Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00752514DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Al seckel"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00752514
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Al seckel" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Please review and read carefully, do not skim. Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:37:13 +0000 Ok. Ye; please review it carefully next week, and let's go over your comments in a substantive way. I understand about a wide-reaching grant program (I was not advocating this at all!, this will be coupled with very specific target areas (already deliniated by you), which I will give to you in the next couple of days, along with some of my own suggestions for your approval, which clarify. Google page is getting cleaned, but it takes time for the google spiders and bots to find the links. They have not crawled yet, they index and catalogue, and its all there, and as I said, as soon as they do this (which I can't control), you will see a dramatic change. As everything is in place for it to place and get cleaned up. Yahoo! went through and we at least got that cleaned up. They still are behind google, as their search algorhythms are different. Easier... As I said, your wild page has been cleaned up extensively, now one reads it as "ho hum, so what" as opposed to egregious. We managed to block your foes from interfering. That was quite a bit of work, as they were in there within 15 minutes every time we made a change, and putting it back. Over time, we will clean it up even more. M. I understand that it is the Epstein Foundation, but we need the name "Jeffrey Epstein" in there, to get it ranked at the top of the google searches. Part of the issue is how many times it specifically sees your full name as opposed to the countless other epsteins out there. Please understand that this has a "double purpose" From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Al seckel < Sent: Fri, November 5, 2010 7:22:53 AM Subject: Re: Please review and read carefully, do not skim. i will reveiw next week„ first lets elimnate Jeffrey, it is the epstein foundation. next no instittions, third , only tell what is needed as opposed to what will be rejected, i do not really want a wide reaching grant program„ i want the google page cleaned On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Al seckel < > wrote: I look forward to your substantive comments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by EFTA00752514 return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00752515

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.