From: "Martin G. Weinberg" <

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, <I Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:11:22 +0000 Importance: Normal I think the issues under review are more about 6E, 3d party privacy, and perhaps the media complaint for access, but this is just speculation since the DOJ reviewer would not identify the issues under review. You may be right, no downside, I will call him today. From: jeffrey E. Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 8:44 AM To: Martin G. Weinberg ; Darren Indyke Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL marty do you think we should let the fbi appeal office know that the govt has put in papers that say that the deal cannot be invalidated so we see know reason to withould so much. On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Martin G. Weinberg a wrote: Richard, I attach last month's invoice for charges for legal services in May which included the prior month's invoice for legal services in April both of which remain outstanding. Although I had several calls/emails this month, they amount to less than an hour and there is no charge. Thanks, Marty Martin G Weinberg PC 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Tel Cell Virus-free. www.avast.com please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01041517