Case File
efta-efta00671106DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00671106
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"
To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
Subject: RE: FW: Autism and real science
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:26:17 +0000
Agree 100% with you.
This time is irrelevant — next time might be something stupid that you never said. I do not want that this gets associated
with you.
She is doing it to impress you and him.
The only way to stop is that you tell her to stop doing it.
You might say that you would like to focus your discussion with him on currency and that would prefer that the other
topics do not distract.
Working like a dog here.
From: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 3:25 AM
To: Boris Nikolic (bgC3)
Subject: Fwd: FW: Autism and real science
forwarded this to me, As you know I think most of her thinking is goofy, The fact that she merely tells
me about it , does not mean I have any interest, respect, agreement. she then sends a e mail to bill that she and i
are having a conversation about it, I found strange. no need to mention me
Forwarded message
From:
Date: Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:42 PM
Subject: FW: Autism and real science
To: "jeevacation®gmail.com" [email protected]>
FYI
From:
Sent: Saturda February 05, 2011 8:39 PM
To:
Cc: Boris Nikolic (bgC3)
Subject: Autism and real science
I know that autism has been coming up quite a lot lately, and I agree that it would be very unlikely that there is a
relationship between vaccine administrations and any sort of static encephalopathy or regression. This is a line of
conversation that JEE and I have been having recently, and since it might be of some interest to you — I will try
to summarize some very creative and evidence-based thinking in this area.
Specifically, and most interestingly:
EFTA00671106
•
Influenza? Maternal influenza infection prior to closure of neural tube seems to have a high
correlation with autism and schizophrenia — verified via large Scandinavian pre-natal care data sets. If
you really think about it though, it probably isn't just influenza; it is more likely hyperthermia (fever)
related to and possibly linked to some form of infectious/post-infectious insult.
•
Hyperthermia? An episode of hyperthermia is not uncommon during pregnancy. The consequences
depend on the extent of temperature elevation, its duration, and the stage of development when it
occurs. Mild exposures during the pre-implantation period and more severe exposures during
embryonic and fetal development can result in prenatal death and abortion. Hyperthermia also causes a
wide range of structural and functional defects. The central nervous system (CNS) is most at risk
probably because it cannot compensate for the loss of prospective neurons by additional divisions by
the surviving neuroblasts and it remains at risk at stages throughout pre- and postnatal life. In
experimental animals the most common defects are of the neural tube, microphthalmia, cataract, and
micrencephaly, with those without physical defects but with associated functional and behavioral
problems. Nearly all these defects have been found in human epidemiological studies following (known)
maternal fever or hyperthermia during pregnancy.
•
Valproic Acid and Thalidomide? It is interesting too that the same outcomes can be seen in
pregnant moms who take valproic acid (an antiepileptic, anti-depressant and pretty decent pain
medication) or thalidomide (no longer available) during early pregnancy, and even throughout gestation.
The usual physical deformities can be seen, but there is also a strong correlation with autism and other
psychological issues that don't manifest until later — or present as a regression.
SO?
Autism spectrum disorders affect behaviors that emerge at ages when typically developing children become
increasingly social and communicative, but many lines of evidence suggest that the underlying alterations in the
brain occur long before the period when symptoms become obvious. Studies of the behavior of children in the
first year of life demonstrate that symptoms are often detectable in the first 6 months. The environmental factors
known to increase the risk of autism have critical periods of action during embryogenesis. Minor malformations
that occur frequently in people with autism are known to arise in the same stages of development. Anomalies
reported from histological studies of the brain are consistent with an early alteration of development. Congenital
syndromes with high rates of autism include somatic that originate early in the first trimester. In addition, it is
possible to duplicate a number of anatomic and behavioral features characteristic of human cases by exposing rat
embryos to a teratogenic of valproic acid or thalidomide at the time of neural tube closure.
It is still true that the underlying brain injury that leads to autism has been difficult to identify. The diagnostic
criteria of the disease are not readily associated with any brain region or system, nor are they mimicked by
vascular accidents, tumors, or degenerative neurological diseases occurring in adults. There is a cool paper from
the 1990s that provides some evidence that the disease originates by an injury at the time of closure of the neural
tube. The human data suggest that the initiating lesion includes the motor cranial nerve nuclei. To test this
hypothesis, the investigators first examined motor nuclei in the brainstem of a human autistic case. The autopsy
brain exhibited near-complete absence of the facial nucleus and superior olive along with shortening of the
brainstem between the trapezoid body and the inferior olive (very high-priced real estate). A similar deficit has
been reported in Hoxa-1 gene knockout mice in which pattern formation of the hindbrain is disrupted during
neurulation.
Alternatively, exposure to antimitotic agents just after neural tube closure could produce the observed pattern of
deficits. Thus, the lesions observed in the autopsy case appear to match those predicted by the thalidomide cases
in both time of origin and central nervous system (CNS) location. To produce similar brain lesions
experimentally, the team exposed rat embryos to valproic acid, a second teratogen linked to autism. Animals
received 350 mg/kg of valproic acid (VPA) on day 11.5 (the day of neural tube closure), day 12, or day 12.5
gestation. Each treatment significantly reduced the number of motor neurons counted in matched sections of the
EFTA00671107
earliest-forming motor nuclei (V, XII), and progressively later exposures affected the Vlth and IIIrd cranial nerve
nuclei. All treatments spared the facial nucleus, which forms still later (super interesting). Counts from the
mesencephalic nucleus of trigeminal, the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, and the locus ceruleus were not
affected by exposure to VPA, even though these nuclei form during the period when exposure occurred. Despite
its effects on the motor nuclei, valproic acid exposure did not alter the further development of the brain in any
obvious way. Treated animals were robust and had no external malformations. The autopsy data and
experimental data from rats confirm that CNS injuries occurring during (or just after neural tube closure) can
lead to a selective loss of neurons derived from the basal plate of the rhombencephalon. The results add two new
lines of evidence that place the initiating injury for autism around the time of neural tube closure.
Whether it is an exogenous agent (ie, medication) given to mom during this critical period or an infection/fever,
it seems pretty clear that the damage is done during the period when the neural tube is forming. Not post-natal.
There also seems to be a role for VIP, although unclear if that is collateral or an independent process.
There are very few scientists studying this, but the best one is at Caltech. Go Beavers.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00671108
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01853136
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01826966
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02689306
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01862346
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02575428
2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025
Jeffrey Epstein email to Boris Nikolic referencing Vanity Fair piece on Epstein‑Maxwell alliance and hinting at financial mystery
The email contains a direct link to a Vanity Fair article that discusses Epstein’s connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers (Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne). It reinforces Email from Epstein to Boris Nikolic dated March 8 2011 includes a Vanity Fair link about Epstein‑Max References to high‑profile financiers: Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne, Steven Hoffenberg. Alludes to pote
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.