Case File
efta-efta01075547DOJ Data Set 9OtherREPORTS
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01075547
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
REPORTS
abwdance (3). We normalized the AD values to 'fre-
quency' values by referring the AD values on each chip
to a calibration curve constructed from the AD values
for the 11 control transaipts with known abundances
that were spiked into each hybridization (9). This 'fre-
quency normalization" allowed comparison of tran-
script measurements across multiple way experiments.
Frequency values for each gene %we expressed in num-
ber concentrations (transcripts per million or ppei)
under the assumptions described (9).
13. P. Tamayo et at, Proc. Nett Aced. Sc). U.SA. 96,
2907 (1999).
14. Supplemental information is available at www
sciencernagorg/feature/data/1053496.shl
15, L L Johnstone. J. D. Barry, EM8O). 15. 3633 (1996).
16. M. C Costanzo et at. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 73
(2000
The Proteome WormPD database is available
at
17. C. E. Rocheleau et at, Cell 90, 707 (1997).
18. P. W. Carter*, J. M. Roos, K. J. Kemphues, Mot. Gen.
Genet. 221, 72 (1990).
19. Additional details are available as supplemental in-
formation (II).
20. J. H. Xin, 8. P. Brandhont, R. J. Britten, E. H. Davidson,
Dev. Slat. 89. 527 (1982).
21. S. A. Cherritz et at, Science 282, 2022 (1998).
22. G. M. Rubin et at, Science 287, 2204 (2003).
23. To classify ?KOMI genes, we used the sequence com-
parison results of Rubin et at (22). In the period
between the date of our chip design (early 1999) and
the date of this more recent sequence comparison
(early 2000). some of the worm ORFs that had been
included in the chip designs had been deleted or
altered by worm sequence curators (for details on the
°Nation of the Wcempep database, see http://vemy
sangersc.uk/Projects/C_elegans/wcempept). To rec-
oncile worm ORFs in the sequence comparison with
worm ORFs on the arrays, we limited our analysis to
worm ORFs on the arrays that were unchanged be-
tween the two data sets, using creation lists main-
tained at the Sanger Centre (the Wonnpephistory
file). Thus, we identified on the arrays 2905 worm
genes shared between yeast, worm and fly (core
genes); 3150 warn genes shared between worm and
fly, but not yeast (animal genes); and 8741 worm
genes that were unique to the worm (worm genes).
Song Replay During Sleep and
Computational Rules for
Sensorimotor Vocal Learning
Amish S. Dave and Daniel Margoliash.
Songbirds learn a correspondence between vocal-motor output and auditory
feedback during development. For neurons in a motor cortex analog of adult
zebra finches, we show that the timing and structure of activity elicited by the
playback of song during sleep matches activity during daytime singing. The
motor activity leads syllables, and the matching sensory response depends on
a sequence of typically up to three of the preceding syllables. Thus. sensori-
motor correspondence is reflected in temporally precise activity patterns of
single neurons that use long sensory memories to predict syllable sequences.
Additionally, "spontaneous" activity of these neurons during sleep matches
their sensorimotor activity, a form of song "replay." These data suggest a model
whereby sensorimotor correspondences are stored during singing but do not
modify behavior, and off-line comparison (e.g., during sleep) of rehearsed motor
output and predicted sensory feedback is used to adaptively shape motor
output.
In reinforcement learning, systems learn
through interaction with the environment by
trying to optimize some measure of perfor-
mance. Biological systems may experience a
substantial delay between prentotor activity
and assessment of performance through sen-
sory feedback (I). This delay poses the prob-
lem of how to reward or punish a premotor
circuit when that circuit is participating in a
different task by the time the reward or pun-
ishment is computed. Reinforcement learning
is further complicated in systems such as
vocal learning, where the mapping of sensory
feedback (fundamentally represented as fre-
quency versus time) onto motor output (mus-
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy,
University of Chicago, 1027 East 57 Street, Chicago, IL
60637, USA.
• To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-
mail: dantebigbird.udskago.edu
cle dynamics) is of high dimensionality (a
many-to-many dynamic mapping). Methods
developed in the field of machine learning
solve the problem of reinforcement learning
with delayed reward (2), and a variety of
biological solutions have been proposed to
the problem of learning sequences of actions
(3). Here, we report on neuronal data that
represent a solution to the problem of senso-
rimotor mapping in the bird vocal-motor
("song") system. The physiological proper-
ties observed during sleep also suggest an
algorithmic implementation for reinforce-
ment learning of song.
