Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00687766DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Martin Weinberg"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00687766
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacationggmail.com> Cc: <j Subject: Re: JE Appeal Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:37:44 +0000 i will talk to jay and fowler to make sure we can do a filing that gets you some advantage - allows judge to see scarola as something other than a source of legal wisdom Original Message From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Martin Weinberg Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:02 PM Subject: Re: JE Appeal i am ok if you want to make a motion for sanctions or some such " it is wrong. On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Martin Weinberg C > wrote: I am not content to simply sit silent while Scarola writes threatening letters but I do not want to do anything in conflict with strategy to bring Kirkland in etc. but think that the Judge should know at the appropriate time that Scarola is threatening your counsel to try to deny you representation when its Scarola's intransigence/irrationality on the counter-claim that keeps the case alive. If Scarola was to have your way, you would have no lawyers to defend you on the counter-claim. Original Message From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Sandra Musumeci Cc: Jay Lefkowitz • Martin Weinberg • • Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:28 PM Subject: Re: JE Appeal can i also have the appeal iteself On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Sandra Musumeci • wrote: Team, Attached are the file-stamped copies of the Notice of Time Requested for Oral Argument and letter to the Clerk of the Court regarding scheduling issues, both of which were filed in court and served on the DA today in connection with the appeal of the SORA adjudication. I will let you know when we are notified of an oral argument date. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Regards, Sandy Sandra L. Musumeci I Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Avenue I New York. NY 10022 ***************WW***WW***WW***WW***WW***WW***WW************ The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of PROT0 Kirkland S, Ellis LLP or Kirkland s Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved PROT1

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainjeevacationggmail.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Martin Weinberg"

1p
Court UnsealedJan 26, 2015

Dershowitz Supplement to Motion for Limited Intervention

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 285 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2015 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOES #2 Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ________________________________/ ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S SUPPLEMENT TO HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION (DE 282) Alan M. Dershowitz, a nonparty to this litigation, respectfully supplements his previously filed Motion for Limited Intervention (

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00429452

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01355640

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING PRODUCTION, USE, AND DISCLOSURE OF PLEA NEGOTIATIONS During the hearing on August 12, 2011, the Court directed the proposed intervenors to file additional briefing on their argument that plea negotiations are privileged and not subject to discovery or use as evidence in these proceedings. Proposed intervenors submit the following memorandum of law, which is identical to Parts I and II of the memorandum of law submitted by proposed intervenor Jeffrey Epstein in support of his motion for a protective order and his opposition to the motions of the plaintiffs for production, use,

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/2672011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES, Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52), Plaintiffs' Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court has heard oral arguments on all motions. The Court has carefully considered the briefing and the parties' arguments and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental brie

14p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.