PETER R EDELMAN

PETER R EDELMAN WYTORPIEVATIJM 110 EAST )9THSTREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 DATE: pr.rAR DELIVER TO: RECIP ::4T'S FAX NUMBER: CC: CLIEN MATTER NUMBER: TOTAL UMBER OF PAGES: September 02, 2010 Darren K. I yke, Esq. is Ian Barthod Epstein w. Fancelli Cover plus 2 Please see attached .2SIMILE ONLY C .:GINAL BY FCM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY .CLIENT PRIVILEGED AM) CONFIDENTIAL AAV INTENDED ONLY FOR THE laND4D RECIPIENTS. IF THE READER OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS NOT THE MANED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE hEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEN7NATZoN, D7sTRILMION OR COPY OF THE COWIUN/C.ATTOW IS STRICM PROHIBITED. IF YOU RAVE RECEIVED THIS CCIONK/CA ION ZN ERROR, PLEASE AKYRIFY 1W BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE TRANSMISSION BY U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. USE 07 FACSIMILE DOSS NOT AUTHORIZE, NOR COleENT To, SERVICE OF LEGAL PAPERS ON PETER P. =EWAN. ESQ., BY PACSINTLE.CPLR 2I03(b) (5) REQUIRES PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OR AGREEMENT POR SUCH SERVICE AND BAKE IS NOT GIVEN. EFTA00729781 PETER EDELMAN ATTOA tY AT LAW H0 EAST.9tH STREET NEW YORK, YORK 10022 September 02, 2010 By Facsiz And First Darren K. 301 East New Yeti I: Transmission: 4sS Mall i::lyke, Esq. Street, 108 dew York 10065 Dear Mr. oske: Re: Epstein w. WITHO ancelli Paneling, Inc. REND C I am trial counsel for Fancell to our tel -Lone conversation of this wee transrninci y facsimile transmission dated A Please note that this letter is letter, not is tents are admissible in a c commence :y Jeffrey Epstein against Fan preclude ii 'posing counterclaims or affi contradict/ . to the terms hereof. First, Punch List Items desi transznittec me for reference to the fabricat Second, Punch List Items de March, 20 Please photograph the conditio Client. Third, Punch List Item desi to me for r nal to my Client for response. I submitted t Aolyneux did not provide for Fourth, Punch List kern desi Order with :lyneux, as both sides of the sl Fifth, Punch List Items desi Purchase O r r with Molyneux. Paneling, Inc. This letter is written in response and to your Indyke "Complaint" Punch List gust 23, 2010. smutted "without prejudice" and neither this urn proceeding, should such a proceeding be li Paneling Inc. The terms of this letter do not tive defenses in such an action which may be ated 1, 2, 3, and 4 should be photographed and for explanation and response to you. rated 5, 6, 7, and 8 refer to items repaired in s and transmit same to me for response by my tad 9 should be photographed and transmitted did note that I am advised that the CAD Plans trical decorative holes patterns. ated 10, is outside the scope of the Purchase g panels were to receive leather upholstery. ted 12 and 13 are outside the scope of the EFTA00729782 Darren K wlyke, Esq. Septembi .I2, 2010 Page -2- Sixth, Punch List Item desi atted 11 is vague and a response requires a far more del id, technical explanation to un erstand what is sought, so that my Client can respond :ther the work requested is wi in the scope of our Purchase Order and can be accomplis d technically. Information is r quired, as well, as to what and by whom the =echoic work that was done was pelf rmed. I recommended that we agree upon an acceptable cutral expert to review the final 'ption of this Rem and if performed by my Client, e neutral's determination wheth the work was performed substantially in accordanc • rith the agreed upon description ould be binding. In this latter regard, there re ins the matter of an outstanding balance due my Client rider the conditions of the ori 'nat Purchase Order and if my client were to perform e tquested work, the matter of rei bursements and fee for same must be resolved, as well. PFE:ernaalimei . cc: Mr 'vistian Barthod Do I i. Glasgow, Esq. tru er F. Edelman EFTA00729783