Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01060941DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "jeffrey E."

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01060941
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "jeffrey E." To: Stephen Hanson Subject: Re: Screenshot 2018-05-11 at 6.13.45 PM Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 01:20:06 +0000 I had asked a simple -why the mad rush . in the middle of the attempted sale. Your answer was/ the warn act . On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:42 PM Stephen Hanson < It's the employees who bring action Ok so what Did not close because of warn act Closed because we ran out of funds with money still owed Sent from my iPad > wrote: On May 11, 2018, at 7:31 PM, jeffrey E. > wrote: you should ask your idiots if they have ever once in their career seen a restaurant closure with less than 50 full time emplyees that was fined under the warn act . . On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:14 PM Stephen Hanson < > wrote: I have sent you two red marked line items Besides the look back which would put me at 50 there are carve outs - sent in red But I was lucky the company ran out of funds forcing a closing date When we looked at the warn act we saw we where 2 weeks under having employment for 6 months - just got lucky I had to fund last weeks PR - This advise was reviewed by two labor lawyers who I would believe to be correct Sent from my iPad On May 11, 2018, at 6:50 PM, jeffrey E. < > wrote: Generally, under the New York WARN Act, an "employer," defined as any enterprise that employs 50 or more employees within New York (excluding part-time employees), must provide 90 days of advance notice (as opposed to 60 days under federal law) prior to ordering a mass layoff, plant closing, relocation, or a covered reduction in work hours. These are defined below: On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:14 PM Stephen Hanson < > wrote: Look back over 50 but under 6 months Sent from my iPad EFTA01060941 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01060942

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.