Zebra finch songs are organized hierarchi-
cally, with one or more notes composing a
syllable, and sequences of syllables forming a
motif, which are repeated to form song. We
investigated neurons in the forebrain nucleus
robustus archistriatalis (RA), whose descend-
ing projections represent the output of the
Shared worm genes were defined as those that had
significant homology to one or more genes in yeast
or fly (BLASTP expectation values E < 1 x 10 bk, as
described by Rubin et at) Discrepancies between
these numbers of ORFs and temperable counts in
Rubin et at are accounted for by the facts (I) that 2%
of worm ORFs were not monitored directly by the
arrays and (ii) that to be conservative, we excluded
from consideration ORFs that had either been delet-
ed or altered in the Worrnpep database in the interval
between the chip design and the sequence compari-
son of Rubin et at.
24. We thank M. Whitley fee advice on array experi-
ments; K. Griffiths fee array bioinformatics support E.
Wilson A. Velasco, and H. Horton for technical as-
sistance; J. Freeman for bioinformatics support during
the chip design protest G. Sherlock for sharing yeast
and worm sequence comparison dattc 11. Yandelt for
sharing yeast, fly, and worm sequence comparison
data; and D. Moots for providing purified oocytes.
26 June 2003; accepted 29 September 2000
forebrain song system. During singing, RA
neurons exhibit short bursts of activity,
whose identity varies with the note that im-
mediately follows the burst (4). In awake
birds, outside the context of vocalizations,
RA neurons are regularly firing. RA neurons
also prominently burst "spontaneously" and
respond to sounds, but only during sleep (5).
With the goal of comparing motor, auditory,
and ongoing bursting activity, we recorded
single neurons in the RA of singing male
zebra finches, permitted the animals to fall
asleep by turning off the lights, and then
tested the sante neurons' sensory and ongoing
discharge properties (6. 7).
The spiking patterns of RA neurons in
singing birds consisted of phasic patterns of
premotor excitation superimposed over a
background of profound inhibition (4) (Fig.
I, B and C). This premotor activity was
virtually invariant for multiple occurrences of
the same sound. After the lights were turned
off, RA auditory responses were initially
weak but gained strength with time, reflect-
ing the gradual transition into sleep (5). Re-
sponses to playback of the bird's own song
(BOS) also consisted of phasic patterns of
excitation separated by inhibition that were
similar for multiple occurrences of the same
sound, differing mainly in the strength of
response rather than pattern (8).
The timing of auditory responses to the
BOS was very well aligned to the timing of
premotor activity (Fig. IF). The only excep-
tions were instances of silence following the
end of a motif or the end of song, where the
auditory response could include an additional
burst that corresponded with the syllable that
would have followed if the song had continued
without pause. To compare motor and auditory
activity, we analyzed the singing-related activ-
ity surrounding each syllable of sang (4, 9). The
spike patterns from the response to the BOS
playback were then compared with the spike
patterns from premotor activity derived from
812
27 OCTOBER 2000 VOL 290 SCIENCE www.sciencemagorg
EFTA01075547
REPORTS
Fig. 1. (A) Schematic of the song system. Audi-
A
tory and premotor activity converge onto the
HVc The HVc projects directly to the RA, which
projects to brainstem motor centers. The HVc
also projects to area X, which projects to the
DIM. The DIM projects to the IMAN, which
projects to the RA. Feedback loops arise from the
RA and IMAN. (B and C) Activity of RA single
neurons during singing is premotor (I.e., neuronal
activity leads syllables). Spectrographs of the
sound that the bird produced are shown in a
color scale (frequency, 0 to 10 kHz, is on the
ordinate; time is on the abscissa). Corresponding
raw traces of the neural activity (amplitude ver-
sus time) are shown below the spectrographs.
Data from one neuron for two similar examples
of singing are shown in (B). The neuron's activity
patterns are the same for the two examples of
singing, except where the vocalizations differ,
and the difference in neuronal discharge (at
arrow) precedes the difference in the vocaliza-
tions. Both sequences of vocalizations occurred
frequently; the neuronal pattern associated with
each sequence was stereotyped. In (C) [different
neuron, same bird as in (8)1, the bird produced
syllable "C (marked by arrows) twice (each
syllable is identified by a letter), with the song
ending prematurely after the second occurrence.
The neuronal discharge following the second C
was affected. Activity during calling (not shown)
also clearly demonstrates that RA activity leads
vocalizations [see also (4)). (D) Cross-correlation
of auditory and motor activity for the first neu-
ron shown in (E) (positive time shifts imply that
auditory response lags premotor activity). (E)
Examples of the match between auditory and
motor activity from one neuron in each of two
birds. The spectrographs show the BOS used as
stimuli during playback experiments, and each
syllable is identified by a letter. The rasters
marked "Aud." represent the neuron's auditory
response during playback while the birds were
asleep. The rasters marked "Mot." were con-
structed from neuronal activity of the same
neurons during singing (4). The correspondence
between the two patterns of activity is visually
striking. In contrast to singing, however, during song playback, neurons exhibited ongoing discharge, not inhibition, for some syllables. (F) Example of
raw traces showing the match between activity during playback and singing [same neuron as in (B)).
