Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00900132DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Jeffre E stein <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00900132
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jeffre E stein <[email protected]> To: Subject: Re: Dr. Axel Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:40:46 +0000 I believe al is a bullshitter and bogus„ he has told me repeatedly things that on investigation are not true, that simple, I would like to take it over and give it to someone i can trust On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, > wrote: should you or i write up some questions or e interview? (if you want me to do this then i have the following comments. upon writing that, i realize i have these comments no matter who writes the questions)....and i am not implying the interview shouldn't also be organic and allow for spontaneity, but here you go: * maybe ALL the interviews should have a similar kind of motif that isn't totally just about the interviewees work. science-y but less descriptive than usual. more about the impact of their work perhaps? or what they would do with a million dollars if they found it on the street? (versus) what would they do with the money if it was publicly granted to them? basically, what will make these interviews different from other interviews these people have done? how are you thinking of injecting your personality into the mix that will make these interviews biting, and maybe slightly (smartly and kindly) awry. i am not even so sure it should be about money because that seems, well, obvious coming from you. thoughts? [she types.... with little hope for any verbose response, but at least freed of the onus of not having tried]. *should we give some questions to him on monday before tuesday's interview, just to ponder so we can maximize our time, efficiency, and the resolution of his answers? ps. if ever you want my opinion about the SEO project and Al, feel free to ask...i will always be honest with you as long as you understand my limited understanding and appreciate what kind of understanding that takes to admit. pps. someday maybe we will discuss intuition (sometimes i think you hear a lot more than most people, whereas i see it). actually, this concept - about intuition, be it social, intellectual, psychological....seems very core to you and your success. this may be a very interesting entry point to the interviews b/c you will be able to speak from a place of intimacy - and i bet the scientists will have very colorful and different perspectives on their own intuition(s). some may not even have a grasp of it. this too, would proove good reading. ppps. perhaps i don't know how to use postscripts. these could have all been in the body of the email. no. there is a difference; i am a person out here - it feels safer in afterthought... EFTA00900132 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00900133

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.