Case File
efta-efta00740274DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00740274
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: Lisa Randall
Subject: Re:
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:45:56 +0000 if 2 is good is there a number to call?
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
2pm?
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Lisa Randall <
> wrote:
Any availability in the spacetime continuum today or tomorrow?
Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
joking, for me , space and time are disconnected as my fingers hunt for keys
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Lisa Randall
<mailto:
>> wrote:
Oops. Problem of email. No offense intended. I was really a little confused. Or were you joking?
Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
Sony,
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Lisa Randall
<mailto:
[repeated 3 times]
>> wrote:
I think reaching the limits of my ability to disentangle grammar and spelling but here goes:
Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
thanks , question , what does it look like if time is running backward , wouldn't it be decelerating" into flat space
from the singularity outward" therefore explosion than
[then] expansion.
It looks like big bang, not inflation before horizon. So not explosive expansion.
but always slowing after
PROT0
crossing the horizon .
after crossing horizon there isn't really a cosmological interpretation anymore. Time and space have switched back.
looking in reverse it appears things accelerate as they approach" charged would be as a result of the
deceleration.
don't understand this last comment.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall
<mailto:
[repeated 7 times]
>>> wrote:
Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always.
For your question, let's first straighten out that there are
3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I
didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-since they are changing with time and a bit more complicated but
indeed they have 2 horizons (just like charged black holes).
Two horizon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space
identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not
rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and
coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2d big bang scenario
(with the other 2d in a compact sphere). Space expands out until you reach the horizon and eventually goes over into flat
space.
It's not really accelerated expansion but still somewhat along lines you
PROT1
suggested.
If there are two horizons (charged black hole case) and you are in between them (we called this Whoville becuase it looks
like space has shrunk to zero but actually spacetime has not and there is a
finite time between them so there's a whole world invisible
to the outside) what happens is you alternate between big bang and big
crunch in the full extended spacetime.
Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
Lisa . thanks" for your time,and patience if i understand the
Kerr equations , and your explanation correctly , time and space appear to exchange coordinates , inside a black
hole. , that assumes that time is unidirectional. doesn't it appear that if
you ran negative time , it would look like any other explosive transaction. great acceleration. emenating from
the second horizon outward slowing to a mere expansion . It would appear
that " time" got shot out of the black hole.
created by a space collapse at the singularity.
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by
PROT2
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeel.
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>>> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
constitute inside information, and is intended only for communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>, and
PROT3
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, and return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, and
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
PROT4
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
PROT5
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Fromm:
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02437525
3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01839811
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02687793
3p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.