C
IIII I IIIIIII
•
E
I A B C DE FGH
A B C
11411r
A I
C
000ms
F
500ms
IA B COE
1IK B
200ms
D
0.6
41
111. 1
I
I ii
0.5
4
OA
0.3
01 I
I
/
1 4
t ill
0.2
-60
0
50
100
-100
Auditory Lag (ms)
200ms
AN
8
I
A
B
C
DE
FGH
h I...1 32.s
La -A
6
At I s
all
I
-C
o
a
.
s
.
A
a
s
s
r
a
i
r
s
a
l
l
a
e
l
a
.
.
.
.
.
-
a
.
s
a
t
u
a
l
I.
1
-E
la `
1
200 ms
Target Syllable
1
1
5
1
6
6
2
7
6
6
7
8
9
1
1
3
2
4
Fig. 2. Deletion experiments. (A) The bird was
7
presented songs during sleep. Below the spec-
trograph of the last motif of the bird's song are
nine histograms of the response of one neuron,
D
7
representing 30 repetitions each of nine differ-
ent stimuli. The BOS histogram is the response
E
8
to the unaltered motif. For each of the eight
other stimuli, one of the syllables from A to H
was replaced with background noise. For syllable
9 F, for example, the neuron responded with two
bursts, with both bursts occurring during syllable
F. The first burst (but not the second) is statis-
tically significantly reduced (8) by the elimina-
tion of syllables C, D. E. or F. The second burst is
affected by the elimination of syllable F. The
burst at syllable H is affected by eliminating syllables F, G, and H. (B) in one bird with the most
complex song, 10 neurons were tested with deletion stimuli. Each cell of the matrix gives the
number of neurons in which the deletion of a syllable (specified by the column) significantly
altered the response during the target syllable (specified by the row). The last syllable of the song,
H, was excluded because appropriate control data were unavailable (an earlier syllable had always
been deleted). The matrix diagonal represents the effect of deleting a syllable on the neuronal
response during that same syllable. The numbers to the right of the diagonal are the number of
neurons for which there were a statistically significant response during the target syllable. It can
be seen that the deletion of a syllable commonly affected the neuronal response several syllables
later. For example, of eight neurons responding to syllable E, the response was suppressed for one,
six. seven, and six neurons when syllables B, C, D, and E, respectively, were deleted.
F
G
•
8
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Deleted Sy table
wwwsciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 290 27 OCTOBER 2000
813
EFTA01075548
REPORTS
the corresponding syllables, showing that the
timing of excitation and inhibition during audi-
tory stimulation was well aligned to such tinting
during singing (Fig. I, D and E). A cross-
correlation procedure revealed a strong, signif-
icant (P < 0.02) correlation (10) between pre-
motor and sensory spike patterns in all 17 neu-
rons (from three birds) (mean normalized peak
correlation = 0.49 -1- 0.13 SD). Thus, sensori-
motor transformations in the song system result
in a correspondence between temporally pre-
cise sensory and motor activity observed at the
level of individual cells.
A
B
The auditory activity was only slightly
delayed in relation to motor activity (by 8 -±
2 ms; range, 4 to 13 nu). Because premotor
activity in RA can lead the onset of syllables
by up to —40 ms (4), this was surprising and
suggested that the sensory patterns represent-
ing subsequent syllables were generated by
responses to previous syllables. To character-
ize the extent of temporal integration in the
auditory responses, we presented stimuli in
which a syllable chosen at random front the
final motif of the BOS was substituted by a
background of equal duration, and we as-
Set
Sate
tAllk
C
D
E
F
G
H
l
ilt
C
D
E
F
h - -Rd 4
t NV
Ili l 1
100ms
AS OW ire,
ims Ow-
A
B
C
A
B
I
ill-IrkRh
,4-11i1\
\w l l d -1-41I
,4111
11 Ilil
Mil
100m8
Fig. 3. Neuronal replay during undisturbed sleep. (A) Raw traces of neuronal activity (900 ms)
during sleep ("Spoil in two different neurons for one bird. For each sample, a representative
corresponding sample of premotor activity ("Mot.") and a color spectrograph of the song that the
bird sang are shown. (B) Raw traces (1400 ms) of simultaneous recordings from two neurons (-400
µm apart) in another bird. (The second neuron's activity is visible in the background of the first
neuron's signal, an artifact of the pairing of signals used to achieve differential recordings resistant
to movement-induced artifacts.) Both neurons simultaneously burst during sleep, with complex
burst structures that match premotor activity. Apparent temporal expansion (first motif: A, B, and
C) and compression (second motif: A, B, and C) is highlighted by the blue lines. This phenomenon
has also been reported in population activity of hippocampal neurons (23).
sensed the effect on the neuronal activity
during the same or subsequent syllables (11).
