Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01054255DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01054255
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:27:56 +0000 n June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout., then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of money wanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed changed our agreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? i would receive only a third. ( note : Pm confident that both the debt , and the artspace investment will also lead to a write off of another 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most people to pay their advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly compensated for my work when strategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended and said " are you suggesting that i would go back on my word " I said no , of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is that when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay I included in this letter the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out my understanding of the compensation for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just completed. though the number was great it was clear. When it appeared that the details could now be worked out I was the first to say , it is too much money, however. From day zero I proposed to discount to 50 - 60 million the fair price of the transaction just completed . including Phaidon.. though this amount was already substantially less than our agreed and negotiated formula. - I was never told that this was out of range. in fact, alternative methods of payment . plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed ( ie including keeping the 30m portion of fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided as you specifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given access to. ( Phaidon was not forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . I was then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best of light , though it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever proposed a unique idea. (including any wayt to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of your largest asset by far , the BAH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the plan and stretch reality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large amount unless they were wearing a brightly colored clown suit. , the payment associated with the deal was known . It had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times , a detailed execution plan was provided . then and only then after all was laid out for the group I was told that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that was more than originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel It was remarkably unfair. I wondered whether brad even knew of our prior agreement.? I called him and he said he was never told.?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful.. I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. If the transactions were never consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the transaction was even begun, and had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, from our agreement . I believe the decision re only paying 20 m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01054255

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedNov 19, 2025

HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016694

November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder

14p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02261918

2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02045063

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01750651

0p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein‑Melanie Spinella family‑office emails reveal disputed $40‑$50M advisory fees, undisclosed accounts, tax‑saving schemes and possible...

The corpus contains detailed internal communications that reference large, undocumented cash balances (e.g., $11 M dormant accounts, $4 M in a drawer), disputed fee arrangements for services that alle Jeffrey Epstein claims to have saved the client $600 M in taxes through complex structures, yet alle References to $11 M in dormant accounts and $4 M cash in a staff member’s drawer suggest undisclos

146p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02212984

To: From: Fisher, Janet Sent Thur 5/18/2017 4:52:06 PM Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Thanks, Lesley. I see that he has Jeffrey on his calendar for 5:30pm tomorrow. -Janet (covering for Selinda today) Janet Fisher I Administrative Assistant Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York, NY 10019-6064 From Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 12:30 PM To: Fisher, Janet Subject: Fwd: Jeffrey Epstein Hello Janet...just wanted to be sure and CC an assistan

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.