Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00722725DOJ Data Set 9Other

305-93t/700

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00722725
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
305-93t/700 Herman 8EMermelstom, P 03:52:a 13-04-2009 2 :1 MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ PA ATTORNEYS AT LAW April 13, 2009 Via Fax Robert O. Critton, Jr. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jane Does 2-7 v. Jeffrey Epstein Dear Bob: Stuart S. Mermetstein Tel 305.9312200 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 I am in receipt of your letter dated April 13, 2009. I do not at this time have any further response regarding the issue of non-party subpoenas on employers. Generally in these cases, it is our position that records can be obtained through authorizations, and that it would unnecessarily infringe on the Plaintiffs' privacy to serve employers with formal subpoenas. As to medical records, we advised you that a HIPAA compliant protective order should be in place for these records, if they are to be subpoenaed. I have not yet seen a proposed HIPAA compliant protective order in these cases. With regard to your proposal to limit our clients to two depositions each, one as a party and one as a witness, we cannot agree. Requiring any Plaintiff to sit for more than one deposition would be burdensome, harassing and unnecessary. With respect to consolidation for purposes of discovery, I do not understand your objection to such a limited consolidation. For one thing, it would seem to avoid the issue on how many depositions there should be of each Plaintiff. We are not withdrawing our request for the cases to be consolidated for discovery purposes only. Very truly ours, mart S. Mermeistein SSM/lr EFTA00722725

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone305.9312200

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01308033

23p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Memorandum and Order: 20cv00484 (JGK) (DF)

The document is a Memorandum and Order from U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman granting Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay the civil proceedings against her and others pending the resolution of her criminal trial. Maxwell is currently in custody awaiting trial on July 12, 2021. The civil case involves allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation against Maxwell and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION RELEVANT PLEADINGS Docket No. Date Description 12 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion to Stay 13 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer 16 7/1/08 Defendant's Notice Concerning Motion to Stay 23 7/17/08 Defendant's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal 24 7/17/08 Defendant's "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action" 31 7/29/08 Defendant's Notice of Filing Exhibits (Attaching Villafaiia Declaration from victims' rights suit) 33 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Stay 34 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Seal 37 8/12/08 Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal 38 8/12/08 Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Stay 40 9/4/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 41 9/22/08 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 45 9/30/08 Order Setting Trial Date and Discovery Deadlines 46 10/6/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Motion fo

2p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf f ift - ( df)t— Th-tittsf e: wr iwi mcfn .3:95Kona - apt?? It * ci of * C PRCta MOSPats Details of a civil lawsuit, made public in January 2035, contained a deposition from "Jane Doe 3" that accused Maxwell of recruiting her in 1999, when she was a minor, and grooming her to provide sexual services for Epstein.M A 2018 expose by Julie K. Brown in the M' revealed Jane Doe 3 to be , who was previously known as met Maxwell at Donald 'frump's Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, w en was a 16- year-old spa attendant.M She asserted that Maxwell had introduced her to Epstein, after which she was " omed by. the two [of them] for his pleasure, including lessons in Epstein's preferences during oral sex". 22n631 Maxwell has repeatedly denied any involvement in Epstein's crimes.L2i In a 2015 statement, Maxwell rejected allegations that she has acted as a procurer for Epstein and denied that she had "facilitated Prince Andrew's [alleged] acts of sexual abus

25p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.