The deletion of a syllable substantially re-
duced the neuronal activity occurring one to
three syllables later (Fig. 2A), up to —250 ins
(8). This property was ubiquitous for all RA
neurons that were auditory (14 neurons from
three birds) (12) (Fig. 2B). These response
properties are suggestive of temporal combi-
nation sensitivity, in which a sensory neu-
ron's response is nonlinearly dependent on
the temporal sequence of preceding syllables.
Such responses have also been described for
neurons in the nucleus HVc, which projects
to the RA (13). Thus, in the RA as well as in
the liVc (4, 13), the integration time of indi-
vidual neurons appears to be considerably
greater when in the sensory (auditory) state
than during singing. Given the alignment of
auditory and motor activity in the RA, one
way of interpreting these results is that audi-
tory responses to song syllables represent a
prediction of subsequent premotor activity.
We also searched for similarities between
ongoing bursting activity during sleep (5) and
the sensorimotor patterns of RA neurons. For
each cell, a visual inspection of samples of
activity from long stretches (15 to 60 min) of
undisturbed sleep identified repeated exam-
ples of one or more complex burst patterns,
suggestive of the patterns that we had ob-
served in the cell's pre: motor activity. To
quantify this match, we developed a proce-
dure to automate burst detection (14), con-
sidering only bursts of eight spikes or more to
ease the computational burden and to allow
for statistical analysis. By this procedure,
7.1 ± 5.3% of all spikes (14 neurons from
three birds) occurred in bursts, an average of
175.4 ± 144.6 (range, 38 to 581) bursts per
cell. For each cell, a measure of similarity
between each burst and the single longest
bout of the cell's premotor activity (4 to 8 s,
consisting of several motifs or songs) was
computed and tested for significance (15,
16). The results showed that 15.3 ± 6.5% of
bursts (range, 2.6 to 26.8%) significantly
matched prentotor activity. Only the cell with
2.6% matching bursts failed to exceed the 5%
level expected by chance (16). Examples of
matches between longer sequences of com-
plex ongoing bursts and premotor activity
were particularly compelling (Fig. 3A). In an
exceptional case when two RA neurons were
recorded simultaneously from different elec-
trodes during sleep, both neurons commonly
exhibited simultaneous bursting, with the dif-
ferent burst patterns for each neuron corre-
sponding to the same sequences of syllables
(Fig. 3B). This suggests that populations of
RA neurons burst in a coordinated fashion
during sleep. Bursts (and matching bursts)
preferentially occurred during periods when
the rate of ongoing discharge was lower and
more variable (Fig. 4). Such modulation may
814
27 OCTOBER 2000 VOL 290 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
EFTA01075549
REPORTS
correspond to specific phases of the sleep
cycle.
In the sensorimotor phase of vocal learn-
ing, the mapping between auditory feedback
and vocal output is the fundamental compu-
tational problem to be solved (17). A solution
to this problem is reflected in the sensorimo-
tor activity patterns of RA neurons. Precision
of spike timing has been observed in a num-
ber of systems and provides evidence for
temporally based neural codes in sensory pro-
cessing, although only in a few cases has the
behavioral relevance been directly demon-
strated (18). The observed correspondence
between auditory activity and vocal output
demonstrates that, in the RA, sensorimotor
mapping is based on a temporal code. This
correspondence is likely to arise from audi-
tory input recruiting similar components of
the RA pattern-generating circuits as those
recruited during singing. In the hierarchical
organization of the song system (4, 19), the
sensorimotor
correspondence
may
first
emerge at the single-cell level within the RA.
The data suggest that, during vocal develop-
ment, the song system learns to generate pre-
motor commands by association with a pre-
diction of future commands based on the
tinting of auditory feedback from preceding
syllables. This can be interpreted as learning
the match between the auditory response to a
sequence of syllables with the premotor pat-
tern for a subsequent syllable or as learning
the match between the prediction of a sensory
representation of a syllable with the premotor
representation of the same syllable.
In the birdsong system, RA receives input
from the IIVc and from an anterior forebrain
pathway (AFP) (Fig. IA). Sensorimotor song
learning could result in part from "online"
Time (min)
Fig. 4. (Top) The firing rate during recordings of
RA ongoing activity over almost 1 hour of sleep,
estimated from a 100-point moving average of
the interspike intervals (there was a gap in the
data collection of —3.25 min). (Bottom) A histo-
gram (30-s bins) of the number of bursts identi-
fied by a burst-finding procedure. The number of
bursts that significantly matched the premotor
activity is shown in blue.
mechanises, whereby during singing, IIVc ac-
tivity in response to auditory feedback from
sequences of syllables is delayed through the
AFP to produce a prediction of activity in the
RA of a subsequent syllable. The data collected
during sleep, however, also suggest "off-line"
models for learning that address the problems
of feedback delay and sequence generation.
