury subpoenas
25
outstanding at the time that the case resolved?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615597
477
1
A.
All I can say --
2
MR. INDYKE: Same objection and
3
instruction.
4
A.
-- is I wish every video, every computer,
5
I wish everything that would show where
was had been turned over and would be turned
7
over.
8
MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Dershowitz's repeated
9
comments about what he wishes would happen are
10
an indirect statement that if he could answer
11
the questions, the responses that he would give
12
would be favorable to him and would exonerate
13
him.
14
His wishes are not the subject of the
15
inquiry. And every occasion on which he
16
expresses a wish and refuses to give an answer
17
is unresponsive to the questions that are being
18
asked, and should be stricken.
19
They also constitute a waiver to the
20
extent that they imply that if the question
21
could be answered, the answer would be
22
favorable.
23
I would ask you to instruct
24
MR. INDYKE: And to the extent that they
25
imply a waiver --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615598
478
1
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on a
2
second. Let him finish.
3
MR. INDYKE: I apologize, Mr. Scarola
4
MR. SCAROLA: That's quite all right,
5
thank you.
6
I know that over the speakerphone, it's
7
difficult, and I take no offense to the
8
interruption. I know it was inadvertent.
9
But I would ask that the witness be
10
instructed to discontinue that improper
11
assertion of statements of opinion when no
12
opinions are being requested.
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Counsel, do you
14
have a response? I think Mr. Scarola is done.
15
MR. INDYKE: My response is to the extent
16
that you're attempting to imply anything
17
from -- imply a waiver from Mr. Dershowitz,
18
Mr. Epstein does not waive, and instructs
19
Mr. Dershowitz that he can make no such waiver.
20
THE WITNESS: I have not refused to
21
answer.
22
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on one
23
second. Let me say this: I would suggest that
24
I don't take such inference that he's waiving
25
based upon his general statements.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615599
479
1
What -- we have been down a little bit of
2
this road this morning on trying to get to what
3
appears to be privileged information or
4
information that -- or activity that was
5
undertaken or not undertaken during the course
6
of the representation, the relationship
the
7
attorney-client relationship between
8
Mr. Dershowitz and Mr. Epstein.
9
And at this point, based upon the
10
objection, I will uphold the objection and
11
we'll move forward.
12
MR. SCAROLA: The second part of my
13
request is that Mr. Dershowitz be instructed to
14
refrain from expressing a desire to answer
15
questions. It's not responsive. It implies
16
that if he could answer, the answers would be
17
favorable.
18
The implication is improper, and the
19
insertion into the record of the implication is
20
improper. If he can't answer the question, he
21
should simply say he cannot answer based on
22
privilege.
23
THE WITNESS: Can I respond?
24
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: No. Let me
25
respond.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615600
480
1
I think that's appropriate. I do actually
2
agree with Mr. Scarola in this respect. I do
3
think that you should be responsive
4
specifically to the question if you can.
5
Where you can't, you state you can't. I
6
believe that the record is now full of your
7
views on some of this in a generic way, and so
8
with that said, I would ask that you be more
9
pointed with your answers.
10
THE WITNESS: I appreciate that. I just
11
want to comment that I did not ever refuse to
12
answer any of those questions. It was
13
instructed not to answer any of those
14
questions.
15
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I do understand
16
that. For purposes of some efficiency here, I
17
would like to get through this within the time
18
alloted.
19
MR. EDWARDS: Me, too. Thank you.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Is there any nonprivileged information
22
which would demonstrate whether
23
statement that she was flown on Jeffrey Epstein's
24
plane while underage was true or false?
25
A.
I'm sure there must be, but I don't have
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615601
481
1
it in my mind right now, so I can't answer that
2
question.
3
Q.
The flight logs were previously marked
4
as --
5
MR. SCAROLA: Exhibit 7.
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
-- as Exhibit 7 to the deposition. I'll
8
show you pages from Exhibit 7 which indicate the
9
dates of the flight logs for those on the phone
10
November 2002 through January -- sorry,
11
November 2000 through January 2001 and January 2001
12
through February 20th, 2001.
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Counsel?
14
MR. SCOTT: Okay.
15
A.
Yes, I see the flights that you have
16
marked in green.
17
BY MR. EDWARDS:
18
Q.
Do the flight logs indicate
II~sa
passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's plane
20
with Jeffrey Epstein?
21
A.
Well, the first one I look at does not.
22
It has
and
Although it's
23
underlined, it doesn't suggest
24
The second one does say
■
. And the fourth and fifth ones say
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615602
482
1
. And on the next page, two of them say
2
, yes.
3
Q.
These in the year 2000 and early 2001; is
4
that correct?
5
A.
I can't see dates. I see 2001. I see
6
November 2000. Could you remind me of
' birthday.
8
Q.
9
A.
So she would be I at this
10
time.
11
Q.
So she's traveling as a passenger under
12
the age of 18? That's my question.
13
A.
Under the age of 18, but the age of
14
consent in numerous places that she flew to were 17
15
and 16. So New York, the age is 17, to my
16
recollection. And in New Mexico, I think it's 17.
17
And the Virgin Islands, I think it's 16. So the
18
answer to the question is she underage might well be
19
no.
20
Q.
My question was, is there nonprivileged
21
information that would indicate the truth or falsity
22
of her statement that she traveled on Jeffrey
23
Epstein's airplane with Jeffrey Epstein while under
24
the age of 18?
25
A.
I do not know of any statement that she
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615603
483
1
said -- may have said it, but I don't have in my
2
mind any statement that says below the age of 18 as
3
distinguished from when she was underage. So you
4
would have to show me. If the statement was below
5
the age of 18, that would be correct. If the
6
statement would be underage, that would be more
7
questionable.
8
Q.
Do you know the purpose for which she was
9
traveling with Jeffrey Epstein during the flights
10
indicated on those logs?
11
A.
I do not.
12
MR. SCOTT: Privileged.
13
MR. INDYKE: Objection, work product,
14
attorney-client, common interest.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
Your answer is "I do not"?
17
A.
I do not.
18
Q.
You have not ascertained from any source,
19
is what you're telling us, the purpose for her
20
travels with Jeffrey Epstein, correct?
21
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection
22
and instruction.
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
You are unable to answer, or you have not?
25
A.
I have been instructed not to answer.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615604
484
1
Q.
I misunderstood you. I thought you said
2
earlier "I have not," indicating that you don't know
3
the purpose?
4
A.
I said that in answer to one question.
5
You've asked me other questions.
6
Q.
Is there a legitimate purpose for her
7
being 17 years old, traveling with Jeffrey Epstein?
8
MR. SCOTT: Objection, argumentative.
9
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection,
10
same instructions.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
Isn't it a federal crime to knowingly
13
transport an individual who has not attained the age
14
of 18 years in interstate commerce with the intent
15
that that individual engage in prostitution or in
16
any sexual activity?
17
A.
I haven't read the statute clearly, but I
18
think that's an accurate paraphrase of my
19
understanding of the law, yeah.
20
Q.
Would you agree that that flight log in
21
front of you indicates a federal crime was being
22
committed against
at the time when
23
she has said a federal crime was being committed
24
against her?
25
A.
Oh, absolutely not.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615605
485
1
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
2
A.
Does not prove a federal crime.
3
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
4
instruction.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
So that goes back to my last question.
7
What is, then, the legitimate reason that causes
8
that flight to fall outside of this criminal statute
9
that I just read to you?
10
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
11
instruction.
12
A.
I can give this answer. My understanding
13
of federal law imposes the burden of proof on the
14
prosecution to demonstrate one of the illicit
15
purposes, and this does not satisfy that burden of
16
proof. So this would not prove that a federal crime
17
occurred. It would prove one element of that crime.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615606
486
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Move forward.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
Let me try to understand that which you
24
are explaining right now, which is are you saying
25
that if she was traveling on Jeffrey Epstein's
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615607
487
1
airplane while underage for the purposes of sex and
2
or prostitution, that --
3
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
4
instructions.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
-- she was not being sexually trafficked
7
or would not be a victim of that statute?
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
MR. EDWARDS: I'm asking a hypothetical
11
now based on his last statement.
12
MR. SCOTT: That's not a hypothetical.
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: That's not how
14
you framed it.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
Let me reframe it, then.
17
Assuming that -- I'll give you a
18
hypothetical based on what you say her friends have
19
told you, which is that she is free to leave while
20
being taken across state lines by Jeffrey Epstein.
21
This is the hypothetical. And being used for sexual
22
purposes. Is she, in that hypothetical, not a
23
victim to sexual trafficking?
24
MR. SCOTT: Objection to form,
25
speculation, argumentative. Can you answer
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615608
488
1
that?
2
A.
I can answer it. Since you gave me a
3
hypothetical, as a law professor for 50 years, I
4
would give this as a hypothetical to my class. I
5
would ask my students do you think it's trafficking,
6
do you think a woman has been trafficked when she
7
voluntarily, below the age of consent in some
8
states, above the age of consent in other states,
9
when she voluntarily engages in sexual conduct for
10
money, free to leave at any time.
11
I think it would be an interesting
12
classroom discussion about whether that constitutes
13
trafficking.
14
That's a different question from whether
15
or not that would violate the statute. That would
16
violate the statute. But your question is, would it
17
constitute trafficking. That would be a very
18
interesting law school hypothetical.
19
BY MR. EDWARDS:
20
Q.
In your opinion, does it constitute
21
trafficking?
22
A.
I think the word "trafficking" is
23
overused, and I think should be reserved for the
24
kinds of people who I have enormous sympathy for,
25
people who have no choice, no options, whose
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615609
489
1
passports have been taken away, who have been forced
2
and coerced in some way to engage in sexual conduct.
3
And I think it begins to weaken the very
4
important term "trafficking" when it's applied to a
5
volunteer, close to her 18th birthday who was
6
enjoying and spending money and has the option of
7
leaving. I know that Sigrid McCawley is shaking her
8
head, but that's my honest opinion.
9
Q.
Does your answer to the hypothetical
10
change if we rewind time
11
when she's 15 or
12
16 years old? Meaning are you making a distinction
13
because she's 17 as opposed to 16 or 15? If so,
14
what's the cutoff?
15
A.
Well, I think that age is relevant
16
MR. INDYKE: For my clarification, this is
17
all hypothetical?
18
MR. SCAROLA: Yes, it is.
19
A.
Age is one of the relevant factors. It's
20
not the only relevant factor. It's one of the
21
relevant factors. That's why your hypothetical was
22
17, almost 18, 17 and a half.
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
Let's get that right. That's when,
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615610
490
1
A.
We're talking about
2
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: We're still
3
operating under the hypothetical?
4
MR. EDWARDS: We are. I thought he said
5
that my hypothetical was almost 18. Which in
6
this hypothetical, she turns
7
8
THE WITNESS: =,
the same year.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
Was she lying when she said that
11
Epstein --
12
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Are we now done
13
with the hypothetical?
14
MR. EDWARDS: Yes, we are.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
engaged in sex with many underage
17
girls? Was she lying when she said that?
18
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
19
instructions.
20
A.
I can only say this. You --
21
MR. SIMPSON: Was there an instruction?
22
A.
There was an instruction, but I can answer
23
without that.
24
You have accused me of having sex with
25
many underage girls --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615611
491
1
MR. EDWARDS: I move to strike this as
2
nonresponsive to my question.
3
A.
-- based on no evidence whatsoever.
4
MR. EDWARDS: I want a ruling on the
5
Motion to Strike.
6
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Let me hear the
7
rest of it.
8
A.
So when you say "many," I need to know
9
with some precision what you have in mind.
10
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I'll strike the
11
first part of it, the first part of his answer.
12
And if you can assist him in defining "many."
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
Sure. You do know Bob Josefsberg,
15
correct?
16
A.
I've known him since 1959.
17
Q.
And you are aware that he represented, I
18
believe, more than 15 girls who claimed to have been
19
victims of Mr. Epstein in this case, aren't you?
20
A.
I recommended him for that job because I
21
think so highly of him.
22
Q.
And in his Complaints, are you aware that
23
he's made the allegation that Defendant Epstein has
24
a sexual preference for underage minor girls? Are
25
you aware of that?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615612
492
1
MR. SCOTT: Just for the record, object to
2
the relevancy of all of this.
3
A.
I'm not aware of that.
4
MR. INDYKE: Just for the record, to the
5
extent that Alan's answer requires him to
6
invade privilege, I would object and instruct
7
him not to answer.
8
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Within the
9
confines of the privilege objection, if you can
10
answer.
11
A.
I'm not aware that he said that. I
12
haven't read his pleadings.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
Okay. Are you aware that in his
15
pleadings, he wrote "Defendant Epstein used his
16
resources and his influence over vulnerable minor
17
girls to engage in a systemic -- systematic pattern
18
of sexually exploited behavior"?
19
A.
I'm not aware.
20
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
21
instruction.
22
A.
I was not involved in that aspect of the
23
case.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
You were not involved in the facts part of
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615613
493
1
the case?
2
A.
I was not involved in the compensation
3
part of the case. The part that Bob Josefsberg was
4
involved in, I was not involved in.
5
MR. INDYKE: Alan, just admonishment,
6
let's not go into the subject matter of your
7
representation, please.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
20
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615614
494
1
question.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
In 2009, when that Complaint and that
4
allegation was asserted, are you aware that Jeffrey
5
Epstein never refuted that allegation in any
6
pleading?
7
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
8
instruction.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
Were you representing Jeffrey Epstein in
11
2009?
12
A.
Not in connection with that case. And I
13
was not aware of what his response was, if any.
14
Q.
Are you aware that after that allegation
15
was made by
, that Jeffrey Epstein
16
paid money to settle her case?
17
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
18
instruction.
19
MR. SCOTT: Let me object to all the
20
relevancy of this.
21
A.
My understanding is that the plea bargain
22
required him to make payments regardless of what his
23
views may have been, that he was absolutely required
24
to make those payments. He had no discretion.
25
That's my understanding. I may be wrong, but you
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615615
495
1
can check the actual nonprosecution agreement, but
2
that's my understanding of what it said, that he
3
could not contest anything.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
You were one of the attorneys that
6
represented Jeffrey Epstein in the negotiations with
7
the United States Attorney's Office, right?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.
Right, along with
MR. INDYKE: Same
A.
No, I don't think
Kenneth Starr --
objection. Objection.
you can object to that.
These are people who are at the hearings, at the
events with the U.S. Attorney. The people who were
at the events representing Jeffrey Epstein is not
privileged, included Roy Black, Ken Starr, Marty
Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz --
MR. SCAROLA: Not responsive.
A.
-- Jerry Lefcourt.
BY MR. EDWARDS:
Q.
lawyers.
A.
I was one of them, yes.
Q.
I only asked if you were one of the
The answer is yes?
A.
The complete answer is yes, but the rest
of the people were part of the legal team.
Q.
I will ask you when I want somebody else's
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615616
496
1
name.
2
Were you a part of the negotiations in
3
October of 2007 when the special matter was
4
selected? You remember that part?
5
A.
Is the special master Josephsburg?
6
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
7
instruction.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
Yes.
10
A.
My recollection is that I was simply asked
11
for a recommendation, but I played no further role.
12
Q.
Were you aware that there was a joint
13
letter to the special master created between Jeffrey
14
Epstein's attorneys and the United States Attorney's
15
Office describing the investigation?
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
A.
I'm not -- as I sit here today, I have no
19
recollection of that.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Was
lying when she says
22
that while underage, she was made to massage Jeffrey
23
Epstein in the nude, while he masturbated?
24
A.
I have no idea.
25
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615617
497
1
instruction.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
If I show you the proposed joint letter to
4
the special master, will it refresh your
5
recollection?
6
A.
I want to add to the last question
When
7
I say I have no idea,
8
9
10
11
MR. EDWARDS: Move to strike as
12
nonresponsive.
13
A.
But that's relevant to standing naked and
14
being masturbated.
15
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Move on to your
16
next question.
17
A.
Yes.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
When I am asking for nonprivileged
20
information or evidence that would give you the
21
ability to tell me whether
is lying
22
when she says she had sex with Jeffrey Epstein while
23
underage, would you consider a joint letter crafted
24
between Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers and the United
25
States Attorney's Office to form the basis of that
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615618
498
1
answer? Let me rephrase the question.
2
When I'm asking for nonprivileged
3
information that you may have to demonstrate the
4
truth or falsity of
' statement that
5
she was made to have sex with Jeffrey Epstein while
6
underage, would you consider the joint letter to the
7
special master evidence from which you could draw an
8
answer?
9
MR. SCOTT: Objection.
10
A.
I would have to know more about it than
11
that. I would have to know the nature of the
12
letter, the reason it was sent.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
Would you like to review the letter? Is
15
that going to help you?
16
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Ask him if he's
17
seen the letter first.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
You were part of the team that was mainly
20
negotiating with U.S. Attorney's Office, correct?
21
A.
I was only negotiating the criminal part
22
of the case.
23
Q.
Okay. I'm going to show you the letter,
24
and if you had nothing to do with it, tell me that.
25
If you've never seen it before, then tell me that.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615619
499
1
I guess my first question is, have you
2
seen it?
3
MR. INDYKE: I would object to that.
4
MR. SCOTT: I would like to make a request
5
for this depo and future depositions, if they
6
are going to show exhibits to a witness, I
7
think we should be -- have a copy of them.
8
We provided copies to you of all exhibits
9
we used during the deposition of your client.
10
And I think if you're going to pull out
11
exhibits and have one, you should have at least
12
copies for counsel, and I would agree to do the
13
same thing, rather than having to run and make
14
a copy and all the rest of it.
15
MR. EDWARDS: I wasn't ready for him to be
16
unfamiliar with his and his legal team's
17
correspondence.
18
MR. SCOTT: I understand, but you haven't
19
had any all day. So all I'm asking you,
20
Mr. Edwards, is that we have copies of exhibits
21
that you intend to confront the witness with.
22
That's -- as you pointed out, you've got all
23
the questions laid out, so you know where we're
24
headed. There's a note on here. Do you want
25
that on there?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615620
500
1
MR. EDWARDS: No.
2
MR. SCOTT: It's one of your cheat sheet
3
notes. I don't know if you really want that on
4
there.
5
MR. EDWARDS: It just says "Isn't this
6
nonprivileged?"
7
MR. SCOTT: Okay. It's still an exhibit
8
going into evidence, right? Without your
9
notes?
10
MR. SIMPSON: Can we get it marked?
11
THE WITNESS: This is a draft, not a
12
letter.
13
MR. EDWARDS: I said it's a proposed
14
letter. I read the title exactly.
15
(Thereupon, marked as Plaintiff Exhibit
16
19.)
17
A.
This is not -- it's not familiar to me
18
except that what I said previously that as part of
19
the resolution of this case, Mr. Epstein agreed he
20
would not contest jurisdiction for the victims who
21
chose to sue him, et cetera, is consistent with my
22
memory, but I have no recollection of actually
23
seeing this draft, this proposed draft.
24
MR. SCOTT: That's number?
25
COURT REPORTER: Nineteen.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615621
501
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Wouldn't you agree
wasn't
one of the listed victims to the
4
nonprosecution agreement?
5
A.
If so, I was not aware of.
6
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
7
instruction.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
As you sit here today, after having made
10
many statements about
being a
11
serial liar --
12
A.
She is.
13
Q.
-- you have no idea whether she was a
14
listed victim to the nonprosecution agreement?
15
MR. SCOTT: Objection, asked and answered.
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
A.
Right now, I have no recollection of
19
whether she was listed or not.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Okay.
22
A.
I know that the FBI tried to speak to her
23
and she wouldn't speak to them is my recollection.
24
MR. SCAROLA: That's not responsive.
25
MR. EDWARDS: Not responsive.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615622
502
1
MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike.
2
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: That, I will
3
strike. Move forward.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Was
lying when she says that
6
Jeffrey Epstein also had sex with a girl named
8
9
MR. INDYKE: Same objections, same
10
instruction.
11
MR. SCOTT: Can you answer that?
12
A.
I've never heard that name. It's not
13
familiar to me at all.
14
BY MR. EDWARDS:
15
Q.
Was
lying when she says
16
she traveled to Jeffrey Epstein's island when
17
underage?
18
MR. INDYKE: Same objections, same
19
instruction.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
By "underage," I mean under the age of 18.
22
A.
I can only tell you I never saw her on the
23
island. I was on the island when she was not there.
24
I would love to know whole story she was
25
on the island --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615623
503
1
MR. SCOTT: There's no question pending.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
The two-page flight log exhibit, if we
4
look at January 22nd, 2001, and also
5
December 14th, 2000, can you look at those, and
6
I'll ask a question.
7
A.
Sure. Give me the dates again.
8
January 16?
9
Q.
Where it has the departing airport code
10
and
11
A.
Yeah.
12
Q.
-- where she's landing.
13
A.
Right.
14
Q.
TIST is the code for Virgin Islands,
15
correct?
16
A.
I have no idea. Been to the Virgin
17
Islands once that I remember.
18
Q.
You have been to Jeffrey Epstein's home on
19
the Virgin Islands, haven't you?
20
MR. SCOTT: He's already answered that.
21
A.
I was with my wife and my daughter and
22
Professor
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
I don't mean to ask who you went with -- I
25
didn't mean to ask --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615624
504
1
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on. Let
2
him finish his answer. I think this is
3
contextual. I'm okay with it.
4
A.
And six months before
5
ever met Jeffrey Epstein. So I was never on the
6
island during the period of time that Jeffrey
7
Epstein knew
8
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
My question was, how did you get to the
11
island?
12
A.
Jeffrey Epstein sent a one-engine, small
13
plane with a 70-year-old pilot for me, my wife and
14
my daughter, and I regret to this day ever getting
15
on that plane. Flew us from Guadalupe to the Virgin
16
Islands, where I was picked up by a boat and taken
17
to Jeffrey Epstein's island where we had dinner with
18
Michael Porter and his wife and family and my wife
19
and my daughter, and stayed, as far as we remember,
20
for one night and left the next day.
21
Q.
How did you get to Guadalupe?
22
A.
Jeffrey Epstein flew us from Charleston,
23
South Carolina, where we were visiting Caroline, my
24
wife's mother, on an airplane that had a bathroom
25
that had only a little curtain. That's all I
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615625
505
1
remember about it.
2
Q.
What was the date of that trip that you're
3
describing that you took Jeffrey Epstein's island?
4
MR. SCOTT: If you know.
5
A.
It was six months or eight months before
6
she ever met Jeffrey Epstein, so it would be
7
Christmas, around Christmastime, around Christmas
8
vacation of the year 1998, to my recollection. But
9
I would have to check.
10
When it is she met Jeffrey Epstein in that
11
summer, it was the winter before that. That's the
12
only time I've ever been on the island, so her
13
statement that she had sex with me on the island is
14
totally, categorically made up.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
My question is, where is the flight log of
17
that trip that you just described?
18
A.
Neither flight -- neither flight was on
19
Jeffrey Epstein's airplane. The flight that we went
20
from Charleston to Guadalupe, somebody owed Jeffrey
21
Epstein several hours on an airplane, so Jeffrey
22
borrowed his Learjet, it was a Learjet, borrowed his
23
Learjet, two or three hours on the Learjet because
24
it would have taken us ten hours to fly from
25
Charleston to Atlanta, Atlanta to Puerto Rico and
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615626
506
1
2
3
4
5
6
Miami, and Miami or Puerto Rico to Guadalupe.
So Jeffrey offered to use the credit he
had with someone else on a Learjet to fly us to
Guadalupe, and then used -- then rented -- it was
$1,200, I remember seeing the bill, to fly the small
airplane from Guadalupe. He was anxious for us to
7
see his newly bought -- relatively newly bought
8
island, and so we went there with my daughter and we
9
dug around in the sand and we had dinner with the
10
various professors and that. Then we left.
11
Q.
So there are no flight manifests --
12
A.
I have no idea.
13
Q.
-- for the trip that you just described?
14
A.
I have no idea. There probably are,
15
probably on the Learjet is probably the manifest.
16
Q.
In fact, in the statements that the flight
17
manifests will conclusively and demonstratively
18
exonerate you --
19
A.
That's true.
20
Q.
-- where can we get the full flight
21
manifests so that we can review and make that
22
determination for ourselves? Do you know?
23
A.
I assume --
24
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615627
50
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
What we have here --
3
MR. INDYKE: Attorney-client, work product
4
and common interests.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
What we have here is only the fraction of
7
flights where Dave Rogers was one of the pilots.
8
Can you help us get the flight logs from Larry
9
Visosky, Larry Morrison, any of the flight logs from
10
the helicopters, et cetera?
11
A.
I would love to. It would all show that I
12
wasn't on the plane.
13
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
14
instruction.
15
A.
I will do everything in my power
16
MR. SCOTT: You can make any request you
17
want to through counsel, and we'll take them
18
up.
19
A.
But I will do everything in my power to
20
get you every flight manifest.
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Move forward.
22
MR. INDYKE: We do not waive any
23
objection.
24
MR. SCAROLA: And that request has been
25
made.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615628
508
1
A.
Is that a question?
2
MR. SCOTT: No. Just Mr. Scarola
3
MR. EDWARDS: Just that we made a request
4
for production.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
Was
lying when she says that she
7
was taken to Jeffrey Epstein's home in New York
8
while underage?
9
A.
I have no idea.
10
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
11
instruction.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
Was
lying when she says she was
14
taken to Jeffrey Epstein's ranch in New Mexico while
15
underage?
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
A.
I can tell you this. She's lying when she
19
said she met me at the ranch. So I cannot believe
20
anything she says about the ranch.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
Was she lying when she says Ghislaine
23
Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein used sex toys on her
24
when she was underage?
25
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615629
509
1
instruction.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
Was she lying when she says Jeffrey
4
Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell made her dress up in
5
outfits for them?
6
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
7
instruction.
8
A.
Well, I can
but I do have some material
9
outside of the record on that.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
Okay.
12
A.
I know that Sigrid McCawley said that she
13
said that Leslie Wexner made her dress up --
14
MS. McCAWLEY: I am going to object to the
15
extent that you are trying to reveal
16
conversations that were part of a settlement
17
discussion which the judge has already sealed
18
the record on and there is a pending motion for
19
sanctions. And if you're going to start
20
revealing that information, we're going
21
directly to the Judge Lynch.
22
A.
I am going to start revealing --
23
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: No, I'm going to
24
stop you --
25
THE WITNESS: Let me tell you why.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615630
510
1
Because I didn't get that from Sigrid or from
2
David Boise. I got it from Leslie Wexner's
3
lawyer in a totally nonprivileged
4
communication.
5
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Let me stop you.
6
I don't believe it's responsive to the question
7
that's pending, so let's move forward.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
My question was, was she lying -- was
10
lying when she says Jeffrey Epstein
11
and Ghislaine Maxwell made her dress up in outfits
12
for them?
13
A.
I can only say that that allegation has
14
been made regarding Leslie Wexner as well.
15
Q.
It has nothing to do with my question.
16
MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike.
17
A.
Leslie Wexner's lawyer regards that as a
18
full statement and, therefore, I can only assume
19
that it's a false statement when made about someone
20
else. I think that's relevant.
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: So with respect
22
to the --
23
MR. EDWARDS: I'm moving to strike the
24
nonresponsive portion of that answer.
25
THE WITNESS: He opened the door.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615631
511
1
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I do believe it
2
was nonresponsive in its entirety. Move
3
forward. Go ahead.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Do you know Jean-Luc Brunel?
6
A.
No.
7
Q.
Have you ever met him?
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
A.
I have no memory of ever meeting a man by
11
that name.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
Do you know what his role was in Jeffrey
14
Epstein's life?
15
A.
No.
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction. Mr. Dershowitz, if you would let
18
me make my objections before you respond.
19
THE WITNESS: Right.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Was
lying when she said
22
Jeffrey Epstein socialized with Bill Clinton during
23
the relevant time period?
24
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
25
instructions.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615632
512
1
A.
My information is that
2
was lying when she said that she saw Bill Clinton on
3
Jeffrey Epstein's island. That's all I can comment
4
about with that. And she's lying about that. And
5
she's lying about how Bill Clinton got to the
6
island.
7
MR. EDWARDS: I move to strike the
8
Nonresponsive portion of the answer.
9
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: No, it's
10
relevant to what you asked. Move forward. I'm
11
not going to strike it.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
I'm going to go back to the question until
14
I get an answer, though.
15
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
That is, when
said that
18
during the relevant time period, which we defined as
19
1999 through 2002 --
20
A.
Let's be clear. Around August of both of
21
those years, right?
22
Q.
I think August of '99 through October of
23
2002.
24
A.
September, I think it is.
25
Q.
Okay. Was she lying -- was
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615633
513
1
lying when she said Jeffrey Epstein
2
socialized with Bill Clinton during that time
3
period?
4
A.
I don't know.
5
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
6
instruction.
7
BY MR. EDWARDS:
8
Q.
And you have no nonprivileged information
9
that would provide you the answer to that?
10
A.
I have nonprivileged information that
11
provides me that they socialized together at some
12
point. I don't know whether it was within that
13
timeframe at all. I know they went to Africa
14
together on a mission of goodwill, but I don't know
15
the date of that. So I can't tell you whether it
16
was
17
know
18
19
20
21
immediately disprove her statement that Bill Clinton
22
and Jeffrey Epstein socialized during that time
23
period?
24
A.
I don't understand that question.
25
Q.
No?
in the period or outside the period. You may
that; I don't.
Q.
Well, if Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton
associated, but only at some time period either
before or after the relevant time period, it would
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615634
514
1
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I don't
2
understand the question either. If you can
3
rephrase the question, that would be helpful.
4
MR. EDWARDS: Sure.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
If you -- do you know from nonprivileged
7
information whether Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton
8
ever socialized?
9
A.
Yes.
10
Q.
Do you know the beginning -- when their
11
relationship began?
12
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection,
13
same instruction.
14
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Again, under
15
nonprivileged.
16
MR. EDWARDS: Under nonprivileged
17
information.
18
MR. SCOTT: Do you have any nonprivileged
19
information about that?
20
A.
I remember having dinner at the home of
21
Caroline Kennedy and Ed Schlossberg with President
22
Clinton, and he basically asked me how Jeffrey was
23
doing, and led me to believe that he had some
24
relationship with Jeffrey. I don't remember whether
25
that dinner -- when that dinner was. I can probably
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615635
515
1
find out. But that would be nonprivileged.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
Was he still President at the time that
4
conversation was taking place?
5
A.
I don't remember.
6
Q.
Have you ever been, yourself, together
7
with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton?
8
A.
No.
9
Q.
Have you ever talked to Jeffrey Epstein
10
about Bill Clinton?
11
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection,
12
same instruction.
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Nonprivileged.
14
MR. EDWARDS: Yeah, nonprivileged.
15
A.
It's hard to sort out the privileged and
16
the nonprivileged.
17
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: So based upon
18
the objection, I would ask that you -- unless
19
it's obvious, then no, until we sort that out.
20
A.
I shouldn't answer that probably.
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I'm going to
22
grant his objection at this point, again, as a
23
continuum because I want to make sure that we
24
preserve this issue for later on.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615636
516
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
In a previous -- previously in this
3
deposition, you indicated your representation of
4
Jeffrey Epstein on this subject matter began in
5
2005, right?
6
A.
It began, I think I said, when the first
7
allegations were. I don't have an exact date in
8
mind.
9
Q.
The relevant time period for
as we've defined, is 1999 through 2002.
11
A.
That's correct, yes.
12
Q.
So I'm asking if you know from Jeffrey
13
Epstein, in a time period prior to your
14
representation, whether he was socializing with Bill
15
Clinton.
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
A.
Yes, yes.
19
MR. SCOTT: As long as it's a
20
nonprivileged situation.
21
A.
He was.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
He was?
24
A.
He was.
25
Q.
So prior --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615637
517
1
A.
During the whole period of time up through
2
2005, you're saying? Yes.
3
Q.
Right.
4
A.
Yes, I think this dinner occurred before
5
2005, so I would -- yes.
6
Q.
So what did Jeffrey Epstein tell you about
7
his relationship with Bill Clinton?
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
Prior to 2005, obviously.
12
A.
That they knew each other and that they
13
were doing some charitable work together.
14
Q.
Had Bill Clinton ever been to Jeffrey
15
Epstein's home?
16
A.
I'm not aware.
17
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
18
instruction.
19
BY MR. EDWARDS:
20
Q.
What kind of charitable work was Jeffrey
21
Epstein --
22
A.
I can tell you Donald Trump has been to
23
Jeffrey Epstein's home, and I've seen him there.
24
Q.
Okay. What question do you think that
25
you're answering?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615638
518
1
A.
Well, you're asking about general things
2
people --
3
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Let's move
4
forward.
5
A.
-- so I mean, I gave you an example of one
6
who has been there.
7
BY MR. EDWARDS:
8
Q.
Okay. I'm specifically talking about
9
when -- we started with was
lying when she
10
said that Jeffrey Epstein socialized with Bill
11
Clinton during the relevant time period. And now
12
I'm drilling it.
13
A.
I don't know the answer to that.
14
Q.
Okay. Did you understand -- did Bill
15
Clinton travel with Jeffrey Epstein?
16
A.
My understanding from newspaper --
17
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
18
instruction.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MR. SCOTT: Can we take a break in a few
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615639
519
1
minutes? I would like -- in the afternoon, he
2
gets a little tired, so I would like to, every
3
hour or so, take -- an hour and ten minutes,
4
take a couple-minute break.
