Case File
efta-efta00770293DOJ Data Set 9OtherDS9 Document EFTA00770293
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00770293
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To: jeevacation <[email protected]>
Subject:
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:55:40 +0000
John
Is it legal to broadcast a videotaped deposition all over the internet???
The Palm Beach Post is responsible for this leaking to Gawker.com as well as the Buffington
Post.
I found this:
The deposition first has to be transcribed by the sitting court reporter. Generally either of
the attending attorneys can order the deposition transcribed. The transcription is then held
by that attorney to be referred to in the courtroom at trial if needed. The attorney can pick
and choose from the witnesses' statements and refute what that person said in their
deposition in the courtroom. It is not considered ethical for the contents of a deposition to
be used in any other manner other than to refute a witness' statements in a courtroom. The
deposition is generally not filed with the court. And no, it is not public information if it
is not filed with the court. A court reporter may not divulge it's contents either. She is a
notary public and swears in the witnesses and takes down the proceedings in a deposition. If
the deposition IS filed with the clerk's office, then yes, the deposition may be read by
anyone who looks at the court file.
By the way, you look good.
Off to Zorro on Wed. (drag
will be gone)
EFTA00770293
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
gawker.comEmail
[email protected]Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.