Such models share some similarities with tem-
poral-difference models of reinforcement learn-
ing and sequence generation that are prominent
in mammalian work on basal ganglia and the
cerebellum, in that they reward or modify the
system on the basis of its overall performance,
not on the basis of the performance of individ-
ual components or movements (3). The AFP
has been likened to a mammalian cortienlywkl
ganglia-thalarnocortical loop (20, 21).
In the vocal learning model motivated
by the present data, signals that arise in the
RA during singing train the AFP to gener-
ate a prediction of auditory feedback; dur-
ing sleep rehearsal, the AFP's predicted
feedback provides reinforcement to RA
neurons. During singing, sensorimotor ef-
ference copy signals (premotor output and
expected auditory feedback) traverse the
AFP, and via the lateral subdivision of the
magnocellular nucleus of the anterior neo-
striatum (IMAN) projection onto area X,
are compared with real auditory feedback
arriving in area X from the HVc (Fig. IA).
Efference copy is brought into temporal
register with auditory feedback using the
long (-50 ms) synaptic delays observed in
the medial subdivision of the dorsolateral
nucleus of the thalamus (DLM) (21). This
stimulates area X neurons that are sensitive
to temporally coincident input. The output
of the IMAN onto the RA has a reduced
effect because the IMAN is not in temporal
register with driving input from the HVc.
During sleep, replay of song premotor pat-
terns via ongoing bursting generates coher-
ent activity throughout the song system that
is similar to singing in the absence of actual
sound production and perception. The out-
put of the IMAN represents a prediction of
the real auditory feedback that would have
resulted from the burst-generated motor
command, is in near coincidence with IlVc
bursts driving the RA, and is used to mod-
ify RA neurons that are sensitive to tempo-
rally coincident input.
The proposed algorithm for birdsong
learning depends on circadian modulation of
neuronal activity patterns (22). Our observa-
tion of neuronal replay of sensorimotor pat-
terns during sleep is consistent with data front
hippocampal studies suggesting that sleep is
important for the consolidation of neuronal
temporal codes for spatial memory (23, 24).
The fundamental prediction of our model is
that birdsong learning depends on sleep or
other off-line computations.
References and Notes
1. In songbirds, there is a minimum delay of —70 ms
or longer between the production of a burst of
neuronal activity contributing to song generation
and the reception of processed auditory input from
the resulting vocalization. In zebra finches, sylla-
bles are typically SO to 200 ms in duration and may
comprise one or several notes. The minimal delay is
the sum of premotor lead (-50 ms) and sensory
lag. Sensory lag is the sum of the minimal latency
for response (-20 ms) and the sensory integration
time, which, for song system neurons, can be tens
to hundreds of milliseconds.
2. R. S. Sutton, A. G. Berta, Reinforcement Learning: An
Introduction (MIT Press, London, 1998).
3. R. E. Sur!, W. Schultz. Exp. Brain Res. 121, 350 (1998);
D. G. Beiser. J. C. Houk, f. NewrophysieL 79, 3168
(1998); G. S. Berns, T. J. Sejnowski, f. foga. Nearest).
10, 108 (1998); J. Brown, D. Bullock, S. Grossberg
f. Neumset 19, 10502 (1999).
4. A C. Yu, D. Margoliash, Science 273, 1871 (1996).
5. A S. Dave, A C Yu. D. Margoliash, Science 282, 2250
(1998)
6. All neuronal data reported in this report are from
single units. Eighteen neurons (10. 5, and 3) from
three birds contributed to the data reported herein.
Two additional neurons from a fourth bird exhibited
a match between auditory responses and ongoing
bursts. These data were the genesis for this study but
did not include premotor data.
7. The chronic recording procedures and conduct of the
experiments are described in detail on Science Online
(24).
8, Additional procedures and data regarding the audi-
tory responses of the netecos are described on Sci-
ence Online (24).
9. The pattern of RA neuronal activity depends on
notes. which are constituents of syllables. By defini-
tion, the same pattern of notes is repeated for a given
syllable type. We analyzed RA activity at the syllable
level to ease the analysis and to minimize the number
of deletion stimuli required in subsequent experi-
ments. FolloiMng established procedures, we identi-
fkd each syllable that the bird sang, and the times of
asset and offset were manually determined from
spectrographs and oscillographs of the acoustic sig-
nal. The spectrographs of all exemplars for each
syllable type were cross-correlated to establish opti-
mal time shifts; these were then applied to the
corresponding spike bursts. The aligned time-shifted
spikes were the basis for further analysis.
10. Peak cross-correlation values were tested for signifi-
cance by using a bootstrap procedure, described in
detail on Science Online (24).