5
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: You tell me when
6
is a good --
7
MR. EDWARDS: Maybe 15 minutes and we'll
8
switch topics, and we can take a break. Good,
9
Tom?
10
MR. SCOTT: Yes.
11
MR. EDWARDS: Okay.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
Was
lying when she says
14
she was introduced to Prince Andrew through Jeffrey
15
Epstein?
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Under
19
non-privileged information.
20
A.
I have seen a photograph of Prince Andrew
21
and
and Ghislaine Maxwell. I have
22
myself met Prince Andrew. He came to my class at
23
Harvard Law School and there was a dinner for him,
24
and he asked about Jeffrey Epstein. We discussed
25
Jeffrey Epstein.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615640
EFTA00615641
EFTA00615642
522
1
correct?
2
A.
I do.
3
Q.
And you know her through Jeffrey Epstein,
4
right?
5
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
6
instruction.
7
A.
I wrote an article about her father's
8
death years ago, and I don't remember if I met her
9
independently. I do remember meeting her through
10
her -- I remember that the Lady Rothschild asked me
11
to meet Jeffrey Epstein, and when Jeffrey Epstein
12
came to meet me, he was with Ghislaine Maxwell.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
And when was that?
15
A.
The first time I Jeffrey Epstein, which
16
would have been in the summer of Leslie Wexner's
17
59th birthday. That's all I can tell you is the
18
summer of his 59th birthday because I then flew with
19
Jeffrey Epstein to Leslie Wexner's 59th birthday. I
20
was presented to Leslie Wexner. Leslie would like
21
to get as birthday gifts interesting people that his
22
friends had met during the year, and so I was
23
Jeffrey Epstein's intellectual gift to Leslie
24
Wexner. And it was that year that I met Jeffrey
25
Epstein. That's the best I can date it.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615643
523
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Q.
I'm asking about your conversations with
16
Ghislaine Maxwell, who's in a separate litigation,
17
civil litigation for defamation. Have you
18
personally spoken with Ghislaine Maxwell since these
19
allegations?
20
A.
If there's no objection, I will answer.
21
MR. INDYKE: There was an objection. Same
22
objection, same instruction.
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
Is there a joint defense agreement related
25
to the civil allegation -- actions regarding the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615644
524
1
defamation actions that involve Ghislaine Maxwell
2
and yourself?
3
MR. INDYKE: Same objection.
4
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: What's the
5
basis -- can you explain to me what the basis
6
of the objection is -- and what was the
7
question?
8
MR. EDWARDS: Has Mr. Dershowitz spoken
9
with Ghislaine Maxwell since the allegations --
10
since this defamation suit came about as well
11
as the defamation suit with Ghislaine Maxwell.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
Let me ask it cleaner. Have you spoken
14
with Ghislaine Maxwell since January 2015?
15
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
16
instruction.
17
BY MR. EDWARDS:
18
Q.
So that I'm clear, there is a joint
19
defense of the allegations regarding Ghislaine
20
Maxwell that's New York litigation and this
21
defamation case?
22
MR. INDYKE: There's a common interest
23
agreement in effect with respect to the
24
New York case and a common interest agreement
25
with respect to this case.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615645
525
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Okay. Was
lying when she
3
says that she was taken by Ghislaine Maxwell and
4
MR. SCAROLA: Who negotiated the agreement
5
and when?
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
Is there a common interest agreement in
8
existence with respect to the allegations that have
9
arisen since January of 2015 or that you contend
10
covers that?
11
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
12
instruction.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
If there is, who negotiated this
15
agreement?
16
MR. SCAROLA: Can we have a ruling on
17
propriety?
18
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: You haven't
19
pushed me, so I let you go.
20
MR. SCAROLA: Can we have a ruling as to
21
whether we get to know whether Mr. Dershowitz
22
is a party to a common interest agreement with
23
Ghislaine Maxwell?
24
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Counsel
25
MS. McCAWLEY: Also, just this is Sigrid
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615646
526
1
McCawley, if any of the individuals on the
2
phone are representing Ghislaine Maxwell, my
3
understanding is the person on the phone is
4
representing Jeffrey Epstein, not Ghislaine
5
Maxwell. That needs to be clarified.
6
MR. INDYKE: Correct. Correct.
7
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: The answer is
8
correct?
9
MR. INDYKE: With respect to Mr. Epstein,
10
I can tell you there's a common interest
11
agreement with respect to this matter and a
12
common interest agreement with respect to the
13
Ghislaine Maxwell suit in New York.
14
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Is
15
Mr. Dershowitz party to that?
16
MR. INDYKE: Mr. Dershowitz is party to a
17
common interest agreement with Jeffrey in this
18
case. And I believe -- I'd have to check, but
19
I believe that that would extend
20
MR. SCAROLA: We want an answer from the
21
witness as to whether the witness is a party to
22
a common interest agreement with Ghislaine
23
Maxwell.
24
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Then ask the
25
question, because I haven't seen the question
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615647
527
1
asked yet.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
Are you a party to a common interest
4
agreement with Ghislaine Maxwell?
5
A.
If there's no objection, I'll answer it.
6
MR. INDYKE: I apologize. I thought we
7
were still operating under the original set of
8
objections. So I will repeat it. Same
9
objection, same instruction.
10
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: With respect to
11
that question, you can answer
12
A.
My understanding is that I am still
13
Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer. Jeffrey Epstein, I
14
understand, has a common interest or joint defense
15
agreement with Ghislaine Maxwell, so I have -- my
16
understanding is that I am bound by a common
17
agreement.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
Is this the same common interest agreement
20
that we were talking about from 2005, or is this a
21
separate common interest agreement that has been
22
signed as a consequence of the lawsuits that have
23
been filed since January 2015?
24
MR. INDYKE: If this is a new question,
25
I'll assert the same objection and the same
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615648
528
1
instruction.
2
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: And I'm going to
3
overrule the objection. And you can answer
4
that.
5
A.
My understanding is that it's a
6
combination; that is, it reflects the previous
7
agreement and that there is a new agreement that
8
supplemented the previous agreement.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
When you say it's your understanding, is
11
this understanding in writing; meaning, is there a
12
written common interest agreement that has been put
13
in place since January of 2015?
14
A.
I don't know.
15
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
16
instruction.
17
MR. SCOTT: Can we take a recess when we
18
get a chance?
19
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Yes, but I'm
20
going to instruct you --
21
A.
I don't know. I don't know the answer to
22
that, whether there's additional writing or not.
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
Last question, then we take a break. Have
25
you signed any such agreement
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615649
529
1
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
2
instruction.
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
-- since January 2015?
5
A.
Since January? Not to my recollection.
6
MR. EDWARDS: We can take a break.
7
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The
8
time is approximately 2:09 p.m.
9
(Recess was held from 2:09 p.m. until 2:26 p.m.)
10
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.
11
Time is approximately 2:26 p.m.
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615650
530
12
says that she was paid to have sex with Prince
13
Andrew?
14
A.
I have no idea.
15
Q.
You have met Prince Andrew, right?
16
A.
I have.
17
Q.
He sat in the back of your classrooms?
18
MR. SCOTT: Objection, asked and answered
19
twice.
20
A.
Once, yes.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
I think we went to Jeffrey Epstein sitting
23
in your classrooms, but now I'm talking about Prince
24
Andrew sat in your classroom as well, right?
25
A.
Yes, once.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615651
531
1
MR. SCOTT: I thought we went through
2
Andrew before; maybe I'm wrong.
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
Have you, since the -- since January of
5
2015, have you contacted Prince Andrew?
6
A.
No. I got a Christmas card from him.
7
Q.
Have you spoke with him about the
8
allegations that were alleged against Prince Andrew?
9
A.
Not to him, but to -- not to him.
10
Q.
Have you spoke to some representative of
11
his, of Prince Andrew?
12
A.
I need to know whether --
13
MR. INDYKE: Guy, sorry, I was just cut
14
off for some reason.
15
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hold on a
16
second. Go ahead and restate your question
17
so -- Darren, can you hear now?
18
MR. INDYKE: Yes, I can.
19
BY MR. EDWARDS:
20
Q.
My question is, have you spoken with
21
Prince Andrew or any representative of or for Prince
22
Andrew since January of 2015?
23
MR. SCOTT: If any of that involved work
24
product on our part, I am instructing you not
25
to answer.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615652
532
1
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
2
instruction on my end as well.
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
Whether or not you have spoken with him
5
would not be protected.
6
A.
I have not spoken to him.
7
MR. SCOTT: That, I don't have a problem
8
with.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
Have you spoken with any representative of
11
Prince Andrew since January of 2015?
12
A.
Is there any objection? I don't think I
13
have, but I think my lawyers have. But I don't
14
think I have.
15
MR. SCOTT: Don't go into any work
16
product.
17
A.
I don't think I have.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
Do you know that some representative of
20
yours has spoken with some representative of Prince
21
Andrew since January of 2015?
22
A.
I think so, yes.
23
Q.
Is Prince Andrew a party to any joint
24
defense agreement?
25
A.
Not that I am --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615653
533
1
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
2
instruction.
3
A.
I'm not aware of any.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Okay. Do you know which representative
6
which of your representatives communicated with
7
which of Prince Andrew's representatives?
8
A.
No. I do remember being told, though,
9
that there was a call from Prince Andrew's people to
10
one of my lawyers, but that's all I know.
11
Q.
So when I'm asking you whether
■
is lying about having sex with Prince Andrew
13
when she was under the age of 18, do you know the
14
answer to that question from --
15
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
16
instruction.
17
A.
Same answer. If it's based on her own
18
statement, I have no reason to believe it. If
19
there's other objective evidence, I'm not aware of
20
it.
21
I have no
22
reason to believe she would be telling the truth.
23
But I don't have any personal knowledge of that.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
What information do you have from Prince
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615654
534
1
2
3
4
Andrew's representative on that subject?
MR. SCOTT: Don't answer that question.
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
instruction.
5
A.
I can say publicly --
6
MR. SCOTT: Don't answer that. You've
7
been told.
8
A.
Okay, I'm sorry.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615655
535
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615656
536
1
2
3
Q.
Ghislaine Maxwell has been friends and
4
acquaintances of Prince Andrew for a very long time.
5
You know that, right?
6
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
7
instruction.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
Is that privileged, the answer to that
10
question, Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with
11
Prince Andrew? Let me ask it this ■
--
12
MR. INDYKE: To the extent that
13
Mr. Dershowitz obtained that information in
14
connection with his representation of Jeffrey
15
Epstein, of course it is.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
I have a better ■
to go about this,
18
then. Ghislaine Maxwell and
you met her well
19
before 2005, didn't you?
20
A.
I did, yes.
21
Q.
And Prince Andrew you met before 2005 as
22
well, correct?
23
A.
I think it was before 2005, yeah.
24
Q.
And prior to 2005, you understood that
25
Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew were social
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615657
537
1
acquaintances, didn't you?
2
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
3
instruction.
4
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: That deals with
5
if you have any nonprivileged.
6
A.
I do.
7
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Then I would
8
overrule the objection to that extent.
9
A.
I've seen them together at a party on
10
Martha's Vineyard given by Lady Rothschild.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
And back at that time, prior to your
13
representation of Jeffrey Epstein, did he tell you
14
that he had been introduced to Prince Andrew through
15
Ghislaine Maxwell?
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction. As Mr. Dershowitz previously
18
responded to the question about representation,
19
he said it was -- maybe he did not represent
20
Mr. Epstein in this case, but he represented
21
him in other cases.
22
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I will overrule
23
the objection to the extent that you have
24
nonprivileged information that you can base the
25
answer.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615658
538
1
A.
Yes. And in a letter that Prince Andrew
2
wrote to me thanking me for inviting him to my class
3
and having the dinner for him at Harvard Law School,
4
he made a reference to Jeffrey Epstein.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
And when was -- when did Prince Andrew
7
write a letter to you?
8
A.
When he came to my class at Harvard Law
9
School, just a thank-you note.
10
Q.
What was the approximate date of that
11
letter?
12
A.
I don't know.
13
Q.
What was the approximate year of the
14
letter?
15
A.
I don't know.
16
Q.
Do you still have the letter?
17
A.
I'll check.
18
Q.
Is there any reason why you haven't
19
personally contacted Prince Andrew to discuss these
20
allegations?
21
MR. SCOTT: Objection, hypothetical,
22
speculation.
23
A.
Not easy to reach the Queen, not easy to
24
reach the Prince. I don't know who I would call.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615659
539
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Couldn't you just call Ghislaine Maxwell,
3
though? It's not that easy for many people.
4
Couldn't you call Ghislaine?
5
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
6
MR. SCOTT: Argumentative.
7
BY MR. EDWARDS:
8
Q.
Do you know the circumstances -- as you
9
sit here, the circumstances that led to this
10
photograph being taken in London?
11
A.
No.
12
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
13
instruction.
14
BY MR. EDWARDS:
15
Q.
Have you ever seen photographs or the
16
copies of photographs of young naked teenage girls
17
that were taken from within the closet of Jeffrey
18
Epstein's home in Palm Beach?
19
A.
Absolutely not.
20
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
21
instruction.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
Have you ever attempted to get those
24
photographs from the law enforcement
25
MR. SCOTT: Let the lawyer make his
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615660
540
1
objection before you respond, Professor
2
Dershowitz.
3
MR. INDYKE: Finish your question, please.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Have you ever attempted to obtain those
6
photographs taken through the search warrant of
7
Jeffrey Epstein's home from law enforcement?
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
MR. EDWARDS: He's being instructed not to
11
answer whether he's ever attempted to obtain
12
the photographs?
13
MR. INDYKE: If it was done in connection
14
with his representation of Mr. Epstein, it's
15
work product.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
But I'm asking about communication that
18
you had with law enforcement. Are you claiming that
19
the communication you had with law enforcement is
20
protected by privilege?
21
MR. SCOTT: He's not claiming anything.
22
He's being instructed by a lawyer.
23
MR. EDWARDS: Okay. Well, I want to
24
understand what the record is --
25
MR. SCOTT: Then ask the lawyer, not my
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615661
541
1
client.
2
MR. EDWARDS: Darren, is that you?
3
MR. INDYKE: That is me, yes.
4
MR. EDWARDS: Are you saying that
5
Mr. Dershowitz or any of Jeffrey Epstein's
6
legal team, that their communication with law
7
enforcement is privileged?
8
MR. INDYKE: Whether or not such
9
communication exists and if they've never been
10
used, yes.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
Do you know whether the photographs of
13
young, naked teenage girls that were taken within
14
Jeffrey Epstein's home contain photographs of
15
while she was a young girl?
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
A.
Of course not. I've never seen those
19
photographs. But here I can answer nowhere, if I
20
ever was with Jeffrey Epstein in any of his homes,
21
did I ever see a naked photograph of anybody except
22
for a Rodin model, which was a sepia print in the
23
entranceway, kind of a classic Rodin model print,
24
but I've never, ever seen any photograph of any
25
naked, underage, inappropriate -- my grandchildren
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615662
542
1
visited his house. My wife visited his house. I
2
never would have permitted anybody to visit a home
3
that had those kinds of pictures displayed.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Was
lying when she said
6
that Epstein sent girls to some of his friends?
7
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
8
instruction.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
To any of his friends?
11
MR. SCOTT: Only on nonprivileged.
12
A.
To the extent that she said that I was one
13
of those friends, which I know is a categorical
14
absolute lie, I would not believe anything she said
15
about having been sent to others of his friends.
16
But I don't have personal knowledge of that. All I
17
have is personal knowledge that lied when she said
18
she was sent to me.
19
MR. INDYKE: Same objection.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Have you at any time obtained personal
22
knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein having sent any girls
23
to any of his friends?
24
A.
No.
25
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615663
543
1
instruction. Please wait for the objection.
2
MR. SCOTT: Please listen.
3
THE WITNESS: I'm sorry.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
When and under what circumstances did you
6
first hear
' name?
7
A.
My recollection --
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
A.
My answer will show it's not privileged.
11
My current recollection is the first time I heard
12
the name was when I was called and told that she was
13
accusing me. The name was not familiar to me at the
14
time.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
Were you ever familiar with the list of
17
victims that were listed as a part of the criminal
18
investigation -- the federal criminal investigation?
19
MR. SCOTT: Asked and answered in the last
20
depo and earlier today.
21
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
22
instruction.
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
Was
lying when she said that
25
Jeffrey Epstein's code word for sexual encounters
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615664
544
1
with minors was "massage"?
2
A.
I have no idea.
3
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
4
instruction.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
Have you reviewed the message pads that
7
were taken as a result of trash pulls conducted by
8
the Palm Beach Police Department on Jeffrey
9
Epstein's home?
10
A.
Not to my knowledge.
11
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
12
instruction.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
Have you reviewed the document that has
15
been at times referred to as the "Holy Grail," which
16
is a phone journal from Jeffrey Epstein's computer?
17
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
18
instruction to the extent it's privileged and
19
you got it other than from any kind of
20
disclosure by Mr. Edwards.
21
MR. SCOTT: Unless it's nonprivileged.
22
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: All these
23
questions -- with respect to nonprivileged, if
24
you can answer them, answer them.
25
A.
I'm happy to answer them all. So the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615665
545
1
question is am I familiar with this -- is this the
2
one that has the circles?
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
Yes.
5
A.
That has Donald Trump circled and Bill
6
Clinton circled and me circled?
7
Q.
I didn't know that it had Bill Clinton
8
circled.
9
A.
Maybe not.
10
Q.
So, just so that the record is clear, the
11
journal -- was the journal
12
MR. SCOTT: Was this marked in the last
13
depo? I don't recall. I don't think so.
14
MR. SCAROLA: I don't think that it was.
15
MR. INDYKE: To the extent that those
16
items are from -- I think the exhibits are a
17
statement of undisputed facts, obviously my
18
objection would apply to those items. To the
19
extent that they came out of Mr. Dershowitz's
20
representation of Mr. Epstein, I would object
21
if the answer is based as to information in
22
them.
23
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: We haven't seen
24
the exhibit yet. I know you are on the other
25
end of the phone.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615666
546
1
THE WITNESS: Can I take a one-minute,
2
two-minute break?
3
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record,
4
2:43 p.m.
5
(Recess was held from 2:43 p.m. until 2:45 p.m.)
6
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.
7
The time is approximately 2:45 p.m.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
Have you ever read the case documents
10
related to the arrest of Alfredo Rodriguez for the
11
Federal obstruction of justice charges?
12
A.
No.
13
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
14
instruction.
15
MR. SIMPSON: Just pause for a second
16
before answering to let Mr. Indyke jump in if
17
he needs to.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
The journal that we're talking about is
20
the one that has been disclosed in discovery in this
21
case and in prior cases where, as you mentioned
22
before, certain people's names are circled. Are you
23
familiar with that document?
24
A.
I have perused the part of it that circled
25
me and some other prominent names. I have not read
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615667
547
1
2
3
4
5
6
the whole document.
Q.
I'm going to show you the page from this
journal that is for Bill Clinton just based off of
your last comment, and then I'll ask you some
questions about that.
A.
This doesn't say Bill Clinton, it says
7
Doug Band. That's what you're talking about.
8
(Thereupon, marked as Plaintiff
9
Exhibit 20.)
10
A.
This doesn't have an entry for Bill
11
Clinton
It has an entry for Douglas Band, who I
12
know.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
You know Doug Band?
15
A.
Sure.
16
Q.
Is Doug Band affiliated with Bill Clinton?
17
A.
Oh, yeah, he was. Not any longer.
18
Q.
19
A.
20
Q.
21
A.
22
23
24
25
A.
How do you know Doug Band?
Through Bill Clinton.
How do you know Bill Clinton?
I've known him for --
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection,
same instruction.
MR. SIMPSON: Nonprivileged information.
Well outside of my relationship with
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615668
548
1
Jeffrey Epstein. I was -- supported him. I've been
2
to the White House at his invitation. I've had
3
dinner with him on numerous occasions.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Have you called Bill Clinton with respect
6
to the allegations that have been made in this
7
lawsuit?
8
A.
I've tried to.
9
Q.
Has Bill Clinton given you any comment
10
whatsoever on any of the allegations?
11
A.
Not personally, but Doug Band has. And
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
with Doug Band?
19
A.
Very shortly after the accusation, as soon
20
as I could reach him.
21
Q.
January 2015?
22
A.
Probably January.
23
Q.
Is Doug Band somebody who traveled with
24
Jeffrey Epstein as well?
25
A.
That's true -- no, he traveled --
Q.
When was that conversation that you had
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615669
549
1
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
2
instruction.
3
A.
He traveled with Bill Clinton always. I
4
mean, he was his body man. He was the guy who
5
traveled with him wherever he went.
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
My question is, did Doug Band ever travel
8
with Bill Clinton -- I mean with Jeffrey Epstein?
9
A.
I don't know the answer to that.
10
Q.
Well, did Bill Clinton ever travel with
11
Jeffrey Epstein?
12
MR. SIMPSON: Asked and answered.
13
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
14
instruction.
15
A.
According to public information, yes.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
And Doug Band, you are saying, was always
18
with Bill Clinton?
19
A.
Not always, but he was the guy who
20
traveled with him. Nobody can be with anybody 24/7.
21
Q.
The flight logs will speak for themselves
22
whether the two were traveling together, correct?
23
A.
I have no idea.
24
Q.
That entry -- I believe the comment that
25
you made was that was Alfredo Rodriguez had circled
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615670
550
1
Bill Clinton's name.
2
A.
I thought he had. He circled a lot of
3
prominent people's names, Hollywood actors.
4
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Do you know that
5
outside of your relationship with Mr. Epstein?
6
THE WITNESS: Yes, I saw the --
7
MR. INDYKE: I'm asking Mr. Dershowitz if
8
he's answering that question outside of his
9
relationship with -- his attorney-client
10
relationship or work product relationship or
11
common interest relationship with Mr. Epstein.
12
THE WITNESS: Yes.
13
MR. SIMPSON: The document was produced in
14
discovery.
15
MR. INDYKE: The question is as for the
16
circles in the document.
17
A.
The document I saw had circles in it, and
18
I saw that in discovery in this case. I hadn't seen
19
it previously.
20
MR. INDYKE: Okay.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
So you have seen the notations that
23
Alfredo Rodriguez made to the document during the
24
time he was turning the document over to the FBI?
25
A.
The only notations that I saw that I
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615671
551
1
recall are circles.
2
Q.
Okay. And is it your understanding that
3
Alfredo Rodriguez was indicating to the FBI who was
4
involved in the illegal activity with minors along
5
with Jeffrey Epstein?
6
A.
Absolutely not. Categorically absolutely
7
not.
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
That's not your understanding?
12
A.
Not only is it not my understanding, it is
13
a totally false statement because if it were true,
14
Donald Trump would be standing accused of having
15
improper sexual conduct and many other Hollywood
16
actors, actresses and other people who have never
17
been accused by your lying client would also stand
18
accused.
19
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Let's move --
20
MR. EDWARDS: That was not my question.
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Let me stop
22
before we get too far down this. The document
23
that -- the portion of the document that you're
24
asking questions upon, let's understand the
25
context of the questions, and Mr. Dershowitz's
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615672
552
1
answer so far has been that because it's been
2
produced in this case. So let's stay focused
3
on that.
4
A.
Can I see that document, please.
5
MR. INDYKE: Just for clarification, I
6
don't want to interrupt, but for clarification,
7
I wasn't objecting to the document. I was
8
objecting to the foundation upon which
9
Mr. Dershowitz may or may not know why they
10
were circled, how that information came
11
through.
12
A.
I know that independently.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
You know why the various circles were made
15
independently?
16
A.
No, but I know what the allegation is.
17
Q.
The allegation -- you know what the
18
allegation is why the circles were made?
19
A.
I know that it was not that the people
20
whose name were circled were involved in any illegal
21
activity. Can you please show me the document.
22
MR. SCOTT: Can he see the exhibit?
23
MR. SCAROLA: I --
24
MR. EDWARDS: I don't have it. I mean, I
25
only have the piece of the page that he just
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615673
553
1
talked about, which is Bill Clinton. I mean, I
2
have it and I'll copy it for you and I'll give
3
it to you tomorrow and we can talk about the
4
whole document.
5
A.
It is a categorical lie --
6
MR. SCOTT: Let's put it over until
7
tomorrow, then, when we have the exhibit.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
Well, that before you -- you just
10
indicated that one of the people who was circled was
11
Bill Clinton.
12
A.
I said I thought.
13
MR. SCOTT: He also indicated he would
14
like to see the whole exhibit.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
On that page that's before you that's
17
listed Doug Band, is Bill Clinton's name listed
18
under that?
19
A.
It says Office of William J. Clinton.
20
Q.
Are there numbers for Bill Clinton listed
21
under that entry?
22
A.
I assume they're numbers of Bill Clinton.
23
I assume so.
24
Q.
When you talked to Doug Band, can you tell
25
us what that conversation was that you had with Doug
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615674
554
1
Band?
2
A.
Yes.
12
Q.
Go on. What did Doug Band tell you?
13
A.
That it wasn't true.
14
Q.
Did Doug Band tell you whether Bill
15
Clinton had ever been to Jeffrey Epstein's island?
16
A.
He told me that to his knowledge,
17
President Clinton had never been to Jeffrey
18
Epstein's island.
19
Q.
Did he tell you whether Bill Clinton and
20
Jeffrey Epstein had ever shared a meal together?
21
A.
I didn't ask him that question. I only
22
asked him about the island. I think I only asked
23
him -- I'm not positive whether I asked him during
24
the relevant period or ever. I think I asked him
25
ever.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615675
555
1
Q.
Had -- has Bill Clinton ever flown on an
2
airplane -- or sorry, on a helicopter with Ghislaine
3
Maxwell?
4
A.
Not to my knowledge.
5
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection,
6
same instructions.
7
A.
I cannot imagine the former President or a
8
President of the United States being allowed by the
9
Secret Service to fly on a helicopter with a pilot
10
who had just barely been licensed.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
I'm just asking what you know. Do you
13
know whether or not
14
A.
I know -- I know that Bill Clinton never
15
flew
never was flown by Ghislaine Maxwell to the
16
island. I know it based on my common sense
17
experience.
18
Q.
Not my question. My question is, do you
19
know whether Bill Clinton ever flew on a helicopter
20
with Ghislaine Maxwell?
21
MR. SCOTT: On the phone, there's
22
background. Thank you.
23
A.
I don't know for sure, but I would
24
seriously doubt it.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615676
556
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Okay.
3
A.
We're going to get tomorrow the circled
4
document that we can look at?
5
Q.
I can find it now and I can get it and we
6
can look at it today.
7
MR. SCOTT: Take a minute.
8
A.
I want to make sure we see all the circled
9
names.
10
MR. EDWARDS: Here's a copy right here
11
that we can copy at the next break.
12
MR. SCOTT: Sure.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
Was
lying when she says
15
that Ghislaine Maxwell served as Jeffrey Epstein's
16
madam?
17
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
18
instruction.
19
A.
I would have no knowledge that would
20
establish that. Certainly I wouldn't believe it
21
just because she said it.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
Have you asked Ghislaine Maxwell about
24
that?
25
A.
No.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615677
557
1
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
2
instruction.
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
One of the things -- one of the statements
5
that we began the day with was that something that
6
Paul and I could have done was call you and ask you,
7
right, we could have picked up the phone and called
8
you?
9
A.
You and Mr. Cassell, yeah. Yeah.
10
Q.
When you were representing Jeffrey Epstein
11
back in 2007, did you ever insist that Jeffrey
12
Epstein had paid for massages, but had not engaged
13
in sex or erotic massages with any minors?
14
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
15
instruction to the extent that you can
16
specify --
17
BY MR. EDWARDS:
18
Q.
I'm asking whether you ever made that
19
statement.
20
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
21
instruction.
22
A.
Can you repeat the question for me?
23
THE REPORTER: "When you were representing
24
Jeffrey Epstein back in 2007, did you ever
25
insist that Jeffrey Epstein had paid for
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615678
558
1
massages, but had not engaged in sex or erotic
2
massages with any minors?"
3
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: By definition of
4
your question, it's within the representation
5
of Jeffrey Epstein, right? So in a -- without
6
any further clarification, I would agree with
7
the objection.
8
MR. SCAROLA: I'm sorry, this is about a
9
public statement.
10
MS. McCAWLEY: It's a public statement.
11
MR. EDWARDS: It's a public statement that
12
he makes to the New York --
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: So then make
14
your question limited to that. Then I can rule
15
on that. That's why looked at the question.
16
MR. SCOTT: If you specify where the
17
statement came from, it would be helpful.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
Did you ever make a public statement --
20
did you ever make a statement in public that Jeffrey
21
Epstein had paid for massages, but had not engaged
22
in sex or erotic massages with any minors?
23
A.
May I see the statement?
24
Q.
Sure.
25
MR. SCAROLA: No.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615679
559
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Well, did you make that statement?
3
A.
I have no recollection of whether I made a
4
statement like that ten years ago. I'd like to see
5
the statement.
6
MR. SCAROLA: Now you can refresh his
7
recollection.
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
Did you make a public statement that
12
Epstein was innocent of all allegations?
13
MR. SCOTT: Let me object to this in the
14
context that he's asking him statements from
15
ten years ago without specifying date, time and
16
place. It's just unfair.
17
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: If you're
18
reading from an article, published article,
19
then show him that. Let's stop for a second.
20
Do you recall making that statement?
21
THE WITNESS: I do not recall.
22
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Will you show
23
him something that might
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Sure. I'm going to go through each of the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615680
560
1
2
3
4
three statements and then I'm going to show you the
document.
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: These all deal
with public statements, right?
5
Q.
Yes.
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
8
9
10
11
12
•
^ou
e p o re res your reco ec ion
13
if I showed you the statement?
14
A.
Yes.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615681
61
www.phi sre orting.com
So your --
MR. SCOTT: Are we going to mark that?
MR. EDWARDS: Yes, we can mark that.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
9
10
11
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
EFTA00615682
562
1
Q.
Hypothetically, if you had made those
2
statements, those statements would be false,
3
correct?
4
MR. SCOTT: Objection. Hypothetical --
5
we're not even talking -- we have no knowledge
6
of who this woman is.
7
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I'm going to
8
grant the objection. Move on. Rephrase the
9
question.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Q.
This is not my deposition.
20
A.
I understand that, but you're giving a
21
hypothetical and I'm giving a hypothetical answer.
22
One would have to know whether or not the lawyers
23
who should have called me knew about the statement.
24
Q.
In this hypothetical, suppose that we were
25
aware of every one of your public statements that
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615683
563
1
you have ever made on this case of this subject
2
matter as well as related subject matter whatsoever
3
at the time.
4
A.
You would find that I was a truth-telling
5
person who never has ever deliberately stated an
6
untruth in my professional life.
7
Q.
We're going to get through this --
8
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead and ask
9
the question now based on that hypothetical you
10
just laid out.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
If we hypothetically assumed that you had
13
made these statements, would these statements, given
14
your knowledge of the facts of this case, be false?
15
A.
Let me see the statements again, please.
16
MR. INDYKE: Objection. To the extent the
17
knowledge of the facts of this case derive from
18
Mr. Dershowitz's representation of Mr. Epstein,
19
I don't think he can answer that question
20
without violating the privilege.
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on one
22
second. Did we hop over the hypothetical to
23
reality?
24
MR. INDYKE: I think we may have.
25
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: That's my
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615684
564
1
question to you.
2
MR. EDWARDS: We're still operating in
3
hypothetical.
4
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: So now go back
5
and describe your hypothetical specifically so
6
he understand the question that you are asking.
7
A.
Is this hypothetical still?
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
A.
I can understand it. What I would have
23
done as a responsible lawyer, what you should have
24
done, is you should have called me and asked me
25
about these statements, and I might have told you I
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615685
565
1
said them, I might have told you I didn't say them,
2
I would have to have checked.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MR. INDYKE: Objection if you're talking
10
about actual facts.
11
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: He's answering a
12
hypothetical, so it's within -- move forward on
13
the hypothetical basis only.
14
15
16
17
It says that I said that he had passed a
18
lie detector test. I don't recall that. I don't
19
recall that he took a lie detector test. But if he
20
had taken a lie detector test and I was told he
21
passed it, that statement would be true.
22
If I had been told hypothetically that he
23
had paid for massages and had not engaged in
24
massages with underage minors, at that point in time
25
in 1907 [sic], that statement would be true. But as
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615686
566
1
a lawyer, I wouldn't necessarily, A, take the word
2
of the Daily Mail without calling or, B, assume that
3
the statements quoted in the Daily Mail were false.
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
Would you agree it is a fair assumption or
6
a fair presumption that when you are making public
7
statements on behalf of the client, that you have at
8
least reviewed the available evidence that may exist
9
against that client?
10
A.
That's too broad a question. It really
11
depends. I mean, I get called on day one of a case,
12
I don't know the evidence, and I'm called by the
13
press. I talk about my client being presumed
14
innocent, my client being innocent. That's part of
15
the role of a criminal defense lawyer. Justice
16
Blackmun has said that the criminal defense lawyer's
17
role does not end in a courtroom, it continues to
18
the courthouse steps.
19
And so when my client is being accused of
20
something, I have the right to --
21
MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me one moment. Rick,
22
could you step outside with me.
23
A.
to express my clients' views on the
24
matter. I'm speaking in a representative capacity.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615687
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Can we now remove ourselves from that
3
hypothetical and go to the allegations in this
4
Complaint, which include the various allegations
5
made in the statements at the beginning of this
6
deposition?
7
A.
