Case File
efta-efta01059951DOJ Data Set 9OtherDS9 Document EFTA01059951
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01059951
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To: Danny Hillis •
Cc: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 16:05:44 +0000
>
Hi Danny,
I appreciated your thoughts yesterday re "stories."
Three follow up thoughts:
I) In cases where we can't tell complete stories, like your sorting algorithm, we can presumably tell stories about
certain features. And I guess this is what I was trying to claim about evolutionary theory; we can't hope to predict
a priori which features will show up in which taxa or why humans evolved, but we can explain why sex ratios
are about 50:50. And in such cases we can still distinguish between good and bad stories (the god explanation or
a group selection explanation vs fisher).
But I guess this raises two questions:
2) In such domains, which kinds of stories will we be able to tell and which kinds won't we? Should we be
striving for a Darwin-like story of human culture? For a high level pseudocode-like story for how the mind
works? Or are there other questions we should be asking? What is the level of analysis we should be doing in
these domains of research?
3) And in such domains, how can we distinguish good from bad stories? This seems like a particular problem in
domains, like the social and biological science, where even the good stories are incomplete and never 100%
accurate. But there are still better and worse stories. Currently, as you pointed out, these fields seem rife with bad
stories. How could we more systematically distinguish the good from the bad, in such domains? Is there a
conceptual tool or a litmus test they might be able to apply?
Anyhow, I look forward to chatting again. I hope you didn't find my comments or questions off-putting.
I didn't get to hear what your daughter does, but it sounded like she has an interest in psychology. And in
evolution. I teach and do research in both those departments, and would be happy to chat with her more, if she
had an interest and found herself by Harvard again. I appreciated her comments as well.
-Moshe
On Dec 2, 2016, at 9:20 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:20 PM jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:15 PM moshe hoffman <
Jeff,
wrote:
Is it OK for me to send Danny a follow up email? If so, might you have his email address by chance?
EFTA01059951
Happy to pass the email by you first, if you prefer.
-Moshe
Sent from my iPhone
EFTA01059952
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01877767
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01732180
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01827309
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02057547
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Danny Hillis ‹
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02668191
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.