Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00824020DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00824020
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Rupert Sheldrake Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:20 +0000 why would they influence rather than actually just be a probability field themselves. . it also might be fun to think of " luck" as a morphic field . I think a strong argument can be made that the power laws zipfs pareto are the proofs of morphic fields. . forcing all natural phenomoma into the same shape of distribution that has come before it its very very elegant. and as good a theory as any scientist can propose. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Rupert Sheldrake wrote: Dear Jeffrey, Yes, I think Brian Josephson is indeed rather scattered. I don't think Deepak is interested in deep theoretical issues so I don't think you'll succeed in moving him towards the study of probabilities. But I agree with you that it would be better if he stayed away from quantum phenomena which he doesn't know much about and which in relation to medicine and consciousness seem to me to create a cloud of scientific-sounding rhetoric which obscures rather than illuminates the problems. I'm all for the idea of attractors, but I don't think mathematically so find it hard to grasp probability arguments. Although I think morphic fields are probability structures and work by influencing probabilities. We leave for a remote island in British Columbia on Wednesday and I'll be away for about 2 months. But still in email contact most of the time. Rupert On 9 Jul 2016, at 10:53, jeffrey E. wrote: he pointed me to brian josephson, seems scattered.? view? I m trying to convince depak to move in the realm and study of probabilities and stay away from quantum phenomena. . I think natures distributions pushing elements to be average , describes many processes. . it appears that morphing all local faces into one ( average ) appears to be beautiful.. if things are distributed on a bell live or normal curve, just looking at the distribution could lead one to think there is a force pushing toward the middle. maybe gravity is just that, . probability of all things being equally distributed. appearing as a pseudo force . ( like centrifugal force ). the central limit theorem might answer many mysteries. . derivation of the power laws for example. zipf, pareto. . if the distribtuions are the attractors. having even a distribution of esoteric traits like happinesss could lead one to belive that if the distribution wants to stay constant. as one point on the curve ( the person) if they become happier, the pseufo force would push someone else towards the average. . and yes - a few times depak and i roared with laughter. On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Rupert Sheldrake wrote: Glad to hear about your meeting. Deepak is good company, has a broad vision, and can be hilarious too. Rupert On 8 Jul 2016, at 21:18, jeffrey E. wrote: EFTA00824020 depak chopra was here this morning, a great fan of yours please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00824021

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.