Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01055851DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01055851
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Leon Black Subject: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:41:19 +0000 I htought it might be helpful if you had real facts before we speak. could you please ask yourself , do you think you have been fair. - truly . I know i dont think so. I m certain karp doesnt think so but you can check with him yourself. and i was told repeatedly by wechsler that you "just dont like paying money" though he called to say how much " value you and he thought i had contributed :IT appears that the only person that knows the facts that thinks you have been fair is you. ask yourself how is it possible that you havent even offered to reimburse me for money paid out on your behalf . moneys for your tax returns in april. october , the gift tax. , and the gift tax audit and its results all took my time and expertise ( me , the only professional that you choose not to pay , as you continue to suggest that you" expect" things from me. ) I would ask you why you would ask me to detail the largest transaction in your personal life and then not pay me for that work. I believe in you I cant figure it out You have in the past suggested that our negotiated formula was never in play though each time the subject of money came up you have historically said i need to see " value " , but then , even when shown you have to admit to yourself that you created a different reason not to pay. . ask yourself if the original giacometti , schiele plus transaction had a balanced component. that allowed both you and I to benefit . but the fee component was ignored . and you said , if I can take you at your word, .. the work you dismiss on the 8865 as only a few changes. after hours and hours of work, leads me to the conclusion that focusing my time on your risks is not really worth it to either you or I . With your new self reflection, there is no rush to any of these answers , take the time to really think about what ive said. I have little enthusiasm for further interaction with your office. Barry callled this morning , and I gave him a broad stroke vision to the TRA . however as you know, still nothing done on the full fire drill or further estate plan. There is no hurt involved. I know that you would never intentionally do anything that would cause me hurt. It is frustration that your behavior is so high risk and self destructive and my inability to guide you to a place of safety with the recognition and compensation that it deserves. Saving you from yourself and then being told you cant see the value is hearbreaking not hurtful. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01055851

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflection

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.