Which Complaint are we talking about?
8
9
10
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
THE WITNESS: I don't think so, based on a
25
combination of factors, including material that
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615688
568
1
I got in a lawyer-client and work product
2
fashion.
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
Okay. Let's take it a different III. One
5
of the things you said we should have done is just
6
called you.
7
A.
That's right.
8
Q.
If we had called you, isn't it more
9
likely, based on what we've seen today, that what we
10
would have had is just a bunch of objections and you
11
not being able to tell us anything?
12
A.
Absolutely not.
13
MR. SCOTT: Objection --
14
A.
This requires a long answer because you've
15
asked me what you would have found out had you
16
called me. So let me tell you what you would have
17
found out.
18
MR. SCOTT: Do you want a long answer?
19
BY MR. EDWARDS:
20
Q.
I don't want a long answer. I'm asking
21
wouldn't Jeffrey Epstein have had a say in what you
22
tell us, the same way that he has a say apparently
23
today in what you're telling us?
24
A.
No. When it comes to me defending myself,
25
I will make the ultimate decision as to -- I'm an
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615689
569
1
expert on lawyer-client privilege. I'm an expert on
2
work product. I'm an expert on the exceptions. I
3
can tell you exactly what I would have told you.
4
What I would have told you was that I have
5
documentation that could prove categorically that I
6
could not have been on Jeffrey Epstein's island
7
during the three-year period that is relevant.
8
I can prove categorically that I could not
9
have had sex or any contact with her at the ranch.
10
I can prove categorically that I couldn't have had
11
sexual contact with her on the airplane. I can
12
prove categorically that I couldn't have had sexual
13
contact with her in Palm Beach. And that I could
14
not prove categorically that at least I wasn't in
15
the same city with her in New York because I was in
16
New York for a long period of time.
17
I would have told you what that
18
documentation was. I would have asked you for an
19
opportunity to produce the documentation. I would
20
have provided you with other information.
21
No, I would not have raised any privilege.
22
I would have told you exactly what the evidence is,
23
and you would have believed me and you would have
24
not made these allegations if you're a responsible
25
lawyer.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615690
570
1
Q.
Is this the documentation that you have
2
now produced in this litigation, the documentation
3
you're talking about?
4
A.
Yes.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615691
571
1
anything is missing, I regret it much more than you
2
do because I am positive that they would provide
3
exculpatory information.
4
Q.
The same way
5
A.
I'm hoping that you can find it. Please
6
go ahead with my blessing. Please go find it.
7
MR. INDYKE: Objection. In connection
8
with Mr. Dershowitz's response, Mr. Epstein
9
waives no such objections that he's raised.
10
He's not waiving privilege. He's not waiving
11
work product. He's not waiving
12
attorney-client, common interest, joint
13
defense.
14
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I've got it.
15
M•v f rw r
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615692
572
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A.
First of all, I did not rely on --
MR. INDYKE: To the extent that your
response requires you to invade privilege, I
would instruct you not to respond.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Q.
Is this related to answering my question?
18
A.
Yes, it is very directly.
19
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: What you're
20
looking at there is related?
21
A.
Yes. Her statement -- here's what I would
22
look at.
23
MR. EDWARDS: Can we attach this to the
24
deposition that he's reviewing this?
25
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Yeah, yeah.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615693
573
1
A.
I am simply quoting from her affidavit.
2
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Who "her"?
3
A.
That's what I looked
4
at, her affidavit, which says that
5
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on one
6
second. Tom, before he quotes, let's
7
understand, I do think we need a copy of that
8
now.
9
THE WITNESS: It's in the affidavit.
10
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: But I do think
11
in fairness to these guys, I think that what
12
you're reading from, they need to have it.
13
A.
I won't read from it. In her affidavit,
14
she states that she had sex with Presidents, plural,
15
of countries, a well-known prime minister of a
16
country, prominent American politicians, prominent
17
American businessmen, academics, and more.
18
And when I read that and read other
19
information about what she was reported to have
20
said, that's not from newspapers, that's from her
21
own affidavit.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615694
574
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MR. SCOTT: You've been quoting from
9
newspapers all along, and now you have a
10
problem with a newspaper?
11
MR. EDWARDS: I don't have a problem with
12
a newspaper.
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Wait a second.
14
Move on. You don't need to respond.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615695
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Q.
But by throwing that last piece in there
18
that it's also on the basis of conversations you've
19
had with your client, it implies that those
20
conversations somehow justified those statements.
21
And if that's what you're sticking to, I want to
22
understand what it is that you learned from him that
23
could possibly justify those public statements in
24
2007.
25
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615696
576
1
instruction.
2
A.
What I'm saying is that lawyers,
3
particularly criminal defense lawyers, whether in
4
court or out of court -- I don't know whether these
5
statements were made in court of out of court -- are
6
entitled to assert the innocence of their clients.
7
That's what lawyers do all the time. I'm
8
sure you've done it. I'm sure Professor Cassell has
9
done it. I'm sure Mr. Scarola has done it. And
10
none of us ever want to be judged on our credibility
11
by pleading a client nonguilty or asserting a
12
client's innocence, and then it turns out perhaps
13
later that the client -- I'm not suggesting that
14
that happened here, but that the evidence
15
contradicts it.
16
First of all, we don't know what the
17
evidence is we're talking about here because we're
18
dealing with a timeframe that's very, very different
19
from the timeframe that ultimately was available
20
later on in the case.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
Let me ask it to you this way, then:
23
First let me ask, is
a Massachusetts rule of
24
professional conduct on truthfulness in statements,
25
are you familiar with that rule?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615697
577
1
A.
Yes.
2
Q.
And doesn't it indicate that in the course
3
of representing a client, a lawyer shall not
4
knowingly make a false statement of material fact or
5
law to a third person?
6
A.
And I've never done anything that even
7
comes close to violating that rule.
8
Q.
Okay. So let's take the statement, the
9
public statement that we are discussing from the
10
Daily Mail April 2007 article.
11
A.
Right.
12
Q.
The statement that the financier had paid
13
for massages, but had not engaged in sex or erotic
14
massages with any minors, do you, as you sit here
15
today, believe that statement to have been true at
16
the time that you made it?
17
A.
Absolutely.
18
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
19
instruction.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
The 87-page police report that has already
22
been marked to this deposition was generated in 2005
23
and 2006 prior to that statement that you made; is
24
that right?
25
A.
I have no idea. Let me qualify my answer.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615698
578
1
I don't recall having used those words. I don't
2
recall an interview with the Daily Mail. My current
3
recollection is I did not have an interview with the
4
Daily Mail.
5
Had I had an interview with the Daily
6
Mail, it would have had to have been authorized by
7
my client. I don't think he would have authorized
8
such an interview, so I am now not acknowledging --
9
I just don't know, but I am not acknowledging that I
10
actually said those words to the Daily Mail. You
11
are going to have to demonstrate that. I don't
12
remember speaking to Ms. Churchhill or whatever her
13
name is. It's possible, but I don't remember it.
14
Q.
So if somebody is attributing those
15
statements to you, are you saying that they are
16
lying?
17
A.
I don't remember having made those
18
statements.
19
MR. SCOTT: I would like to object to the
20
entire relevancy of this entire line because
21
this doesn't even establish which lady he's
22
talking about. That article doesn't even
23
establish anything about your client.
24
MR. EDWARDS: I hear your objection. But
25
the article actually says that Jeffrey Epstein
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615699
579
1
was innocent of all allegations. So it's
2
apparently talking to at least --
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
Wouldn't you agree it's reasonable to
5
presume that it's talking about all of the
6
allegations --
7
A.
Allegations against him that I recall at
8
the time that I was representing him involve two
9
women, two young women, is my recollection of the
10
allegations. And we were taking the position, and
11
we took the position with the State Attorney that he
12
was not guilty of those allegations.
13
There were many defenses that were being
14
raised, some dealing with credibility, some dealing
15
with --
16
MR. INDYKE: Objection, objection.
17
A.
-- whether or not some of the women showed
18
him IDs.
19
MR. INDYKE: You're getting into
20
attorney-client.
21
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead ad make
22
your point.
23
MR. INDYKE: My point is that it sounds to
24
me that Alan is now discussing attorney-client
25
matters and internal decisions and strategies
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615700
580
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
and statements that may not have been a matter
of public record.
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I think you
responded to the question.
MR. INDYKE: And therefore they're subject
to privilege, and we object and instruct him
not --
8
MR. SCOTT: Again, I'm going to object to
9
relevancy. It's been going on for hours. It
10
doesn't even involve his client.
11
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I'm not going to
12
rule on the relevancy objection. This is
13
something that you can take up later at a
14
deposition. So move forward. He gets to take
15
his own deposition.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
Do you remember that one of the alleged
18
victims that you were -- do you remember trying to
19
discredit one of the alleged victims named -- hold
20
on, this is difficult here. What I'm having trouble
21
with is what we are going to do with the identity of
22
underage sex abuse victims. I'm a little nervous to
23
say it on the record on a video. So can we just
24
take a two-minute break, five-minute break so that I
25
can figure out how we're going to work this out?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615701
581
1
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: We're on break.
2
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The
3
time is approximately 3:23 p.m.
4
(Recess was held from 3:23 p.m. until 3:38 p.m.)
5
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.
6
The time is approximately 3:38 p.m.
7
BY MR. EDWARDS:
8
Q.
I'm going to give you the police report
9
that has been moved in as Exhibit 18, and I have
10
included a sticky note that we'll throw away. I'm
11
going to refer to her by the normal'. but I've
12
marked her real name so that you will know it, and
13
I'll ask if you remember her and things of that
14
nature. But here you go.
15
A.
While I'm doing that, may I amend the
16
previous answer?
17
MR. INDYKE: If you're asking if he knows
18
her name, then I would object to -- on the same
19
basis I objected previously.
20
MR. SIMPSON: Why don't we discuss that on
21
the next break before you amend an answer.
22
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead again.
23
I lost it.
24
MR. INDYKE: If you're asking whether or
25
not he knows this person I'll, if that's the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615702
582
1
question, I would object on the basis of work
2
product, attorney-client, common interests, and
3
instruct you not to answer to the extent it
4
invades any of those privileges.
5
A.
What am I looking at here?
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
This is the Palm Beach Police Department
8
police report.
9
A.
What do you want me to look at?
10
Q.
Sure. It's page 40.
11
A.
I have it, yes.
12
Q.
We're going to go to the paragraph --
13
second paragraph, "Detective
and I met with
14
on October 11, 2005."
15
A.
"Detective
and I met with
. and
16
her friend."
17
Q.
I'm going to tell you that the person
18
under that redaction is
19
A.
Okay. That doesn't mean anything to me.
20
Q.
Is that somebody that -- whose name that
21
you --
22
A.
Oh, that person.
23
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead and
24
make your objection.
25
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615703
583
1
instruction.
2
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Do you know this
3
person?
4
A.
Only through my work with Jeffrey Epstein.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Q.
That you produced to the State Attorney's
17
Office?
18
A.
I don't know how to use a computer, so I
19
couldn't pull down anything. But I was presented
20
with these within the lawyer-client representation.
21
And I don't know how much further to go.
22
Q.
And didn't you take that information --
23
MR. INDYKE: Instruct you not to answer.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Didn't you take that information, whatever
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615704
584
1
information that you pulled from
.'s MySpace page
2
to the State Attorney's Office to convince the State
3
Attorney's Office that this witness was not
4
credible?
5
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Do you have an
6
objection, or no?
7
MR. INDYKE: No.
8
A.
For 50 years, I've taught my students in
9
criminal law that their job is to present evidence
10
that would raise questions about the credibility of
11
a witness against their criminal defendant. And, of
12
course, every criminal lawyer does that. And I,
13
along with my co-defendants [sic), did the very same
14
thing in this case.
15
MR. SIMPSON: I believe you misspoke. You
16
said "co-defendants." Co-counsel?
17
MR. SCAROLA: Freudian slip.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615705
585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Q.
After you made the statement that
13
Mr. Cassell and I had fabricated the allegations
14
against you and believed in the story of a
15
incredible, serial liar, and had failed to call you,
16
did you read our responsive pleading which I believe
17
was more than 150 pages long outlining some of our
18
investigation of the surrounding allegations? Just
19
did you read that response? I believe it was filed
20
January 21, 2015, in Judge Marra's courtroom.
21
A.
I don't recall reading a 150-page
22
document. My lawyer Kendall Coffey would have read
23
it. It's possible I read it. But -- can you show
24
it to me?
25
Q.
I don't have it here, but I assumed that
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615706
586
1
you had read it.
2
A.
I would be happy to look at it and see if
3
it's something I read. I know I'm familiar with
4
what -- some of the things you said you did, and
5
they didn't make me change my opinion at all.
6
Q.
Did you read Detective
's
7
deposition that was taken in the civil cases against
8
Mr. Epstein?
9
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
10
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: There's no
11
grounds for an objection as to whether he read
12
a deposition.
13
MR. INDYKE: Well, there is when they
14
didn't place it within a timeframe.
15
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Okay.
16
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
17
instruction.
18
BY MR. EDWARDS:
19
Q.
In production we had produced many
20
depositions not only in this case, but have been
21
filed in other cases, which is why I asked you about
22
that January 21st pleading.
23
Is one of the documents that you have read
24
regarding our investigation of the allegations
25
Detective
deposition?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615707
587
1
A.
When -- when was Detective Recarey's
2
deposition?
3
Q.
It was taken sometime in 2010. I don't
4
have the entire document.
5
A.
I doubt that I read it. I wouldn't have
6
had any reason to read it back in 2010.
7
Q.
If --
8
MR. INDYKE: If are you talking about what
9
he did in 2010 rather than in response to
10
pleadings in this case, then I would object.
11
Same objection, same instruction.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
I don't need to ask you if you've read the
14
deposition. If Detective
has testified that
15
the State Attorney, very early on in the
16
investigation, was gung-ho up until the meeting with
17
Alan Dershowitz, would that be a true statement?
18
MR. SCOTT: Objection, form, totally
19
irrelevant to anything.
20
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
21
instruction.
22
A.
I sure hope so. I mean, if I did a good
23
job in persuading a very distinguished State
24
Attorney about being less gung-ho about going after
25
my client, that's my job, that's what I get paid for
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615708
588
1
as a criminal defense lawyer. So I'm proud to
2
have -- if it's true, have had him be less than
3
gung-ho.
4
I have tell you my negotiations with him
5
were very tough, very arm's length and very
6
difficult to the point where I was replaced at one
7
point for not getting a good enough deal.
8
BY MR. EDWARDS:
9
Q.
If --
10
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Alan, please do
11
not go into the substance of any kind of
12
interactions between you and any of on
13
Mr. Epstein's counsel in connection with your
14
representation.
15
BY MR. EDWARDS:
16
Q.
At some point in time, were your services
17
terminated by Mr. Epstein?
18
A.
I was replaced.
19
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
20
instruction.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
At what point in time were you terminated?
23
MR. SCOTT: He didn't say that.
24
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
25
instruction.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615709
589
1
A.
I wasn't terminated. A lawyer was added
2
to the team. And I think the record will show when
3
that happened, and negotiations continued with a new
4
lawyer who was seeking to get a better deal.
5
BY MR. EDWARDS:
6
Q.
If Detective
Detective l
testified that the
7
point of your meeting with the State Attorney's
8
Office was to show that the character of the girls
9
was not to be believed, would that be a fair and
10
accurate description of that?
11
A.
Well, the purpose of the meeting was
12
multiple. The purpose of the meeting, I remember we
13
brought forth every single --
14
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
15
instruction, please. And, Professor Cassell,
16
I'm having some difficulty hearing you.
17
MR. SCOTT: He's having a hard time
18
hearing you.
19
MR. INDYKE: Yes.
20
A.
The plain purpose of my meeting and the
21
work that did I together with my research assistant
22
was to gather all the cases in Palm Beach County and
23
maybe some other surrounding counties involving the
24
allegations, allegations similar to those against my
25
client, and to show that in none of the cases had
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615710
590
1
prison time been given for the kinds of activities
2
that were alleged against my client. So, I
3
presented him with hundreds of --
4
MR. INDYKE: I have to interrupt you. If
5
you are talking about what you did for
6
Mr. Epstein, which it sounds like you are, then
7
you are invading the attorney-client privilege
8
and work product.
9
A.
I gave it to the prosecutor.
10
MR. INDYKE: I object, and I instruct you
11
not to answer.
12
BY MR. EDWARDS:
13
Q.
My question is very narrow.
14
Do you remember attending a meeting with
15
Detective
yourself and the State Attorney
16
wherein you made presentations using the website of
17
some of the victims, including
18
A.
The three people that you mentioned were
19
not the only people at that meeting.
20
Q.
I'm not insinuating that they are. Do you
21
remember those people being at the meeting?
22
A.
I remember others as well, including
23
Mitchell Webber, who had done some of the research
24
for me on the case.
25
Q.
I'm just asking do you remember this
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615711
591
1
meeting?
2
A.
I do, yes.
3
Q.
If Detective
says that the point
4
of your presentation was to attack the credibility
5
of the witnesses, is that accurate?
6
A.
No. The point of my meeting
7
Q.
I'm only asking for yes or no.
8
A.
I have to do more than yes or no.
9
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: The initial
10
answer was?
11
A.
No. And now explain. The point was to
12
get a reduction in sentence and to get the best
13
possible deal I could get for my client. That
14
included giving comparative sentencing data about
15
other cases and included raising questions about the
16
17
18
19
20
21
against my client, which is -- I've done that many,
22
many times, and so has every other criminal lawyer I
23
know.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
And if Detective
says it was Alan
credibility of the witnesses and included showing
documentation that some of the witnesses had
provided false documentation about their age.
It was a general presentation to a
prosecutor to try to mitigate the allegations
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615712
592
1
Dershowitz that was making the presentation on
2
Mr. Epstein's behalf to discredit the victims, that
3
would be a true statement in part?
4
A.
Alan Dershowitz made a presentation in
5
general that included truthful statements about the
6
witnesses, the truth of which tended to discredit
7
some of their testimony, yes.
8
Q.
If Detective IIIIIII was asked, in fact,
9
"Was he, Alan, trying to convey to the State
10
Attorney's Office that you should not believe these
11
girls that they were at his house at all because
12
they have credibility problems," and he answered,
13
"That was the impression I received, yes"
14
A.
Totally false impression.
15
Q.
This is something that Detective
16
if he said that, he's lying?
17
A.
No, I didn't say he's lying. You're
18
putting words in my mouth. I said it's a false
19
impression. He didn't say it definitely happened.
20
He said that's the impression he had.
21
I didn't ever say that these people were
22
not at Jeffrey Epstein's house. That was not part
23
of my defense. I never said that to anybody about
24
any of the people involved in this case. The
25
defense was very different. And Mitch Webber, who
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615713
593
1
was there, and probably the State Attorney will
2
confirm that.
3
Q.
Okay. Going to the police report of
4
on page 40 it begins, is she one of the victims that
5
you tried to discredit during this meeting we're
6
discussing?
7
A.
My recollection is that
was one of
8
the accusers, and we had --
9
MR. INDYKE: Objection. I'm sorry, I'm
10
trying to give you some leeway, but I object on
11
the same basis that I objected previously. And
12
I believe this was also treading settlement
13
negotiations on behalf of Mr. Epstein with the
14
police department. Again, this is -- so I
15
instruct you not to answer to the extent it
16
invades privilege.
17
THE WITNESS: So I just understand, are
18
you alleging a negotiation privilege, too?
19
MR. INDYKE: Yes. I don't want you
20
talking about --
21
THE WITNESS: Clearly, it's covered by
22
negotiation, and it would take incredible --
23
well, I'm not going to say it. This was
24
clearly a negotiation. Are they asserting a
25
negotiation privilege? I would like to hear
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615714
594
1
that.
2
MR. INDYKE: Yes.
3
MR. SCAROLA: It's being asserted by
4
Mr. Epstein's counsel.
5
THE WITNESS: Are you challenging the
6
negotiation privilege?
7
MR. SCAROLA: We're asking the question.
8
MR. EDWARDS: Are we challenging it?
9
Absolutely.
10
THE WITNESS: Good.
11
MR. SIMPSON: Just wait for a question.
12
MR. EDWARDS: It's not getting us
13
anywhere.
14
MR. INDYKE: I would instruct you not to
15
answer that question to the extent it invades
16
that privilege.
17
THE WITNESS: I think we need a ruling on
18
negotiation privilege.
19
MR. SCAROLA: I don't think we get that
20
ruling in the context of this deposition.
21
THE WITNESS: Well, you're asking me a
22
question --
23
MR. SCOTT: There's no question pending.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Do you remember
. as being one of the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615715
595
1
victims that explained that she was also made to
2
have sexual relations with
3
A.
No, I have no recollection.
4
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
5
instruction.
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
Do you remember ■
being one of the
8
victims sa in that Epstein bragged that he bought
9
from her family in
to be
10
his sex slave?
11
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
12
instruction.
13
BY MR. EDWARDS:
14
Q.
Do you remember -- do you know how it was
15
that
obtained a visa in this
16
country?
17
A.
No, absolutely not.
18
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
19
instruction.
20
BY MR. EDWARDS:
21
Q.
Were you a part of the negotiation with
22
the U.S. Attorney's Office to protect
against immigration charges?
24
A.
I was not aware that there was any
25
negotiation relating to her.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615716
596
1
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
2
instruction.
3
BY MR. EDWARDS:
4
Q.
Are you aware that
told the police
5
that she had massagers, vibrators and strap-on
6
rubber penises used on her?
7
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
8
instruction.
9
MR. SCOTT: If that is privileged, then
10
don't answer it.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
You're refusing to answer?
13
A.
I'm not refusing to answer anything. I
14
have not refused to answer a single question today.
15
I'm instructed, I await the judge's ruling, and
16
whatever the judge says, I do.
17
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: There are now, I
18
count, four privilege issues that have been
19
raised separately. One deals with the
20
privilege issue directly and under the
21
representation of Mr. Epstein, the work product
22
issue that deals with the scope of the
23
representation of Mr. Epstein, the joint
24
defense agreement and common interest
25
privilege, and now as well as a negotiation
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615717
597
1
privilege.
2
And for my purposes, in fairness to all
3
the parties, I do think that is something that
4
has to be subject to a set of facts on some of
5
them and fuller briefing of law, and that
6
requires -- I'm happy to hear it, but I think
7
it would be even in the purview of a separate
8
hearing from today, whether it's in front of me
9
or in front of directly Judge Lynch.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
Do you remember III. saying that Epstein
12
turned her on her stomach on the massage bed and
13
began to pump his penis in her vagina?
14
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
15
instruction.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
I'm going to read this into the record and
18
then we'll get the objection and then we'll --
19
MR. INDYKE: I apologize. I'm not there,
20
so I'm not clear when you're finished. I just
21
want to make sure I make the objection before
22
Mr. Dershowitz responds.
23
BY MR. EDWARDS:
24
Q.
then became upset over this. She
25
said her head was being held against the bed
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615718
598
1
forcibly as he continued to pump inside her. She
2
screamed no, and Epstein stopped. She told him that
3
she did not want to have him inside of her. Epstein
4
apologized and subsequently paid her a thousand
5
dollars."
6
Does that refresh your recollection as to
7
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615719
599
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Do you believe, then, that it was a
3
different victim that Jeffrey Epstein forcibly raped
4
and that had a long history of lying, theft and
5
blaming others for her crimes other than
6
MR. SCOTT: Object to the form.
7
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
8
instruction.
9
MR. SCOTT: Argumentative and relevancy.
10
This whole line.
11
A.
I guess I have to answer?
12
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: No.
13
A.
I just want to make one point in response,
14
though, and that is the quotes from the Mail, of the
15
three paragraphs, the first two are not in quotation
16
marks, they are not quoting me directly, they're not
17
in quotation marks, and I do not remember saying
18
those.
19
Only the third one is in quotation marks,
20
and only had a long record of lying, theft and
21
blaming others for her crimes, and I think that
22
comes from a court document. And I think if you
23
check, you would see that quotation comes from a
24
court document. So I have not been quoted by the
25
Daily Mail, and I do not think I ever spoke to
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615720
600
1
Ms. Churchill.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
You don't deny, though, that in reading
4
the Daily Mail article in your hand that the Daily
5
Mail has attributed each of those statements to you,
6
whether quoted or not?
7
MR. SCOTT: Objection, form, totally
8
improper examination.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
You can answer.
11
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: You can answer.
12
A.
Oh, sure. I have no memory of having had
13
an interview with the Daily Mail. They do attribute
14
statements to me, but not in quotes, and that's
15
always a red flag. When you see statements
16
attributed to somebody in the newspaper and there
17
are no quotes, any reasonable lawyer or reader would
18
question whether there, in fact, had been such a
19
conversation because if there had been such a
20
conversation, any good journalist would put it in
21
quotes. And many of the things article are in
22
quotes, but my statements are not in quotes other
23
than the last statement, which I think comes from a
24
legal document.
25
And at the time I made any statement about
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615721
601
1
this -- about a woman with a long record of lying, I
2
don't think I was making it about somebody who
3
claimed to have been raped. I have no recollection
4
as I sit here now that anybody ever claimed to have
5
been raped by Jeffrey Epstein. I mean forcibly
6
raped in the way that you described it in that
7
document. That was not part of my negotiation with
8
the D.A. The D.A. never accused --
9
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
But that document that I was reading from
12
is the public police report that is available to
13
everybody. You recognize that, right?
14
A.
But the D.A. obviously didn't put much
15
credit in that because he never charged him with
16
that. So that was not one of the things that I was
17
dealing with.
18
What I was dealing with was two charges --
19
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
20
A.
-- of massages with underage sex. That
21
was what I was dealing with. That's what any
22
comments I may have made dealt with. There was
23
never an allegation of forcible rape made by any
24
responsible prosecutor in this case.
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615722
602
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Isn't the comment, that's attributed to
3
you, doesn't it specifically say he, talking about
4
Alan Dershowitz, said that the girl who accused
5
Epstein of forcible sex had a long record of lying,
6
theft and blaming others for her crimes? That's --
7
A.
I categorically deny having said that in a
8
context of a statement about forcible sex. What the
9
Mail probably did is they juxtaposed their view
10
based on these articles that it was forcible sex and
11
assumed somehow that what I was saying related to
12
her. That's not what I said. That I remember quite
13
unequivocally.
14
Q.
is particularly one of the victims --
15
A.
is not mentioned in this article.
16
Q.
No, no,
is one of the victims whose
17
MySpace page you used to give a presentation to the
18
State Attorney's Office about her credibility, isn't
19
it?
20
MR. SCOTT: Let me object. Argumentative.
21
We've been through this five times.
22
MR. INDYKE: Objection, same instruction.
23
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: How much further
24
do you have on this line of questions because I
25
will be --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615723
603
1
MR. EDWARDS: I just want to get an
2
answer, that's it. I want to get answers.
3
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: But the point is
4
well made that the way this article is
5
constructed, it's meant to -- really the only
6
thing that's quoted here based upon this
7
article is "had a long record of lying, theft
8
and blaming others for her crimes."
9
The rest of it is not. And so you don't
10
know the source. Based upon what you've
11
already elicited from the witness, he doesn't
12
remember even talking to the Mail. And so I
13
don't want impact your line of questioning.
14
I've let you go on this. But how much further
15
do you have?
16
MR. EDWARDS: Okay, but I think I need to
17
put this in context, then, so that we kind of
18
understand what the point of this is.
19
This is a defamation action where we've
20
been accused of not performing any
21
investigation. So part of what we had to do is
22
what has she told us and what can we prove, and
23
what has he said in light of the evidence.
24
When we're weighing credibility, this is
25
one of the public statements that we have to
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615724
604
1
weigh against the evidence.
2
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: And I've read
3
the pleadings, I've read the various arguments,
4
I've read the summary judgment that was filed,
5
and so I agree, that's why I've kind of let
6
this continue. But how much further? Because
7
I'm not so sure how much more information you
8
can get from him that you haven't gotten
9
already.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
Are the three statements that are
12
attributed to you in the Daily Mail true or false?
13
MR. SCOTT: Asked and answered three
14
times.
15
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
16
instruction.
17
A.
I have no knowledge, as I said today, as
18
to whether or not Jeffrey Epstein passed a lie
19
detector test. If I said it, and I don't recall
20
saying it, I assume it's true. I can check that.
21
So I assume statement one is true. Statement two,
22
"'The financier had paid for massages, but did not
23
engage in sex or erotic massages with any minors,'
24
the lawyer insisted," I have no recollection of
25
saying that.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615725
605
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
Can we start over and go back to the first
3
statement and finish that whole statement, and then
4
you tell me whether it's true or false?
5
A.
Right.
6
Q.
So the first statement is told the Mail --
7
MR. INDYKE: If you are speaking about the
8
truth or falsity about these statements in any
9
manner to which I have I inserted my
10
objections, I would ask you not to answer the
11
question.
12
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: So in the
13
context of privilege that Mr. Epstein is
14
asserting, can you answer the question any
15
further than you have already?
16
THE WITNESS: Yes. I can.
17
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Go ahead.
18
A.
Our position was that he was innocent of
19
the allegations against him. They did not include
20
any allegations relating to forcible sex, they did
21
not include any of the things that you just read.
22
And our position was, and we stated it to
23
the State Attorney, that he was innocent of those
24
allegations, innocent of those statements.
25
I don't want to ever be held to statements
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615726
606
1
that are not quoted, because particularly the Daily
2
Mail and other newspapers take tremendous liberties
3
with what you say. And therefore --
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
I'm asking are they true or false?
6
A.
Say it again.
7
Q.
Are the statements true or false?
8
A.
Statement one is passed the lie detector
9
test.
10
MR. INDYKE: Objection again.
11
A.
I don't know the answer to that, but I
12
assume if I said it, it was true at the time.
13
Statement two, he was innocent of all the
14
allegations, that was the position that we took as
15
to the two women who had allegation against them.
16
the State Attorney obviously did not credit
17
.'s testimony because he never -- it would be
18
irresponsible for a State Attorney not to bring rape
19
charges against somebody who had done what you
20
allege from that police report had been done.
21
Obviously the State Attorney came to the conclusion
22
that there were real questions about her
23
credibility.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
Q.
Is it true or false?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615727
607
1
A.
The statements are true.
2
Q.
All of them are true?
3
A.
All of these statements, to the extent
4
that I made them, are true.
5
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
6
A.
To the extent that I made these
7
statements, they are true, yes. And you should have
8
been on your guard when you saw that there were no
9
quotes, and you should have checked to see that the
10
one statement that was quoted probably appeared in a
11
legal document. And you should have checked with
12
Churchill to see if I ever spoke with her, because I
13
have absolutely no recollection of speaking with her
14
and I'm fairly confident I did not.
15
MR. EDWARDS: I move to strike the
16
unresponsive aspects of that answer beyond
17
whether they were true or false, which I
18
believe the witness has said the statements are
19
true.
20
A.
That's not --
21
MR. INDYKE: To the extent that the
22
witness was making that statement from
23
privileged information, I move to strike the
24
remainder of it.
25
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: To the extent
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615728
608
1
that -- your motion on the privilege piece is
2
granted to the extent that that's what it's
3
based upon.
4
However, I would say to you that the
5
balance of the statement is in response to your
6
continued questions on it, so I'm going to
7
leave it be. You can be put in context in
8
argument with the Court.
9
MR. INDYKE: Okay. Thank you.
10
BY MR. EDWARDS:
11
Q.
Did you write a letter or communicate to
12
the U.S. Attorney's Office that Mr. Epstein never
13
targeted minors?
14
A.
I have no
15
MR. INDYKE: Same objection as to
16
settlement negotiations.
17
BY MR. EDWARDS:
18
Q.
Is that a true statement that Mr. Epstein
19
never targeted minors?
20
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Let me ask a
21
question about that.
22
Is there a copy of the letter?
23
MR. EDWARDS: Yes.
24
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Is it in the
25
context of the negotiation between -- under the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615729
609
1
context of either Mr. Dershowitz or his team
2
representing Mr. Epstein with the State
3
Attorney's Office?
4
MR. EDWARDS: It is. And I will put on
5
the record something that everyone in this room
6
knows, which is that we have litigated in the
7
context of that case whether or not a privilege
8
extended between the defense attorneys for
9
Mr. Epstein and the government.
10
We had to battle both the government and
11
his defense attorneys on that all the way to
12
the 11th Circuit, and we have an 11th Circuit
13
opinion indicating that there is no such
14
privilege.
15
So to the extent it is being claimed, it
16
was already ruled there is no such privilege by
17
the 11th Circuit.
18
A.
But --
19
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on one
20
second. I'm at a disadvantage because you've
21
lived the case and this is my second day in the
22
case. So what
who was party to the 11th
23
Circuit? Darren, were you involved with that,
24
or were you, Tom?
25
MR. SCOTT: No.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615730
610
1
MR. INDYKE: No, not directly.
2
MR. EDWARDS: Martin Weinberg and Roy
3
Black represented Jeffrey Epstein there. The
4
government, I believe, was represented by
5
in the argument. And we were the
6
other party. And we prevailed by written
7
opinion. I think that it --
8
THE WITNESS: I'm personally delighted if
9
there is no negotiation privilege because the
10
negotiation privilege only has been invoked
11
against me --
12
MR. SCAROLA: There's no question pending.
13
THE WITNESS: Sorry. Sorry.
14
MR. SCAROLA: We move to strike.
15
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I would agree
16
with. Strike that last portion from the
17
witness.
