Case File
efta-efta00673837DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "Lawrence H. Summers" <
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00673837
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Lawrence H. Summers" <
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
CC: lhsoffice
Subject: Fwd: Summers / DE Shaw
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:50:45 +0000
FYI
Sent from my iPad
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office
Follow me on twitter ®Ihsummers
www.larrysummers.com
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Neff, Daniel A." <
Date: July 29, 2015 at 3:10:10 PM EDT
To: "Lawrence H. Summers"
Cc: "Kim, Richard K." <I
Subject: Fwd: Summers / DE Shaw
Larry,
>, "Lawrence H. Summers"
Our lead regulatory partner, Richard Kim, believes that the question you asked me on Friday relates to
amendments to the Investment Advisers Act made by Dodd-Frank. Richard 's view, as indicated below, is that
that you should be OK so long as your advice relates to economic, finance or political matters and not to the
purchase or sale of individual securities. Don't hesitate to contact Richard directly (or me, of course) if you
wish to discuss further.
Dan
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Kim, Richard K." <e
Date: July 28, 2015 at 5:41:55 AM GMT+2
To: "Neff, Daniel A."
Subject: Summers / DE Shaw
mailto
mailto:
>>
Dan - I looked at the question of whether the Dodd Frank amendments to the Investment Advisers Act should
pose any issues for Professor Summers and don't think they do. The Investment Advisers Act requires
registration with the SEC for any person who engages in the business of advising others as to the value of
securities or the advisability of investing in or selling them as well as those who issue analyses concerning
securities. Dodd Frank eliminated the private investment adviser exemption which previously exempted
EFTA00673837
investment advisers with fewer than 15 clients who did not hold themselves out as investment advisers. The
purpose was to sweep in advisers to hedge funds. Since Summers' business shouldn't fall within the scope of
the definition of an investment adviser to begin with, the loss of the exemption shouldn't have any implications
for him. Glad to discuss at your convenience.
Richard
Richard K. Kim
Wachtell Ligon, Rosen & Katz
Please be advised that this transmittal may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise
be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this
communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail
) or by telephone (call us collect at
) and delete this message and any
attachments.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.
www.wlrk.com
EFTA00673838
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01682184
186p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01370863
1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown
Medical Record/Clinical Encounter: DOJ-OGR-00026334
This clinical encounter document from the Bureau of Prisons details a medical evaluation of Jeffrey Epstein on July 12, 2019. It covers his medical history, current complaints, and treatment, including discussions around his triglyceride levels, sleep apnea, and back pain. The document was generated by the treating physician at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.
1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00014087
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02367961
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01977826
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.