11. Multiple stimuli were derived from the 8O5, one for
each syllable deleted from the last complete motif of
the SOS; these were presented in one block during
the night while the bird was asleep. Deleted syllables
were replaced with samples from silent intervals
between motifs or syllables. Spike rates were com-
puted over the duration of each syllable. For each
syllable from the second to the penultimate, we
compared the spike rates over the interval of the
target syllable when a previous syllable or the target
syllable itself was deleted (experimental data)
against the spike rates for the target syllable when
only a subsequent syllable was deleted (control data),
using a Mann-Whitney U test at the 95% confidence
level The last syllable in the song was excluded
because, by definition, control data were not Orval-
able. (The response to the SOS. presented at the
beginning of the night's recordings as the bird tran-
sitioned into sleep, showed fluctuations in the
strength of response but not in the timing of spikes.
Thus, it was appropriate for correlation testing of
sensorimotor comparisons but not for a comparison
with spike counts of deleted syllable stimuli.)
12. The three birds presented with deletion stimuli had
songs with eight, five, and three syllables per motif.
All 10 neurons tested in the eight-syllable bird (Fig.
28) and all 3 neurons tested in the three-syllable
bird showed a loss of excitatory response when the
target or a previous syllable was deleted. One of
two neurons tested in the five-syllable bird showed
no response to any syllable of the 8O5; the other
wwwsciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 290 27 OCTOBER 2000
815
EFTA01075550
REPORTS
neuron responded at the second syllable, and the
response was suppressed by deletion of the first or
second syllable.
11 D. Margolies/O. Necutod. 3. 1039 (1983); D. Mar-
goliash, E. S. Fortune, J. Neustod. 12, 4309 (1992).
14. We gathered sufficient data from 14 neurons (from
three birds) to permit quantitative comparisons be-
tween ongoing discharge and singing. Interspike in-
terval histograms of the ongoing discharge of RA
neurons during sleep are binadal the longer interval
peak is related to nonbursting activity. Thus, bursts
were defined as continuous sequences of interspike
intervals falling outside of the normal (nonbursting)
distribution of intervals.
15. Two tests of significance were devised. For each
neuron, a distance was computed between each
ongoing burst and the exemplar stretch of activity
during singing. Each best match (lowest distance)
was tested for significance by using a bootstrap
procedure that assessed the probability of occur-
rence of the exact sequence of intervals observed
in the burst. In the second test, for the one bird
with the greatest number of recordings, we also
compared each neuron's ongoing discharges during
sleep with the premotor data from other neurons.
For seven out of eight neurons, there were more
matches with the neuron's own cremator data
than with the premotor data from the other neu-
rons. The same neuron failed to achieve signifi-
cance in both tests.
16. The procedures for identifying bursts in ongoing ac-
tivity, matching bursts to premotor activity, and as-
sessing the significance of the matches are described
in detail on Science Online (24).
17. M. Konishi. Z. Thecpsychol. 22, 770 (1965).
18. C. E. Carr, W. Heiligenberg. G. J. Rose, J. Neurosd. 6,
107 (1986); J. Neunuct 6, 1372 (1986); A. Molten,
M. Konishi, J. Neumsci. 1, 40 (1981); C E. Carr, M.
Konishi, J. Netwoul. 10, 3227 (1990); G. Laurent, M.
Welts, H. Davidowitz, J. NeuroseJ. 16, 3837 (1996);
R. C. deCharms, M. M. Merzenich, Nature 381, 610
(1996); A. K. Engel P. R. Roelfsema P. Fries, M. Brecht,
W. Singer, fere& Cortex 7. 571 (1997); Y. Prut et at.,
J. Neon:physic,. 79, 2857 (1998).
Structure of Murine CTLA-4 and
Its Role in Modulating T Cell
Responsiveness
David A. Ostrov," Wuxian Shi,2 Jean-Claude D. Schwartz,1
Steven C. Almo,Z* Stanley G. Nathensonl as
The effective regulation of T cell responses is dependent on opposing signals
transmitted through two related cell-surface receptors, CD28 and cytotoxic T
lymphocyte—associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Dimerization of CTLA-4 is required
for the formation of high-avidity complexes with 87 ligands and for transmis-
sion of signals that attenuate T cell activation. We determined the crystal
structure of the extracellular portion of CTLA-4 to 2.0 angstrom resolution.
CTLA-4 belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily and displays a strand
topology similar to Va domains, with an unusual mode of dimerization that
places the B7 binding sites distal to the dimerization interface. This organization
allows each CTLA-4 dimer to bind two bivalent B7 molecules and suggests that
a periodic arrangement of these components within the immunological synapse
may contribute to the regulation of T cell responsiveness.
