Case File
efta-efta00913180DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00913180
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com>
To: GMAX
Subject: Re: This is the actual version they wanted me to send which I changed..but this is back from my
UK lawyers..
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:26:17 +0000
i u nderstand „ do you want to come with the gang,
jeanluc,
, etc
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, GMAX <
> wrote:
The lawyers and PR people want me to be on standby with supporting dots for any of my claims where possible or to
couch the lang in a way if I don't have a doc but not to allow me to be sued for slander or be damaged by any form of
premable or exaggeration or — well you know what they want and you and andrew know what will help and what cold
hurt me not being 100% sure for sure
Gx
On 6/12/11 16:20 PM, "J Jep" <[email protected]> wrote:
I will be able to edit after 9 tonight or tomorrow morning, where are you?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM, GMAX <
wrote:
Thank you _ I have it now and am working the letter a little — I will send the final version tomorrow and what ever is
in it will be factually accurate
On 6/12/11 16:00 PM, "Philip Barden" <
> wrote:
See below as amended by me only for factual accuracy and some notes where I am uncertain of the accuracy.
Dear Mr Klein
Ross Gow of Acuity Reputation, who I have retained to deal with press enquiries, tells me that you have
sent him the following list of questions.
My condition of answering those questions is that you print this reply in full. I've answered in a narrative
form, which I hope will make sense both to you and to your readers. I've tried to keep it succinct.
We don't know each other but lam familiar with the world of journalism and there is an obvious
temptation for journalists to sensationalise their stories, so, as a precaution, I've sent a copy of this letter
to Vanity Fair's Editor in Chief Graydon Carter.
Driving straight to the heart of the matter, the allegations that have been made against me are part of
an attempt by
and her lawyer, S
to extort money from me. This follows an
unsuccessful attempt by them at blackmailing me. To spice up the story they have made allegations
about HRH Prince Andrew. They are untrue.
EFTA00913180
You must be aware that Mr
' former partner (check this), S
is now serving a 50
year prison term for creating false allegations against Mr Epstein and then using those allegations to
obtain money by deception in a Ponzi scheme. You know that Mr
destroyed people's lives with
his fantastic and untrue suits and that in pursuit of his evil plans he corrupted ex policemen to create
faked cases. He even forged the signatures of judges to sign off on those charges [I am not aware of this
level of detail — is it correct?) . You will be aware that Mr.
now, himself, faces a professional
investigation and serious potential charges.
allegations only emerged at the time that
was creating false claims and
years atter the alleged misconduct . The releasing of the allegations to the national press only occurred
after I refused to make any payments to silence Ms
or her attorneys because the allegations were
utterly false. As you will be aware, it is also believed to be the case that she has been paid a large sum of
money by at least one British national newspaper. That represents a further incentive to make false
claims.
If you write a balanced article, you will be bound to record that Ms
has made a previous claim of
sexual harassment totally unrelated to Mr Epstein and which was not proceed with because the police
took the view she had no credibility.
You will also, presumably, draw attention to the fact that, prior to filing her civil suit against Mr Epstein,
Ms
fled the US to avoid being arrested for grand theft.(is this correct. My recollection is that we
knew she was indicted but did not know the outcome. Perhaps you have better information now)
All in all, given her record, which includes a number of other highly colourful events (of which I have no
doubt you will be aware and will reflect) I assume you will treat what she says with great scepticism.
All the untrue events are alleged to have happened ten years ago. Until those allegations emerged I had
no recollection of Ms
at all. I couldn't have picked her out in a crowd or, perhaps more relevantly
in her case, in an identity parade. After some thought, I recalled that I first met Ms
when she
was working at a
, claiming to be 18 years old and a professional masseuse. As part
of his health programme, Mr Epstein had regular massages and employed both female and male
masseuses. Ms
always came to Mr Epstein's property with either her mother or fiance in
attendance, sometimes both. I was aware of no improper conduct and none was brought to my
attention.
When it comes to Ms
allegations about her time in London, I can't say I remember her at all and
neither can ! remember flying with her. I fly many thousands of miles a year all over the world in many
different aircraft.
Of course, I've seen the photograph of the Duke of York with
but I have absolutely no
recollection at all of the photograph being taken and cannot say who took it.
I've met the Duke of York on a number of occasions but whenever I've seen him he has been properly
attired and I have no knowledge of naked pool parties at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate or elsewhere.
I do not share any homes with Mr Epstein and he does not support me in any way. To put this in context
my relationship with Mr Epstein ended over a decade ago and since then I have had a long term
relationship. Mr Epstein's imprisonment and the circumstances to which that related occurred over 5
years after our relationship had ceased.
EFTA00913181
If I've missed anything do let Mr. Gow know.
Regards
Ghislaine Maxwell
Attach Klein's questions.
Brian Basham
Mobile:
<mailto
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00913182
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
jeevacationggmail.comEmail
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
DS9 Document EFTA01186642
51p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com>
3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
DS9 Document EFTA00590045
51p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com>
3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01682184
186p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
It's an absurdly vast house, among the largest in Manhattan, but the
20p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.