Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01014592DOJ Data Set 9Other

DS9 Document EFTA01014592

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01014592
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: J <[email protected]> Subject: Re: thoughts Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:18:08 +0000 Conference call with Kathy Ruemmler, Michael Wolff and Darren at 11:30am today. I will send dial in details to all. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2018, at 9:21 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote: Forwarded message From: Kathy Ruemmler <1 Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:07 PM Subject: Re: thoughts To: Michael Wolff Cc: J <[email protected]>, Darren Indyke J, Please have put a call/meeting together tomorrow so we can discuss collectively. Michael is correct that this should not be done piecemeal. K. On Dec 2, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Michael Wolff < wrote: You're thinking of the investigative journalist as having a higher purpose instead of being a player in a greater drama. Your enemies have supplied them with value. So the issue is what you can offer them. Let's chat tomorrow. On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 8:51 PM J [email protected]> wrote: If the investigative journalist would take a break from patting each other on the back, they might want to explain to the public. how many other men received erotic massages from these girls . how many worked in the local strip clubs BEFORE they met mr epstein. how many worked in the local erotic massage parlors. how many advertised as prostitutes . They might want to disclose that the former detective in the video worked for the lawyers not the police. They might feel an obligation to point out that some of these girls brought their best friends both to mr epstein and to other men they might want to also point out that the idea that mr epstein was an informant. has absolutely no foundation in fact whatsoever. ask for one iota of proof. IT DOES "NOT exist. The so called investigative reporters total malicious fabrication. . Mr epstein was an investor that lost money, nothing more. please note EFTA01014592 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01014593

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Internal email chain discussing Jeffrey Epstein's 2018 plea deal, federal‑state jurisdiction clash, and potential political leverage involving Alex...

The passage reveals a private strategy discussion about framing Epstein’s case to implicate high‑level officials (Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, former U.S. Attorney, and former special counsel Ken S Email mentions Alex Acosta (then U.S. Attorney, later Secretary of Labor) as a target for political Ken Starr is referenced as a source of commentary on the deal, indicating possible coordination wi

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal email chain discussing framing Jeffrey Epstein's case and potential political leverage against the Trump administration

The passage reveals a coordinated effort by senior legal and political operatives (including references to Ken Starr, Alex Acosta, and possible Clinton connections) to shape the narrative around Jeffr Email dated Dec 15, 2018 references using Epstein's "Clinton connection" to attack the Trump adminis Ken Starr is shown drafting a defense of the federal handling of Epstein's case, mentioning Alex A

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: J [email protected]>

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein advised to use anti‑Trump narrative to counter upcoming Patterson book

The passage reveals a strategic communication plan discussed between Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Wolff, suggesting Epstein’s intent to shape public perception by positioning himself against Donald Tru Email chain dated March 18, 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein, Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, Darren In Discussion of a forthcoming Patterson book slated for August 2016 and its potential political impa

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email discussing strategy to use Donald Trump as a counter‑narrative to upcoming James Patterson book, addressed to Jeffrey Epstein

The passage reveals a private communication in which Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein to position himself as an anti‑Trump voice to pre‑empt a forthcoming book by James Patterson. It suggests coo Email chain includes Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Wolff discussing a counter‑narrative strategy. Reference to a James Patterson book slated for August 2016 publication. Suggestion to frame Epstein as

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal email chain discussing leveraging Jeffrey Epstein's Clinton ties to target Trump administration officials and critique federal handling

The passage reveals a strategic conversation among media and legal figures about using Epstein's alleged Clinton connections to politically pressure current officials, mentioning high‑profile names (J Email dated Dec 15, 2018, from Matthew Hiltzik to Michael Wolff discusses invoking Epstein's Clinton Mentions using the story to “tara” (target) a Trump administration official who handled the case.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.