Case File
efta-efta01035756DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Valeria Chomsky
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01035756
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Valeria Chomsky
To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Cc: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Fwd:
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 23:35:21 +0000
As Noam wrote you, they refused to sign the two proposed releases -- one of them more complete and the other
much simplified.
My impression is that they keep the same strategy, delaying everything as much as possible.
Now they only want to distribute the funds to Noam if part of it goes into a trust for Noam's medical health
needs. The question is that they sign a "term sheet" agreeing that they would distribute some of Noam's own
funds, without any conditions -- that was agreed and signed in a mediation process with a mediators and
lawyers. Now they want to change and put conditions that they are not in position of doing. And all of this just
one day before the date of the court appointment.
Noam and I are going to establish a trust ourselves for any medical emergencies, but as a decision of a married
couple, not as something imposed by them, who don't care one way or another, just want to make trouble and
make sound that they have to do this to protect Noam from me, justifying his original Petition to the Court.
They also completely ignore all the stress that all this is causing to Noam. Very difficult situation.
Valeria
Forwarded message
From: Noam Chomsky
Date: Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:21 PM
Subject: Re:
To: J <[email protected]>
Cc: Valeria Chomsky
He's talking to Madoff, the mediator, Monday. Max's lawyer is working with Vincent to solve this expeditiously.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:19 PM J <[email protected]> wrote:
shame. what does vicent suggest. ? if no relase , will they still give you the 750. ?
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 7:12 PM Noam Chomsky <
wrote:
It was delayed because my children refused to sign the release that Vincent proposed, after the first one was
dropped.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:53 PM J [email protected]> wrote:
what happened in court ? did you need to go?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
EFTA01035756
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01035757
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.