T cell—dependent immune processes require
cell-surface interactions that mediate the ini-
tiation, modulation, and the ultimate course
of the response. The specificity of T cell
recognition is determined by the engagement
of the T cell receptor (TCR) on T cells with
cognate peptide-major histocompatibility
complex (MHC) complexes presented by an-
tigen-presenting cells (APCs) (1, 2). Addi-
tional signals are required to sustain and en-
hance T cell activity, the most important of
which is provided by the engagement of
CD28 on T cells with its ligands B7-I
(CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) on APCs (3, 4). In
contrast, the interaction of B7 isoforms with
'Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Wre-
partment of Biochemistry, 'Department of Cell Biol-
ogy. Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Bronx, NY
10461. USA.
'To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-
mail almofeaecorn.yu.edu or nathenscSaecom.yu.
edu
CTLA-4, a CD28 homolog (31% identity),
provides inhibitory signals required for
down-regulation of the response (5).
Unlike CD28, which is expressed on rest-
ing T cells, CTLA-4 is not detected on the
cell surface until 24 hours after activation,
peaking at 36 to 48 hours after activation (6).
In addition, CTLA-4 exhibits an affinity for
the B7 isoforms that is 10 to 100 times that
for CD28 (7). On the basis of these differ-
ences in expression patterns and affinities, it
is likely that CTLA-4 directly competes with
CD28 for binding B7 and also directs the
assembly of inhibitory signaling complexes
that lead to quiescence or anergy (8). Consis-
tent with the inhibitory role of CTLA-4, mice
deficient in CTLA-4 die as a consequence of
unchecked polyclonal T cell expansion,
which results in fatal lymphoproliferative dis-
orders (9). Thus, the balance between the
opposing signals elicited by CD28 and
CTLA-4 is central to the regulation of T cell
responsiveness and homeostasis (10).
19. E. T. vu, M. E. Mazur&
Kuo, J. Neurosct 14,
6924 (1994).
2a S. W. Bottler, F. Johnson, J. Neurobiot 33, 602
(1997).
21. M. Luo, D. J. Perkel, J. Neurosc). 19. 6700 (1999).
2Z G. E. Hinton, P. Days; 8. J. Frey, R. M. Neal. Science
268. 1158 (1995).
21 G. Bundki, Neunucience 31. 551 (1989); M. A. Wil-
son, B. L McNaughton Science 265, 676 (1994);
W. E. Skaggs, B. L McNaughton Science 271, 1870
(1996); L NiSdasdy, H. Hirase, A. Curka, J. CSitSvarl,
G. Buzsdki,./. /Yet/fwd. 19. 9497 (1999).
24. Supplemental data are available at www.sclencemag.
orefeaturefdata/10511399shl
25. We thank. T. Q. Gerstner, ).-M. Ramirez, P. S. Ulinski,
and especialty two anonymous reviewers for valuable
comments on the manuscript. This work was sup-
ported by grants from the NIH (MH59831 and
MH60276) to
and (MH1161S) to =.
6 April 2000; accepted 8 September 2000
Because of its dominant role in modulating
T cell activity, CTLA-4 has received consider-
able attention as a therapeutic agent (M. The
soluble CTLA-4 —inununoglobulin (CTLA-4 —
Ig) fusion protein acts as an inhibitor of CD28-
B7 costimulation and has specific inhibitory
effects in animal models of autoinununity,
transplant rejection, asthma, and allergy (3, 12).
The efficacy of CTLA-4-Ig treatment of hu-
man disease has been demonstrated in clinical
trials on patients with psoriasis vulgaris (13).
This approach may well extend to a variety of T
cell-mediated diseases including autoimmune
diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus
erythematosus, and graft-versus-host disease
(13). In contrast to strategies that interfere with
the CD28-B7 association, reagents that inter-
fere with the CTLA-4 -B7 interaction intensify
specific T cell responses. For example, block-
ing antibodies directed against CTLA-4 en-
hance rejection of preestablished tumors and
protect against secondary challenge in animal
models of prostate cancer and colon carcinoma
(14).
The structure of the soluble extracellular
domain of murine CTLA-4 (15) revealed two
independent copies of the CTLA-4 dimer in
the asymmetric unit of the crystal (Fig. I, A
and B, and Table I) (16). The CTLA-4
monomer is a two-layer I3-sandwich that ex-
hibits the chain topology found in the immu-
noglobulin variable domains (Fig. IA) (17).
The front and back sheets, composed of
strands A'GFCC1 and ABEDC', respectively,
are connected by two intersheet disulfide
bonds. The disulfide bond between the B and
F strands is a signature for the immunoglob-
ulin fold; the disulfide bond joining strands
C and D is unique to the CD28/CTLA-4
family (Fig. 1A) (17, 18).
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
structure of a monomeric form of human
CTLA-4 (18) shows the same overall topol-
ogy as the murine homolog, with a root mean
square (mu) deviation of 2.4 A between
equivalent Ca atoms. The most significant
816
27 OCTOBER 2000 VOL 290 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
EFTA01075551
Supplementary Material
All birds were sexually mature males >120 days of age,
originally obtained from a commercial breeder. Before
experiments, birds were outfitted with a chronic recording
apparatus [A. Dave, A. C. Yu, J. J. Gilpin, D. Margoliash, in
Methods for Simultaneous Neuronal Ensemble Recordings, M.
