From: Cecile de Jongh

From: Cecile de Jongh To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Fw: Hangar Planning Services Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:54:30 +0000 OK DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged,confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. From: Jeffrey Epstein <*eevacation@ mailcom> To: Cecile de Jongh < > sent: Wed, December 8, 2010 10:37:36 AM subject: Re: Fw: Hangar Planning Services approved On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Cecile de Jongh Hi Jeffrey. This is the proposal from VIPA. Cecile > wrote: DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged,confldential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies. app Forwarded Messa e From: Dale Gregory c To: EFTA00709269 Cc: Kenn Hobson < Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 3:17:38 PM Subject: FW: Hangar Planning Services Good afternoon Cecile: >; Denise Mills < I asked our consultant, URS, to look into the possibility of placing a hanger in the position requested adjacent to the GA apron at the Cyril E. King Airport. They believe that the approval can be received if they undertake the work as defined in the scope of work in their proposal attached- Supplemental Agreement No. 8. The end result will be a placement of the hanger that is consistent with our development plan and a site that is acceptable to the FAA. Should I tell them to proceed with the work as proposed? Thanks, Dale A. Gregory From: [mailto: Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:44 PM To: Dale Gregory; Byron Todman Cc: Subject: Hangar Planning Services I talked to Armando and the FAA's position on pavement life is 20 years, so if there weren't other constraint issues, the Port Authority could build on the GA Ramp area. FAA's position however is that SIT needs all the ramp space it has, otherwise you wouldn't be parking aircraft on taxiways. Armando really wants the Port Authority to reopen discussions with the college on possible land swaps. He is looking forward to reviewing possible new GA apron utilization plans, but believes striking a deal with the college will provide the most benefit to the Airport. Fred indicated he could find several of the past exhibits he has completed for the GA area, for further discussion at ow meeting in December. Please call if you have any questions on the attached. Steven Henriquez, PE Vice President-Operations Manager URS Corporation Southern 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, FL 33607-1462 EFTA00709270 di eel e-mail: This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential information that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient. you should not retain. distribute. disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00709271