Case File
efta-efta00720710DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Matthew Hiltzik
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00720710
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Matthew Hiltzik
To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
CC: Ben Sosenko
Subject: Re: privileged and confidential
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:16:36 +0000
Sending you the list of questions this afternoon
Lets connect on call tomorrow
Am seeing our mutual friend who connected us for lunch on friday
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This email is confdential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient please delete it and notify usus immediately by telephoning or e-mailing the sender. You should
not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.
On Jun 5, 2017, at 10:16 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
We can chat . Public filings
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:42 PM Matthew Hiltzik
Need to figure out how much of this can be shared publicly
How much does your plea allow for a review of the facts etc
The material is adding up
> wrote:
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient please delete it and notify us immediately by telephoning or e-mailing the
sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.
On Jun 5, 2017, at 6:27 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
wild the govt puts out the statement that the "main victim " swore under oath , that she lied about her
age, had a fake id. wanted to marry me, and i had done nothing wrong. she said that she brought friends
many over 18 , and those that werent she told them to lie about their age. ( not in keeping with someone
searching for underage girls ).
the adnrew accuser admits she made a mistake about her age. though she
was told that making herself younger would sell more of the " book " she was trying to sell. SO Weird
.
for the legal point the govt said they did not want any " impeachment evidence to surface.
WHOLLY improper. . like saying there is a witness who says they saw the guy who robbed the bank ,
not he one the govt had charged, and the govt tries to not let " impoeachment evidence be heard "
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
EFTA00720710
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00720711
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.