Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00820186DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Joscha Bach

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00820186
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Joscha Bach To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:11:21 +0000 By guessing. It seems to be a general learning problem to me; we assume an initial causal model and update approximating a Bayesian model based on observation. For instance, if I want to find out if my opponent is going to defect, I can make a model of my opponent, where I weight the influence of - their expected current and future interaction reward with me - their general principled inertia (people tend to behave consistently, partially because it makes them generally predictable, and partially because they don't want to consider everything from first principles) - how much they see me as an end-goal (like a parent sees their children, or a teacher their pupils) - how much reputation gain they expect from actual and imagined 3rd party observation - how much "virtual" reputation gain/loss they get from defecting from their own values. If one wanted to make a PED style model of this, it is probably too complex and perhaps it makes sense to simplify it to a single reputation factor. But I guess that in actual interactions, this is what we implicitly consider. > On Aug 24, 2016, at 12:58, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > so how does one determine the matrix without knowing the internal state of the player. > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Joscha Bach cfl wrote: > If the hypothetical observer is expected to dole out rewards/punishments as result of the player's actions, the player will add the expected rewards to the payoff. > Reputation can be translated into expectation of future reward, based on a cooperation/defection function of other players. > > On Aug 24, 2016, at 12:52, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > > in a two player game what if one player BELIVES there is an observer but there is not. the payoff matrix should change. ? > -- > please note > The information contained in this communication is > confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may > constitute inside information, and is intended only for > the use of the addressee. It is the property of > JEE > Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this > communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited > and may be unlawful. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately by > return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and EFTA00820186 > destroy this communication and all copies thereof, > including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00820187

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.