Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00722598DOJ Data Set 9Other

Page 1

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00722598
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 1 LexisNexis' I of 100 DOCUMENTS NEW YORK CONSOLIDATED LAW SERVICE Copyright (c) 2005 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., one of the LEXIS Publishing (TM) companies All rights reserved *** ARCHIVE *** *** THIS SECTION IS CURRENT THROUGH THE 2005 SESSION *** PENAL LAW PART THREE. SPECIFIC OFFENSES TITLE M. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH AND MORALS ARTICLE 230. PROSTITUTION OFFENSES NY CIS Penal 230.05 (2005) 0 230.05. Patronizing a prostitute in the second degree A person is guilty of patronizing a prostitute in the second degree when, being over eighteen years of age, he patronizes a prostitute and the person patronized is less than fourteen years of age. Patronizing a prostitute in the second degree is a class E felony. HISTORY: Add, L 1978, ch 627, B 2, eff Sept 1, 1978. Former 0 230.05, add, L 1965, ch 1030, B I; renumbered 0 230.02, L 1978, ch 627, B I, eff Sept 1, 1978. NOTES: Commission Staff Notes In substance, this section, which is new, makes it a violation for a person to hire or attempt to hire a prostitute or anyone else to engage in sexual conduct with him. Though not formerly an offense in New York, such "patronizing" conduct is proscribed in various forms by the penal codes of several other jurisdictions, including the recently revised codes of Illinois and Wisconsin and it is included as an offense in the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code (B 251.1[5]). At the public hearings held by the Commission with respect to the new Penal Law, and in conferences and correspondence with the Commission and its staff, a number of persons and organizations have strongly urged the inclusion of a "patronizing" offense. The reasons most vigorously advanced are: (I) that criminal sanctions against the patron as well as the prostitute should aid in the curtailment of prostitution; and (2) that to penalize the prostitute and exempt the equally culpable patron is inherently unjust. After consideration of these contentions, the Commission decided to include the indicated patronizing offense in the new law (0 230.05) as a proper corollary to "prostitution" (0 230.00). Following these two sections, it may be observed, a "no defense" provision has been added (0 230.10): this makes it perfectly clear that both the "prostitution" and the "patronizing" offenses apply not only to the usual situation where a female is hired by a male, but also to those where a male is hired by a male, a female by a female, and male by a female. EFTA00722598 Page 2 NY CLS Penal B 230M5 New York References: This section referred to in B 240.37; CLS Pub Health, 2324-a; CLS Real P Actions & Pr B 715; CLS Real Pig 231 Research References & Practice Aids: 35B NY Jur 2d, Criminal Law BB 4931, 4977 Annotations: Validity and construction of statute or ordinance proscribing solicitation for purposes of prostitution, lewdness, or assignation-modem cases.77 ALR3d 519 Texts: 4 Frumer & Biskind, Bender's New York Evidence--CPLR J8 11.04 New York Criminal Practice Ch. 77 Criminal Jury Instructions, New York: Patronizing a prostitute, second degree. CJI2d [NY] Penal Law, 230.05 Case Notes: In order to prevail on a claim for malicious prosecution, one must establish the commencement or continuation of a criminal proceeding by the defendant against the plaintiff, the termination of the proceeding in favor of the accused. the absence of probable cause for the criminal proceeding, and actual malice. The trial court reversibly erred in omitting the statutory definition of advancing prostitution and, although the defendants failure to object to the charge would ordinarily be deemed a waiver, the error was fundamental where it related to the key factual issue of whether there had been probable cause for the prosecution of defendant for advancing prostitution. Antonucci v Irondequoit (1981, 4th Dept) 81 App Div 2d 743, 438 NYS2d 417. Penal Law,' 230.05 is violated when one person solicits another to engage in sexual contact in return for fee; it was immaterial that person whom defendant patronized was not a prostitute, but a policewoman. People v Bronski (1973) 76 Misc 2d 341, 351 NYS2d 73. EFTA00722599

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire RefReferences

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.