Case File
efta-efta00688901DOJ Data Set 9OtherDS9 Document EFTA00688901
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00688901
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevaeation@::ginail.coin>
CC: Boris Nikolic
Subject: Re: additional info
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 04:25:56 +0000
Hi, here's a summary:
I. Initial agreement signed between
Contract ended in
and was not renewed yet
have a copy but basically it says that they pay us
addition to the
(M)
Current portfolio's are companies
example,
period. We at
converted ou
contract w/
investment vehicle in each deal. We've always been more than aligned in the deals we
sourced as we
helping
them grow.
You
in
As an
in sales in a
year
The context for this agreement was that they wanted to do deals in
an d
also negotiate and get us to win the deals that were good, a good entry value, then
This is exactly
what is happening in a way as
=and force the sale of the portfolio companies.
2. In they
too much of a deal flow to handle alone.
as we had
started taking the deals and running - going to meetings on their own and not acting as team members,
literally by-passing on deals we sourced. At that time,
and included the clause
that we would participate in everything they did.
h clearly stated we would be in
every deal, sourcing it or not, and the contract reflects that. Over time, to make sure the guys ink knew
what we were up to,
including for
Some things made this worse, for example, when
came to '
because
they were junior, and because
as
he said), or, the portfolio companies and partners of
elsewhere, when coming to =,
asked me
for help, and not them, as the two could not get them into the owners of the companies/clients or decision
makers that would generate real business. So thats how things got worse.
3. The fee for the deal in question is
the deal, but worked on it and it closed
•
I did not like
EFTA00688901
On top, they said this was due
to new
requirements. Then, after we sent the info,
. They never, ever, sent any email
or complained about our work or quality during the process. On the contrary, we have a ton of praising
emails over time and thank you emails to the team on this deal. But the
guys, in S
cut us off
from the
took our names out of the investment memo sent to the
and started selectively cutting us off everything we were working on. In
4. After S
I met w/
again in
and had a very honest conversation
about the entire situation. He asked me to send evidence which I did in
(the ppt you have).M
their
to ■
Other people internally aware of this are
who is on our side and knows how bad the
behaved.
ands.
a close friend
5. My plan is to (i) drop out of the -at
the
portfolio companies they/I invested in; (ii) Get
paid the fee for=
that was signed in
and has a closing next week (they said they would pay), and (iii) right after
get a lawyer to press them to pay for
. While they offered to pa
I did not accept as I said we did do work
and they need to fulfill the agreement.
6.
I know that the
- has been very much on top of their business, costs, selling, pulling back etc and making
their life difficult. So part of what they say is that "things changed", that they need to figure out what will be
of S
that these are new times and paying anything needs to be much justified etc.
I just
want
to pay what they owe me as that is the right thing, and if getting the lawyer is the most effective
way (even if just to put pressure) I will do that. If going through another path is worthwhile
, ready to learn what that would be. Its
important to say that
that are worth at
I don't want to put that at risk, even though we have
contracts there.
=
So they really look at me thinking I will bend and do nothing. I can be very patient.
EFTA00688902
thoughts?
Thanks,
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:00 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
now?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:40 PM,
wrote:
Thanks Boris. Jeff - let me know if I can call you tonight or what other time would be good to speak. Best,
From: Boris Nikolic [mailto:
Sent: Wednesda
March 26, 2014 04:29 PM
To:
•i•ie
Epstein <jeevacationagmail.com>
Subject: Connect
and Jeffery
Jeffery as I mentioned you
has some challenges re her. Agreement. You are uniquely position to advise her.
It is the best if you could connect directly.
Jeffery's cell is
EFTA00688903
He is now in NYC. Please call him when you can.
Thank you Jeffrey!
Boris
Sent from my Windows Phone
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00688904
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
jeevacationagmail.comEmail
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01853136
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01826966
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02689306
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01862346
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02575428
2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025
Jeffrey Epstein email to Boris Nikolic referencing Vanity Fair piece on Epstein‑Maxwell alliance and hinting at financial mystery
The email contains a direct link to a Vanity Fair article that discusses Epstein’s connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers (Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne). It reinforces Email from Epstein to Boris Nikolic dated March 8 2011 includes a Vanity Fair link about Epstein‑Max References to high‑profile financiers: Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne, Steven Hoffenberg. Alludes to pote
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.