Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

US District Court Civil Docket

US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Florida Southern (West Palm Beach) 9:08cv80736 Doe'. United States of America This case was retrieved from the court on Sunday, May 22, 2016 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lead Docket: Other Docket: Jurisdiction: 07/07/2008 Judge Kenneth A. Marra Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon (Settlement) Other Civil Rights (440) no cause specified None USCA, 13-12923-C USCA, 13-12926-C USCA, 13-12928-C U.S. Government Defendant Litigants Jane Doe Petitioner United States of America Respondent Class Code: OPEN Closed: Statute: Jury Demand: None Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Other Civil Rights Attorneys Bradley James Edwards LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL Jav C. Howell PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jay Howell & Associates PA ISM Paul G. Cassell PRO HAC VICE;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED EFTA00211439 Miami , FL 33132

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2's PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION TO CONFORM TO EXISTING EVIDENCE AND TO ADD JANE DOE NO. 3 AND JANE DOE NO. 4 AS PETITIONERS Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's Motion pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend their Petition to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 as Petitioners, and states: I. FED.R.CIV.P. 15 GOVERNS PETITIONERS' ATTEMTPS TO AMEND THEIR PETITION AND ADD TWO NEW PETITIONERS Petitioners have filed their "protective" motion to amend their petition and to add two new petitioners, Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4. Both motions are governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15, and both should be deni

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 05:14:2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, EFTA00234817 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 0514:2009 Page 2 of 4 Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaint

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

Case: 9:08-cv-80736 As of: 02/25/2019 01:48 PM EST 1 of 35