From: Martin Weinberg -MINIM>

From: Martin Weinberg -MINIM> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:55:13 +0000 understood, the log itself is a 6(e) violation, and one that preceded any judicial OK to identify witnesses, subjects, etc Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, EFTA00718256 distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From: Jeffrey Epstein <• evacation mail.com> To: Martin Weinberg Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:53 PM Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE she also named witnesses , igor etc. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote: agreed, no value in delay, will get back with you tomorrow after speaking with roy Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The EFTA00718257 information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg < Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:21 PM Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE what about you and roy going to ferrar sooner rather than later? On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Martin Weinberg < wrote: Jeffrey A rough first draft of a possible intervention motion on 6(e). We will expand it, but I am inclined to redact phrases like "draft indictments" so it is not us that is inserting that info into public pleadings. We need to feature your privacy interests - which will lead, inexorably, to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputational interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good you've done since this case that would be at risk if this historic (and presumptively private stuff) gets to public is something we should think about (science foundation, grants, philanthropy, years since this case etc). We will be bound by the strict pg limits and timelines Court gave Cassell in his 6-19 Order Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 EFTA00718258 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00718259