From: "Mike Sitrick"

From: "Mike Sitrick" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Cc: "Tony Knight" • Subject: FW: my edits Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:56:18 +0000 From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:41 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Alan M. Dershowitz; Martin Weinberg; Tony Knight; Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: my edits Marty suggested the changes below per his previous emails. Also, I spoke with a defamation lawyer in the UK and my friend who represented Prince Charles. Mike An attorney for Jeffrey Epstein today issued the following statement: Contrary to media reports being published in effort to demonize Prince Andrew, the government did not charge, nor were there ever allegations that Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile. Mr. Epstein pled guilty and served an 18 month sentence followed by a year of heightened supervision for soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. Theiensanentilineel-r-eferefte-in-a-handfal-ef-media-te-ealls-from-sehnel-girls-er-sehnel-ehildren-is-blantittly mi.;leading. A.; far a.; we can tell, the calls that arc being referenced came from college students in their 20s and a 22-year-old-who-was-a-mudent-in-a-massage-seheet. Aside from the fact that these and other assertions that have been reported in the media on this matter are inaccurate, much of this information is emanating from plaintiffs lawyers who are seeking monetary advantage from Mr. Epstein --one whom is currently serving a 50 year sentence for fabricating Epstein-related cases --and feund-te-ne-erediblej-and-whose-nevraeeusations-are-demenntrably4aine. Our criminal justice system is based on finality and on encouraging people who made mistakes to suffer a single punishment and then have a chance at a new life. Mr. Epstein has paid that price for his past mistakes. There is absolutely no allegation of any such conduct after 2005 and all of what has been pled to or even alleged occurred long before that. As Mr. Epstein said through a spokesman in a statement, this was a different time in his life and one, with the help of counseling from professionals, he has put behind him. He is a different person today than he was when these events occurred many years ago. He is focusing on helping the community through educational, scientific and healthcare philanthropic contributions, as well as discharging his responsibility as a financier at the highest professional level. From: Jeffrey Epstein [malito:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:08 AM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Fwd: my edits EFTA00682314 Forwarded message From: Alan Dershowitz <1 Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:06 AM Subject: Re: my edits To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Yes to both Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBeny From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:04:56 -0800 To: Mike Sitrick Cc: Tony Knight Subject: Re: my edits ; Alan Dershowitz< do we want to say the that the tabloid exageration due to Prince andrews involvement has now demonized Jeffreys conduct to that of a pedophile? do we want to specifically point out that virginias alllegations were fully explored. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Mike Sitrick < > wrote: Marty If we don't say what she is saying is inaccurate, I think we can just take it out. That really is the purpose here. What I don't want to do is have someone respond: "Yeah, she is seeking her 15 minutes of fame, but you are not saying what she is saying is false. Mike From: [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:58 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Mike Sitrick Cc: Darren Indyke; Alan Dershowitz; Tony Knight Subject: Re: my edits I would also end the par on the pi lawyers with moment of fame The rest invites even more mudslinging Is there is an example we can attribute to a specific pi atty? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:30:00 -0800 To: Mike Sitrick Weinberg ; Tony Knight ; Alan M. Dershowi ; Martin Cc: Darren Ind k Subject: Re: my edits s. An attorney for Jeffrey Epstein today issued the following statement: Despite inaccurate reports to the contrary, the government did not charge, nor were there ever allegations that Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile. After Mr. Epstein pled guilty and served an_l 8 month sentence followed by a EFTA00682315 year of heightened supervision. for soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. The sensationalized reference in a handful of media ,to calls from school girls or school children is blatantly misleading. The calls from school girls or school children being referenced were in fact college students in their 20s and a 22 year old who was a student in a massage school. Aside from the fact that these and other assertions that have been reported in the media on this matter is inaccurate, much of this information is emanating from plaintiffs lawyers who are seeking monetary advantage from Mr. Epstein --one whom is currently serving a 50 year sentence for fabricating Epstein-related cases. and individuals who are seeking their 15 minutes of fame, who are also making statements that are demonstrably false. Our criminal justice system is based on finality and on encouraging people who made mistakes to suffer a single punishment and then have a chance at a new life. Mr. Epstein has paid that price for his past mistakes. There is absolutely no allegation of any such conduct after 2005 and all of what has been pled to or even alleged occurred long before that. As Mr. Epstein said through a spokesman in a statement, this was a different time in his life and one, with the help of counseling from professionals, he has put behind him. He is a different person today than he was when these events occurred many years ago. He is focusing on helping the community through educational, scientific and healthcare philanthropic contributions, as well as discharging his responsibility as a financier at the highest professional level. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:43 AM To: Mike Sitrick Cc: Darren Indyke; Alan M. Dershowitz; Martin Weinberg Subject: my edits Some thoughts on content: and questions do we refute duchess of york, clearly delusional statements? 1. That the media has mischaracterized the offenses, that after a thorough investigation, JE plead guilty to - there was no reference to being a pedophile and the tabloids tales of "school girls" is misleading - instead, the evidence showed a pattern of girls, many over 18, some under, exchanging massages for money and that the girls under 18 were regularly told to assure JE that they were 18 to even gain admittance to his house 2. That the media has focused on just one slice ofJE life. That he is a generous philanthropist and brilliant professional with loyal friends and colleagues whose relationship with him has nothing to do with women 3. That our criminal justice system is based on finality and on encouraging people who made mistakes to suffer a single punishment, and then to have a chance at a new life. JE has paid that price for his past. There is absolutely no allegation of any conduct after 2005, and most of it was long before. 4. The entirety of the articles rely on information given to them by civil plaintiffs lawyers, one who is currently serving a 50 year sentence for fabricating epstein related cases. who are currently seeking monetary advantage from JE. They deal exclusively with conduct over 6 and often over 10 years old. I will keep an eye out for drafts *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00682316 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00682317