Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00995269DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Vincenzo Iozzo alEIM>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00995269
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Vincenzo Iozzo alEIM> To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Thanks and some considerations Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 03:19:37 +0000 Other alternatives to think about which might be viable are the Vatican and Monaco. Probably a couple of others with some tweaking but those two were on top of my head Sent from my Iphone > On 10/ago/2014, at 20:28, Vincenzo Iozzo < IMIM> wrote: > Jeffrey, > I'll start with the easy thing: thanks for letting me stay tonight > Now some considerations on our conversation from today: > I) what you said about not liking working with people much struck me quite a bit, mostly because I feel the same and also because especially when money/greed is involved people become mean and stupid - which is probably the most annoying combination out there. > I guess my solution to this is to try and work with people I like/trust/respect, but yours works as well if you can pull that off > Anyhow onto more practical things. > 2) besides the 'personal safety' considerations the more I think about your idea (and users of your idea) the more I think it's flawed. Here's why: > A) digitaUvirtual currencies are fragile, you can protect them only by selecting a few 'trustworthy' parties that can use the currency. Alternatively you can protect them if everyone likes 'it' and wants more of it. > The wording here is fundamental: think how easy if would be to destroy a currency(even a regular one) if people hated it instead of just wanting more of it for themselves > B) in most of the countries you were thinking about this wouldn't work - simply because they are not technologically advanced enough to handle it (think about the tiny villages, the old people, the underground economies, etc etc) > C) in some of the countries you were thinking about this could work but the incumbents have no interest whatsoever in the transparency that a public ledger will force > D) all those countries are weak, this will make them weaker - you can hack their currency and they are done > I think the keys here to make this work are: > I) interest free loans > 2) reduced FX risk for participants > 3) limited circulation > 4) enforced identities/accountability > You said you like great hacks - selling companies and/or big western countries a currency that doesn't actually EFTA00995269 exist is probably the ultimate hack in the world. I think, if anything, we should focus on that. > Let me know what you think, I'll read about Sweden in the meanwhile > Sent from my Iphone EFTA00995270

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.