From: Peter Attia

From: Peter Attia To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: This is the technique Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:26:48 +0000 That's a huge difference but not actually the driver. It's time. MRI requires much more time. The gap is narrowing every day. I can give you all numbers if you like. Peter Attia, M.D. I Attia Medical, PC The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information, including patient information protected by federal and state privacy laws. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. On Feb 19, 2016, at 3:57 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote: is the cost difference the machine cost? On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Peter Attia < > wrote: Mammo is controversial b/c of both the false positive and false negatives. The former can result in unnecessary biopsies and even procedures, but the latter is the real issue in "young" women (those with glandular breast tissue). The only place MRI fails is with lesions purely calcified, but it's not clear these lesions matter. So I'm not sure if MRI will ever fully displace mammo since it's so cheap, but I think it would be crazy not to add MRI to mammo (and PSA) for those who can afford it. Peter Attia, M.D. Attia Medical, PC The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information, including patient information protected by federal and state privacy laws. It is intended only for the use of the personfs) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. From: Jeffrey E. [mailtoleevacationegmail com Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 7:31 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: This is the technique EFTA00834054 a long way away from acceptance. , if it is only an adjunct to the mamagram. wouldnt a biopsy be better .? not my field of interest or knowledge. . can't tell from the article how accurate in clinical trials On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Peter Attia < > wrote: Only if you believe that microcalcifiations in DC1S matter. Many oncologists today are starting to doubt that altogether. Peter Attia, M.D. I Attia Medical, PC The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information, including patient information protected by federal and state privacy laws. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. From: Jeffrey E. (mailtoleevacationagmail.com Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:55 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: This is the technique the breast cancer benefit seems slgiht as it is needed to be added to the man-tow-am anyway On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Peter Attia < > wrote: Peter Attia, M.D. I Attia Medical, PC The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information, including patient information protected by federal and state privacy laws. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. please note EFTA00834055 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00834056