18
If you can share the 11th Circuit opinion,
19
that would be appreciated.
20
MR. EDWARDS: Okay.
21
THE WITNESS: With us, too.
22
MR. SCOTT: I've never seen it.
23
MR. SIMPSON: I'm aware there is one.
24
MR. EDWARDS: Okay. Thank you, Rick.
25
MR. SCOTT: I've never seen or read the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615731
611
1
opinion, that's all I'm telling you.
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
Do you know Gerald Lefcourt?
4
A.
I do.
5
Q.
One of the cases -- when you were
6
outlining the five pieces of litigation, one of the
7
cases was the Crime Victim Rights Act that you
8
outlined?
9
A.
I don't think I included that. That
10
brings it up to seven. Unless you're talking about
11
the case in front of Judge Marra.
12
Q.
I'm going to show you what we'll mark as
13
the next consecutive exhibit, and I don't have a
14
clean copy, but it's okay. We can mark mine.
15
MR. SCOTT: Well, while we're doing that,
16
can we get the exhibits actually marked and
17
make sure we know which is which for the
18
record?
19
(Discussion off the record.)
20
(Thereupon, marked as Plaintiff
21
Exhibit 22.)
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
Can we go to page 13? Can we go to the
24
last page? And is that your signature?
25
A.
No, it's not.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615732
612
1
Q.
On the last page.
2
A.
It is not.
3
Q.
That's not your signature?
4
A.
No.
5
Q.
Who signed your name to this document?
6
A.
I don't know, but I didn't sign it. It's
7
not my signature. It's not even close.
8
Q.
Somebody forged your signature to this
9
document?
10
A.
No, no, I don't know. It's not my
11
signature. You asked me the question is it my
12
signature. It is not my signature. You can check
13
it against hundreds of signatures.
14
Q.
Did you have anything do with the
15
authoring of this letter?
16
A.
My recollection -- I'd have to read the
17
letter -- is that I did some of the legal research.
18
My job was primarily to be the legal research
19
person.
20
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
I'm really just asking about this letter
23
and the authenticity of it.
24
A.
I did not sign this letter.
25
Q.
Did you authorize someone to sign your
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615733
613
1
signature to this letter?
2
A.
I have no recollection. But probably. I
3
can't imagine somebody sending a letter with my name
4
on it that wasn't somehow authorized.
5
Q.
Is that something that you would do is
6
authorize somebody to sign your name to a letter?
7
A.
I'm not responsible for who signed this
8
letter. I did not sign this letter. All I can tell
9
you is I know my signature, and nobody who knows my
10
signature would know this is not my signature.
11
Q.
Okay. You do know Gerald Lefcourt?
12
A.
Yeah. In fact, my name is even spelled
13
wrong, but it's okay. I know Gerald Lefcourt very
14
well, yeah.
15
Q.
Was he authorized to sign your name to the
16
bottom of a letter?
17
A.
I'm sure he must have been. I'm sure I
18
saw a draft of the letter at some point and said,
19
that's okay, or maybe he just assumed he can sign my
20
name because I had done the research, legal
21
research, the III you do of counsel, outside counsel
22
letters --
23
MR. INDYKE: Objection.
24
A.
but I don't have any distinct
25
recollection of this.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615734
614
1
BY MR. EDWARDS:
2
Q.
You agree that the recipient of that
3
letter would believe that that was a letter authored
4
by you, given that it was purported to be your
5
signature at the bottom, wouldn't you agree?
6
A.
A letter that I had some input to. No,
7
not necessarily. The first signature is Lefcourt.
8
I'm senior to him, older than him. Normally if I
9
wrote a letter, my name would come first.
10
Probably what should have been -- probably
11
it should have included my name as of counsel.
12
But -- but, again, I don't have any real
13
recollection of this letter.
14
Q.
If we go to page 13, second paragraph --
15
A.
I don't see pages.
16
MR. SCOTT: Do you need time to review
17
this letter?
18
A.
It's a long, long letter
It would take
19
me over an hour to review it, probably take me an
20
hour to review it. There are no pages. Yours may
21
have pages; mine don't have pages.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
In the top right, it starts "Jeffrey
24
Sloman," if you go down to that --
25
A.
Would you find it for me.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615735
615
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Q.
Sure.
MR. SCOTT: Do you want to review the
letter for few a minutes? Professor, do you
want to review the letter for a few minutes?
THE WITNESS: I see where it is. Let me
first hear the question, and then I might want
to review it. I think it's basically a legal
8
brief, if I recall correctly. Page 13.
9
BY MR. EDWARDS:
10
Q.
Second paragraph.
11
A.
I see it.
12
Q.
Second sentence, "As we believe we
13
persuaded you at the June 26 meeting..."
14
Were you at the June 26 meeting?
15
A.
I don't remember. I've been at several of
16
the meetings, but I can't give you a date. I can go
17
back in my calendars and see if I was at the June 26
18
meeting,
19
Q.
20
wouldn't
21
sentence
22
A.
23
Q.
24
A.
25
Q.
but I don't have a current recollection.
Given the two signatures at the bottom,
a reasonable interpretation of that
be "as we"
Yes.
-- "Alan and Gerald"?
Yes.
Comma, "Mr. Epstein never targeted
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615736
616
1
minors."
2
Do you see that?
3
A.
Yes.
4
Q.
Is that a true statement?
5
A.
That was the position --
6
MR. INDYKE: Objection. Same objection on
7
any privilege, attorney-client, settlement
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
privilege.
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Can I see the
document?
MR. INDYKE: Object and instruct him not
to answer.
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hang on one
second.
THE WITNESS: Do you want to give it to me
16
overnight and we do it tomorrow?
17
MR. SCOTT: He needs to read the letter
18
MR. EDWARDS: To know whether that's a
19
truthful statement?
20
MR. SCOTT: He wants to read the letter
21
before he's examined on it.
22
MR. EDWARDS: He can read the statement
23
I'm going to ask him is that a truthful
24
statement.
25
MR. SCOTT: But he needs to read it in the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615737
617
1
1
context of the whole letter. That's what
2
you're entitled to do. He's entitled to read
3
the exhibits before he answers that.
4
MR. SCAROLA: We'll move on and we'll deal
5
with it tomorrow. He can read it overnight.
6
MR. SCOTT: You seem to be laughing at
7
things I say or smiling at them, and I
8
apologize if you do that, because I'm just
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
trying to protect my client --
MR. EDWARDS: I understand.
MR. SCOTT: -- like you're trying to
protect yours. And I wasn't laughing at you
when we took Mr. Cassell's deposition.
Seriously, I don't understand why you laughed
several times. I don't get it. This is
serious, and nobody is enjoying this.
17
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Okay.
18
THE WITNESS: One laughs, one cries.
19
MR. EDWARDS: I think we're just waiting,
20
right?
21
MR. SCOTT: So he can make a copy
22
overnight and look at it.
23
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: That's fine. I
24
would suggest for purposes of tomorrow that a
25
copy of the letter be sent to counsel that's on
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615738
618
1
the phone, too, so at least he can hear
2
argument around that letter rather than have
3
him be at a disadvantage.
4
MR. EDWARDS: It would have to be sent by
5
them. Jeffrey Epstein is not submitted to the
6
jurisdiction of the Court.
7
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: This is going to
8
be -- my guess is that it's going to be subject
9
to a full further inquiry, so let's just -- you
10
know, we'll skip to it.
11
MR. SCOTT: If I can have copies of the
12
exhibits ahead of time so we can look at them,
13
it would be helpful. We're going to be using
14
them to cross examine him.
15
MR. EDWARDS: I'm sorry, Tom. I will do
16
that. I was not prepared for the fact that
17
Mr. Dershowitz's signature's on the bottom of
18
something and he apparently didn't sign them.
19
I was blindsided, too. I thought this was a
20
letter he would be intimately familiar with
21
because I thought he had authored it. I didn't
22
realize somebody had signed his name to the
23
bottom of it.
24
And that's the cause of my laughter,
25
because I've personally never seen that before.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615739
619
9
10
BY
11
12
13
14
1
I've never seen that happen.
2
MR. SCOTT: I understand, but when you're
3
going to show -- I apologize, Mr. Pozzuoli, but
4
when you're going to show exhibits and ask
5
questions about them, you should anticipate
6
that the witness and his counsel would want to
7
see them. So you should have a copy of them.
8
I think that's basic good rules of a
deposition.
MR. EDWARDS:
Q.
Do you agree that in assessing your
credibility on the subject matter of who was
involved in the abuse of underage girls, that it
would be fair and reasonable to assess the
15
statements that you made during and surrounding that
16
investigation against the available evidence?
17
MR. SCOTT: Objection --
18
A.
If that would be done, every criminal
19
defense lawyer in the country could be charged with
20
rape, with murder, with every other crime that he
21
defends his clients on the basis of.
22
I'm a criminal defense lawyer. I've been
23
teaching criminal defense law, I've been teaching
24
legal ethics in the context of criminal cases for 40
25
years. Lawyers are advocates. They assert
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615740
620
1
positions given to them by clients. And the idea
2
that a lawyer asserts a position and, as a result of
3
that, is guilty of rape is the worst form of
4
McCarthyism imaginable.
5
Q.
So your answer is you don't think it would
6
be fair to put your statements up against the
7
evidence when evaluating your credibility?
8
A.
In the context that you've just stated, it
9
would be utterly unfair, in the context that you
10
have just stated, utterly unfair and unprofessional,
11
and you know better than that. If I were to judge
12
you by the same standards --
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Okay.
14
BY MR. EDWARDS:
15
Q.
Because this case is about an initial
16
allegation of unprofessionalism, I want to
17
investigate that last statement. And let me make
18
sure that I got it correctly. It would be
19
unprofessional of me to assess
or any lawyer to
20
assess your credibility by --
21
MR. SCOTT: Listen to the question.
22
BY MR. EDWARDS:
23
Q.
-- statements that you have made
24
surrounding this particular case against the
25
backdrop of the available evidence that would be
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615741
621
1
unprofessional?
2
A.
Not only would it be unprofessional, it
3
would involve you also to accuse Jerry Lefcourt, to
4
accuse Roy Black, to accuse Ken Starr. All of us
5
stood behind our client's defense, and we were
6
successful. We persuaded the United States
7
Attorney's Office, persuaded the State Attorney's
8
Office of our position.
9
And you're saying that our advocacy and
10
persuasion is evidence that I committed a crime of
11
rape. That that is so unprofessional, so goes
12
against what the legal system is all about. And
13
would basically make it impossible for anybody to
14
defend alleged criminals in any criminal context.
15
Yes.
16
Q.
Can you find a public statement that was
17
made by Roy Black or any of Epstein's other lawyers
18
that says that Jeffrey Epstein was innocent of all
19
charges or never engaged in an erotic massage or sex
20
with minors?
21
A.
Yes, I'm sure that those positions were
22
stated universally by all the lawyers in all the
23
contexts, if they were stated -- I mean those kinds
24
of statements. I'm not saying those statements in
25
specific, because I don't know who made those
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615742
622
1
statements.
2
But defending a client against charges,
3
trying to minimize the charges, are made by all
4
lawyers, and were made by all the lawyers in this
5
case, and have been made by you in cases. I'm sure
6
if I go back, I will find them.
7
Q.
Okay.
8
MR. EDWARDS: I have a document we'll mark
9
as -- what's the next consecutive exhibit?
10
COURT REPORTER: Number 23.
11
(Thereupon, marked as Plaintiff
12
Exhibit 23.)
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Will you mark
14
that as 22 so we don't forget?
15
MR. SIMPSON: Yes.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
Can you look at the document that we've
18
marked as number 23?
19
A.
Yes.
20
Q.
My only question is going to be, did you
21
go to that speaking engagement that was scheduled?
22
MR. INDYKE: I didn't hear the question.
23
This is Darren.
24
MR. EDWARDS: I've shown him a document,
25
and it is a public document about a scheduled
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615743
623
1
speaking engagement for Mr. Dershowitz, and I'm
2
just asking him whether or not he gave that
3
speech.
4
A.
I don't recall that I did.
5
MR. INDYKE: Thank you.
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
Do you recall it being canceled or you not
8
going?
9
A.
I don't recall me doing that speech.
10
Q.
Okay. Do you remember it being scheduled?
11
A.
I remember -- I don't remember
12
specifically, but I remember some general statement
13
that I had some speeches scheduled, yeah.
14
MR. EDWARDS: Do we have an extra copy of
15
the Daily Mail article? I thought we --
16
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The
17
time is approximately 4:26 p.m.
18
(Recess was held from 4:26 p.m. until 4:29 p.m.)
19
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record.
20
The time is approximately 4:29 p.m.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
Are you aware from any nonprivileged
23
document or information that Jeffrey Epstein
24
referred to sex with underage girls as massages,
25
that that was a code word?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615744
624
1
A.
No.
2
Q.
In reviewing the message pads that were
3
taken from his home and the public police report,
4
have you been able to learn that fact?
5
A.
I think it's false. I think it's a false
6
fact. When I was offered a massage at Jeffrey
7
Epstein's house, I received a legitimate massage by
8
a professional masseuse who hurt me. And I called
9
my wife and told her about it. I didn't enjoy it.
10
And I've been told by numerous people that they have
11
gotten ordinary massages, so I don't believe it was
12
a code word. I think that's false.
13
Q.
Who told that you that they got ordinary
14
massages at Jeffrey Epstein's house?
15
A.
People who were guests at the house.
16
Q.
Exactly.
17
MR. INDYKE: I'm sorry?
18
A.
My wife --
19
MR. INDYKE: Can you repeat the question,
20
please.
21
MR. EDWARDS: Yes, I was just asked for
22
the identity of the people who have told
23
Mr. Dershowitz that they have received
24
legitimate massages at Jeffrey Epstein's home.
25
MR. INDYKE: I object to that question and
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615745
625
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
the response to the extent it would invade
privileges that we've already discussed, and
instruct Alan not to answer.
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I think you can
answer it outside the privilege.
A.
Virtually everybody that -- when I was at
Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach, not in
8
New York -- I never heard the word "massage" used in
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
New York, but in Palm Beach, he would offer -- you
would get an offer of massage, and people would
accept it or not. But I never heard massage being
anything other than an ordinary therapeutic massage.
And I think it's insulting to professional massage
therapists to assume that every massage -- I mean,
it was like --
BY MR. EDWARDS:
Q.
Maybe I communicated my question poorly.
I was actually asking for the names of the people
who told you --
A.
I told you my wife, my daughter, myself.
I'll try to think of other names, but I remember
people telling me
Jeffrey Epstein's
Q.
Anybody
that they had received massages at
house.
outside of your immediate family?
A.
Yes, but I'm having trouble remembering
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615746
626
1
specifically who they were.
2
Q.
Okay.
3
MR. INDYKE: Outside of
subject to not
4
privilege, you're saying?
5
A.
Right, yeah.
6
BY MR. EDWARDS:
7
Q.
Do you remember speaking with the Daily
8
Mail on or around January 21, 2015, and saying --
9
Dershowitz said the statements are all lies and "I
10
never got a massage from anybody, it's made up out
11
of whole cloth"?
12
A.
No, I never said.
13
Q.
If I showed you the statement, would it
14
help refresh your recollection?
15
A.
No, because it's false. I never said that
16
I never got a massage because I said immediately
17
from day one that I got one massage. I said that
18
immediately. I described the massage. I might have
19
been asked did I get a massage from
. The answer would be no. Did I get massage
21
during the relevant period of time? The answer
22
would be no.
23
But I never stated, and I would challenge
24
you to come up with -- no, with a tape recording of
25
me saying that in full context because that's not
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615747
627
1
what I said. I've always said that I received one
2
massage.
3
4
5
6
7
Q.
What does the quote say?
8
A.
And, in fact, I said specifically that I
9
kept my underpants on. I was very specific about
10
the massage that it was -- I think it was a woman
11
from a Russian background. I was very clear. So to
12
say that I said that I never got a massage is just
13
false. From day one, I said I got a massage.
14
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: You had another
15
question in the middle that. Go ahead.
16
BY MR. EDWARDS:
17
Q.
Right. What does the quote attributed to
18
you in that article say?
19
MR. SIMPSON: The document hasn't even
20
been marked yet.
21
MR. EDWARDS: What are we up to, 24?
22
(Thereupon, marked as Plaintiff
23
Exhibit 24.)
24
A.
It doesn't show what the question was. It
25
doesn't show the context. And like -- all lies.
I said that, I think, on day one.
And, again, you're dealing with the Daily
Mail. The context would have to be did you get a
massage from any underage girl or anything like
that. I never said that.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615748
628
1
All lies. Obviously I was referring to what
2
said and what
said
3
about me, so that was the "all lies."
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
I'm asking what is the quote about the
6
massages? What are the words that are used?
7
A.
"I never got a massage from anybody, it's
8
made up out of whole cloth." I did not say that.
9
Q.
Okay. So the reporter --
10
A.
Is wrong.
11
Q.
-- is wrong?
12
A.
Who is the reporter? Is it the same
13
Ms. Churchill?
14
So this is an article
you said, again,
15
the Daily Mail. This sounds like it's the Daily
16
News, not the Daily Mail.
17
Q.
Okay.
18
A.
But it's not true. I never said in the
19
context of generally massage. Because why would I
20
say that if I said it on television, I said it on
21
the radio, I've said it over and over again that I
22
got a massage?
23
Q.
You deny making the statement that was
24
attributed to you in the Daily Mail article that's
25
attached to the deposition as Exhibit 24?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615749
629
1
A.
That's right.
2
Q.
Okay. It does say the Daily News.
3
A.
Or -- now, let me be very clear. If I
4
said it, I said it in the context of
5
Q.
Daily News.
6
A.
If I said it, I said it in the context of
7
' massage or a massage during the
8
relevant period because I never would say that I
9
didn't get a massage when I got one, and I always
10
said I did.
11
Go back and check earlier statements,
12
statements before this, and you'll see that I said
13
it. So what sense would it make for me to say that
14
I didn't get it?
15
Q.
So is your testimony that you only had one
16
massage at Mr. Epstein's home?
17
A.
That's -- let me be very clear. I never
18
had a massage in the New York place. I of course
19
never had a massage in the -- in the ranch. I have
20
no recollection of having a massage -- I never had a
21
massage on airplane. And I had one massage in the
22
Palm Beach home.
23
Q.
What year it was that you had the massage
24
in the Palm Beach home?
25
A.
I don't know, but I suspect it was in --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615750
630
1
very early in my friendship or my acquaintanceship
2
with Jeffrey Epstein, probably '96 or '97, but I
3
would be guessing.
4
It was not during the relevant time period
5
because I was not in Jeffrey Epstein's -- my records
6
show I was not in Jeffrey Epstein's home in Palm
7
Beach during the relevant time period, so I couldn't
8
have had a massage during that period.
9
Q.
So is it your testimony, then, that the
10
only massage
we're getting some background from
11
the phone.
12
MR. SIMPSON: On the phone, there's some
13
background.
14
MR. INDYKE: Am I the only one on the
15
phone? This is Darren. Because if I'm not --
16
(Discussion off the record.)
17
BY MR. EDWARDS:
18
Q.
So is your testimony today that at any of
19
Jeffrey Epstein's homes, you have only had one
20
massage, and that was only at the Palm Beach home
21
and it was sometime in the mid to later '90s?
22
A.
No, let me be very clear. I know for
23
absolute certainty I never had a massage in the
24
New York home. I know for absolute certainty I
25
never had a massage in the ranch.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615751
631
1
I do recall having one massage in the Palm
2
Beach home. I do know for certain that I never had
3
a massage in the airplane. And I'm fairly certain I
4
never had a massage at the -- on the island.
5
Q.
And the one massage that you had at the
6
Palm Beach home was sometime early in your
7
relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, '96 or '97
8
approximately?
9
A.
I'm not sure. I'm not sure about that. I
10
just don't remember exactly when it was. But it
11
wasn't -- obviously it was when I was in his house,
12
and the records show that I wasn't in his house
13
during the relevant time period.
14
Q.
Is it your memory, though, that it was in
15
the '90s?
16
A.
I can't remember. It could have been --
17
it could have been later. I know that when my
18
children and grandchildren came to stay at Jeffrey
19
Epstein's house in 2005, I think there was some
20
massages that were -- oh, yeah, I think some of them
21
had massages. I did not --
22
Q.
But --
23
A.
-- is my recollection.
24
Q.
But your massage was many years before
25
that experience in --
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615752
632
1
A.
I think so, but I'm not sure. It could
2
have been later too. I just don't have any distinct
3
chronological frame of reference for when I had a
4
massage, but I do remember it very clearly and I
5
remember that it was painful and I remember that the
6
massage therapist wanted to put her knees on my
7
shoulder, and I called my wife immediately after I
8
had the massage and told her that this therapist
9
wanted to put her knees on my shoulder and I said I
10
wasn't really anxious to have that, because she had
11
hurt me. She was a very deep therapy massage
12
person.
13
Q.
Have you seen Juan Alessi's testimony
14
wherein he indicates that you had massages at
15
Jeffrey Epstein's home?
16
A.
Would you show it to me, please.
17
MR. INDYKE: Same objection and
18
instruction.
19
MR. SCOTT: Didn't we cover this with
20
Mr. Scarola the last time, the massage issue?
21
I could be wrong.
22
THE WITNESS: I was asked about it last
23
time.
24
MR. SCOTT: Last time I think I covered
25
this.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615753
633
1
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Is this the
2
deposition from this matter?
3
MR. EDWARDS: The deposition that was in
4
the civil matters against Jeffrey Epstein, and
5
I think I've bracketed each of the pertinent
6
parts.
7
A.
I don't see him saying more than one
8
massage. It says, "Did he have massages sometimes
9
when he was there?
10
"Yes. A massage was like a treat for
11
everybody. If they wanted, we called the massage
12
and they had a massage."
13
That doesn't sound to me like it's very
14
specific. I was offered massages on numerous
15
occasions by the house staff, and I said no. I did
16
have that one massage. And then you have bracketed
17
material about big dildos. That clearly refers to
18
an area of the house that I was never in, never
19
allowed into. Do you have any other brackets
20
material?
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
Not for this question.
23
A.
So this is not any statement that I had
24
massages or multiple massages, doesn't contradict
25
what I said at all. He's testifying as to the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615754
634
1
general procedure, and he's right, people were
2
offered massages, and they were real massages, the
3
ones that I know about.
4
Q.
Okay. Well --
5
A.
Let me say this. Jeffrey Epstein would
6
never dare to offer me an erotic massage. He would
7
know that I would walk out of that room so fast, I
8
would never speak to him again. He knows about my
9
relationship with my wife. He knows how much I love
10
her. He would never in a million years offer me
11
anything that was in any way improper, and he
12
didn't.
13
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Brad, you have
14
five minutes before Jack smartly wants to get
15
out of here, so if you want to look for an
16
appropriate break.
17
MR. EDWARDS: I'll finish after -- a few
18
more questions on this, and then we're done.
19
BY MR. EDWARDS:
20
Q.
Okay. The question was:
21
"Do you have any recollection of
■
coming to the house when Prince Andrew was
23
there?
24
"ANSWER: It could have been, but I'm not
25
sure."
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615755
635
1
MR. INDYKE: Object --
2
BY MR. EDWARDS:
3
Q.
"QUESTION: When Mr. Dershowitz was
4
visiting
5
"ANSWER: Uh-huh.
6
"QUESTION -- how often did he come?
7
"ANSWER: He came pretty -- pretty often.
8
I would say at least four to five times a year.
9
"QUESTION: And how long would he
10
typically stay?
11
"ANSWER: Two, three days.
12
"QUESTION: Did he have massages sometimes
13
when he was there?
14
"ANSWER: Yes. A massage was like a treat
15
for everyone. If they wanted, we'd call the massage
16
and they have a massage."
17
He does indeed say that you stayed for two
18
or three days at a time and had plural massages,
19
right? That's his testimony.
20
A.
No, he says I stayed for two or three
21
days. He doesn't say I was there with
■
And he says -- first of all, English is
23
not his first language, and he's talking about did
24
you have massages. "Yes, a massage is a treat for
25
everybody."
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615756
636
1
I was offered massages. I had one
2
massage. Just -- I'm trying to think of something
3
else he said. Can I see it again, please?
4
BY MR. EDWARDS:
5
Q.
The whole deposition?
6
A.
Just that part of it.
7
The only time I stayed for -- he's right,
8
I stayed for two or three days with my wife, my
9
daughter-in-law, my son, and two grandchildren and
10
my daughter. We stayed for about five days.
11
Jeffrey Epstein was not in the house at that point
12
in time.
13
He found out we were looking for a
14
vacation place, and he offered his empty house with
15
the housekeeper and his wife, and we stayed there
16
during that period of time.
17
The only other time that I stayed for more
18
than one day was when I was involved in the case
19
with my research assistants. I stayed for two days
20
once with my nephew, Adam, who was coming to watch a
21
launch of the space shuttle. But I have no
22
recollection of ever staying three days alone.
23
There would be no reason I would do that. And I
24
didn't.
25
Q.
While you were staying at the house, did
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615757
637
1
Mr. Epstein have underage girls over to give him
2
massages?
3
A.
Certainly not to my knowledge. If I had
4
seen a single underage girl in that house that
5
looked like she was there for any inappropriate
6
person, I would have been out of there
7
instantaneously. That would not be covered by the
8
lawyer-client privilege. And I would have called
9
the police and turned him in. That's how strongly I
10
feel about sex with underage people, male or female.
11
Q.
Even though these girls were 14, 15, 16
12
years old?
13
A.
I never saw -- not even though.
14
Especially. Of course. A fortiori. I never saw
15
anything like that, not on the airplane, not in the
16
ranch, not on the -- in the island, not in Palm
17
Beach, and not in New York.
18
MR. SCOTT: It's 4:45.
19
A.
He did always travel with an entourage,
20
and he had people in his encourage who looked like
21
they were in their middle 20s. And, of course,
22
Mr. Scarola tried to accuse me of being on an plane
23
with an underage girl who turned out to be 25.
24
BY MR. EDWARDS:
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615758
638
1
Q.
My last question, are you aware -- we can
2
pick back up here off of my last question. Are you
3
aware that another housekeeper, Alfredo Rodriguez,
4
put you in the home at a time when underage girls
5
were also in the home?
6
A.
Would you please show me that? Because
7
your last question was a mischaracterization
8
MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same
9
instruction.
10
A.
-- so let me see this one as well.
11
BY MR. EDWARDS:
12
Q.
Sure. I'll just read it to you.
13
A.
No, just let me see it. You can read it
14
to me. Let me see it.
15
Q.
"And did you have knowledge of" --
16
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: What are you
17
reading from?
18
MR. EDWARDS: Sure. It's the deposition
19
of Alfredo Rodriguez that was taken July 29,
20
2009.
21
BY MR. EDWARDS:
22
Q.
"Was there a lawyer from Harvard named
23
Alan Dershowitz?
24
"Yes, ma'am.
25
"How often during the six months or so
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615759
639
1
when you were there was Alan Dershowitz there?"
2
A.
What were the six months, by the III?
3
Q.
I don't know. We'll find out from his
4
employment with Jeffrey Epstein. Your client would
5
know.
6
"Two or three times.
7
"How did you have knowledge of why he was
10
11
12
friend?
13
14
15
at the time he was there?
16
17
18
instance,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
8
visiting a -- and did you have knowledge of why he
9
was visiting?
"No, ma'am.
"Was he acting as a lawyer or there as a
"ANSWER: I believe a friend.
"Were there also young ladies in the house
"ANSWER: Yes, ma'am.
"And would those
and
have included, for
"Yes, ma'am.
"Were there other young ladies there when
Mr. Dershowitz was there?
"Yes, ma'am.
"Do you have any idea who those young
women were?
"No, ma'am.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615760
640
1
"Were any of those young women that you
2
have said came to give massages?
3
"Yes, ma'am."
4
"Ms. Esell, who was representing
at the time, asked you about Mr. Dershowitz
6
being present in Mr. Epstein's home, and I think she
7
said -- and I think you said Mr. Epstein was -- and
8
he and Mr. Dershowitz were friends?
9
"ANSWER: Yes.
10
"She also, I think, asked was
11
Mr. Dershowitz ever there when one of the women who
12
gave a massage was present in the home.
13
"ANSWER: I don't remember that.
14
"QUESTION: That's what I want to clear
15
up. Is it your testimony that Mr. Dershowitz was
16
there when any of the women came to Mr. Epstein's
17
home to give a massage?
18
"ANSWER: Yes.
19
"QUESTION: And when Mr. Dershowitz was at
20
the house, I understood you to say that these local
21
Palm Beach girls would come over to the house while
22
he was there, but you're not sure if he had a
23
massage from any of the girls.
24
"ANSWER: Exactly.
25
"QUESTION: And what would he do while the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615761
641
1
girls were in the house?
2
"He would read a book, glass of wine by
3
the pool or stay inside."
4
So my question is, are you aware that
5
Alfredo Rodriguez put you in Jeffrey Epstein's home
6
when the underage girls were coming to his home to
7
give massage?
8
A.
Absolutely not.
9
MR. SIMPSON: Object to the form and
10
mischaracterizing and taking multiple separate
11
sections of a deposition and multiple different
12
pages read as though they were together.
13
Object to the form.
14
A.
I'll answer. He talks about young
15
ladies --
16
MR. SWEDER: I'm going to object to that,
17
too. This is Mr. Sweder. That is a misleading
18
reading of that deposition, leaving out a very
19
particular part of it --
20
MR. EDWARDS: Okay. The whole
21
deposition --
22
MR. SWEDER: -- that says that he didn't
23
know whether Dershowitz ever even saw these
24
young women.
25
MR. SCOTT: We covered this all in the
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615762
642
1
last depo.
2
A.
I never saw an underage person in Jeffrey
3
Epstein's house. I saw
, who is a young
4
woman. I saw Giselle [sic] Maxwell, who is a young
5
woman. I saw women in their late 20s and 30s.
6
I never had a massage from any of these
7
young women. There's no mention of underage in the
8
entire deposition. And you again willfully and
9
deliberately misstated what you said the deposition
10
said, just like you misstated the deposition of
11
Mr. Rodriguez.
12
Q.
Okay. The deposition will speak for
13
itself whether or not there's any mention of
14
underage women in the deposition.
15
A.
Will you again point to met to the
16
underage? Point me to the word "underage" in that
17
deposition.
18
Q.
I understand your statement that there is
19
not one.
20
A.
There is not one, okay. I'm glad we have
21
that acknowledgment.
22
Q.
I didn't acknowledge that. It's just not
23
true.
24
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Is there any
25
other questions at this point?
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615763
643
1
MR. EDWARDS: This is a good breaking
2
point.
3
VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The
4
time is approximately 4:49 p.m.
5
SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: We're
6
reconvening 9:00 tomorrow?
7
MR. EDWARDS: Yes.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615764
644
I, the undersigned authority, certify
that ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ personally appeared
before me and was duly sworn on the 12th day of
January, 2016.
Signed this 14th day of January, 2016.
0 t a ( :4
•
,..
6
g
4
?-44c144,4/
.
Notary Public, State of Florida
My Commission No. FF 226848
Expires: 7/12/2019
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615765
645
I, KIMBERLY FONTALVO, Registered
Professional Reporter, do hereby certify that I
was authorized to and did stenographically report
the foregoing videotape continued deposition of
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ; pages 462 through 455; that a
review of the transcript was requested; and that
the transcript is a true record of my
stenographic notes.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am not a
relative, employee, attorney, or counsel of any
of the parties, nor am I a relative or employee
of any of the parties' attorneys or counsel
connected with the action, nor am I financially
interested in the action.
Dated this 14th day of January, 2016.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615766
646
January 14, 2016
10111111111111
Re: Bradley Edwards, et al., v. Alan M. Dershowitz
Please take notice that on the 12th day of January,
2016, you gave your deposition in the above cause.
At that time, you did not waive your signature.
The above-addressed attorney has ordered a copy of
this transcript and will make arrangements with you
to read their copy. Please execute the Errata
Sheet, which can be found at the back of the
transcript, and have it returned to us for
distribution to all parties.
If you do not read and sign the deposition within a
reasonable amount of time, the original, which has
already been forwarded to the ordering attorney, may
be filed with the Clerk of the Court.
If you wish to waive your signature now, please sign
your name in the blank at the bottom of this letter
and return to the address listed below.
Very truly yours,
J101111.
I do hereby waive my signature.
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615767
647
ERRATA SHEET
In Re: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ET AL., V. ALAN M.
DERSHOWITZ
Case No.:
January 12, 2016
PAGE
LINE
CHANGE
REASON
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have
read the foregoing document and that the facts
stated in it are true.
Date
www.phi sre orting.com
EFTA00615768
1
484:18 589:10
591:5
accusation (2)
502:7
actresses (1)
551:16
554:10
ago (4)
521:19 522:8
airplanes (1)
570:20
airport (1)
A
474:12 548:19
actual (2)
559:4,15
503:9
accuse (4)
495:1 565:10
agree (17)
al (2)
621:3,4,4
ad (1)
475:19 480:2
646:5 647:3
637:22
579:21
484:20 499:12
Alan (21)
5 accused (14)
Adam (1)
501:2 558:6
462:7,11 493:5
465:17 490:24
636:20
562:16 564:15
579:24 587:17
533:21 551:14
add (1)
566:5 570:22
588:10 591:25
551:17,18
497:6
571:19 579:4
592:4,9 602:4
a 1 ay
560:8 561:18
added (1)
604:5 610:15
615:23 625:3
497:21
565:4 566:19
589:1
614:2,5 619:11
638:23 639:1
able (4)
598:16 601:8
additional (1)
agreed (1)
644:9 645:10
521:18,19
602:4 603:20
528:22
500:19
646:5,22 647:3
568:11 624:4
accusers (1)
address (1)
agreement (37)
647:4,25
above-address... 593:8
646:15
467:16,17,19,22 Alan's (1)
646:8
accusing (1)
Administrator...
