From: US GIO <us.gio®jpmorgan.com>

From: US GIO <us.gio®jpmorgan.com> To: Undisclosed recipients:; Subject: J.P. Morgan Macro Skinny: Stabilizing at healthy levels Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:06:51 +0000 Attachments: 2013-02-23_Stabilizing_at_healthy_levels.pdf Inline-Images: image° 1 1.jpg; image001.png; image002.png; image004.png; image005.png; image006.png; image007.png; image008.png; image009.png; image010.png; image012.png February 23, 2013 Stabilizing at healthy levels Global growth stabilizing at a healthy level. After five straight months of impressive monthly gains, the global manufacturing surveys are taking a breather: the February manufacturing PM! was flat in Europe and a touch lower in the US. We had expected a downtick in the U.S. surveys (January 29th Macro Skinny) as higher taxes and the impending budget sequestration temper business sentiment. So this weakness is nothing to get worried about. The European manufacturing survey was disappointingly flat, but the silver lining here is the improvement in both France and Germany (the Euro-area average was probably dragged down by Italy, perhaps in response to heightened election uncertainty). The bigger surprise was the collapse in Europe's services PMI. It does admittedly imply a more protracted recovery, but one should not dismiss the impressive progress seen in manufacturing activity in recent months, which tends to be a more reliable forward-looking measure of growth. Taken together, European growth is still on track to improve from a run rate of -2% late last year towards 1% at the end of this year. It is an improvement, even if it's well below the pre-crisis trend of roughly 2%. Pending the February manufacturing surveys from the emerging markets, our best guess is for a global PMI index consistent with decent, 3.5% global GDP growth in the first quarter (left chart). The improvement in the global PMI from prior months is already showing up in the hard data. Global car sales, for example, have picked up sharply in recent months (right chart). US: focus on the other side of the valley. In the US there are early signs of the well-anticipated fiscal drag "finally" kicking in. Our view here hasn't changed — it's a temporary drag masking a faster growing private sector, which is why we're still looking for growth acceleration later in the year. For now, though, economic data will be noisy. On the consumer side, the January retail sales held up, but the hit to consumers from higher taxes (as well as gasoline prices) seem likely to appear in the February-March numbers. On the corporate side, the national ISM/PMI surveys across both EFTA00954849 services and manufacturing businesses continue to paint a solid picture for both production and capex plans (left chart). A modest tentative drag from fiscal tightening is likely, and based on the regional Fed surveys, most of it will likely be concentrated in sequester-sensitive states.' Housing data may wobble2, too, but the fundamentals — of growing demand and shrinking supply (right chart) — support our view that sales activity, construction, and prices will continue to head higher. We would heavily discount any possible weakness in housing stemming from the drama in Washington regarding the sequestration (ongoing), the budget deal (next month), and the debt ceiling (in May). Fed: expect more communication hiccups. The equity market did not like the January FOMC minutes earlier this week, which revealed that several participants suggested the Fed should "vary the pace of asset purchases...in response to changes in the economic outlook or as its evaluation of the efficacy and costs of such purchases evolved ". But this is not new; the Fed already put to rest notion of "QEternity" in the minutes to the previous FOMC meeting (January 19th Macro Skinny). Rightly so, the bond market didn't budge this week, particularly when yields had already corrected upward quite a bit in prior months. More confusion from the Fed is unavoidable, but in our view the FOMC is unlikely to announce any material change to its Large-Scale Asset Purchases (LSAP) program over the next 3-6 months; the tax hikes and the sequester implementation will keep the labor market weak enough to keep the FOMC hawks at bay. That being said, we continue to assign a high likelihood that asset purchases end or are reduced by the end of the year. Even then, it is extremely unlikely that bond yields will snap up violently. Assuming conservatively that the Fed starts tightening in mid- 2015, our Treasury valuation model3 suggests that ending LSAP by year-end would lead to around a 35bp sell off— similar to what the bond market anticipates already (right chart). a More ECB/BOJ easing likely. Outside the US, monetary policy will likely ease further in two key economies. Japan: the G7 group signaled that competitive devaluation is legitimate provided it is implemented using domestic policy easing, as opposed to pushing for a weaker currency vis-a-vis foreign asset purchases. If Prime Minister Abe wants to show he can "walk the talk", without buying foreign bonds, the BoJ needs to seriously consider a Fed-style "twist" to its asset purchases program — shifting aggressively from short-maturities to much longer maturities. It is quite striking that in duration terms (measured in "10-yr equivalent" securities), the Bo] hasn't been buying much, certainly when compared to the Fed (left chart). Europe: the ECB will likely realize that monetary policy in the Euro-area is getting too tight, particularly when compared to the rest of the G 10. 