Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00625033DOJ Data Set 9Other

December 7, 2016

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00625033
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
December 7, 2016 Via Email: Joe Titone, Esq. 621 S.E. 5th Street Pompano Beach , FL 33060 Re: Service of Process Dear Joe: I have had an opportunity to review the Notice Service of Process that you filed in the Jean Luc Brunel/Jeffrey Epstein case. From my careful review it is clear that once again the attempt to serve runs afoul of Florida Statutes 48.031, as well as the holding in the Third District in HAUSER VS. SCHIFF. I have attached a copy of that case for your ready reference. It is now almost two years past the January 2015 filing date of your clients' amended complaint joining Mr. Epstein as a defendant to the original action filed in August 2014. I remind you that no attempt was made to even serve Mr. Epstein until March 10, 2015. In that attempt the required Notice of Service was never filed with the Court, and which you, yourself, agreed in your later filed Motion for Reconsideration was an improper service. After rescheduling the hearing on Mr. Epstein's Motion to Quash, filed on April 29, 2015, and on four different occasions, you failed to appear. At the July 27, 2016 hearing that you, yourself, set more than a year after the date of Mr. Epstein's Motion to Quash you sought pardon from the Court for your continued neglect, claiming that you somehow misunderstood the date on which you were to appear , due to a brain issue , though it was you who cancelled the previously scheduled June 22, 2016 hearing date and specifically scheduled the hearing on July 27, 2016. The Court's grant of an additional 120 days for service in deference to your medical issues did not confer on you a license to continue to disregard the jurisdictional perquisites of proper service, with which you have failed to comply even after having had 681 days do so . The failure to properly serve Mr. Epstein, again is evident from the face of your Notice of Service of Process. No response to your clients' Amended Complaint is due or should be expected unless and until proper service is made. I remind you that the judge set a not later than 120 days following the Court's October 5, 2016 order. Please be guided accordingly. Very truly yours, EFTA00625033 W. Chester Brewer, Jr., P.A. EFTA00625034

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.