467:23 468:3,6 492:5
absolute (4)
543:13
462:21
468:7,10,14
Alburquerque...
497:10 542:14
acknowledge (... admonislunen...
474:19 495:1
465:21
630:23,24
642:22
493:5
501:4,14
Alessi's (1)
absolutely (14)
acknowledgin... advocacy (1)
523:24 524:23
632:13
470:16 472:19
578:8,9
621:9
524:24 525:4,7 Alfredo (7)
484:25 493:15
acknowledgm... advocates (1)
525:15,22
546:10 549:25
494:23 539:19
642:21
619:25
526:11,12,17
550:23 551:3
551:6,6 568:12 acquaintances... affidavit (7)
526:22 527:4
638:3,19 641:5
577:17 594:9
536:4 537:1
533:21 572:14
527:15,17,19
allegation (16)
595:17 607:13
acquaintances...
573:1,4,9,13
527:21 528:7,7
491:23 493:22
641:8
630:1
573:21
528:8,12,25
494:4,5,14
abuse (3)
act (4)
affiliated (1)
532:24 596:24
510:13 523:25
486:17 580:22
530:8 535:6,11
547:16
ahead (13)
534:21 552:16
619:13
611:7
Africa (2)
466:6 504:8
552:17,18
abused (2)
acting (1)
513:13 518:20
511:3 512:15
571:18 583:9
486:15,20
639:11
afternoon (1)
531:16 563:8
601:23 606:15
academics (1)
action (3)
519:1
571:6 579:21
620:16
573:17
603:19 645:18
age (20)
581:22 582:23
allegations (33)
accept (1)
645:19
471:14 482:12
605:17 618:12
516:7 523:9,19
625:11
actions (2)
482:13,13,15
627:15
524:9,19 525:8
acceptable (1)
523:25 524:1
482:24 483:2,5 airplane (16)
531:8 535:20
571:20
activities (1)
484:13 488:7,8 471:3,9,13
538:20 548:6
account (2)
590:1
489:15,19
474:1 482:23
548:10,14
562:15 571:22
activity (4)
502:21 529:24
487:1 504:24
559:12 567:3,4
accounts (3)
479:4 484:16
530:7,9 533:13
505:19,21
569:24 579:1,6
518:19 521:16
551:4 552:21
535:4 591:18
506:6 555:2
579:7,10,12
572:5
actors (2)
agent (1)
569:11 570:12
584:19,21
accurate (3)
550:3 551:16
5 ;-t:18
629:21 631:3
585:13,18
actress (1)
agents (1)
637:15
586:24 589:24
www.phi
s
rting.com
EFTA00615769
2
589:24 591:20
478:21 479:14
640:9,13,18,24 appreciated (1)
571:18 602:10
605:19,20,24
479:16,20,21
641:14
610:19
ascertain (1)
606:14
480:12,13
answered (9)
appropriate (2)
473:16
allege (1)
481:1 482:18
473:1 477:21
480:1 634:16
ascertained (1)
606:20
483:16,24,25
501:15 503:20
approximate (2) 483:18
alleged (6)
484:4 485:12
530:18 543:19
538:10,13
Ashe (2)
465:22 531:8
485:24 486:2
549:12 592:12
approximatel...
572:7,8
580:17,19
487:25 488:2
604:13
466:2 529:8,11
Asia (1)
590:2 621:14
489:9 490:22
answering (5)
546:7 581:3,6
518:21
allegedly (1)
491:11 492:5,7
517:25 546:16
623:17,20
asked (33)
473:5
492:10 493:25
550:8 565:11
631:8 643:4
473:1 477:18
alleging (1)
495:22,23
572:17
April (6)
484:5 495:19
593:18
498:1,8 502:11 answers (4)
560:7 567:14
496:10 501:15
alloted (1)
504:2 510:24
479:16 480:9
574:20 577:10
512:10 514:22
480:18
512:8,14 513:9
603:2 617:3
598:13,22
519:24 522:10
allowed (2)
515:20 518:13
anticipate (1)
area (1)
527:1 530:18
555:8 633:19
518:22 523:12
619:5
633:18
543:19 549:12
amend (2)
523:20 526:7
anxious (2)
argument (4)
554:4,11,22,22
581:15,21
526:20 527:5
506:6 632:10
466:18 608:8
554:23,24
American (2)
527:11 528:3
anybody (9)
610:5 618:2
556:23 564:24
573:16,17
528:21 531:25
541:21 542:2
argumentativ...
568:15 569:18
amount (1)
533:14,17
549:20 592:23
484:8 487:25
586:21 592:8
646:12
534:2,6,15
601:4 621:13
521:3 539:6
604:13 612:11
and-- (2)
535:25 536:9
625:24 626:10
564:18 599:9
624:21 626:19
463:13,17
537:25 540:11
628:7
602:20
632:22 640:5
Andrew (35)
541:19 543:10
apologize (7)
arguments (1)
640:10
465:24 519:14
544:24,24,25
466:7 478:3
604:3
asking (28)
519:20,22
545:21 549:9
527:6 585:8
arisen (1)
487:10 497:19
520:19 521:12
552:1 562:21
597:19 617:8
525:9
498:2 499:19
529:21 530:9
563:19 564:21
619:3
arm's (1)
516:12 518:1
530:13,15,24
567:23 568:14
apologized (1)
588:5
523:15 533:11
531:2,5,8,11
568:18,20
598:4
arrangements...
540:17 550:7
531:21,22
577:25 581:16
apparently (4)
646:9
551:24 555:12
532:11,21,23
581:21 582:3
568:22 573:25
arrest (1)
557:18 559:14
533:12 534:11
583:23 590:11
579:2 618:18
546:10
561:13 564:6
534:15,18
591:10 593:15
APPEARAN...
arrested (1)
568:20 581:17
535:12,20
594:15 596:10
463:1 464:1
572:12
581:24 590:25
536:4,11,21,25
596:12,13,14
appeared (2)
article (17)
591:7 594:7,21
537:14 538:1,6
599:11 600:10
607:10 644:9
465:16,22 522:7
606:5 612:22
538:19 634:22
600:11 603:2
appears (1)
559:18,18
623:2 625:18
Andrew's (4)
605:10,14
479:3
577:10 578:22
628:5
465:16 533:7,9
606:11 607:16
applied (1)
578:25 600:4
aspect (1)
534:1
616:12 620:5
489:4
600:21 602:15
492:22
answer (118)
625:3,5 626:20 apply (1)
603:4,7 623:15 aspects (1)
471:6,24,25
626:21 634:24
545:18
627:18 628:14
607:16
474:3 476:11
635:5,7,11,14
appreciate (1)
628:24
assert (4)
477:10.16.21
639:13.16
480:10
articles (2)
467:17 527:25
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615770
3
576:6 619:25
asserted (2)
484:13
attempted (3)
598:15
attributing (1)
487:11,18
491:3 515:17
B
B (2)
494:4 594:3
539:23 540:5,11
578:14
465:18 566:2
533:17,20
asserting (3)
attempting (1)
audiences (1)
back (24)
545:21 547:3
576:11 593:24
478:16
573:24
466:1467:4
555:16 563:9
605:14
attending (1)
August (4)
470:25 485:6
565:7 567:24
assertion (2)
590:14
482:8 490:6
493:9 512:13
568:9 602:10
467:19 478:11
attorney (21)
512:20,22
529:10,13
603:6,10 608:3
asserts (1)
464:14 465:19
authenticity (1)
530:17 537:12
basic (1)
620:2
466:19,23
612:23
546:6 557:11
619:8
assess (3)
467:2,5 495:12 authored (2)
557:24 564:4
basically (3)
619:14 620:19
561:22 572:11
614:3 618:21
581:5 587:6
514:22 615:7
620:20
579:11 587:15
authoring (1)
598:11 605:2
621:13
assessing (4)
587:24 590:15
612:15
615:17 622:6
basis (11)
564:12,13
593:1 605:23
authority (1)
623:19 629:11
497:25 521:16
574:16 619:11
606:16,18,21
644:8
638:2 646:10
524:5,5 565:13
assist (4)
645:15 646:8
authorize (2)
backdrop (1)
575:12,18
474:6,10 475:4
646:13
612:25 613:6
620:25
581:19 582:1
491:12
attorney's (17)
authorized (5)
background (5)
593:11 619:21
assistant (2)
466:23 476:21
578:6,7 613:4
468:9 555:22
bathroom (1)
465:19 589:21
495:7 496:14
613:15 645:8
627:11 630:10
504:24
assistants (1)
497:25 498:20
available (11)
630:13
battle (1)
636:19
583:16 584:2,3 469:14 566:8
balance (1)
609:10
associated (1)
589:7 592:10
567:17 571:24
608:5
Beach (19)
513:19
595:22 602:18
574:21 575:13
Band (17)
463:4,5 539:18
assume (9)
608:12 609:3
576:19 598:12
547:7,11,14,16
544:8 569:13
506:23 510:18
621:7,7
601:12 619:16
547:18 548:11
570:11 582:7
553:22,23
attorney-clien...
620:25
548:13,18,23
589:22 625:7,9
566:2 604:20
471:17 472:10
Ave (1)
549:7,17
629:22,24
604:21 606:12
479:7 483:14
464:4
553:17,24
630:7,20 631:2
625:14
507:3 550:9
await (1)
554:1,4,12,14
631:6 637:17
assumed (4)
571:12 579:20
596:15
Bands (1)
640:21 646:20
563:12 585:25
579:24 582:2
aware (31)
465:14
bed (2)
602:11 613:19
590:7 616:7
472:6 491:17,22 Bar (I)
597:12,25
Assuming (1)
attorneys (10)
491:25 492:3
469:21
bedroom (1)
487:17
475:18 495:5
492:11,14,19
barely (1)
473:7
assumption (1)
496:14 562:11
493:19,22,24
555:10
began (5)
566:5
564:9 571:21
494:4,13,14
bargain (1)
514:11 516:4,6
Atlanta (2)
574:19 609:8
496:12 501:5
494:21
557:5 597:13
505:25,25
609:11 645:17
517:16 518:22
BARNHART ... beginning (5)
attach (1)
attribute (1)
523:2 533:3,19 463:4
472:2 489:10
572:23
600:13
562:17,25
base (1)
514:10 567:5
attached (2)
attributed (7)
564:10 595:24
537:24
570:13
520:3 628:25
598:12 600:5,16
596:4 610:23
based (22)
begins (2)
attack (1)
602:2 604:12
623:22 638:1,3 471:6 478:25
489:3 593:4
591:4
627:17 628:24
641:4
479:9,21 486:3 behalf (10)
attained (1)
attributes (1)
463:2.8 464:3.7
www.phi 11 orting.com
EFTA00615771
4
468:5 476:23
566:7 575:15
592:2 593:13
behavior (1)
514:7 515:7,10
516:14 517:7
517:14 518:10
518:14 545:5,7
boat (1)
504:16
Bob (4)
491:14 493:3,20
breaking (1)
643:1
brief (1)
615:8
637:8
calling (2)
566:2 585:1
canceled (1)
492:18
547:3,6,10,16
493:21
briefing (1)
623:7
believe (33)
547:19,20
body (1)
597:5
capacity (1)
466:22 469:2
548:5,9 549:3
549:4
bring (1)
566:24
470:5 480:6
549:8,10,18
BOLES (1)
606:18
card (1)
491:18 508:19
550:1 553:1,11
464:8
brings (1)
531:6
510:6 511:1
553:17,20,22
Boise (1)
611:10
Carolina (1)
514:23 520:2
554:8,14,19
510:2
British (2)
504:23
526:18,19
555:1,14,19
book (1)
535:7 560:19
Caroline (2)
533:18,22
574:1
641:2
broad (1)
504:23 514:21
534:14 542:14
billionaire (1)
borrowed (2)
566:10
Carve (1)
549:24 556:20
465:16
505:22,22
brought (1)
472:11
570:5 574:24
birthday (6)
Boston (1)
589:13
case (46)
577:15 584:15
482:7 489:5
463:15
BROWARD (3)
462:2 467:2,8
585:16,19
522:17,18,19
bottom (6)
462:1 644:5
473:20,21,23
592:10 593:12
522:21
613:16 614:5
645:4
476:25 491:19
599:2 607:18
birthdays (1)
615:19 618:17
Brunel (1)
492:23 493:1,3
610:4 614:3
493:10
618:23 646:15
511:5
494:12,16
615:12 624:11
bit (3)
bought (3)
Building (1)
498:22 500:19
639:13
466:22 469:11
506:7,7 595:8
646:19
524:21,24,25
believed (5)
47 :1
Boulevard (3)
bunch (1)
526:18 537:20
569:23 570:15
(1)
463:4,10 646:3
568:10
546:9,21
584:23 585:14
502:7
bound (1)
burden (2)
550:18 552:2
589:9
Black (4)
527:16
485:13,15
563:1,14,17
belongs (1)
495:14 610:3
boyfriend (1)
businessmen (1)
564:12 566:11
466:19
621:4,17
486:9
573:17
567:9576:20
bench (1)
Blackmun (1)
bracketed (2)
584:14 586:20
C
469:21
566:16
633:5,16
587:10 590:24
CACE (1)
best (6)
blaming (10)
brackets (1)
592:24 601:24
475:5,9,9
560:10 561:20
633:19
462:2
609:7,21,22
522:25 530:5
565:5,16 575:8 Brad (1)
calendars (1)
611:11 620:15
591:12
598:17 599:5
634:13
615:17
620:24 622:5
better (3)
599:21 602:6
Bradley (3)
call (9)
636:18 647:4
536:17 589:4
603:8
462:4 646:5
533:9 538:24
eases (11)
620:11
blank (1)
647:3
539:2,4 557:6
537:21 546:21
beyond (3)
646:15
bragged (1)
562:13 564:13
586:7,21
475:12 523:6
blessing (1)
595:8
585:15 635:15
589:22,25
607:16
571:6
break (12)
called (14)
591:15 611:5,7
big (1)
blindsided (1)
518:25 519:4,8
543:12 548:5
619:24 622:5
633:17
618:19
528:24 529:6
557:7 562:23
Cassell (9)
bill (43)
blogs (1)
546:2 556:11
564:24 566:11
462:4 557:9
465:23 506:5
574:7
580:24,24
566:12 568:6,8
567:13 571:20
511:22 512:2,5 Blvd (1)
581:1,21
568:16 624:8
574:18 576:8
513:218.21
464:8
634:16
632:7 633:11
584:20 585:13
mmw.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615772
5
589:15
Cassell's (1)
617:13
601:15 619:19
charges (8)
546:11 561:18
551:1 552:14
552:18
Circuit (7)
629:17 630:22
640:14
clearly (5)
555:1,14,19
574:2
Clinton's (2)
categorical (3)
595:23 601:18
462:1,1 609:12
484:17 593:21
550:1 553:17
497:9 542:13
606:19 621:19
609:12,17,23
593:24 632:4
close (3)
553:5
622:2,3
610:18
633:17
489:5 577:7
categorically (... charitable (2)
circumstances... Clerk (1)
612:7
473:9 486:5
517:13,20
539:8,9 543:5
646:13
closer (1)
505:14 551:6
Charleston (3)
city (1)
client (34)
466:12
554:7 569:5,8
504:22 505:20
569:15
466:20,25 467:3 closet (1)
569:10,12,14
505:25
civil (4)
467:5,7 468:5
539:17
602:7
cheat (1)
523:17,25 586:7
472:7 473:15
cloth (2)
cause (2)
500:2
633:4
473:17 474:9
626:11 628:8
618:24 646:7
cheek (8)
claim (1)
499:9 541:1
CLR (4)
causes (1)
495:1 505:9
486:6
551:17 566:7,9 462:20 644:15
485:7
526:18 538:17
claimed (4)
566:13,14,19
645:22 646:18
Centre (2)
599:23 604:20
491:18 601:3,4
575:14,19
Co-counsel (1)
463:9 646:2
612:12 629:11
609:15
576:11,13
584:16
certain (3)
checked (3)
claiming (2)
577:3 578:7,23 co-defendants...
546:22 631:2,3
565:2 607:9,11
540:18,21
580:10 587:25
584:13,16
certainly (5)
checking (1)
claims (1)
589:25 590:2
code (5)
469:12 486:14
574:25
572:13
591:13,21
503:9,14 543:25
556:20 570:15
children (1)
clarification (4)
617:9 622:2
623:25 624:12
637:3
631:18
489:16 552:5,6
639:4
coerced (1)
certainty (2)
choice (1)
558:6
client's (4)
489:2
630:23,24
488:25
clarified (1)
466:22 472:21
Coffey (1)
Certificate (4)
chose (1)
526:5
576:12 621:5
585:22
465:7,7 644:1
500:21
clarify (1)
clients (4)
COLE (2)
645:1
Christmas (3)
466:5
575:16 576:6
463:9 646:2
certify (3)
505:7,7 531:6
class (4)
619:21 620:1
combination (2)
644:8 645:7,14
Christmastim...
488:4 519:22
clients' (1)
528:6 567:25
cetera (2)
505:7
538:2,8
566:23
come (5)
500:21 507:10
chronological... classic (1)
Clinton (44)
574:3 614:9
challenge (1)
632:3
541:23
465:23 511:22
626:24 635:6
626:23
Churchhill (1)
classroom (2)
512:2,5 513:2
640:21
challenging (2)
578:12
488:12 530:24
513:18,21
comes (7)
594:5,8
Churchill (3)
classrooms (2)
514:7,22 515:7
560:24,24
chance (1)
600:1 607:12
530:17,23
515:10 516:15
568:24 577:7
528:18
628:13
clean (1)
517:7,14
599:22,23
change (3)
circled (13)
611:14
518:11,15
600:23
489:10 586:5
545:5,6,6,8
cleaner (1)
545:6,7 547:3
coming (3)
647:7
546:22,24
524:13
547:6,11,16,19
634:22 636:20
CHANGES (1)
549:25 550:2
clear (11)
547:20 548:5,9
641:6
647:2
552:10,20
466:21 474:20
549:3,8,10,18
Comma (1)
character (1)
553:10 556:3,8
512:20 524:18
553:1,11,19,20
615:25
589:8
circles (6)
545:10 597:20
553:22 554:5,8 comment (6)
charged (2)
545:2 550:16.17
627:11 629:3
554:15,17.19
480:11 512:3
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615773
6
547:4 548:9
549:24 602:2
comments (2)
477:9 601:22
commerce (1)
484:14
Commission (1)
472:5 475:12
570:6
Composite (1)
469:5
compound (1)
564:17
computer (3)
564:16
consistent (1)
500:21
constitute (3)
477:19 488:17
488:20
constitutes (1)
contradict (1)
633:24
contradicts (1)
576:15
control (1)
570:21
conversation (5)
507:17 525:24
588:13 594:4
613:21,21
614:11 617:25
619:6 645:15
645:17
count (1)
644:16
477:4 544:16
488:12
515:4 548:17
596:18
committed (4)
583:18
constructed (1)
553:25 600:19
counties (1)
484:22,23
computers (2)
603:5
600:20
589:23
535:11 621:10
476:6,24
contact (4)
conversations ... countries (1)
common (24)
conclusion (1)
569:9,11,13
509:16 523:15
573:15
471:5,17 472:10
606:21
570:10
575:18,20
country (3)
483:14 507:4
conclusively (5)
contacted (2)
convey (1)
573:16 595:16
524:22,24
474:16,16
531:5 538:19
592:9
619:19
525:7,22
506:17 570:8,9 contain (1)
convince (1)
County (4)
526:10,12,17
conduct (4)
541:14
584:2
462:1 589:22
526:22 527:3
488:9 489:2
contained (1)
copies (5)
644:5 645:4
527:14,16,19
551:15 576:24
476:7
499:8,12,20
couple (1)
527:21 528:12
conducted (1)
contend (1)
539:16 618:11
466:5
550:11 555:16
544:7
525:9
copy (17)
couple-minute...
571:12 582:2
confident (1)
contest (2)
469:7,7,13
519:4
596:24
607:14
495:3 500:20
499:7,14 553:2 course (9)
communicate ... confidentialit...
context (21)
556:10,11
473:18 479:5
608:11
467:24
551:25 559:14
573:7 608:22
536:15 541:18
communicate...
confines (1)
594:20 602:8
611:14 617:21
577:2 584:12
533:6 534:19
492:9
603:17 605:13
617:25 619:7
629:18 637:14
625:17
confirm (1)
608:7,25 609:1
623:14 646:8,9
637:21
communicatio... 593:2
609:7 617:1
Corali (1)
court (14)
510:4 540:17,19 confront (1)
619:24 620:8,9 583:9
462:1 465:24
541:6,9
499:21
621:14 626:25
correct (16)
500:25 561:23
communicatio... connected (1)
627:4,25
482:4 483:5,20
576:4,4,5,5
467:4 468:3,5
645:18
628:19 629:4,6
491:15 498:20
599:22,24
comparable (1)
connection (5)
contexts (1)
503:15 516:11
608:8 618:6
520:12
494:12 536:14
621:23
522:1 523:3,7
622:10 646:13
comparative (1)
540:13 571:7
contextual (1)
526:6,6,8
courthouse (1)
591:14
588:13
504:3
536:22 549:22
566:18
compensation ... consecutive (2)
continue (2)
562:3
courtroom (2)
493:2
611:13 622:9
467:10 604:6
corrected (1)
566:17 585:20
Complaint (6)
consent (4)
continued (6)
466:11
cover (1)
493:19,22 494:3
482:14 488:7,8
462:10 464:1
correctly (2)
632:19
567:4,7,8
530:7
589:3 598:1
615:8 620:18
covered (4)
Complaints (1)
consequence (1)
608:6 645:9
corresponden...
593:21 632:24
491:22
527:22
continues (1)
499:17
637:7 641:25
complete (2)
consider (2)
566:17
counsel (15)
covers (2)
470:14 495:23
497:23 498:6
continuum (1)
469:4 478:13
468:17 525:10
completely (3)
consideration ...
515:23
481:13 499:12
crafted (1)
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615774
7
497:23
created (1)
496:13
credibility (20)
470:25 562:12
562:14 564:14
564:14 574:17
615:18
curtain (1)
504:25
cut (1)
531:13
cutoff (1)
489:14
dated (2)
465:18 645:20
dates (3)
481:9 482:5
503:7
daughter (6)
503:21 504:14
December (1)
503:5
decision (1)
568:25
decisions (1)
579:25
declare (1)
deliberately (2)
563:5 642:9
delighted (1)
610:8
demonstrate (5)
473:11 480:22
485:14 498:3
574:17,22
504:19 506:8
647:22
578:11
-D--
576:10 579:14
625:20 636:10
deep (1)
demonstrative...
584:10 591:4
D (2)
daughter-inl...
632:11
506:17
591:16 592:12
636:9
defamation (8)
denials (1)
602:18 603:24
Dave (1)
523:5,17 524:1
523:9
606:23 619:12
507:7
524:10,11,21
denied (3)
620:7,20
a e an
)
David (2)
567:8 603:19
534:16,22 535:2
credible (1)
463:9,10 646:2
510:2 548:12
defend (1)
DENNEY (1)
584:4
646:3
Dawson (2)
621:14
463:3
credit (4)
Daily (35)
582:13,15
defendant (5)
deny (4)
506:2 535:17
465:16 560:18
day (15)
462:8 463:8
486:5 600:3
601:15 606:16
560:19,19,20
473:9 499:19
491:23 492:15
602:7 628:23
cries (1)
560:21,22,24
504:14,20
584:11
denying (1)
617:18
561:1,9,14
557:5 566:11
defending (2)
534:20
crime (9)
566:2,3 574:25
609:21 626:17
568:24 622:2
departing (1)
484:12,21,23
577:10 578:2,4
627:2,13
defends (1)
503:9
485:2,16,17
578:5,10
636:18 644:10
619:21
department (4)
611:7 619:20
598:13 599:25
644:12 645:20
defense (27)
544:8 582:7
621:10
600:4,4,13
646:6
467:15,17,22,23
583:7 593:14
crimes (9)
604:12 606:1
days (8)
468:3,7,10,14
depends (1)
560:10 561:20
623:15 626:7
521:19 635:11
523:24 524:19
566:11
565:6 575:8
627:3 628:15
635:18,21
527:14 532:24
depo (5)
598:18 599:5
628:15,16,24
636:8,10,19,22
561:22 566:15
473:2 499:5
599:21 602:6
629:2,5
DC (1)
566:16 571:13
543:20 545:13
603:8
dare (1)
463:19
576:3 588:1
642:1
criminal (17)
634:6
deal (5)
592:23,25
deposition (38)
485:8 498:21
Darren (10)
560:3 588:7
596:24 609:8
462:10 468:24
543:17,18
464:4,5 466:3
589:4 591:13
609:11 619:19
469:1 481:7
566:15,16
470:9 476:16
617:4
619:22,23
499:9 516:3
576:3 584:9,11
531:17 541:2
dealing (7)
621:5
520:3 562:19
584:12 588:1
609:23 622:23
576:18 579:14
defenses (1)
567:6 572:24
591:22 619:18
630:15
579:14 601:17
579:13
577:22 580:14
619:22,23,24
data (1)
601:18,21
defined (2)
580:15 586:7
621:14
591:14
627:3
512:18 516:10
586:12,25
criminals (1)
date (9)
deals (3)
defining (1)
587:2,14
621:14
505:2 513:15
537:4 596:19,22
491:12
594:20 617:13
cross (1)
516:7 522:25
dealt (1)
definitely (1)
619:9 628:25
618:14
530:4 538:10
601:22
592:19
633:2,3 636:5
current (3)
559:15 615:16
death (1)
definition (2)
638:18 641:11
543:11 578:2
647:25
522:8
486:12 558:3
641:18.21
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615775
8
642:8,9,10,12
642:14,17
645:9646:7,12
depositions (2)
479:14
details (2)
465:24468:9
Detective (12)
466:21
disbelieved (1)
572:10
disclose (1)
465:14,20
544:14 546:23
547:1 550:13
550:16,17,23
547:11
draft (4)
500:11,23,23
613:18
499:5 586:20
582:13,15 586:6
575:15
550:24 551:22
draw (1)
derive (1)
586:25 587:1
disclosed (3)
551:23 552:4,7
498:7
563:17
587:14 589:6
467:6 469:3
552:21 553:4
dress (3)
Dershowitz (51)
590:15 591:3
546:20
556:4 560:2
509:4,13 510:11
462:7,11 465:21
591:25 592:8
disclosure (4)
585:22 587:4
drilling (1)
467:11,13
592:15
467:18,21
599:22,24
518:12
468:13,13,16
detector (6)
468:12 544:20
600:24 601:7
dug (1)
468:23 469:15
565:18,19,20
discontinue (1)
601:11 607:11
506:9
478:17,19
575:10 604:19
478:10
612:5,9 616:10 duly (1)
479:8,13
606:8
discovery (4)
622:8,17,24,25 644:10
511:17 524:8
determination... 471:7 546:20
623:23 627:19
E
525:21 526:15
506:22
550:14,18
647:22
E (3)
526:16 536:13
determine (1)
discredit (4)
dociunentatio...
537:17 540:2
473:16
580:19 592:2,6
569:5,18,19
464:8 465:1
541:5 550:7
determining (1)
593:5
570:1,2,5,7,24
552:9 587:17
574:22
discretion (1)
572:9 591:17
592:1,4 597:22
494:24
591:18
602:4 609:1
discuss (2)
documents (3)
earlier (5)
623:1 624:23
different (6)
538:19 581:20
546:9 583:6
468:24 484:2
626:9 635:3
488:14 568:4
discussed (2)
586:23
543:20 573:24
638:23 639:1
576:18 592:25
519:24 625:2
doing (5)
629:11
639:21 640:5,8
599:3 641:11
discussing (3)
514:23 517:13
early (5)
640:11,15,19
difficult (3)
577:9 579:24
581:15 611:15
482:3 486:15
641:23 644:9
478:7 580:20
593:6
623:9
587:15 630:1
645:10 646:5
588:6
discussion (4)
dollars (1)
631:6
646:22 647:3,4 difficulty (3)
488:12 509:17
598:5
earn (1)
647:25
466:9,10 589:16
611:19 630:16
Donald (3)
486:7
Dershowitz's (7) dildos (1)
discussions (1)
517:22 545:5
easy (3)
469:1 477:8
633:17
585:6
551:14
538:23,23 539:3
545:19 551:25
dinner (10)
displayed (1)
door (1)
Ed (1)
563:18 571:8
504:17 506:9
542:3
510:25
514:21
618:17
514:20,25,25
disprove (1)
doubt (3)
Edward (1)
describe (1)
517:4 519:23
513:21
475:12 555:24
464:13
564:5
538:3 548:3
distinct (3)
587:5
Edwards (301)
described (5)
554:8
561:24 613:24
Doug (17)
462:4 469:24
505:17 506:13
directly (7)
632:2
465:15 547:7,14
470:16,20,24
554:8 601:6
509:21 572:18
distinction (1)
547:16,18
471:11,21
626:18
574:4596:20
489:12
548:11,13,18
472:15,24
describing (2)
597:9 599:16
distinguished ...
