Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00863108DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Richard Joslin

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00863108
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Richard Joslin To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> CC: Brad Wechsler Subject: FW: Update on AIF IV Management Inc. Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:28:14 +0000 fyi From: Ada Clapp Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:21 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Eileen Alexanderson; Richard Joslin Subject: Update on AIF IV Management Inc. Hi Jeffrey, Eileen and I spoke with John Suydam yesterday about the possibility of liquidating AIF IV Management Inc. ("AIF"). To refresh your recollection on the background: AIF was the original general partner ("GP") of AIF IV Management Inc. ("AIF MGT"). In February 2007, a new entity (the "Successor GP") was admitted as a managing GP of AIF MGT and AIF was reclassified as an administrative GP. In May 2007, AIF's GP interest was converted to a limited partner ("LP") interest and the Successor GP became the sole GP of AIF MGT. In June 7, 2007, AIF transferred its LP interest in AIF MGT to Black Family Partners, LP ("BFP") and was admitted as a non-economic LP. John Suydam agreed that the LP interest in AIF MGT currently held by BFP has no economic value. He also confirmed that such interest could be cancelled and that AIF could thereafter be liquidated without creating any tax or regulatory problems for Apollo. Before doing that, however, John would like the AIF governing documents revised to remove all Apollo officers currently listed as officers of AIF (unless acting in their individual capacity), since AIF is no longer an Apollo related entity. We have a call in to Apollo to find out how to accomplish the above. I do have a few questions relating to the cancellation of BFP's LP interest in AIF MGT. If this interest is cancelled: (i) does AIF automatically cease to be a non-economic partner of BFP, or (ii) does AIF have to formally withdraw as a partner and demand the return of its capital, or (iii) does BFP have to cancel AIF's non-economic interest in BFP based on the fact that it has no economic value. In the later two cases, I am concerned about having to obtain a value for AIF's initial capital contribution (i.e. because if the LP interest in AIF MGT did have a value on date of contribution, the cancellation of the BFP interest by an entity that is controlled by Leon may raise gift tax issues). I that case, it may be simplest to just distribute the non-economic interest in BFP directly to Leon rather than cancel it. EFTA00863108 Do you have any thoughts on this? Ada Clapp Elysium Management LLC 445 Park Avenue Suite 1401 New York New York 10022 Dire Fax: • Email: IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to IRS regulations, I inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person or entity for the purposes of (i) avoiding tax related penalties imposed by any governmental tax authority, or (ii) proposing, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter discussed herein. I advise you to consult with an independent tax advisor on your particular tax circumstances. This communication and any attachment is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that further dissemination of this communication and its attachments is prohibited. Please delete all copies of this communication and its attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in error. Thank you. EFTA00863109

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email discusses $11 M tax strategy to reduce Medicare tax and leverage Obamacare benefits

The passage reveals a concrete tax‑avoidance scheme involving multi‑million dollar deductions and references to high‑profile individuals (Jeffrey Epstein, Leon Black) and potential manipulation of the Email dated Oct 17 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein and Brad Wechsler mentions $4 M RA and Artspace loss The strategy is linked to obtaining Obamacare (ACA) benefits by reducing taxable income. Leon Blac

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein‑linked family office emails reveal disputed $40‑$60 M advisory fees, alleged mis‑management of $6 B assets, undisclosed bank accoun...

The corpus of internal emails shows a high‑net‑worth client (Leon) working with Jeffrey Epstein and his advisors on complex structures (Phaidon, art partnerships, foreign trusts, 8865 filings). They d Emails reference a $6 billion family office with $250‑500 m annual income and dozens of entities, ba Repeated mention of a $40‑$60 million annual advisory fee arrangement with Epstein’s adviser, with

146p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email discussing $4M and $7M tax deductions to avoid Medicare tax and gain Obamacare benefits

The passage reveals a possible tax‑avoidance scheme involving multi‑million‑dollar deductions tied to Medicare tax and Obamacare benefits, directly referencing Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. It p Email dated Oct 17, 2016 from Brad Wechsler to Jeffrey Epstein discusses $4 million RA and Artspace These amounts are said to reduce the 3.8% Medicare tax and be exempt from Medicare taxes per prior

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein‑Melanie Spinella family‑office emails reveal disputed $40‑$50M advisory fees, undisclosed accounts, tax‑saving schemes and possible...

The corpus contains detailed internal communications that reference large, undocumented cash balances (e.g., $11 M dormant accounts, $4 M in a drawer), disputed fee arrangements for services that alle Jeffrey Epstein claims to have saved the client $600 M in taxes through complex structures, yet alle References to $11 M in dormant accounts and $4 M cash in a staff member’s drawer suggest undisclos

146p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01802262

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01782954

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.