Case File
efta-efta01018993DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: J <[email protected]>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01018993
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: J <[email protected]>
To: Lawrence Kraus
Subject: Re: we like new version
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 15:42:52 +0000
appeal?
no reason
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:34 AM Lawrence Krauss <[email protected]> wrote:
thanks.. everything is accurate here.. in the edited version.. namely I didn't get to see all the evidence during
the investigation.. couldnt cross examine witnesses or be represented by a lawyer during interview, and
couldn't directly appeal oei or provost findings..
so good all around. oK.. ?
just woke up on plane and gonna send out the edited versions I sent you after this within an hour or so if I
don't hear from you
On Oct 21, 2018, at 2:48 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote:
dont give them am opportunity to correct your statments , than it is over
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:20 AM Lawrence Krauss <lawkrauss®gmail.com> wrote:
at the airport now.. I like the new version. Reads more like me.. and I think doesn't suffer from things you
worried about, has concerns up front, and more clearly explains process and my decision to retire. Please
like it.. I don't want to have a day like yesterday.. want to get this out.
Thanks for your stamina and friendship.
Here is version after nancy's edits (bold) of my original.. I am preparing a jpeg just in case I can send out
soon.
Yesterday I submitted, and the University accepted, my request to retire from my position as Professor at
ASU, at the end of this academic year on May 16, 2019. The University has now closed its review
process, following a conciliation procedure. My choice at this time to retire in May was prompted by
the strict (perhaps `rigid' would be a better word or just delete, unnecessary) regulations of the
Arizona Board of Regents, under which I would only be allowed to directly test the credibility of my
accusers or the veracity of their claims if I were to first agree to be dismissed, which I was not willing to
do. The nature of the review process I experienced thus far had (delete) included theinability to have
(incomplete )access to all (delete) evidence and accusations during the investigation, the inability (no
opportunity) to cross-examine witnesses or be represented by a lawyer during the
investigation interviews, and finally the inability (no option) to directly appeal the
subsequent determinations made by the investigators or the Provost.
EFTA01018993
To be clear, I have never harassed or assaulted anyone and have most certainly not exhibited
gender discriminationin my professional dealings at the University or elsewhere. Based on what has been
reported to me by the University, none of my students, departmental staff, faculty colleagues, research
colleagues and postdoctoral fellows, or participants in the Origins events I led over the past decade at ASU,
has ever issued any allegations or complaints to the University regarding my behavior.
I am confident an appeals process that impartially examines all evidence, including the evidence I had
prepared for the conciliation process, would have led to an outcome in my favor. Nevertheless, my
experience over the past seven months has led me to surmise that even following such an outcome, I
would no longer find a working environment at ASU that is conducive to continuing my active teaching,
research and service activities. I look to the future for new and different challenges and opportunities.
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 852874404
krausseaasu.edu
twitter.com/Ikraussl I www.lawrencemkrauss.com
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
twitter.com/Ikraussl l www.lawrencemkrauss.com
EFTA01018994
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01018995
Technical Artifacts (7)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
krausseaasu.eduDomain
twitter.comDomain
www.lawrencemkrauss.comEmail
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Phone
2874404Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02512763
3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01873814
3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02624186
3p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01984612
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Lawrence Krauss <Ma>
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01871509
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.