548:23 549:7
473:14,22
496:15 505:3
610:1
483:3 587:23
549:17 553:17
474:5,24
description (1)
disadvantage ... distribution (1)
553:24,25
475:14 476:1
589:10
609:20618:3
646:11
554:4,12,14
476:12,20
desire (1)
disagree (1)
document (36)
Douglas (1)
480:19.20
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615776
9
481:6,17
537:11 538:5
608:17,23
encounters (1)
Epstein (135)
483:15,23
539:1,7,14,22
609:4 610:2,20
543:25
464:3 467:9
484:11 485:5
540:4,10,16,23
610:24 611:2
encourage (1)
471:10 473:5
485:18 486:1
541:2,4,11
611:22 612:21
637:20
473:24 474:21
486:22 487:5
542:4,9,20
614:1,22 615:9 enforcement (5)
478:18 479:8
487:10,15
543:4,15,23
616:18,22
539:24 540:7,18
481:20 482:23
488:19 489:23
544:5,13,20
617:10,19
540:19 541:7
483:9,20 484:7
490:4,9,14,15
545:3 546:8,18
618:4,15
engage (4)
485:21 486:16
491:1,4,13
547:13 548:4
619:10 620:14
484:15 489:2
487:20 489:11
492:13,24
549:6,16
620:22 622:8
492:17 604:23
490:11 491:19
493:8,18 494:2
550:21 551:10
622:16,24
engaged (7)
491:23 492:15
494:9 495:4,18
551:20 552:13
623:6,14,21
490:16 557:12
493:10 494:5
496:8,20 497:2
552:24 553:8
624:21 625:16
558:1,21
494:10,15
497:11,18
553:15 555:11
626:6 627:16
565:23 577:13
495:6,13
498:13,18
556:1,10,13,22
627:21 628:4
621:19
496:23 497:8
499:15,20
557:3,17
630:17 633:3
engagement (2)
497:22 498:5
500:1,5,13
558:11,18
633:21 634:17
622:21 623:1
500:19502:6
501:1,8,20,25
559:1,10,24
634:19 635:2
engages (1)
504:5,7,12,22
502:4,14,20
560:6 561:4,5
636:4 637:24
488:9
505:6,10,21
503:2,23 504:9
561:12 562:10
638:11,18,21
England (1)
508:23 509:4
505:15 507:1,5
563:11 564:2,8
641:20 643:1,7 530:10
510:10 511:22
508:3,5,12,21
566:4 567:1,10
646:5 647:3
English (1)
513:1,18,22
509:2,10 510:8
567:11 568:3
effect (1)
635:22
514:7 515:7,9
510:23 511:4
568:19 571:16
524:23
enjoy (1)
516:4,13 517:6
511:12,20
572:16,23
efficiency (1)
624:9
517:21 518:10
512:7,12,16
573:22 574:11
480:16
enjoying (2)
518:15 519:15
513:7 514:4,5
574:15 576:21
eight (1)
489:6 617:16
519:24,25
514:16 515:2
577:20 578:24
505:5
enormous (1)
522:3,11,11,15
515:14 516:1
579:3 580:16
Eighty-three (1) 488:24
522:19,25
516:22 517:10
581:7 582:6
482:9
ENTER (1)
526:4,9 527:13
517:19 518:7
583:5,24
either (3)
647:2
530:22 535:19
519:7,11,12
584:18 585:9
513:19 514:2
entire (5)
536:15 537:13
520:1,7,9,17
585:11 586:18
609:1
467:2 578:20,20
537:20 538:4
521:8,13
587:12 588:8
element (1)
587:4 642:8
540:14 541:20
522:13 523:14
588:15,21
485:17
entirety (1)
542:6,22
523:23 524:8
589:5 590:12
elicited (1)
511:2
545:20 548:1
524:12,17
591:24 594:8
603:11
entitled (4)
548:24 549:8
525:1,6,13
594:12,24
else's (1)
475:8 576:6
549:11 550:5
527:2,18 528:9
595:6,13,20
495:25
617:2,2
550:11 551:5
528:23 529:3,6
596:3,11
EMERSON (2)
entourage (1)
554:20 557:10
529:12,19
597:10,16,23
463:11 646:4
637:19
557:12,24,25
530:1,21 531:3
598:10 599:1
employee (2)
entranceway (1)
558:5,21
531:19 532:3,9
600:2,9 601:10
645:15,16
541:23
559:12 560:8
532:18 533:4
602:1 603:1,16 employment (1) entry (5)
561:16 563:18
533:24 534:9
604:10 605:1
639:4
465:14 547:10
565:4 568:21
535:8,18 536:2
606:4,24
empty (1)
547:11 549:24
571:8 578:25
536:8,16
607:15 608:10
636:14
553:21
583:4 586:8
www.phi 11 orting.com
EFTA00615777
10
588:17 590:6
593:13 595:8
561:16 577:13
604:23 621:19
exactly (6)
500:14 569:3,22
619:4
exist (2)
563:16 570:25
572:2 582:3
596:21,23
634:6
624:16 631:10
473:16 566:8
593:15 594:15
597:11 598:2,3 Errata (3)
640:24
existence (1)
607:3,6,21,25
598:16 599:3
465:8 646:9
examination (2)
525:8
608:2 609:15
601:5 602:5
647:1
465:3 600:8
exists (2)
625:1
604:18 605:13
Esell (1)
examine (1)
474:23 541:9
extra (1)
608:12,18
640:4
618:14
exonerate (3)
623:14
609:2,9 610:3
Especially (1)
examined (1)
473:17 477:12
F
615:25 618:5
637:14
616:21
506:18
fabricated (1)
621:18 623:23
ESQ (8)
example (1)
exonerates (1)
630:2 631:7
463:5,11,12,15
518:5
570:6
585:13
633:4 634:5
463:19 464:5,9 exception (1)
experience (2)
fabricating (1)
636:11 637:1
646:4
467:3
555:17 631:25
584:21
639:4 640:7
establish (3)
exceptions (1)
expert (3)
face (1)
Epstein's (62)
556:20 578:21
569:2
569:1,1,2
575:5
471:3,13 472:8
578:23
exchanged (3)
Expires (1)
fact (10)
473:25 475:3
et (4)
475:16,17 583:7
644:17
486:19 506:16
475:17 476:3,5
500:21 507:10
exculpate (1)
explain (2)
577:4 592:8
476:7,23
646:5 647:3
472:4
524:5 591:11
600:18 613:12
480:23 481:19
ethics (1)
exculpatory (1)
explained (1)
618:16 624:4,6
482:23 486:25
619:24
571:3
595:1
627:8
496:14 497:24
evaluating (1)
excuse (2)
explaining (1)
factor (1)
502:16 503:18
620:7
486:19 566:21
486:24
489:20
504:17 505:3
events (2)
execute (1)
exploited (1)
factors (3)
505:19 508:7
495:12,13
646:9
492:18
489:19,21
508:14 511:14
everybody (4)
executed (2)
explosive (1)
567:25
512:3 517:15
601:13 625:6
476:3,5
465:24
facts (8)
517:23 522:23
633:11 635:25
execution (1)
express (1)
492:25 545:17
527:13 539:18
evidence (32)
465:8
566:23
563:14,17
540:7 541:5,14 471:9 473:16
exhibit (25)
expresses (1)
565:10,14
543:25 544:9
475:3,11,16,20
468:25 469:5,16
477:16
597:4 647:22
544:16 554:5
475:23 491:3
469:23,25
expressing (1)
failed (1)
554:15,18
497:20 498:7
470:6 481:5,7
479:14
585:15
556:15 569:6
500:8 533:19
481:8 500:7,15 extend (1)
fair (9)
570:21 588:13
562:15 566:8
503:3 545:24
526:19
566:5,6 567:12
592:2,22 594:4
566:12 567:17
547:9 552:22
extended (1)
574:16,23,24
621:17 624:7
569:22 570:16
553:7,14
609:8
589:9 619:14
624:14,24
571:23 572:7,8
561:11 581:9
extent (29)
620:6
625:7,23
574:21 575:12
611:13,21
468:11 469:3
fairly (2)
629:16 630:5,6
576:14,17
622:9,12
474:23 477:20
607:14 631:3
630:19 631:19
584:9 603:23
627:23 628:25
477:24 478:15
fairness (2)
632:15 640:6
604:1 619:16
exhibits (10)
492:5 509:15
573:11 597:2
640:16 641:5
620:7,25
465:10 499:6,8
536:12 537:8
fall (1)
642:3
621:10
499:11,20
537:23 542:12
485:8
erotic (8)
exact (1)
545:16 611:16
544:18 545:15
false (26)
557:13 558:1.22
516:7
617:3 618:12
545:19 557:15
473:12.12.13
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615778
11
474:12,17
480:24 510:19
551:13 562:2
563:14 566:3
485:2,13,16
543:18 546:11
feel (1)
637:10
599:15 605:2,6
614:7,9 615:6
635:22,23
fit (1)
Fontalvo (5)
462:20 644:15
645:6,22
646:18
636:13 646:10
foundation (1)
552:8
four (3)
577:4 591:18
female (1)
486:12
forced (1)
570:14 596:18
592:14,18
637:10
five (6)
489:1
635:8
604:12 605:4
FF (1)
570:14 602:21
forcible (9)
fourth (1)
606:5,7,25
644:16
611:6 634:14
560:9 561:19
481:25
607:17 624:5,5 fifth (1)
635:8 636:10
565:4 598:16
fraction (1)
624:12 626:15
481:25
five-minute (1)
601:23 602:5,8
507:6
627:13
figure (1)
580:24
602:10 605:20
frame (1)
falsely (1)
580:25
Fl (1)
forcibly (3)
632:3
533:21
file (1)
464:4
598:1 599:3
framed (1)
falsity (3)
467:2
flag (1)
601:5
487:14
482:21 498:4
filed (6)
600:15
foregoing (2)
frankly (2)
605:8
527:23 585:2,19 flew (6)
645:9 647:22
564:18 585:7
familiar (11)
586:21 604:4
482:14 504:15
forged (1)
free (4)
500:17 502:13
646:13
504:22 522:18
612:8
486:8 487:19
520:10,11
filing (1)
555:15,19
forget (1)
488:10 575:14
543:13,16
465:24
FLEXNER (1)
622:14
Freudian (1)
545:1 546:23
financially (1)
464:8
form (8)
584:17
576:25 586:3
645:18
flight (18)
487:24 497:25
friend (4)
618:20
financier (2)
481:3,9,18
587:18 599:6
465:16 582:16
family (3)
577:12 604:22
484:20 485:8
600:7 620:3
639:12,13
504:18 595:9
find (9)
503:3 505:16
641:9,13
friends (10)
625:24
515:1 556:5
505:18,18,19
former (2)
486:4 487:18
famous (1)
563:4 571:5,6
506:11,16,20
465:23 555:7
522:22 536:3
518:21
614:25 621:16
507:8,9,20
Fort (2)
542:6,10,13,15
far (3)
622:6 639:3
549:21 570:19
462:18 464:9
542:23 640:8
504:19 551:22
fine (1)
flights (3)
forth (3)
friendship (1)
552:1
617:23
481:15 483:9
467:4 585:3
630:1
fashion (1)
finish (5)
507:7
589:13
front (4)
568:2
478:2 504:2
Florida (10)
fortiori (1)
484:21 597:8,9
fast (1)
540:3 605:3
462:1,18 463:5
637:14
611:11
634:7
634:17
463:10 464:9
Forum (1)
full (6)
father's (1)
finished (1)
644:4,16 645:3 646:19
468:9 480:6
522:7
597:20
646:3,20
forward (12)
506:20 510:18
favorable (3)
fired (1)
flown (6)
479:11 486:21
618:9 626:25
477:12,22
572:12
471:2,13 480:23
502:3 507:21
fuller (1)
479:17
first (23)
554:9 555:1,15
510:7 511:3
597:5
FBI (3)
465:18 466:7
fly (5)
512:10 518:4
further (9)
501:22 550:24
481:21 491:11
471:9 505:24
520:15 565:12
496:11 558:6
551:3
491:11 493:21
506:3,5 555:9
571:15 580:14
583:21 602:23
February (1)
498:17 499:1
focused (1)
forwarded (2)
603:14 604:6
481:12
516:6 522:15
552:2
465:8 646:13
605:15 618:9
federal (8)
543:6,11 572:1 folks (1)
found (4)
645:14
484:12,21.23
576:16.23
466:9
568:15.17
future (1)
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615779
12
499:5
522:23
gifts (1)
493:6 504:8
511:3 512:13
good (8)
519:6,8 587:22
573:11 585:5
G
522:21
512:15 525:19
588:7 594:10
G (1)
girl (11)
531:16 532:15
600:20 619:8
462:4
465:17 502:6
536:17 554:12
643:1
541:15 560:8
559:25 563:8
goodwill (1)
half (1)
561:18 565:4
564:4 567:3
513:14
489:22
gained (1)
598:16 602:4
571:6,6 579:21 gotten (2)
hand (1)
472:13
627:5 637:4,23
581:14,22
604:8 624:11
600:4
Gallagher (1)
girls (22)
582:12,23
government (3)
hands (4)
464:15
490:17,25
583:21 588:11
609:9,10610:4
475:16,17,17,18
gather (1)
491:18,24
603:14 605:2
Grail (1)
Hang (9)
589:22
492:17 493:11
605:17 611:23
544:15
469:10 478:1,22
general (7)
539:16 541:13
611:23 614:14
grand (2)
504:1 521:6
464:14 478:25
542:6,22 554:9
614:24 615:16
476:22,24
563:21 573:5
518:1 591:19
589:8 592:11
622:6,21
grandchildren...
609:19 616:13
592:5 623:12
619:13 623:24
627:15 629:11
541:25 631:18
happen (2)
634:1
637:1,11 638:4 goes (2)
636:9
477:9 619: I
generally (1)
640:21,23
485:6 621:11
grant (2)
happened (4)
628:19
641:1,6
going (63)
515:22 562:8
529:25 576:14
generated (1)
Giselle (1)
466:1 470:25
granted (1)
589:3 592:19
577:22
642:4
472:17 493:9
608:2
happy (4)
generic (1)
give (22)
498:15,23
green (1)
469:6 544:25
480:7
470:8 471:23,24
499:6,10 500:8 481:16
586:2 597:6
Gerald (5)
477:11,16
509:14,19,20
grounds (1)
hard (2)
465:18 611:3
485:12 486:3
509:22,23
586:11
515:15 589:17
613:11,13
487:17 488:4
512:11,13
Guadalupe (6)
Harvard (4)
615:23
497:20 503:7
515:21 528:2
504:15,21
519:23 538:3,8
getting (6)
553:2 572:15
528:20 529:7
505:20 506:1,4
638:22
474:10 504:14
581:8 593:10
529:10,13
506:6
Hawking (1)
579:19 588:7
602:17 615:16
546:3,6 547:2
guard (1)
574:1
594:12 630:10
616:15 637:1
556:3 559:25
607:8
head (2)
Ghislaine (35)
640:2,17 641:7
560:1,17 561:3 guess (4)
489:8 597:25
508:22 509:4
given (7)
562:7 563:7
467:15 499:1
headed (1)
510:11 519:21
537:10 548:9
565:3 578:11
599:11 618:8
499:24
521:24 522:12
563:13 590:1
580:8,9,11,21
guessing (1)
hear (10)
523:1,8,16,18
614:4 615:19
580:25 581:2,5 630:3
466:13 491:6
524:1,9,11,14
620:1
581:8,11
guests (1)
531:17 543:6
524:19 525:3
giving (4)
582:12,17
624:15
578:24 593:25
525:23 526:2,4 497:8 562:20,21
587:24 593:3
guilty (3)
597:6 615:6
526:13,22
591:14
593:23 597:17
530:10 579:12
618:1 622:22
527:4,15 536:3 glad (1)
608:6 611:12
620:3
heard (4)
536:10,18,25
642:20
616:23 618:7,8 gung-ho (3)
502:12 543:11
537:15 539:2,4 glass (1)
618:13 619:3,4
587:16,24 588:3
625:8,11
555:2,15,20
641:2
622:20 623:8
guy (3)
hearing (6)
556:15,23
go (37)
623:16,19
531:13 549:4,19
466:9,10 585:6
gift (1)
466:6 470:15
641:16 643:3
guys (2)
589:16.18
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615780
13
597:8
hearings (1)
641:5,6
homes (5)
538:21 562:4
562:21,21,24
513:21 626:16
626:18 632:7
590:22
incorrect (1)
495:11
472:8,22 474:1
563:9,22 564:3 immigration (1)
470:7
held (6)
541:20 630:19
564:5,7 565:12
595:23
incredible (2)
529:9 546:5
honest (1)
565:13 567:3
impact (1)
585:15 593:22
581:4 597:25
489:8
hypothetically... 603:13
incriminate (1)
605:25 623:18
Honor (1)
562:1 563:12
implication (2)
473:17
helicopter (5)
567:21
564:9 565:14
479:18,19
independently...
554:11 555:2,9
hop (1)
565:22
implies (2)
522:9 552:12,15
555:19 570:21
563:22
479:15 575:19
indicate (4)
I
helicopters (1)
hope (9)
imply (4)
481:8,18 482:21
idea (19)
507:10
472:3,5 473:3,3
477:20,25
577:2
help (5)
473:6,7,8
471:15,19,20,23
478:16,17
indicated (4)
498:15 507:8
474:4 587:22
496:24 497:7
important (1)
483:10 516:3
560:12 598:19
hoping (1)
501:13 503:16
489:4
553:10,13
626:14
571:5
506:12,14
imposes (1)
indicates (3)
helpful (3)
hour (4)
508:9 529:16
485:13
484:21 535:10
514:3 558:17
519:3,3 614:19
530:14 535:21
impossible (1)
632:14
618:13
614:20
544:2 549:23
621:13
indicating (4)
highlighted (2)
hours (4)
577:25 620:1
impression (4)
484:2 551:3
560:15 598:15
505:21,23,24
639:23
592:13,14,19,20
567:15 609:13
highly (1)
580:9
identified (1)
improper (7)
indication (1)
491:21
house (26)
469:16
467:1 478:10
535:13
history (3)
476:3 542:1,1
identifies (1)
479:18,20
indirect (1)
572:10,11 599:4
548:2 592:11
469:4
551:15 600:8
477:10
hold (2)
592:22 624:7
identify (1)
634:11
individual (2)
531:15 580:19
624:14,15
575:4
improperly (1)
484:13,15
holding (1)
625:7,23
identity (2)
584:23
individuals (1)
476:23
631:11,12,19
580:21 624:22
inaccuracies (1)
526:1
Hollywood (3)
633:15,18
IDs (1)
575:2
Indyke (199)
502:7 550:3
634:22 636:11
579:18
inadvertent (1)
464:4,5 466:3,3
551:15
636:14,25
II (2)
478:8
466:7,18 469:8
Holy (1)
637:4 639:14
463:9 646:2
inappropriate...
470:11 471:4
544:15
640:20,21
illegal (2)
541:25 637:5
471:16 472:9
home (31)
641:1 642:3
551:4 552:20
include (4)
472:23 474:2
475:3 476:7
housekeeper (2) illicit (1)
469:13 567:4
474:20 475:7
486:10 503:18
636:15 638:3
485:14
605:19,21
475:22 476:10
508:7 514:20
hundreds (2)
images (1)
included (14)
476:15 477:2
517:15,23
590:3 612:13
476:7
469:5,15,23,25
477:24 478:3
539:18 540:7
hurt (2)
imaginable (1)
470:6 495:14
478:15 483:13
541:14 542:2
624:8 632:11
620:4
581:10 591:14
483:21 484:9
544:9 624:3,24 hypothetical (... imagine (3)
591:15,16
485:1,3,10,22
629:16,22,24
487:10,12,18,21
472:1 555:7
592:5 611:9
487:3,8 489:16
630:6,20,24
487:22 488:3,4
613:3
614:11 639:17
490:18 492:4
631:2,6 632:15
488:18 489:9
immediate (1)
including (6)
492:20 493:5
638:4,5 640:6
489:17,21
625:24
476:8 567:17,25
493:13 494:7
640:12.17
490:3.5.6.13
immediately (4)
575:13 590:17
494:17 495:9
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615781
14
496:6,16,25
499:3 501:6,16
587:8,20
588:10,19,24
initial (2)
591:9 620:15
540:22 596:15
instructing (1)
632:18 638:9
instructions (8)
502:9,18
589:14,19
initially (2)
531:24
484:10 485:23
506:24 507:3
590:4,10 593:9
493:20 584:19
instruction (97)
487:4 490:19
507:13,22
593:19 594:2
innocence (2)
477:3 483:22
511:25 529:18
508:10,16,25
594:14 595:4
576:6,12
485:4,11 487:9
529:23 555:6
509:6 511:8,16
595:11,18
innocent (10)
490:21,22
instructs (1)
511:24 513:5
596:1,7 597:14
559:12 561:17
492:21 493:14
478:18
514:12 515:11
597:19 598:8
566:14,14
493:16 494:8
insulting (1)
516:16 517:8
598:24 599:7
579:1 605:18
494:18 496:7
625:13
517:17 518:17
601:9,19
605:23,24
496:17 497:1
intellectual (1)
519:16 522:5
602:22 604:15
606:13 621:18
501:7,17
522:23
523:10,21
605:7 606:10
input (1)
502:10,19
intend (1)
524:3,15,22
607:5,21 608:9
614:6
507:14508:11
499:21
525:11 526:6,9
608:15 610:1
inquiry (3)
508:17 509:1,7 intent (1)
526:16 527:6
612:20 613:23
473:19 477:15
511:9,17 513:6
484:14
527:24 528:15
616:6,11
618:9
514:13 515:12
interactions (1)
529:1,17,22
622:22 623:5
inserted (1)
516:17 517:9
588:12
531:13,18
624:17,19,25
605:9
517:18518:18
interest (20)
532:1 533:1,15
626:3 630:14
insertion (1)
519:17 522:6
471:5,18 472:10
534:3,23
632:17 635:1
479:19
523:11,22
483:14 524:22
535:14,22
638:8
inside (3)
524:16 525:12
524:24 525:7
536:6,12 537:2 inexperienced...
598:1,3 641:3
527:9 528:1,16
525:22 526:10
537:16 539:5
554:10
insinuating (1)
529:2 532:2
526:12,17,22
539:12,20
inference (1)
590:20
533:2,16 534:4
527:3,14,19,21
540:3,8,13
478:24
insist (2)
534:24 535:15
528:12 550:11
541:3,8,16
influence (1)
557:11,25
535:23 536:7
571:12 596:24
542:7,19,25
492:16
insisted (1)
537:3,17
interested (1)
543:8,21 544:3 information (...
604:24
539:13,21
645:19
544:11,17
471:22472:13
instance (1)
540:9 541:17
interesting (3)
545:15546:13
474:22475:15
639:18
542:8543:1,9
488:11,18
546:16 547:22
479:3,4 480:21 instantaneous...
543:22 544:4
522:21
549:1,13 550:4
482:21 486:3
637:7
544:12,18
interests (2)
550:7,15,20
497:20 498:3
instruct (17)
546:14 547:23
507:4 582:2
551:8 552:5
509:20 512:1
467:11 468:15
549:2,14 551:9 internal (1)
555:5 556:17
513:8,10 514:7
468:15 474:3
556:18 557:2
579:25
557:1,14,20
514:17,19
476:10 477:23
557:15,21
interpretation...
559:8 563:16
519:19 533:25
492:6 528:20
559:9 567:20
615:20
563:24 565:9
535:10 536:13
572:4 580:6
576:1 577:19
interrupt (2)
567:19 571:7
537:24 545:21
582:3 583:23
583:1 586:17
552:6 590:4
572:2 575:25
547:24 549:15
590:10 593:15
587:11,21
interruption (1)
577:18 579:16
552:10 569:20
594:14 616:11
588:20,25
478:8
579:19,23
570:18 571:3
625:3
589:15 595:5
interstate (1)
580:5 581:17
573:19 583:22
instructed (8)
595:12,19
484:14
581:24 582:25
583:25 584:1
478:10 479:13
596:2,8 597:15 interview (5)
583:23 584:7
604:7 607:23
480:13 483:25
598:9,25 599:8
578:2,3,5,8
586:9131 6
623:23
485:24 540:10
602:22 604:16
600:13
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615782
15
interviews (1)
486:4
intimately (1)
606:18
island (22)
502:16,23,23,25
495:15
Jean-Luc (1)
511:5
544:16 548:1
548:24 549:8
549:11 551:5
545:11 546:19
547:3
journalist (1)
618:20
504:6,11,17
Jeffrey (155)
554:5,15,17,20
600:20
introduced (2)
505:3,12,13
464:3 465:18
556:15 557:10 JR (2)
519:14 537:14
506:8 512:3,6
471:3,10,13
557:11,24,25
463:11 646:4
invade (5)
554:5,15,18,22
472:8 473:5,24
558:5,20
jsx@searcyla...
467:13 468:14
555:16 569:6
473:25 475:3
561:16 568:21
463:6
492:6 572:3
570:9 631:4
475:17 476:3,5
569:6 570:20
Juan (1)
625:1
637:16
476:6,23
578:25 583:4
632:13
invades (3)
Islands (5)
480:23 481:19
592:22 599:3
judge (7)
582:4 593:16
482:17 503:14
481:20 482:22
601:5 604:18
509:17,21
594:15
503:17,19
482:23 483:9
610:3 614:23
585:20 596:16
invading (1)
504:16
483:20 484:7
618:5 621:18
597:9 611:11
590:7
issue (6)
485:20 486:25
623:23 624:6
620:11
investigate (1)
472:12 476:21
487:20 489:11
624:14,24
judge's (1)
620:17
515:24 596:20
493:10 494:4
625:7,23 630:2
596:15
investigation (8)
596:22 632:20
494:10,15
630:5,6,19
judged (1)
496:15 543:18
issues (1)
495:6,13
631:7,18
576:10
543:18 585:18
596:18
496:13,22
632:15 633:4
judgment (1)
586:24 587:16
items (2)
497:8,22,24
634:5 636:11
604:4
603:21 619:16
545:16,18
498:5 502:6,16
639:4 641:5
JUDICIAL (1)
investigative (1)
503:18 504:5,6
642:2
462:1
J
585:3
504:12,17,22
Jerry (2)
July (2)
investigators (2)
505:3,6,10,19
495:17 621:3
465:18 638:19
476:22 583:9
505:20,21
Joanne (1)
jump (1)
invitation (1)
506:2 508:7,14
572:8
546:16
548:2
508:23 509:3
job (6)
June (3)
inviting (1)
510:10 511:13
491:20 572:12
615:13,14,17
538:2
Jack (4)
511:22 512:3
584:9 587:23
jurisdiction (2)
invoked (1)
463:5 469:11,19
513:1,18,22
587:25 612:18
500:20 618:6
610:10
634:14
514:7,22,24
joint (19)
jury (2)
involve (4)
January (29)
515:7,9 516:4
465:13 467:15
476:22,24
524:1 579:8
462:15 481:10
516:12 517:6
467:17,22,23
justice (2)
580:10621:3
481:11,11
517:14,20,23
468:2,6,10,14
546:11566:15
involved (13)
490:1 503:4,8
518:10,15
496:12 497:3
justified (1)
492:22,25 493:2
524:14 525:9
519:14,24,25
497:23 498:6
575:20
493:4,4 523:2
527:23 528:13
522:3,11,11,15
523:24 524:18
justify (1)
531:23 551:4
529:4,5 531:4
522:19,23,24
527:14 532:23
575:23
552:20 592:24
531:22 532:11
526:4,17
571:12 596:23
juxtaposed (1)
609:23 619:13
532:21 548:21
527:13,13
Josefsberg (4)
602:9
636:18
548:22 585:2
530:22 535:19
491:14 493:3,20 juxtaposition ...
involving (1)
585:20 586:22
536:14 537:13
493:21
571.23 574:21
589:23
626:8 644:11
538:4 539:17
Josephsburg (1)
K
irrelevant (1)
644:12 645:20
540:7 541:5,14 496:5
K (3)
587:19
646:1,6 647:5
541:20 542:22
journal (5)
irresponsible (... Jay (1)
543:25 544:8
544:16 545: II
463:18 464:4,5
mmw.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615783
16
MI
Ken (2)
495:14 621:4
Kendall (2)
548:12 585:22
Kennedy (1)
514:21
Kenneth (2)
463:15 495:8
kept (1)
627:9
Kimberly (5)
514:10 516:12
518:13 520:2
521:14,21,25
522:3 525:21
528:14,21,21
531:12 532:19
533:5,10,13
534:14,25
536:5 538:12
538:15,24
539:8 541:12
542:13 545:7
545:24 547:12
known (2)
491:16 547:21
knows (6)
581:17,25 609:6
613:9 634:8,9
ksweder@swe...
463:16
540:7,18,19
541:6 577:5
584:9 597:5
619:23
lawsuit (2)
548:7,15
lawsuits (1)
527:22
lawyer (27)
468:4 510:3,17
527:13 539:25
540:22,25
548:12 564:23
leaving (2)
489:7 641:18
led (4)
486:17 514:23
539:9 585:4
Lee (1)
610:5
leeway (1)
593:10
Lefcourt (7)
465:18 495:17
611:3 613:11
613:13 614:7
I
ladies (3)
639:14,20
641:15
lady (5)
462:20 644:15
547:14,18,20
521:12,14
566:1,15
621:3
645:6,22
549:9 550:4
522:10 537:10
569:25 577:3
Lefkowitz (1)
646:18
552:9,12,14,16
578:21
584:12 585:22
495:15
kind (6)
552:17,19
laid (2)
588:1 589:1,4
left (4)
517:20 541:23
555:12,13,14
499:23 563:10
591:22 600:17
473:6 504:20
544:19 588:11
555:14,16,19
Lakes (1)
604:24 619:19
506:10 520:19
603:17 604:5
555:23 562:22
463:4
619:22 620:2
legal (12)
kinds (5)
565:6 566:12
landing (1)
620:19 638:22
476:5 495:24
488:24 542:3
576:4,16 578:9
503:12
639:11
499:16 541:6
572:9 590:1
581:12 583:2
language (1)
lawyer's (1)
600:24 607:11
621:23
583:18,21
635:23
566:16
612:17,18
KISSANE (2)
586:3 591:23
Larry (2)
lawyer-client (...
613:20 615:7
463:9 646:2
595:14 603:10
507:8,9
568:1 569:1
619:24 621:12
knees (2)
606:11 611:3
Las (1 )
583:20 637:8
legitimate (4)
632:6,9
611:17 612:6
464:8
lawyers (14)
484:6 485:7
knew (7)
612:10 613:9
late (1)
495:20 497:24
624:7,24
473:12,12,13
613:10,11,13
642:5
532:13 533:10
length (1)
504:7 517:12
616:18 618:10
Lauderdale (2)
562:22 575:15
588:5
562:23 565:8
620:11 621:25
462:18 464:9
576:2,3,7
Leslie (9)
know (116)
629:25 630:22
laughed (1)
619:25 621:17
509:13 510:2,14
466:13 470:8
630:24 631:2
617:14
621:22 622:4,4
510:17 522:16
472:20 474:16
631:17 634:3,7 laughing (2)
leading (1)
522:19,20,20
475:11 478:6,8
639:3,5 641:23 617:6,12
573:23
522:23
482:25 483:8
knowingly (2)
laughs (1)
Learjet (6)
let's (16)
484:2 489:7
484:12 577:4
617:18
505:22,22,23,23
466:17 468:19
491:8,14 497:7 knowledge (17)
laughter (1)
506:3,15
489:24 493:6
497:10 498:10
533:23 542:16
618:24
learn (1)
510:7 512:20
498:11 499:23
542:17,22
launch (1)
624:4
518:3 551:19
500:3 501:22
544:10 554:16
636:21
learned (3)
551:24 552:2
502:24 505:4
555:4 556:19
law (17)
473:20,24
553:6 559:19
506:22 509:12
562:5 563:14
484:19 485:13
575:22
568:4 573:6
511:5,13 513:4
563:17 572:6
488:3,18
leave (4)
577:8 618:9
513:12,13,14
604:17 637:3
519:23 535:7
486:9 487:19
letter (47)
513:17 514:6
638:15 639:7.8
538:3.8 539:24
488:10 608:7
465:8.13.18
www.phi 11 orting.com
EFTA00615784
17
496:13 497:3
497:23 498:6
498:12,14,17
498:23 500:12
500:14 538:1,7
538:11,14,16
608:11,22
612:15,17,22
612:24 613:1,3
613:6,8,8,16
613:18 614:3,3
614:6,9,13,17
523:6
limited (1)
558:14
line (5)
578:20 599:10
602:24 603:13
647:7
lines (2)
471:14 487:20
list (1)
543:16
listed (8)
long (21)
516:19 536:4
560:9 561:19
565:5,15
568:14,18,20
569:16 575:7
585:17 598:17
599:4,20 601:I
602:5 603:7
614:18,18
635:9
longer (1)
529:14,20
530:11 533:12
542:5 543:24
551:17 554:7
556:14 560:9
561:19,20
565:5,15
570:14 575:7
578:16 592:16
592:17 598:17
599:4,20 601:1
602:5 603:7
making (11)
468:4 473:19
489:12 559:20
561:21,25
566:6 592:1
601:2 607:22
628:23
male (1)
637:10
man (2)
511:10 549:4
manifest (4)
614:18 615:3,4 501:3,14,19
547:17
Lynch (2)
506:15 507:20
616:17,20
543:17 553:17
look (14)
509:21 597:9
570:21,24
617:1,25 618:2
553:17,20
481:21 503:4,5
manifests (4)
-
11I-
618:20 646:15
646:15
556:4,6 572:22
506:11,17,21
letters (1)
listen (2)
575:3 582:9
M (9)
570:19
613:22
543:2 620:21
586:2 598:11
462:7,11 644:9
manner (1)
Lexington (1)
litigated (1)
617:22 618:12
645:10 646:5
605:9
464:4
609:6
622:17 634:15
646:22 647:3,4 March (1)
liar (4)
litigation (6)
looked (6)
647:25
530:2
501:11 571:19
523:2,16,17
534:12 558:15
MA (1)
Marcinkova (5)
584:24 585:15
524:20 570:2
571:17 573:3
463:15
595:2,9,15,23
liberties (1)
611:6
637:5,20
ma'am (7)
639:18
606:2
little (5)
looking (4)
638:24 639:10
mark (6)
licensed (1)
469:11479:1
564:10 572:20
639:16,19,22
561:3,4 611:12
555:10
504:25 519:2
582:5 636:13
639:25 640:3
611:14 622:8
lie (9)
580:22
lost (1)
mad (1)
622:13
497:10 542:14
live (1)
581:23
486:11
marked (18)
553:5 565:18
486:17
lot (1)
madam (1)
468:25 469:6
565:19,20
lived (2)
550:2
556:16
470:18 481:3
575:10 604:18
486:10 609:21
love (4)
Mail (33)
481:16 500:10
606:8
LLP (2)
502:24 507:11
560:19,19,21,22
500:15 545:12
lied (2)
463:14 464:8
570:23 634:9
560:24 561:1,9
547:8 561:10
497:10 542:17
local (1)
lying (54)
561:14 566:2,3
577:22 581:12
lies (5)
640:20
471:2,12 485:19
574:25 577:10
611:16,20
486:17 626:9
locations (2)
486:19 490:10
578:2,4,6,10
622:11,18
627:25 628:1,3
474:12 570:15
490:17 493:9
598:13 599:14
627:20,22
life (10)
log (3)
493:11 496:21
599:25 600:4,5 marks (3)
472:4 473:4
484:20 503:3
497:21 502:5
600:13 602:9
599:16,17,19
474:14,15
505:16
502:15 508:6
603:12 604:12
Marra (1)
486:16,17
logs (7)
508:13,18,22
605:6 606:2
611:11
511:14 563:6
481:3,9,18
509:3 510:9,10
623:15 626:8
Marra's (1)
570:25,25
483:10 507:8,9
511:21 512:2,4
627:4 628:15
585:20
light (1)
549:21
512:5,25 513:1
628:16,24
Martha's (1)
603:23
London (2)
518:9 519:13
Mail.com (1)
537:10
limitations (1)
529:15 539:10
520:25 525:2
465:16
Martin (1)
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615785
18
610:2
Marty (1)
636:1 637:2
640:2
581:22 582:23
583:2 584:5
642:4
Maxwell's (1)
met (18)
473:5 486:16
495:14
masseuse (1)
585:5 586:10
536:10
504:5 505:6,10
Massachusetts... 624:8
586:15 591:9
McCarthyism...
