Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01032604DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Joichi Ito

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01032604
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Mass Spec device Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 20:53:11 +0000 This machine will kick off the collaboration between Caleb and Ed to work on the plant/animal stuff. Begin forwarded message: From: Arielle Johnson Subject: Re: Mass Spec device Date: September 5, 2017 at 3:07:36 PM EDT To: Caleb Harper Cc: Edward Boyden , Joichi Ito <ti Hi- > We are getting a Gas Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometer System from Agilent Technologies with a 7890B model GC and a 5975 triple qudrupole electron impact mass spec. The autosampler is made by a different company called Gerstel. It is a Gerstel MPS model autosampler. The whole setup works together to accurately extract, sample, separate, and identify/quantify mixtures of volatile (i.e. in equilibrium conditions, spending a significant amount of time in the gas phase) molecules. To detect and analyze these molecules, which tend to be in sub-part per million concentrations and inside plant tissue and other solids/liquids, a sampling and concentration step is necessary. Previously (and some labs still do this) a solvent extraction-distillation process was used to do this, but this is time consuming, labor-intensive, uses hazardous materials, and is often not satisfactorily representative of the proportions of molecules that are smelled-i.e., in the gas phase. Around 20 years ago or so an analytical chemistry group in the Czech republic developed a technique that samples from the headspace above a sample (recall that since we are measuring volatiles, the molecules of interest spend some of their time in the gas phase) and uses and absorptive polymer instead of a liquid solvent. This technique (headspace-solid phase microextraction or SPME) has the added benefit of being highly automatable—instead of having a graduate student do a series of timed extractions on the bench with a stopwatch, it became possible to aliquot out several sample into vials, and perform a timed/temperature controlled sampling and analysis of each with an autosampler robot. It's still necessary to prep the samples by hand and there's a lot of hands-on parts to the data analysis. but it greatly increases throughput and accuracy. This is the GC model we're getting, refurbished: chromatography/gc-systems/7890b-gc and this is a brochure for the GC-MS setup hup://hpst.cz/sites/default/files/attachments/5989-7827en-5975- broschure-Ir.pdf Agilent makes an autosampler, but for our extraction technique I've always used, and have always had recommended to use, the Gerstel model. this is the autosampler: this is some info from Gerstel about SPME: EFTA01032604 let me know if I can clarify anything; I'll be in Cambridge in person next week best Arielle EFTA01032605

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refrefurbished

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.