From: "Martin G. Weinberg" <

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, <I Subject: Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:09:02 +0000 Importance: Normal Surprised case not dismissed on insufficient claims under 1591. Answers start walking you down road toward waiving 5th so have your civil lawyers take that into consideration eg affirmative defenses, factual claims. From: jeffrey E. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 8:39 AM To: Martin G. Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE thx he is nuts, this was looked at over and over, he is psychotic. will go through the normal . are you in contact with alan. the case was not dimsisied on motion and she says she was forced to give alan oral sex with another girl. it never ends On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Martin G. Weinberg < wrote: Law 360 reported the civil securities case. Having just finished a criminal securities case, I know the SOL and how that works to protect defendants from being charged for 30 yr old events but if you want I could research the civil SOL to see how it matches. Factually, the idea that no one knew despite the charges against Hoffenberg seems very weak but whether that legally matters should be looked into If not by me, than by someone. Martin G Weinberg PC Boston, MA 02116 Virus-free. www.avast.com please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01007456