508:19 511:7
576:23
master (128)
596:17 599:12
620:4
519:22 520:23
massage (68)
464:13 465:13
600:11 602:23
McCawley (7)
522:8,22,24
473:8 496:22
466:6 468:18
603:3 604:2
464:9 489:7
530:15 536:18
544:1 597:12
469:10 470:9
605:12,17
509:12,14
536:21 582:13
621:19 624:6,7
470:12,19,22
607:25 608:20
525:25 526:1
582:15 642:15
625:8,10,11,12
472:11 473:21
608:24 609:19
558:10
Mexico (2)
625:13,14
476:17 478:1
610:15 616:9
meal (1)
482:16 508:14
626:10,16,17
478:13,22
616:13 617:17
554:20
Miami (4)
626:18,19,20
479:24 480:15
617:23 618:7
mean (14)
463:10 506:1,1
627:2,5,10,12
481:13 486:21
620:13 622:13
502:21 503:24
646:3
627:13 628:7
487:13 490:2
625:4 627:14
503:25 518:5
mic (1)
628:19,22
490:12 491:6
633:1 634:13
549:4,8 552:24
466:12
629:7,7,9,16
491:10 492:8
638:16 642:24
553:1 566:11
Michael (1)
629:18,19,20
496:5,13 497:4
643:5
582:19 587:22
504:18
629:21,21,23
497:15 498:7
masturbated (2)
601:5 621:23
mid (1)
630:8,10,20,23
498:16 502:2
496:23 497:14
625:14
630:21
630:25 631:1,3
504:1,8 507:21 material (7)
meaning (2)
middle (5)
631:4,5,24
509:23 510:5
471:7 509:8
489:12 528:11
520:22 521:15
632:4,6,8,11
510:21 511:1
567:25 577:4
means (1)
585:7 627:15
632:20 633:8
512:9,15 514:1
585:4 633:17
530:3
637:21
633:10,11,12
514:14 515:13
633:20
meant (1)
million (1)
633:16 634:6
515:17,21
matter (10)
603:5
634:10
635:14,15,16
518:3 519:5,18
493:6 496:3
meet (2)
mind (4)
635:24 636:2
520:15 521:6
516:4 526:11
522:11,12
481:1 483:2
640:12,17,23
521:10 524:4
563:2,2 566:24 meeting (17)
491:9 516:8
641:7 642:6
525:18,24
580:1 619:12
511:10 522:9
mine (2)
massagers (1)
526:7,14,24
633:2
554:8 587:16
611:14 614:21
596:5
527:10 528:2
matters (2)
589:7,11,12,20 minimize (1)
massages (35)
528:19 531:15
579:25 633:4
590:14,19,21
622:3
557:12,13 558:1
537:4,7,22
Maxwell (34)
591:1,6 593:5
minister (1)
558:2,21,22
544:22545:23
508:23509:4
615:13,14,18
573:15
561:17 565:23
551:19,21
510:11 519:21
meetings (1)
minor (2)
565:24 577:13
558:3,13
521:24 522:12
615:16
491:24 492:16
577:14 601:20
559:17,22
523:1,8,16,18
memory (4)
minors (12)
604:22,23
560:3 562:7
524:1,9,11,14
500:22 511:10
544:1 551:4
623:24 624:11
563:8,21,25
524:20 525:3
600:12 631:14
557:13 558:2
624:14,24
564:4,20
525:23 526:2,5 mention (2)
558:22 561:17
625:22 628:6
565:11 567:22
526:13,23
642:7,13
565:24 577:14
631:20,21
571:14 572:19
527:4,15 536:3 mentioned (3)
608:13,19
632:14 633:8
572:25 573:2,5
536:18,25
546:21 590:18
616:1 621:20
633:14,24,24
573:10 574:13
537:15 539:2
602:15
minors,' (1)
634:2,2 635:12
579:21 580:3
555:3,15,20
message (2)
604:23
635:18.24
580:11 581:1
556:15.23
544:6 624:2
minute (1)
www.phi 11 orting.com
EFTA00615786
19
556:7
minutes (6)
608:1
mouth (1)
582:20612:5
613:3,6,12,15
505:18,18
nephew (1)
560:18,20
628:16 629:2,5
519:1,3,7 615:3
592:18
613:20 614:9
636:20
newspaper (11)
615:4 634:14
move (27)
614:11 618:22
nervous (1)
518:16,19
mischaracteri...
466:12 479:11
646:15
580:22
521:16 571:18
638:7
486:21 491:1
named (3)
never (60)
572:5 574:4,10
mischaracteri...
497:11,15
502:6 580:19
494:5 498:25
574:12 575:1,6
641:10
502:1,3 507:21
638:22
502:12,22
600:16
misleading (1)
510:7,16 511:2 names (6)
504:5 520:23
newspapers (5)
641:17
512:7,10 518:3 546:22,25 550:3
520:23,24
561:24 573:20
missing (1)
520:15,16
556:9 625:18
521:2 541:9,18
574:6,9 606:2
571:1
551:19 562:8
625:21
541:24 542:2
NewsRoom/Al...
mission (1)
565:12 571:15
narrow (1)
551:16 554:17
465:20
513:14
574:14 580:14
590:13
555:14,15
night (2)
misspoke (1)
607:15,23
nature (3)
563:5 577:6
486:11 504:20
584:15
610:14 617:4
498:11 581:14
592:23 601:8
Nineteen (1)
misstated (2)
moved (1)
583:11
601:15,23
500:25
642:9,10
581:9
necessarily (2)
606:17 608:12
non-privilege...
misunderstoo...
moving (1)
566:1 614:7
608:19 610:22
472:12 519:19
484:1
510:23
necessary (1)
610:25 615:25
nonguilty (1)
Mitch (1)
multiple (5)
468:2
618:25 619:1
576:11
592:25
469:22 589:12
need (13)
621:19 625:8
nonprivileged ...
Mitchell (1)
633:24 641:10
468:8 469:21,25
625:11 626:10
471:22 472:13
590:23
641:11
470:14 491:8
626:12,15,16
472:25 480:21
mitigate (1)
murder (1)
531:12 573:7
626:23 627:6
482:20 497:19
591:20
619:20
573:12 574:14
627:12 628:7
498:2 500:6
model (2)
MySpace (3)
587:13 594:17
628:18 629:8
510:3 513:8,10
541:22,23
583:14 584:1
603:16 614:16
629:17,19,20
514:6,15,16,18
moment (6)
602:17
needs (4)
630:23,25
515:1,13,14,16
472:3 473:4
526:5 546:17
631:2,4 633:18
516:20 518:23
N
474:14,15
616:17,25
633:18 634:6,8
537:5,24
N (1)
566:21 570:24
negotiated (2)
634:10 637:13
542:11 544:21
money (6)
525:4,14
637:14 642:2,6
544:23 547:24
486:7,8,11
negotiating (2)
new (21)
623:22
488:10 489:6
498:20,21
464:5,5 482:15
nonprosecutio...
494:16
negotiation (13)
482:16 508:7
495:1 501:4,14
months (5)
593:18,22,24,25
508:14 524:20
nonresponsive...
504:4 505:5,5
naked (5)
594:6,18
524:24 526:13
491:2 497:12
638:25 639:2
497:13 539:16
595:21,25
527:24 528:7
510:24 511:2
morning (2)
541:13,21,25
596:25 601:7
558:12 569:15
512:8
466:8 479:2
name (24)
608:25 610:9
569:16 570:16
Normally (1)
Morrison (1)
496:1 502:12
610:10
589:3 625:8,9
614:8
507:9
511:11 543:6
negotiations (6)
629:18 630:24
Notary (1)
mother (1)
543:12,13
495:6 496:2
637:17
644:16
504:24
550:1 552:20
588:4 589:3
newly (2)
notations (3)
motion (3)
553:17 578:13
593:13 608:16
506:7,7
469:14 550:22
491:5 509:18
581:11.12.18
neither (2)
News (5)
550:25
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615787
20
note (5)
581:19 593:11
538:21 539:5
obtained (3)
631:20
467:21468:21
objecting (2)
539:12,20
536:13 542:21
okay (53)
499:24 538:9
552:7,8
540:1,8 541:16
595:15
466:4 470:10
581:10
objection (189)
542:7,19,25
obtaining (2)
473:19 474:18
notes (3)
466:25 467:3,7
543:1,8,21
474:8 475:4
474:25 481:14
500:3,9 645:13
470:17 471:4
544:3,11,17
obvious (1)
492:14 493:17
notice (1)
471:16,16
545:18 546:13
515:19
498:23 500:7
646:6
472:9,23 474:2
547:22,22
obviously (7)
501:21 504:3
notorious (1)
474:2 475:7,21
549:1,13 550:4
517:11 545:17
509:11 512:25
575:1
475:22 476:10
551:8 555:5,5
601:14 606:16
517:24 518:8
November (4)
476:15,18
556:17 557:1
606:21 628:1
518:14 519:11
481:10,11 482:6
477:2 479:10
557:14,20
631:11
520:13 523:1
489:25
479:10 483:13
558:7 559:8
occasion (1)
525:2 533:5
nude (1)
483:21,21
562:4,8 563:16 477:15
534:8 540:23
496:23
484:8,9,9
564:17 565:9
occasions (2)
550:20 551:2
number (11)
485:1,3,10,22
567:19 568:13
548:3 633:15
556:2 568:4
468:25 469:5,16
487:3,8,24
571:7 575:25
occurred (5)
577:8 582:19
469:23 470:1,7
490:18 492:9
577:18 578:24
476:14 485:17
586:15 593:3
500:24 574:24
492:20 493:13
579:16,16
517:4 535:4,5
603:16 608:9
575:3 622:10
494:7,17 495:9
580:12 582:24
October (3)
610:20,24
622:18
495:9 496:6,16
582:25 584:6
496:3 512:22
611:14 613:11
numbers (2)
496:25 498:9
586:9,11,16
582:14
613:13,19
553:20,22
501:6,15,16
587:11,18,20
offense (1)
617:17 620:13
numerous (4)
506:24 507:13
588:10,19,24
478:7
622:7 623:10
482:14 548:3
507:23 508:10
589:14 593:9
offenses (1)
626:2 628:9,17
624:10 633:14
508:16,25
595:4,11,18
523:5
629:2 634:4,20
NW (1)
509:6 511:8,16
596:1,7 597:14 offer (4)
641:20 642:12
163:18
511:24 513:5
597:18,21
625:9,10 634:6
642:20
514:12,12
598:8,24 599:7
634:10
Olas (1)
515:11,11,18
600:7 601:9,19 offered (6)
464:8
515:22 516:16
602:22 604:15
506:2 624:6
old (4)
0
517:8,17
606:10 607:5
633:14 634:2
484:7 489:12
Oath (2)
518:17 519:16
608:15 612:20
636:1,14
502:8 637:12
465:7 644:1
521:3 522:5
613:23 616:6,6 Office (18)
older (1)
object (25)
523:10,20,21
619:17 632:17
464:14 476:21
614:8
468:15 492:1,6
523:22 524:3,6
638:8
495:7 496:15
Oliver (1)
494:19 495:10
524:15 525:11
objections (8)
497:25 498:20
463:14
499:3 509:14
527:5,9,25
474:22 502:9,18
553:19 583:17
once (5)
545:20 559:13
528:3,15 529:1
511:18 527:8
584:2,3 589:8
503:17 530:20
578:19 580:6,8
529:17,22
568:10 571:9
592:10 595:22
530:25 554:7
581:18 582:1
530:18 532:1
605:10
602:18 608:12
636:20
587:10 590:10
532:12 533:1
objective (2)
609:3 621:7,8
one-engine (1)
593:10 599:6
533:15 534:3
475:11 533:19
officers (1)
504:12
602:20 616:11
534:23 535:14
obstruction (1)
583:10
one-minute (1)
624:25 635:1
535:22,24
546: I 1
oh (5)
546:1
641:9,13,16
536:6 537:2,8
obtain (2)
484:25 547:17
ones (3)
objected (2)
537:16.23
540:5.11
582:22 600:12
481:25 574:5
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615788
21
634:3
opened (1)
510:25
operating (3)
outside (12)
485:8 509:9
513:16 547:25
550:5,8 566:22
557:12,25
558:21 565:23
577:12 587:25
598:4 604:22
parts (1)
633:6
party (12)
467:16 468:2,5
625:10,18,22
634:1 637:10
637:20
people's (2)
490:3 527:7
567:23 613:21
painful (1)
525:22 526:15
546:22 550:3
564:2
625:5,24 626:3 632:5
526:16,21
percent (1)
opinion (9)
outstanding (1)
Palm (19)
527:3 532:23
572:6
478:11 488:20
476:25
463:4,5 539:18
537:9 609:22
performing (1)
489:8 535:9
overnight (3)
544:8 569:13
610:6
603:20
586:5 609:13
616:16 617:5,22
570:11 582:7
passed (5)
period (25)
610:7,18 611:1 overrule (3)
589:22 625:7,9 565:17,21
474:14 504:6
opinions (1)
528:3 537:8,22
629:22,24
575:10 604:18
511:23 512:18
478:12
overused (1)
630:6,20 631:1
606:8
513:3,16,16,19
opportunity (1)
488:23
631:6 637:16
passenger (2)
513:20,23
569:19
owed (1)
640:21 646:20
481:19 482:11
516:9,13 517:1
opposed (1)
505:20
paragraph (4)
passports (1)
518:11 554:6
489:13
582:12,13
489:1
554:24 569:7
opposing (1)
614:14 615:10
pattern (1)
569:16 626:21
469:4
paragraphs (1)
492:17
629:8 630:4,7
option (1)
599:15
Paul (3)
630:8 631:13
489:6
p.m (20)
paraphrase (1)
462:4 557:6
636:16
options (1)
462:15,15 466:2
484:18
574:18
perjury (1)
488:25
529:8,9,9,11
part (26)
pause (1)
647:22
oral (1)
546:4,5,5,7
475:18 479:12
546:15
permitted (1)
497:8
581:3,4,4,6
491:11,11
payments (2)
542:2
order (4)
623:17,18,18
492:25 493:3,3 494:22,24
person (17)
467:19 476:9,13
623:20 643:4
495:24 496:2,4 penalties (1)
468:2,4 521:22
486:7
pads (2)
498:19,21
647:22
526:3 534:14
ordered (2)
544:6 624:2
500:18 509:16
pending (5)
563:5 565:6
476:6 646:8
page (17)
531:24 543:17
503:1 509:18
575:4 577:5
ordering (1)
465:3,12 482: I
546:24 566:14
510:7 594:23
581:25 582:17
646:13
547:2 552:25
567:13 592:3
610:12
582:22 583:3
ordinary (3)
553:16 582:10
592:22 595:21
penis (1)
612:19 632:12
624:11,13
583:14 584:1
601:7 603:21
597:13
637:6 642:2
625:12
593:4 602:17
636:6 641:19
penises (1)
personal (5)
orgy (2)
611:23,24
particular (4)
596:6
533:23 542:16
465:24 574:1
612:1 614:14
473:17 583:8
people (28)
542:17,21
original (2)
615:8 647:7
620:24 641:19
488:24,25
572:6
527:7 646:12
pages (11)
particularly (4)
495:11,12,24
personally (6)
outfits (2)
462:13 465:5,19
576:3 598:14
518:2,21
523:18 538:19
509:5 510:11
481:8 585:17
602:14 606:1
522:21 533:9
548:11 610:8
outlandish (1)
614:15,20,21
parties (6)
539:3 551:16
618:25 644:9
572:13
614:21 641:12
467:18,22
552:19 553:10
persuaded (3)
outlined (1)
645:10
470:13 597:3
583:14 590:18
615:13 621:6,7
611:8
paid (12)
645:16 646:11
590:19,21
persuading (1)
outlining (2)
494:16 529:21
parties' (1)
592:21,24
587:23
585:17 611:6
530:8.12
645:17
624:10,15.22
persuasion (1)
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615789
22
621:10
pertained (1)
583:8
pertinent (1)
pilot (3)
504:13 554:10
555:9
pilots (1)
plural (2)
573:14 635:18
point (24)
468:1 479:9
579:11 605:18
605:22 606:14
616:5 620:2
621:8
558:3,13
559:17,22
560:3 562:7
563:8,21,25
633:5
507:7
513:12 515:22
positions (2)
564:4,20
perused (1)
place (9)
565:24 579:22
620:1 621:21
565:11 567:22
546:24
515:4 528:13
579:23 588:6,7 positive (2)
571:14 572:19
Phipps (1)
535:5,6 559:16
588:16,22
554:23 571:2
572:25 573:2,5
646:18
586:14 629:18
589:7 591:3,6
possession (2)
573:10 574:13
phone (15)
636:14 646:19
591:11 599:13
567:16 570:19
579:21 580:3
463:12 464:5
places (1)
603:3,18
possible (6)
580:11 581:1
481:9 526:2,3
482:14
613:18 636:11
474:10 475:6,10
581:22 582:23
544:16 545:25
plain (1)
642:15,16,25
578:13 585:23
583:2 584:5
555:21 557:7
589:20
643:2
591:13
585:5 586:10
562:13 585:6
Plaintiff (7)
pointed (2)
possibly (1)
586:15 591:9
618:1 630:11
465:10 500:15
480:9 499:22
575:23
596:17 599:12
630:12,15
547:8 561:10
points (1)
power (2)
600:11 602:23
phonetic (1)
611:20 622:11
466:5
507:15,19
603:3 604:2
583:9
627:22
police (15)
Pozzuoli (124)
605:12,17
photograph (1... Plaintiffs (2)
544:8 567:18
464:13 466:6
607:25 608:20
473:10 474:25
462:5 463:2
577:21 581:8
468:18 469:10
608:24 609:19
475:8,10
plane (6)
582:7,8 583:7
470:9,12,19,22
610:15 616:9
519:20 520:4
480:24 481:19
583:10 593:3
472:11 473:21
616:13 617:17
520:10,12,18
504:13,15
593:14 596:4
476:17 478:1
617:23 618:7
521:15,23
507:12 637:22
601:12 606:20
478:13,22
619:3 620:13
529:13,15
played (2)
624:3 637:9
479:24 480:15
622:13 625:4
530:2,4 539:10
496:11 584:20
politicians (1)
481:13 486:21
627:14 633:1
541:21,24
plea (1)
573:16
487:13 490:2
634:13 638:16
photographs (...
494:21
pool (1)
490:12 491:6
642:24 643:5
475:1 521:4,5
pleading (4)
641:3
491:10 492:8
precision (1)
539:15,16,24
494:6 576:11
poorly (1)
497:15 498:16
491:9
540:6,12
585:16 586:22
625:17
502:2 504:1,8
preference (1)
541:12,14,19
pleadings (4)
pornographic...
507:21 509:23
491:24
pick (1)
492:12,15
476:7
510:5,21 511:1 prepared (1)
638:2
587:10 604:3
Porter (1)
512:9,15 514:1
618:16
picked (2)
please (22)
504:18
514:14 515:13
present (4)
504:16 557:7
493:7,25 535:23 Porters (1)
515:17,21
464:12 584:9
picture (1)
540:3 543:1,2
572:9
518:3 519:5,18
640:6,12
521:18
552:4,21
portion (4)
520:15 521:6
presentation (5)
pictures (1)
563:15 571:5,6
510:24 512:8
521:10 524:4
591:4,19 592:1
542:3
572:15 585:10
551:23 610:16
525:18,24
592:4 602:17
piece (5)
588:10 589:15
portions (2)
526:7,14,24
presentations ...
475:11 552:25
624:20 632:16
469:14 560:15
527:10 528:2
590:16
570:18 575:17
636:3 638:6
posed (2)
528:19 531:15
presented (3)
608:1
646:6,9,14
468:12 583:10
537:4,7,22
522:20 583:19
pieces (1)
PLLC (1)
position (9)
544:22 545:23
590:3
611:6
464:4
467:16 579:10
551:19.21
preserve (1)
mmw.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615790
23
515:24
President (7)
465:23 514:21
538:19,24
634:22
print (2)
614:10,19
630:2
problem (3)
500:13,23
propriety (1)
525:17
publicly (4)
534:5 561:14
567:17 571:22
515:3 554:4,17 541:22,23
532:7 574:10,11 prosecution (1)
published (1)
555:7,8
printed (1)
problems (1)
485:14
559:18
Presidents (1)
530:2
592:12
prosecutor (3)
publishing (2)
573:14
prior (8)
procedure (1)
590:9 591:20
467:2 574:5
press (1)
468:25 516:13
634:1
601:24
Puerto (2)
566:13
516:25 517:11
proceed (2)
prostitution (6)
505:25 506:1
presume (1)
536:24 537:12
468:19,20
484:15 487:2
pull (3)
579:5
546:21 577:23
produce (2)
530:8,10 535:7
499:10 583:15
presumed (1)
prison (1)
475:20 569:19
535:11
583:19
566:13
590:1
produced (6)
protect (3)
pulled (2)
presumption (2) privilege (39)
471:7 550:13
595:22 617:9,12
583:14 584:1
566:6 567:12
466:24 467:10
552:2 570:2
protected (3)
pulls (1)
pretty (2)
467:14,25
583:16 586:19
467:24 532:5
544:7
635:7,7
471:8 475:20
product (22)
540:20
pump (2)
prevailed (1)
479:22 492:6,9
466:19 467:10
proud (1)
597:13 598:1
610:6
540:20 563:20
469:13 470:18
588:1
purported (1)
previous (5)
569:1,21
471:4,17 472:9 prove (11)
614:4
516:2 521:11
571:10 572:3
475:19,19
474:15 475:12
purpose (8)
528:6,8 581:16
580:6 590:7
483:13 507:3
485:2,16,17
483:8,19 484:3
previously (8)
593:16,18,25
531:24 532:16
569:5,8,10,12
484:6 485:20
469:6 481:3
594:6,16,18
534:25 540:15
569:14 603:22
589:11,12,20
500:18 516:2
596:18,20,25
550:10 568:1
proves (2)
purposes (6)
537:17 550:19
597:1 605:13
569:2 571:11
570:7,9
480:16 485:15
581:19 593:11
608:1 609:7,14
582:2 590:8
provide (5)
487:1,22 597:2
preying (1)
609:16 610:9
596:21
467:12 469:6,17
617:24
465:17
610:10 616:7,8 production (2)
513:9 571:2
purview (1)
primarily (1)
625:5 626:4
508:4 586:19
provided (5)
597:7
612:18
637:8
professional (5)
499:8 569:20
pushed (1)
prime (1)
privileged (14)
563:6 576:24
572:7,8 591:18
525:19
573:15
472:12,25 479:3
624:8 625:13
provides (1)
put (16)
Prince (39)
483:12 486:5
645:7
513:11
493:21,24
465:16,24
495:14 515:15
professor (6)
public (27)
528:12 553:6
519:14,20,22
523:13 536:9
488:3 503:22
534:22 535:1,2
561:15 585:3
520:18 521:12
541:7 543:10
540:1 576:8
549:15 558:9
600:20 601:14
529:21 530:9
544:18 596:9
589:15 615:3
558:10,11,19
603:17 608:7
530:12,15,23
607:23
professors (1)
558:20 559:11
609:4 620:6
531:5,8,11,21
privileges (2)
506:10
560:4,7 562:25
632:6,9 638:4
531:21 532:11
582:4 625:2
prominent (4)
566:6 574:19
641:5
532:20,23
probably (14)
546:25 550:3
575:23 577:9
putting (1)
533:7,9,12,25
506:14,15,15
573:16,16
580:2 583:6
592:18
534:11,15,17
514:25515:20
proof (2)
598:11,21
Q
535:12,19
548:22 593:1
485:13,16
601:12 603:25
qualify (1)
536:4,11,21,25
602:9 607:10
proposed (4)
621:16 622:25
537:14 538:1.6
613:2 614:10
465:13 497:3
6/4:3 644:16
577:25
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615791
24
Queen (1)
538:23
question (113)
467:12 471:6,24
471:25 477:20
479:20 480:4
481:2 482:12
482:18,20
484:4 485:6,25
486:2 488:14
488:16 491:2
494:1 497:6,16
498:1 499:1
503:1,6 504:10
505:16 508:1
510:6,9,15
512:13 513:24
514:2,3 517:24
521:7,11,11
524:7 526:25
526:25 527:11
527:24 528:24
530:11 531:16
531:20 533:14
534:2 535:25
536:10 537:18
540:3 545:1
549:7 550:8,15
551:20 554:11
554:21 555:18
555:18 557:22
558:4,14,15
562:9 563:9,19
564:1,6,19
566:10 572:17
580:4 582:1
585:8 590:13
594:7,11,15,22
594:23 596:14
600:18 605:11
634:20 635:3,6
635:9,12 638:1
638:2,7 640:14
640:19,25
641:4
questionable (1)
483:7
questioning (1)
603:13
questions (20)
468:12 477:11
477:17 479:15
480:12,14
484:5 499:23
544:23 547:5
551:24,25
584:10 591:15
602:24 606:22
608:6 619:5
634:18 642:25
quite (2)
478:4 602:12
quotation (4)
599:15,17,19,23
quote (3)
627:7,17 628:5
quoted (7)
561:23 566:3
599:24 600:6
603:6 606:1
607:10
quotes (8)
573:6 599:14
600:14,17,21
600:22,22
607:9
quoting (3)
573:1 574:8
599:16
579:14 596:19
raising (1)
591:15
ranch (8)
508:14,19,20
569:9 570:10
629:19 630:25
637:16
rape (6)
561:19 601:23
606:18 619:20
620:3 621:11
raped (4)
599:3 601:3,5,6
reach (3)
538:23,24
548:20
read (46)
465:8 484:17
485:9 492:12
500:14 546:9
546:25 560:17
572:13 573:13
573:18,18
585:2,16,19,22
585:23 586:1,3
586:6,11,23
587:5,6,13
597:17 598:19
604:2,3,4
605:21 610:25
612:16 616:17
616:20,22,25
617:2,5 638:12
638:13 641:2
641:12 646:9
646:12 647:22
reader (1)
600:17
reading (7)
470:17 581:12
606:22 614:12
634:2
reality (1)
563:23
realize (1)
618:22
really (5)
500:3 566:10
603:5 612:22
632:10
Realtime (1)
462:21
Reask (1)
521:7
reason (9)
485:7 498:12
531:14 533:18
533:22 538:18
587:6 636:23
647:7
reasonable (5)
579:4 600:17
615:20 619:14
646:12
reasons (1)
468:11
reasserts (1)
467:9
recall (17)
545:13 551:1
559:20,21
565:18,19
578:1,2 579:7
583:12 585:21
604:19 615:8
623:4,7,9
631:1
Recarey (7)
587:14 589:6
625:22 627:1
reception (1)
466:8
recess (5)
528:17 529:9
546:5 581:4
623:18
recipient (1)
614:2
recognize (1)
601:13
recollection (39)
482:16 496:10
496:19 497:5
500:22 501:18
501:23 505:8
529:5 543:7,11
559:3,7 560:11
560:12,23,25
561:9,21,24
578:3 579:9
593:7 595:3
598:6,20 601:3
604:24 607:13
612:16 613:2
613:25 614:13
615:18 626:14
629:20 631:23
634:21 636:22
recommendati...
496:11
recommended...
491:20
reconvening (1)
643:6
record (44)
466:1,5 467:9
468:21 470:4
470:17 479:19
480:6 492:1,4
-R--
605:14 608:21
559:18 573:12
590:15 591:3
509:9,18 529:7
610:12 612:11
radio (1)
585:21 600:3
591:25 592:8
529:10 540:24
615:6 620:21
628:21
601:11 638:17
592:15
545:10 546:3,6
622:20,22
raise (1)
641:18
Recarey's (3)
560:9 561:15
624:19,25
584:10
ready (1)
586:6,25 587:1
561:19 565:5
625:17 627:15
raised (4)
499:15
received (5)
565:15 575:5,7
627:24 633:22
569:21 571:9
real (5)
592:13 624:7.23
580:2.23 581:2
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615792
25
581:5 589:2
597:17 598:17
599:20 601:1
497:4 559:6
560:12 598:6
598:20 626:14
relevancy (6)
492:2 494:20
578:20 580:9
476:6
rented (1)
506:4
533:6,7
represented (7)
473:23 491:17
602:5 603:7
refuse (1)
580:12 599:9
repeat (3)
493:20 495:6
609:5 611:18
480:11
relevant (20)
527:8 557:22
537:20 610:3,4
611:19 623:16
refused (2)
489:15,19,20,21
624:19
representing (...
623:19 630:16
478:20 596:14
497:13 510:20
repeated (1)
473:15 494:10
643:3 645:12
refuses (1)
511:23 512:10
477:8
495:13 526:2,4
recorded (1)
477:16
512:18 513:20
rephrase (5)
557:10,23
475:2
refusing (2)
516:9 518:11
498:1 514:3
571:21 577:3
recording (1)
596:12,13
554:6,24 569:7
521:7,10 562:8
579:8 609:2
626:24
refuted (1)
626:21 629:8
replaced (2)
640:4
recordings (1)
494:5
630:4,7 631:13 588:6,18
request (5)
473:25
regard (1)
rely (3)
report (8)
479:13 499:4
records (2)
470:7
572:1,5 574:7
577:21 581:8
507:16,24
630:5 631:12
regarding (4)
relying (5)
582:8 593:3
508:3
red (1)
510:14 523:25
572:6,7,8,9,10
601:12 606:20
requested (3)
600:15
524:19 586:24
remainder (2)
624:3 645:8
468:23 478:12
redaction (1)
regardless (1)
564:11 607:24
reported (3)
645:11
582:18
494:22
remember (44)
462:20 521:17
require (3)
reduction (1)
regards (1)
496:4 503:17
573:19
467:13,18
591:12
510:17
504:19 505:1
reporter (8)
468:13
refer (1)
Registered 111
506:5 514:20
465:7 500:25
required (2)
581:11
645:6
514:24 515:5
557:23 622:10
494:22,23
reference (3)
regret (2)
522:8,9,10
628:9,12 645:1 requires (4)
470:6 538:4
504:14 571. 1
533:8 578:12
645:7
492:5 568:14
632:3
REIN (1)
578:13,17
Reporting (1)
572:3 597:6
referenced (1)
463:18
580:17,18
646:18
research (8)
469:3
related (6)
581:13 583:11
reports (1)
468:9 589:21
referred (3)
523:24 546:10
589:12 590:14
567:18
590:23 612:17
544:15 574:5
563:2 572:17
590:21,22,25
represent (1)
612:18 613:20
623:24
572:20 602:11
594:25 595:7
537:19
613:21 636:19
referring (3)
relating (2)
595:14 597:11
representatio...
reserved (1)
560:16,20 628:1
595:25 605:20
599:17 602:12
479:6 493:7
488:23
refers (1)
relations (1)
603:12 615:15
516:3,14
resolution (1)
633:17
595:2
623:10,11,11
536:14 537:13
500:19
reflect (1)
relationship (...
623:12 625:21
537:18 540:14
resolved (1)
470:5
479:6,7 489:11
626:7 631:10
545:20 558:4
476:25
reflecting (1)
514:11,24
631:16 632:4.5
563:18 583:20
resources (1)
465:14
517:7 536:10
632:5 640:13
588:14 596:21
492:16
reflects (1)
547:25 550:5,9 remembering...
596:23
respect (13)
528:6
550:10,10,11
625:25
representative... 476:2 480:2
refrain (1)
631:7 634:9
remind (1)
531:10,21
510:21 524:23
479:14
relative (2)
482:6
532:10,19,20
524:25 525:8
reframe (1)
645:15,16
remove (1)
533:5 534:1,19
526:9,11,12
487:16
relatively (1)
567:2
534:20 566:24
527:10 544:23
refresh (6)
506:7
removed (1)
representative...
548:5 583:7
mmw.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615793
26
respond (7)
468:16 479:23
479:25 511:18
reviewed (3)
544:6,14 566:8
reviewing (2)
522:10 537:10
Roy (4)
495:14 610:2
642:4,5
saying (19)
486:24 517:2
540:1 572:4
572:24 624:2
621:4,17
520:25 541:4
574:14
rewind (1)
RPR (4)
549:17 576:2
responded (2)
489:10
462:20 644:15
578:15 595:8
537:18 580:4
Reyes (1)
645:22 646:18
597:11 599:17
responds (1)
464:14
RSimpson@w...
