Case File
efta-efta00826502DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00826502
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>
To: Larry Visoski <
>
Subject: Re: Calls with Doug Jaffe
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:34:00 +0000
tell him 1 mill net and they pay garys commiions
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Larry Visoski <
> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gary Anzalone <
Date: May 31, 2016 at 2:10:42 PM EDT
To: "
"
le
Subject: Calls with Doug Jaffe
Larry,
I have had a couple of calls with Doug.
>
In my first call he immediately told me that after speaking with his team he regrets
stating he would take it at 1.5 done up because it would be a bad deal for both sides.
He patiently listened to my counter offer and said he would discuss it with his team
and call me back.
Doug is an engine guy and has a lot of engine experts as his disposal, so when he
calls back (relatively quickly) he has a guy named LEO "the -219 guru" on the phone
and Doug tells him to explain to me what he just told Doug. Leo says that 'when we
do the repair we will be required to re-do the 8 year engine corrosion inspections, and
when we do, you will be told that 7 & 8 have crapped out'. He says 'These engines are
only worth $100 per cycle ($200K) and it does not make economic sense to spend
200-250k on something that is only worth 200k when it is repaired, especially since 7
& 8 remain at probable risk.'
At that point in the conversation, Doug said he needed to take another call and told
me he would have to call me back.
Larry I do not think there is any way he will do this at the 1.5 million any more. If we
give them the assurances they will want, and if 7 & 8 prove to be bad, the bill could be
another 250k per side to buy another set of 2000 cycle engines. I am not sure the 1.5
repaired is even in our best interest.
As soon as he calls me back I will update you.
EFTA00826502
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00826503
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
jeevacationggmail.comEmail
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02078835
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02097596
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02225369
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01731630
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02327165
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Larry Visoski
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.