4 The strength of the Euro against the US dollar, the Sterling and the Yen indeed shows that the ECB is not easing enough on a global scale. But more fundamentally, loan rates in the periphery are still too high relative to Germany (right chart). More conventional easing (by lowering the ECB rate to 0.25%) would be a good start, but what Europe really needs is aggressive quantitative easing of the type that the Fed and the Bank of England delivered. The ECB does not appear ready to deliver a full-blown QE, but we may get there if the weakness in bank lending markets persists. This should help weaken the Euro and regulate the pace of private sector deleveraging. EFTA00954850 The wall of global liquidity heads for emerging markets. Since growth in developed markets (DM) is still held back by debt deleveraging this year, emerging markets (EM) are going to drive global growth. That's because EM borrowing rates fell throughout last year, and now that global risk aversion has normalized too, the conditions for EM domestic demand re- acceleration are ripe. EM is already running at close to full capacity, yet the scope for a spike in EM inflation this year is limited. Growth is not the sole investment proposition EM has to offer; it's carry as well. EM-DM rate differentials have been quite high since 2009 (right chart), but what makes this theme particularly appealing right now is the scope for EM currency appreciation in a depressed currency volatility environment. Until not so long ago, emerging markets flourished at the start of each global liquidity cycle and popped when the Fed and other major central banks started to tighten monetary conditions. The tsunami of EM currency and debt crises in the 1990s is still echoing, particularly when put in the context of today's ferocious global liquidity glut. But in the 1990s, emerging markets were overfed with liquidity because EM currencies were fixed at "cheap" rates, and consequently overbought in the following years. Today, most EM currencies are allowed to appreciate, and hence, regulates the flow of hot money. It's not a surprise then that the Fed's tightening cycle of 2004-2006 didn't cause any pain in EM (on the contrary — it was the developed world that popped as global liquidity was withdrawn). Bottom line: EM offers interesting opportunities both in yield and in growth investments, yet it is a lot more resilient to sharp swings in ca ital flows. Michael Vaknin Chief Economist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank Paul Eitelman Associate Economist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank Jeff Greenberg Associate Economist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank [I] We saw a similar effect in advance of the fiscal cliff (October 26th Macro Skinny), where the Richmond Fed survey — which covers the states that are most exposed to sequestration — collapsed while the Kansas City Fed and the national Markit PMI were more robust. [2] Some recent measures of housing activity paused, but we see little reason for concern. Housing starts in January slowed month-on- month, but this was from a high rate of increase in December, and the weakness was entirely in the multifamily sector. The National Association of Homebuilders housing market index declined I point (to 46), but this index has steadily increased for more than a year (and is still near the highest levels since 2006). EFTA00954851 [3] Our model was based on a regression of 10-year Treasury yields on: a constant, long-term inflation expectations, and 3-year Treasury yields (the three year rate replaces the commonly-used policy rate variable; the latter became a biased estimator of the Fed's optimal policy rule over the past several years. The Fed's forward looking guidance on the zero policy rate from late '11 till late '12 meant that the three year rate effectively became the new policy rate). We used the regression coefficients to compute the fair value (excluding QE) 10-year Treasury yield in the fourth quarter of 2013 assuming inflation expectations remain constant at current levels, but the 1-year-ahead, 3-year Treasury yield increases in a way that is consistent with our view on the future path of the federal funds rate. Our estimates showed the 10-year yield would increase by 35bps from current levels if the Fed stops its asset purchase program at the end of the year. [4] True, the ECB has expanded its balance sheet, but that was a "credit easing" policy to avoid a melt-down scenario. Like the UK and the US in 2010, monetary policy is too tight in the Euro-area (outside Germany, that is) so more standard QE expansion is needed. They don't seem to be keen on going this way now, but Draghi's recent comment that the Euro is important for "growth and price stability" is very unusual (he put growth and price in the same sentence!). Acronyms: BoJ — Bank of Japan DM — Developed Markets ECB — European Central Bank EM — Emerging Markets FOMC — Federal Open Market Committee FRB — Federal Reserve Board IMF — International Monetary Fund ISM — Institute for Supply Management NAR — National Association of Realtors PMI — Purchasing Managers Index PPP — Purchasing Power Parity QE — Quantitative Easing IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JIWorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any discussion of U.S tax matters contained herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, in connection with the promotion. marketing or recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with JP.Morgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding US. tax-related penalties. Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider. The material contained herein is intended as a general market commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those of Michael Vaknin and may differ from those of other J.P. Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further, the views expressed herein may differ from that contained in J.P Morgan research reports. The above summarylpricesiquotes/stadmics have been obtained limn sources deemed to be reliable, but we do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index References to the performance or character of our portfolios generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. h is a proxy for client performance and may not represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensed for specific activities. Bank trust and investment management services are provided by JPAlorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (IPA'S). member NYSE, £INRA and SIPC. and its affiliates globally as local legislation permits. Securities products purchased or sold through IPA'S are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): are not deposits or other obligations of its bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift affiliates: and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with your J.P. Morgan representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Private investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may increase the risk ofintestment loss, can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tar structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Thpically, such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a confidential offering memorandum. which fully describes all terms, conditions, and risks. This material is distributed with the understanding that J.P Morgan is not rendering accounting. legal or tax advice. Thu should consult with your independent advisors concerning such matters. In the United Kingdom, this material is approved by J.P. Morgan International Bank Limited (JPAHB). with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street. Canary Wharf London Elf 5JP, registered in England No. 03838766 and is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority In addition. this material may be distributed by: JPSIorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB) Paris branch, which is regulated by the French banking authorities Aurorae de Conn* Prudentiel and Autorite des Marches Financiers; J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA. regulated by the Slits Financial Market Supervisory Authorhy; JPMCB Bahrain branch, licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by the Central Bank of Bahrain (far professional clients only): JPMCB Dubai branch. regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (for professional clients only). With respect to countries in Latin America, the distribution of this material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Receipt of this material does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. The Fund may not be publicly offered in any Latin American country without previous registration °finch fund's securities in compliance with the laws of the corresponding jurisdiction. In Hong Kong, this material is distributed by JPAlorgan Chase Bank. N.A. (JPMCB) Hong Kong branch crept to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as private equity and hedge fund.), in which case it is distributed by J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (JPMSAPL). Both JPMCB Hong Kong branch and JPMSAPL are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. In Singapore, this material is distributed by JPMCB Singapore branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as private equity and hedge fiords). in which case it is distributed by J.P. Morgan (SEA.) Limited (JPMSEAL). Both JPMCB Singapore branch and JPAISEAL are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore EFTA00954852 This message has been prepared by personnel in the (Sales and Trading Departments) of one or more affiliates ofJPMorgan Chase & Co. and is not the product of JP. Morgans Research Department. h is not a research report and is not intended as such. This material is for the general information of our clients and is a -.solicitation" only as that term is used within CFTC Rule 1.71 (a)(9)(v)and 23.603(a)(9)(v) promulgated under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act. Each recipient of this presentation, and each agent thereof may disclose to any person. without limitation, the U.S income and franchise tax treatment and tax structure of the transactions described herein and may &Atte all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) provided to each recipient insofar as the materials relate to a U.S. income or franchise tax strategy provided to such recipient by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries. Should you have any questions regarding the information contained in this material or about J.P. Morgan products and services, please contact your J.P. Morgan private banking representative. Additional inlbrination is available upon request. "JP. Morgan" is the marketing name for JPAforgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and of iliates worldwide. This material may not be reproduced or circulated without J.P. Morgans authority. 0 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://wwwjpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. EFTA00954853