602:11 604:20
597:22
RICHARD (1)
463:20
604:25 621:9
response (13)
463:19
rubber (1)
621:24 626:4,8
467:12 468:12
Rick (2)
596:6
626:25 633:7
478:14,15
566:21 610:24
rule (5)
says (38)
494:13 571:8
Rico (2)
558:14 576:23
465:23 471:12
572:3 585:2,19 505:25 506:1
576:25 577:7
483:2 493:9
587:9 599:13
right (42)
580:12
496:21 497:22
608:5 625:1
466:24 478:4
ruled (1)
500:5 502:5,15
responses (1)
481:1 486:24
609:16
508:6,13,20,22
477:11
489:24 495:7,8
rules (1)
509:3 510:10
responsible (4)
500:8 501:18
619:8
519:13 521:1
564:23 569:24
503:13 511:19
ruling (6)
525:3 529:14
601:24 613:7
512:21 516:5
491:4 525:16,20
529:20 530:12
responsive (8)
517:3 522:4
594:17,20
535:5,5 547:6
479:15 480:3
523:3 530:15
596:15
553:19 556:14
495:16 501:24
530:24 536:5
run (1)
565:17 573:4
501:25 510:6
548:16 556:10
499:13
573:25 578:25
520:14 585:16
557:7 558:5
Russian (1)
591:3,25
rest (4)
560:4 566:20
627:11
596:16 621:18
491:7 495:23
568:7 570:13
633:8 635:20
-S-
499:14 603:9
577:11,24
' , , in
635:22 641:22
restate (1)
584:22,25
541:22,23
SAFRA (1)
Scarola (46)
531:16
585:7 601:13
Rodriguez (8)
463:12
463:3,5 466:15
result (2)
605:5 614:23
546:10 549:25
sanctions (1)
468:20 469:8,9
544:7 620:2
617:20 626:5
550:23 551:3
509:19
469:12,22
return (1)
627:17 629:1
638:3,19 641:5 sand (1)
470:4 477:8
646:15
634:1 635:19
642:11
478:3,4,14
returned (1)
636:7
Rogers (1)
479:12 480:2
646:10
Rights (1)
507:7
481:5 489:18
reveal (1)
611:7
role (5)
sat (2)
495:16 501:24
509:15
Riley (1)
496:11 511:13
530:17,24
502:1 507:24
revealing (2)
583:10
566:15,17
satisfy (1)
508:2 510:16
509:20,22
road (1)
584:20
485:15
520:6,14,16
review (11)
479:2
room (3)
saw (15)
525:4,16,20
471:23 498:14
473:8 609:5
502:22 512:2
526:20 545:14
506:21 575:12
634:7
550:6,17,18,25
552:23 558:8
614:16,19,20
ROSS (1)
607:8 613:18
558:25 559:6
615:2,4,7
463:14
637:13,14
566:21 576:9
645:11
Rothschild (2)
641:23 642:2.3
584:17 594:3.7
mmw.phi 11 orting.com
EFTA00615794
27
594:19 610:12
610:14 617:4
632:20 637:22
scheduled (4)
622:21,25
623:10,13
SCHILLER (1)
464:8
Schlossberg (1)
514:21
school (4)
574:8 578:19
580:8 587:18
588:23 589:17
594:23 596:9
599:6,9 600:7
602:20 604:13
609:25610:22
610:25 611:15
614:16 615:2
616:17,20,25
617:6,11,21
552:22 553:14
556:8 558:23
559:4 563:15
586:2 599:23
600:15 607:9
607:12 614:15
615:5,11,17
616:2,9 619:7
629:12 633:7
636:3 638:10
638:13,14
597:7 641:10
separately (1)
596:19
sepia (1)
541:22
September (1)
512:24
serial (3)
501:11 584:24
585:15
serious (1)
558:22 560:9
561:17 565:5
569:9 573:14
573:25 577:13
580:22 595:10
598:16 601:20
602:5,8,10
604:23 605:20
621:19 623:24
637:10
sexual (13)
488:18 519:23
618:11 619:2
seeing (2)
617:16
484:16 487:21
538:3,9
619:17 620:21
500:23 506:5
seriously (2)
487:23 488:9
scope (2)
632:19,24
seeking (1)
555:24 617:14
489:2 491:24
567:23 596:22
637:18 641:25
589:4
served (1)
543:25 551:15
Scott (103)
646:2,4
seen (24)
556:15
561:16 569:11
462:17 463:9,11 screamed (1)
498:17,25 499:2 Service (2)
569:12 570:10
469:18 473:1
598:2
517:23 519:20
554:10 555:9
595:2
475:21 481:14
sealed (1)
520:23,24
services (1)
sexually (2)
483:12 484:8
509:17
521:2,4 526:25
588:16
487:6 492:18
487:12,24
Sean (1)
537:9 539:15
session (2)
shaking (1)
492:1 494:19
464:14
541:18,24
466:8 468:24
489:7
498:9 499:4,18 search (3)
545:23 550:18
sessions (1)
share (1)
500:2,7,24
476:2,4 540:6
550:22 568:9
469:1
610:18
501:15 502:11
SEARCY (1)
610:22,25
set (3)
shared (1)
503:1,20 505:4
463:3
618:25 619:1
470:14 527:7
554:20
507:16 508:2
second (20)
632:13 637:4
597:4
sheet (4)
514:18 516:19
478:2,23 479:12 selected (1)
settle (1)
465:8 500:2
518:25 519:10
481:24 521:7
496:4
494:16
646:10 647:1
520:5,8 521:3
531:16 546:15
sending (1)
settlement (4)
SHIPLEY (1)
523:12 528:17
559:19 563:22
613:3
509:16 593:12
463:4
530:18 531:1
572:15,15
senior (1)
608:16 616:7
shortly (1)
531:23 532:7
573:6 574:13
614:8
seven (1)
548:19
532:15 534:2,6
582:13 609:20
sense (2)
611:10
shoulder (2)
534:25 535:25
609:21 614:14
555:16 629:13
SEVENTEEN... 632:7,9
538:21 539:6
615:10,12
sent (9)
462:1
show (27)
539:25 540:21
616:14
493:10 498:12
sex (42)
477:5 481:8
540:25 542:11
Secondly (1)
504:12 542:6
465:22,23
483:4 497:3
543:2,19
466:18
542:15,18,22
485:21 487:1
498:23 499:6
544:21 545:12
Secret (2)
617:25 618:4
490:16,24
507:11 543:10
552:22 553:6
554:10 555:9
sentence (3)
497:8,22 498:5
547:2 552:21
553:13 555:21
sections (1)
591:12 615:12
502:6 505:13
559:19,22
556:7,12
641:11
615:21
508:23 529:21
560:1 575:6
558:16 559:13
see (31)
sentencing (1)
530:9,12
585:23 589:2,8
561:3 562:4
481:15 482:5,5
591:14
533:12 534:11
589:25 611:12
564:17 567:9
482:5 506:7
separate (4)
535:3,4,11
619:3,4 627:24
568:13.18
541:21 552:4
523:16 527:21
557:13 558:1
627:25 630:6
www.phi sra
g.com
EFTA00615795
28
631:12 632:16
638:6
showed (4)
486:8 560:13
579:17 626:13
showing (1)
591:16
shown (2)
521:18 622:24
500:10 546:15
547:24 549:12
550:13 581:20
584:15 594:11
610:23 622:15
627:19 630:12
641:9
single (4)
570:24 589:13
somebody (14)
466:14 495:25
505:20 521:25
548:23 578:14
582:20 600:16
601:2 606:19
612:8 613:3,6
618:22
son (1)
speaking (10)
560:23,25 561:9
566:24 578:12
605:7 607:13
622:21 623:1
626:7
special (129)
464:13 465:13
466:6 468:18
579:21 580:3
580:11 581:1
581:22 582:23
583:2 584:5
585:5 586:10
586:15 591:9
596:17 599:12
600:11 602:23
603:3 604:2
shuttle (1)
596:14 637:4
636:9
469:10 470:9
605:12,17
636:21
sit (5)
soon (3)
470:12,19,22
607:25 608:20
sic (3)
496:18 501:9
469:7,12 548:19
472:11 473:21
608:24 609:19
565:25 584:13
539:9 577:14
sorry (11)
476:17 478:1
610:15 616:9
642:4
601:4
481:10 531:13
478:13,22
616:13 617:17
sign (11)
sitting (1)
534:8 543:3
479:24 480:15
617:23 618:7
465:8 612:6,24
530:22
555:2 558:8
481:13 486:21
620:13 622:13
612:25 613:6,8 situation (I)
593:9 610:13
487:13 490:2
625:4 627:14
613:15,19
516:20
610:13 618:15
490:12 491:6
633:1 634:13
618:18 646:12
six (4)
624:17
491:10 492:8
638:16 642:24
646:14
504:4 505:5
sort (2)
496:3,5,13
643:5
signature (16)
638:25 639:2
515:15,19
497:4,15 498:7 specific (4)
611:24 612:3,7
skip (1)
sound (1)
498:16 502:2
560:11 621:25
612:8,11,12,12
618:10
633:13
504:1,8507:21
627:9 633:14
613:1,9,10,10
slave (1)
sounds (3)
509:23 510:5
specifically (8)
614:5,7 646:7
595:10
579:23 590:6
510:21 511:1
480:4 518:8
646:14,21
slave' (1)
628:15
512:9,15 514:1
548:13 564:5
signature's (1)
465:22
source (4)
514:14 515:13
602:3 623:12
618:17
slip (1)
472:14 483:18
515:17,21
626:1 627:8
signatures (2)
584:17
535:1 603:10
518:3 519:5,18 specify (2)
612:13 615:19
Sloman (2)
sources (1)
520:15 521:6
557:16 558:16
signed (6)
465:18 614:24
518:23
521:10 524:4
specifying (1)
527:22 528:25
small (2)
South (3)
525:18,24
559:15
612:5 613:7
504:12 506:5
463:10 504:23
526:7,14,24
speculation (2)
618:22 644:12
smartly (1)
646:3
527:10 528:2
487:25 538:22
Sigrid (5)
634:14
Southeast (1)
528:19 531:15
speech (2)
464:9 489:7
s
.. 462:17
537:4,7,22
623:3,9
509:12 510:1
space (1)
544:22 545:23
speeches (1)
525:25
smiling (1)
636:21
551:19,21
623:13
similar (1)
617:7
speak (7)
558:3,13
spelled (1)
589:24
social (1)
466:14 469:10
559:17,22
613:12
simply (3)
536:25
501:22,23
560:3 562:7
spending (2)
479:21 496:10
socialized (6)
549:21 634:8
563:8,21,25
486:11 489:6
573:1
511:22 513:2,11
642:12
564:4,20
spoke (5)
SIMPSON (19)
513:22 514:8
speaker (1)
565:11 567:22
531:7,10 561:13
463:19 466:17
518:10
466:15
571:14 572:19
599:25 607:12
476:16 490:21
socializing (1)
speakerphone...
572:25 573:2,5 spoken (11)
493:16.25
516:14
478:6
573:10 574:13
523:8.18 524:8
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615796
29
524:13 531:20
532:4,6,10,20
535:19 548:13
487:11 498:4
505:13 510:18
510:19 513:21
575:20,23
576:5,24
578:15,18
STEVEN (1)
463:12
steven.safra@...
471:8 477:14
493:6 516:4
534:1 563:1,2
spotty (1)
533:18 534:10
580:1 592:5
463:12
574:18 580:5
466:8
534:13,17
600:5,14,15,22 sticking (1)
597:4 618:8
staff (1)
545:17 551:13
603:25 604:11
575:21
619:12 626:3
633:15
557:19 558:9
605:8,24,25
sticky (1)
submitted (1)
stage (1)
558:10,11,17
606:7 607:1,3
581:10
618:5
486:16
558:19,20,23
607:7,18
stomach (1)
subpoenas (2)
stand (1)
559:2,4,5,11
619:15 620:6
597:12
476:22,24
551:17
559:20 560:7
620:23 621:24
STONE (1)
subsequently (...
standards (1)
560:13 561:14
621:24 622:1
464:9
598:4
620:12
561:25 562:23
626:9 629:11
stood (2)
substance (1)
standing (2)
565:21,25
629:12
497:9 621:5
588:11
497:13 551:14
567:14 572:21
states (8)
stop (4)
successful (1)
Starr (3)
574:20 577:4,8 488:8,8 495:7
509:24 510:5
621:6
495:8,14 621:4
577:9,12,15,23
496:14 497:25
551:21 559:19 sue (1)
start (4)
585:12 587:17
555:8 573:14
stopped (1)
500:21
509:19,22 585:9
592:3 598:12
621:6
598:2
sued (1)
605:2
598:14,21
statute (6)
stories (1)
523:4
started (1)
600:23,25
484:17 485:8
474:17
suggest (3)
518:9
602:8 604:21
487:7 488:15
story (3)
478:23 481:23
starts (1)
604:21 605:3,3
488:16 523:6
502:24 535:3
617:24
614:23
605:6 606:8,13 stay (4)
585:14
suggesting (1)
state (24)
607:10,22
552:2 631:18
strap-on (1)
576:13
471:13 480:5
608:5,18 616:4
635:10 641:3
596:5
suit (3)
487:20 572:11
616:19,22,24
stayed (9)
strategies (2)
524:10,11
579:11 583:16
620:17 621:16
504:19 635:17
467:5 579:25
526:13
584:2,2 587:15
623:12 626:13
635:20 636:7,8 Street (3)
Suite (3)
587:23 589:7
628:23 633:23
636:10,15,17
462:17 463:14
463:9 646:2,19
590:15 592:9
642:18
636:19
463:18
summary (1)
593:1 602:18
statements (70)
staying (2)
stricken (1)
604:4
605:23 606:16
468:22 469:15
636:22,25
477:18
summer (3)
606:18,21
478:11,25
Ste (1)
strike (15)
505:11 522:16
609:2 621:7
501:10 506:16
464:8
491:1,5,10
522:18
644:4,16 645:3
533:20 557:4
stealing (1)
497:11 502:1,3 supplemented...
stated (9)
559:14 560:1,4
572:12
510:16,23
528:8
473:9 563:5
561:7,22,23
stenographic (1)
512:7,11
supported (1)
605:22 620:8
562:2,2,14,17
645:13
520:16 607:15
548:1
620:10 621:22
562:25 563:13
stenographica...
607:23 610:14
suppose (1)
621:23 626:23
563:13,15
462:20 645:8
610:16
562:24
647:23
564:10,11,15
step (1)
strongly (1)
sure (40)
statement (81)
564:25 565:3
566:22
637:9
466:20 470:13
472:16,17
566:3,7 567:5
Stephen (1)
students (2)
476:17 480:25
477:10 480:23
571:22,25
573:25
488:5 584:8
491:14 503:7
482:22,25
573:23 574:3,6 steps (1)
subject (15)
514:4 515:23
483:2.4.6
575:3.11.13.15
566:18
467:24 468:6
521:14 547:15
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615797
30
555:23 556:8
556:12 558:24
559:25 562:11
575:9,10 576:8
576:8,9 582:10
587:22 597:21
600:12 604:7
611:17 613:17
613:17 615:1
620:18 621:21
519:8 528:17
528:24 529:6
546:1 556:7
562:15 564:16
566:1 568:4
571:21 572:14
574:19 577:8
580:13,14,24
583:22,25
593:22 606:2
608:13,19
615:25
taught (1)
584:8
teaching (2)
619:23,23
team (6)
476:5 495:24
498:19 541:6
589:2 609:1
565:18,19,20
575:10 604:19
606:9
testified (2)
587:14 589:6
testifying (1)
633:25
testimony (10)
561:6,8 592:7
606:17 629:15
583:10 586:4
600:21 601:16
605:21 617:7
think (88)
466:10,11
468:16 469:18
469:19,20
471:6 478:14
480:1,3 482:16
482:17 484:18
622:5 631:9,9
614:18,19
team's (1)
630:9,18
488:5,6,11,22
632:1 634:25
646:6
499:16
632:13 635:19
488:23 489:3
638:12,18
taken (24)
teenage (2)
640:15
489:15 491:21
640:22
472:7,21 473:25
539:16 541:13
testing (1)
495:10 499:7
surprise (1)
475:2 487:20
television (1)
470:25
499:10 504:2
560:24
489:1 504:16
628:20
thank (7)
510:20 512:22
surrounding (4)
505:24 508:7
tell (29)
468:18 478:5
512:24 516:6
585:18 589:23
508:14 525:3
470:1 497:21
480:19 555:22
517:4,24
619:15 620:24
529:14,15
498:24,25
608:9 610:24
518:21 520:5,7
suspect (1)
530:4 539:10
502:22 508:18
623:5
530:22 532:12
629:25
539:17 540:6
509:25 513:15
thank-you (1)
532:13,14,17
Sweder (5)
541:13 544:7
517:6,22 519:5
538:9
532:22 536:23
463:14,15
565:20 586:7
521:19 522:17
thanking (1)
545:13,14,16
641:16,17,22
587:3 624:3
526:10 529:24
538:2
554:22,24
switch (1)
638:19
530:6 537:13
theft (10)
563:19,24
519:8
talk (3)
553:24 554:12
560:9 561:20
567:24 573:7
sworn (1)
465:21 553:3
554:14,19
565:5,15 575:7
573:10,11
644:10
566:13
568:11,16,22
598:17 599:4
578:7 580:3
sympathetic (2)
talked (3)
569:3 582:17
599:20 602:6
589:2 594:17
486:14,18
515:9 553:1,24
588:4 605:4
603:7
594:19 597:3,6
sympathy (1)
talking (22)
613:8
therapeutic (1)
599:21,22,25
488:24
490:1 518:8
telling (6)
625:12
600:23 601:2
system (1)
527:20 530:23
483:19 533:22
therapist (2)
603:16 610:7
621:12
546:19 547:7
536:1 568:23
632:6,8
611:9 615:7
systematic (1)
562:5 565:9
611:1 625:22
therapists (1)
617:19 619:8
492:17
567:7 570:3
ten (4)
625:14
620:5 624:5,5
systemic (1)
576:17 578:22
505:24 519:3
therapy (1)
624:12 625:4
492:17
579:2,5 587:8
559:4,15
632:11
625:13,21
Systems (1)
590:5 593:20
tended (1)
thing (6)
627:2,10
462:21
598:21 602:3
592:6
499:13 560:17
631:19,20
603:12 611:10
term (1)
570:11 574:23
632:1,24 633:5
635:23
489:4
584:14 603:6
636:2 640:6,7
tabloid (1)
talks (1)
terminated (3)
things (14)
640:10
575:1
641:14
588:17,22 589:1
467:6 471:1
third (4)
take (30)
tape (1)
terms (1)
518:1 557:4
467:15 577:5
478:7,24 507:17
626:24
467:23
564:15 567:15
598:14 599:19
518:25 519:3.4 targeted (3)
test (6)
568:5 581:13
THOMAS (2)
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615798
31
463:11 646:4
thomas.scott...
567:13 569:16
571:24 575:13
598:2 603:22
605:6 624:9,10
544:7
travel (4)
606:12,25
607:1,2,4,7,17
463:11 646:4
576:7 577:16
624:13,22
518:15 549:7,10
607:19 608:18
thought (9)
579:8 581:3,6
625:19,20
637:19
616:4 628:18
484:1 490:4
588:16,22
632:8
traveled (8)
642:23 645:12
527:6 531:1
589:17 590:1
Tom (5)
482:22 502:16
647:23
550:2 553:12
600:25 606:12
519:9 572:7
518:23 548:23
truly (1)
618:19,21
614:16 618:12
573:6 609:24
548:25 549:3,5 646:16
623:15
623:17,20
618:15
549:20
Trump (3)
thousand (1)
626:21 630:4,7 tomorrow (9)
traveling (5)
517:22 545:5
598:4
631:13 632:20
470:2,21 553:3
482:11 483:9
551:14
three (14)
632:23,24
553:7 556:3
484:7 486:25
truth (5)
476:6 493:11
635:18 636:7
616:16 617:5
549:22
482:21 498:4
505:23 560:1
636:12,16,17
617:24 643:6
travels (1)
533:22 592:6
590:18 599:15
638:4 639:15
top (1)
483:20
605:8
604:11,13
640:5 643:4
614:23
Travis (1)
truth-telling (1)
635:11,18,20
646:7,12
topic (2)
464:15
563:4
636:8,22 639:6 timeframe (4)
564:12 574:23
treading (1)
truthful (3)
three-year (1)
513:13 576:18
topics (1)
593:12
592:5 616:19,23
569:7
576:19 586:14
519:8
treat (3)
truthfulness (1)
thrilled (1)
times (7)
total (1)
633:10 635:14
576:24
474:13
544:15 591:22
497:9
635:24
try (8)
throw (1)
602:21 604:14
totally (6)
tremendous (1)
473:15 475:5,5
581:10
617:15 635:8
505:14 510:3
606:2
475:9,9 486:23
throwing (1)
639:6
551:13 587:18
tried (4)
591:20 625:21
575:17
tired (1)
592:14 600:7
501:22 548:8
trying (9)
time (81)
519:2
tough (1)
593:5 637:22
479:2 509:15
466:2 471:14
TIST (1)
588:5
trip (3)
580:18 592:9
473:5,6 474:14
503:14
toys (1)
505:2,17 506:13
593:10 617:9
476:25 480:17
title (1)
508:23
Tripp (1)
617:11 622:3
482:10 484:22
500:14
trafficked (4)
462:17
636:2
486:9,10
titled (3)
485:20 486:6
trouble (2)
Tuesday (1)
488:10 489:10
465:16,20,22
487:6 488:6
580:20 625:25
462:15
502:7 504:6
today (12)
trafficking (8)
true (43)
turn (2)
505:12 511:23
496:18 501:9
486:13 487:23
466:25 472:20
466:15,17
512:18 513:2
543:20 556:6
488:5,13,17,21
473:11 476:4
turned (5)
513:19,20,22
561:6 568:9,23
488:22 489:4
476:14 480:24
477:6,6 597:12
515:3 516:9,13
577:15 596:14
transcript (7)
506:19 520:20
637:9,23
517:1 518:11
597:8 604:17
469:20,21
535:3 548:25
turning (2)
520:3 522:15
630:18
645:11,12
551:13 554:13
470:17 550:24
529:8,11 535:4 told (25)
646:9,10 647:2
565:15,21,25
turns (2)
536:4 537:12
487:19 533:8
transcripts (3)
570:11 575:6,9 490:6 576:12
542:21 543:11
534:7 543:12
468:22 469:23
575:11 577:15
twice (1)
543:14 546:7
554:16 564:25
469:24
587:17 588:2
530:19
550:24 554:6
565:1,20,22
transport (1)
592:3 604:12
two (21)
559:15 562:18
569:3,4,17,22
484:13
604:20,21
482:1 505:23
563:3 565:24
570:17 596:4
trash (1)
605:4 606:5.7
549:22 554:9
www.phi sr orting.com
EFTA00615799
32
574:6 575:3
underlying (1)
621:2,11
593:4 595:1,8
579:8,9 599:15
523:5
unprofessiona...
602:14,16
601:18 604:21
underpants (1)
620:16
video (6)
606:13,15
627:9
unresponsive ...
473:10,25
615:19 635:11
undersigned (1)
477:17 607:16
474:25 475:10
635:17,20
644:8
untruth (1)
477:4 580:23
636:8,9,19
understand (24)
563:6
Videographer...
639:6
474:18 480:15
uphold (1)
464:15 466:1
two-minute (2)
486:23 499:18
479:10
529:7,10 546:3
546:2 580:24
513:24 514:2
upset (1)
546:6 581:2,5
two-page (1)
518:14 523:7
597:24
623:16,19
503:3
527:14 540:24
use (2)
643:3
typically (1)
551:24 562:20
506:2 583:18
videos (10)
635:10
564:6,19,21,22 Utah (1)
472:18,21 473:3
573:7 575:22
464:14
473:4,6,7,8
U
593:17 603:18
utterly (2)
474:8,13 475:1
U.S (6)
617:10,14
620:9,10
videotape (2)
465:19 476:21
619:2 642:18
462:10 645:9
V
495:12 498:20
understandin...
videotapes (5)
v (2)
595:22 608:12
484:19 485:12
472:2,3,5,7
Uh-huh (1)
494:21,25
646:5 647:3
474:11
635:5
495:2 518:16
vacation (2)
view (2)
ultimate (1)
518:19 526:3
505:8 636:14
486:12 602:9
Virtually (1)
568:25
527:12,16
vagina (1)
views (3)
625:6
ultimately (1)
528:5,10,11
597:13
480:7 494:23
visa (1)
576:19
551:2,11,12
valid (1)
566:23
595:15
unable (1)
understood (3)
467:20
Vineyard (1)
visit (1)
483:24
470:19 536:24
various (9)
537:10
542:2
underage (37)
640:20
468:21 472:8,22 violate (2)
visited (2)
480:24 482:18
undertaken (2)
474:1 506:10
488:15,16
542:1,1
483:3,6 487:1
479:5,5
552:14 567:4
violating (2)
visiting (4)
490:16,25
undisputed (1)
573:24 604:3
563:20 577:7
504:23 635:4
491:24 496:22
545:17
vehemently (1)
Virgin (5)
639:8,9
497:23 498:6
unequivocally_
466:21
482:17 503:14
Visosky (1)
502:17,21
602:13
versus (2)
503:16,19
507:9
508:8,15,24
unfair (3)
564:14 574:17
volume (4)
534:12 535:3
559:16 620:9,10 vibrators (1)
462:13 465:5
541:25 554:9
unfamiliar (1)
596:5
466:16,17
565:24 580:22
499:16
victim (7)
voluntarily (3)
601:20 619:13
united (5)
487:7,23 501:14
486:7 488:7,9
623:24 627:5
495:7 496:14
583:8 598:20
volunteer (1)
637:1,4,10,23
497:24 555:8
599:3 611:7
489:5
638:4 641:6
621:6
victims (14)
vs (1)
642:2,7,14,16
universally (1)
491:19 500:20
462:6
642:16
621:22
501:3 543:17
vulnerable (1)
underlined (1)
unprofessiona...
580:18,19,22
492:16
481:23
6/0:10.19 V1:1
590:17 592:2
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615800
33
warrant (3)
476:2,4 540:6
Washington (1)
568:9 602:21
603:19 622:17
625:2
WILEY (1)
463:18
willfully (1)
579:9,9,17
606:15 639:24
640:1,11,16
_iy_
wait (4)
535:23 543:1
574:13 594:11
463:19
weaken (1)
642:8
641:24 642:5,7
waiting (1)
wasn't (15)
489:3
William (1)
642:14
617:19
475:12 499:15
Webber (2)
553:19
word (8)
waive (8)
501:2 507:12
590:23 592:25
willingly (1)
488:22 535:16
466:24 475:19
552:7 554:13
website (1)
486:6
543:25 566:1
476:18 478:18
569:14 575:6
590:16
wine (1)
623:25 624:12
507:22 646:7
583:6 589:1
weigh (1)
641:2
625:8 642:16
646:14,21
613:4 617:12
604:1
winter (1)
words (4)
waiver (4)
631:11,12
weighing (2)
505:11
578:1,10 592:18
477:19,25
632:10
562:12 603:24
wish (6)
628:6
478:17,19
watch (1)
Weinberg (2)
475:23 476:19
work (27)
waives (1)
636:20
495:15 610:2
477:4,5,16
466:19 467:10
571:9
way (16)
welcome (1)
646:14
469:13 470:18
waiving (5)
470:23 480:7
470:12
wishes (2)
471:4,17 472:9
474:21 478:24
489:2 536:11
well-known (1)
477:9,14
475:18,19
571:10,10,11
536:17 568:4
573:15
witness (44)
483:13 507:3
walk (1)
568:22 571:4
went (12)
465:8 478:9,20
517:13,20
634:7
571:17 576:22
486:7,10 503:24
479:23 480:10
531:23 532:15
want (39)
601:6 603:4
505:19 506:8
490:8 499:6,21
534:25 540:15
466:20 468:20
609:11 613:21
513:13 518:20
500:11 509:25
550:10 568:1
469:18 470:4
634:11 639:2
518:21 530:22
510:25 511:19
569:2 571:11
472:18 480:11
we'll (14)
531:1 549:5
526:21,21
580:25 582:1
491:4 495:25
470:8,15 479:11
573:24
543:3 546:1
583:4 589:21
497:6 499:24
507:17 519:7
West (2)
550:6,12
590:8 596:21
500:3 507:17
581:10 597:18
463:5 646:20
559:21 567:21
working (1)
515:23 526:20
597:18 611:12
Wexner (4)
567:24 573:9
476:23
540:23 552:6
617:4,4 618:10
509:13 510:14
584:3,11
worst (1)
556:8 568:18
622:8 639:3
522:20,24
585:10 593:17
620:3
568:20 575:21
we're (26)
Wexner's (4)
593:21 594:5
wouldn't (14)
576:10 582:9
470:2 474:20
510:2,17 522:16
594:10,17,21
493:24 501:2,23
585:9 593:19
490:1,2 499:23
522:19
603:11 605:16
521:17 556:20
597:21 598:3
509:20 546:19
whatsoever (3)
607:18,22
562:16 564:15
599:13 603:1,2
556:3 562:5
491:3 548:10
610:8,13,17,21
566:1 568:21
603:13 605:25
563:7 564:2
563:2
615:5 616:15
570:22 579:4
615:2,4,6
576:17,17
White (1)
617:18 619:6
587:5 614:5
616:15 619:6
580:25 581:1
548:2
632:22
615:20
620:16 634:15
582:12 585:6
wife (12)
witnesses (5)
write (3)
640:14
593:5 594:7
503:21 504:13
467:5 591:5,16
538:7 608:11
wanted (4)
603:24 611:15
504:18,18
591:17 592:6
647:2
632:6,9 633:11
617:19 618:13
542:1 624:9,18 woman (7)
writing (2)
635:15
630:10 634:18
625:20 632:7
488:6 562:6
528:11,22
wants (2)
643:5
634:9 636:8,15
565:7 601:1
written (2)
616:20 634:14
we've (7)
wife's (1)
627:10 642:4,5
528:12 610:6
470:6 516:10
504:24
women (12)
wrong (6)
www.phi sr
orting.com
EFTA00615801
34
494:25 531:2
613:13 628:10
628:11 632:21
579:9 639:14
639:20,23
640:1 641:14
465:17 637:11
646:1
1400 (2)
491:16
1998 (1)
505:8
2009 (3)
494:3,11 638:20
2010 (3)
wrote (4)
641:24 642:3,4
463:9 646:2
1999 (2)
587:3,6,9
492:15 522:7
642:7
14th (3)
512:19 516:10
2015 (13)
538:2 614:9
Yugoslavia (1)
503:5 644:12
524:14 525:9
2
595:9
645:20
527:23 528:13
ii
15 (5)
2:09 (2)
529:4 531:5,22
Z
X (1)
489:11,13
529:8,9
532:11,21
465:1
491:18 519:7
2:26 (2)
548:21 585:2
0
637:11
529:9,11
585:20 626:8
Y
02110 (1)
15-000072 (1)
2:43 (2)
2016 (7)
yeah (15)
463:15
462:2
546:4,5
462:15 644:11
484:19 503:11
15,000 (1)
2:45 (2)
644:12 645:20
515:14 520:20
530:8
546:5,7
646:1,7 647:5
536:23 547:17
557:9,9 572:25
572:25 613:12
1 (6)
468:25 469:5,16
469:23 470:1,7
150 (1)
585:17
150-page (1)
20 (2)
465:14 547:9
200 (1)
20s (2)
637:21 642:5
20th (1)
613:14 623:13
1,200 (1)
585:21
646:19
481:12
626:5 631:20
year (9)
482:3 490:8
506:5
1:05 (2)
462:15 466:2
1551 (1)
646:19
16 (7)
2000 (5)
481:11482:3,6
489:25 503:5
21 (5)
465:16 561:11
585:2,20 626:8
505:8 521:18
522:22,24
100 (1)
572:6
482:15,17
489:12,13
20006 (1)
463:19
2139 (1)
463:4
538:13 629:23
635:8
11 (1)
582:14
503:8 521:19
637:11
2001 (10)
481:11,11,12
21st (1)
586:22
years (14)
11-person (1)
17 (11)
482:3,5 490:1
22 (4)
484:7,14 488:3
489:12 502:8
512:21 522:8
559:4,15 584:8
619:25 631:24
634:10 637:12
465:24
110 (1)
462:17
11th (5)
609:12,12,17,22
610:18
482:9,14,15,16
484:7 489:13
489:22,22
530:3,5,9
17769 (1)
463:18
490:7,8 503:4
530:3
2002 (4)
481:10 512:19
512:23 516:10
2005 (12)
465:18,19
611:21 622:14
226848 (1)
644:16
22nd (1)
503:4
Yep (1)
470:11
12 (2)
462:15 647:5
18 (13)
471:14 482:12
516:5 517:2,5
517:11 527:20
23 (4)
465:20 622:10
York (16)
464:5,5 482:15
12-year-old (1)
493:11
482:13,24
536:19,21,23
536:24 577:22
622:12,18
508:7 524:20
1200 (1)
483:2,5 484:14
489:22 490:5,6
582:14 631:19
24 (4)
465:22 627:21
524:24 526:13
464:8
502:21 533:13
2006 (1)
627:23 628:25
558:12 569:15
569:16 570:16
12th (2)
644:10 646:6
577:23
581:9
24/7 (1)
2007 (12)
625:8,9 629:18
630:24 637:17
13 (4)
502:8 611:23
18th (1)
489:5
19 (2)
465:18 496:3
557:11,24
549:20
25 (1)
637:23
young (16)
521:12 530:5
614:14 615:8
131 (1)
465:13 500:16
1907 (1)
560:8 567:14
571:23 574:20
26 (3)
615:13,14,17
539:16 541:13
541:15 565:7
463:14
14 (3)
565:25
1959 (1)
575:24 577:10
598:13.22
29 (1)
638:19
mmw.phi sr orting.com
EFTA00615802
3 5
562 (1)
463:10 646:3
3
3:23 (2)
465:16
96 (2)
581:3,4
575 (1)
630:2 631:7
3:38 (2)
464:4
97 (2)
581:4,6
59th (3)
630:2 631:7
30s (1)
522:17,18,19
99 (1)
642:5
512:22
6
33156 (2)
463:10 646:3
6 (1)
33301 (1)
465:18
464:9
612 (1)
33401 (1)
465:18
646:20
623 (1)
33402-3626(1)
465:20
463:5
628 (1)
465:22
4
645 (1)
4 (2)
465:7
462:13 465:5
646 (1)
4:26 (2)
465:7
623:17,18
647 (3)
4:29 (2)
462:13 465:5,8
623:18,20
648 (1)
4:45 (2)
465:8
462:15 637:18
6th (1)
4:49 (1)
462:17
643:4
7
40 (3)
582:10 593:4
7 (3)
619:24
481:5,7,8
401 (1)
7/12/2019 (1)
464:8
644:17
455 (1)
70-year-old (1)
645:10
504:13
462 (3)
8
462:13 465:5
83 (1)
645:10
482:8
4th (1)
87-page (1)
464:4
577:21
5
9
50 (2)
9:00 (1)
488:3 584:8
643:6
501 (1)
90s (2)
465:13
630:21 631:15
548 (1)
465:14
9150 (2)
www.phi sr orting.com
EFTA00615803