Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01052593DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Richard Kahn

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01052593
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Richard Kahn To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: max Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 20:40:55 +0000 Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Begin forwarded message: From: Max Kohlenberg < Subject: Re: Date: May 21, 2018 at 4:40:19 PM EDT To: Richard Kahn < In a meeting Rich, so brief answers. There is no prohibition, but specific IRS rules and case law to acknowledge and comply with. Not something to be done without trust lawyers involved. I have not calculated what the taxes would be if done wrong - not an acceptable outcome for anyone. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Richard Kahn < Date: 5/21/18 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Max Kohlenberg < > EFTA01052593 Subject: Re: i am aware of the rule as we discussed but this is hardly a difficult issue and certainly not a prohibition. that is nonsense. also have you calcuated the amount. as i do not know the original amounts? Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 tt > > On May 21, 2018, at 3:45 PM, Max Kohlenberg wrote: > Rich - > Sorry for the delay on the income distribution information. I'll try to get that for you tomorrow. > • I'm afraid I disagree (as does Harry's attorney) as to the existence of legal issues relating to liquidation of the trusts. As you know, the trusts avoided federal and Massachusetts estate tax at Carol's death by virtue of qualifying for the marital deduction. Unless the termination is handled properly the deferred tax could be triggered on the entire remaining balance. It's not an insurmountable problem, but it needs to be done right and Noam's attorneys and Harry's attorney and I need to be on the same page about whatever settlement is worked out (and how it's documented) or we could all be in big trouble over taxes. > I really do hope that Noam can be prevailed upon to let his attorneys speak with Harry's. I'm in the middle here and whether or not I'm sued by anyone there won't be a settlement until the real "parties in interest" start communicating. > A. Max Kohlenberg > Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP > One Financial Plaza - Suite 1600 > Providence, Rhode Island 02903 > This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete and any copy of this message or attachment. Thank you. > ----Original Message---- > From: Richard Kahn [main° > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 3:29 PM > To: Max Kohlenberg > Subject: > max, may contain hereby prohibited. If the original EFTA01052594 > you were going to provide me proof of all the income going to noams account? thx > harry has stated that there are legal issues preventing him from liquidation NONSENSE > if I were you i would weigh in sooner rather than in another forum.. > Richard Kahn > HBRK Associates Inc. > 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor > New York, NY 10022 EFTA01052595

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

SWIFT/BICNONSENSE

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.