Nicolelis, Ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999), pp. 101-
120]. Subsequently, birds were maintained on a 16.18-hour
light/dark schedule, and experiments began near the end of the
day to facilitate the bird's falling asleep. Electrodes were
advanced or retracted by manually turning a screw while the
bird was restrained until RA single units were isolated. The
bird was then released and induced to sing by presenting a
female in an adjoining half-cage or by broadcasting female
calls. The lights were then turned off, and the bird fell asleep.
Infrared video monitoring of sleeping birds facilitated
assessment of the bird's sleeping state (including lack of
movements, closed eyes, and low respiratory rate). BOS
playback commenced soon after the lights were turned off, as
this seemed to decrease the movements of the birds in the
initial minutes of darkness, reducing the risk of losing unit
isolation. After a variable number of presentations of the BOS
(30 to 220 repetitions, 12 s per repetition), syllable-deleted
versions of the BOS were presented in randomized order.
After auditory stimulation, up to 60 min of ongoing activity
was recorded in silence and darkness. When possible,
thereafter, either additional repetitions of auditory stimuli
were presented or the bird was awakened and more vocal
motor activity was obtained until the unit signal isolation was
lost.
Auditory responses of RA neurons were analyzed on the basis
of the following procedure. Interspike interval histograms of
ongoing discharge of RA neurons during sleep are bimodal;
the longer interval peak is related to nonbursting activity [A.
S. Dave, A. C. Yu, D. Margoliash, Science 282 , 2250 (1998)].
We fit a Gaussian to the longer interval peak using a nonlinear
least squares curve-fitting procedure (Matlab, The Math
Works). During playback of the BOS, a unit was considered
responsive to a syllable when the distribution of interspike
intervals occurring between the start of that syllable and the
start of the next syllable was different from the Gaussian
interval distribution of the nonbursting ongoing activity
(Mann-Whitney U test, P<0.05). In 86% (93 out of 108) of
syllables, units were responsive to two or more occurrences in
the song of the same syllable. In 46% (43 out of 93) of these
cases, the strength of response (number of spikes) differed
significantly (paired r test, P< 0.05) across occurrences of the
same syllable in song (average difference = 21% ± 14%). Each
of 18 units analyzed showed this effect.
We compared premotor and auditory response data for each of
17 units (from three birds) by constructing vectors (histograms
binned at 1 ms) from auditory responses to song playback and
from premotor activity. Cross-correlations of the two vectors
were calculated with lags ranging over ±100 ms. The cross-
correlation was normalized by the square root of the product
of the zero-lag autocorrelation values of the two vectors. Peak
values ranged from 0.23 to 0.66. The peak of the cross-
correlogram was tested for significance by randomly shuffling
the values of bins in the auditory response vector and then
repeating the cross-correlation (200 times). The resultant
distribution of peak correlations defined a normal distribution,
which was used to derive the probability of obtaining the
actual peak value. For one site, deletion stimuli (see report)
but not the intact BOS were presented because cell isolation
began unexpectedly during stimuli presentation with a
simultaneous recording site on another electrode. Thus,
instead of the BOS, the response to an auditory stimulus with
the last syllable of the BOS replaced with silence was
compared with the premotor activity of that unit
We also compared premotor and ongoing discharges of the
single units. Bursts occurring in ongoing activity during sleep
were defined as continuous sequences of intervals that fell
outside of the 99% confidence interval of the distribution of
the longer interspike intervals. To match ongoing bursts
against syllable-level activity recorded during singing, we
removed long intervals from the beginnings and ends of
bursts. We also determined the longest duration between
syllable onsets within a motif and split any bursts at intervals
greater than this duration (185 to 220 ms). One site was
excluded because it did not burst sufficiently (rate of ongoing
discharge of only 2.46 spikes/s); another site required
lowering the confidence threshold for finding burst from 99 to
95% to obtain any bursts. Sufficient data (at least 15 min of
sleep, some bursts, and sufficient premotor activity) were
therefore available for 14 units (from three birds). For each
unit, we computed distances (0.5-ms resolution) between each
burst from ongoing activity and the unit's premotor data. The
distance D between the two spike trains at a given shift was
defined as the average interval from each spike in one train to
the nearest spike in the other train
I Min (5.0, Min7,,In —0+ iMin(5.0,
hi)
D— t'1
Supplemental Figure 1.
where / and j index the two spike trains and n, and ri) are the
number of bursts in each train. A ceiling of 5 ms was set to
increase the robustness of the algorithm to outlier spikes. That
is, the duration between any spike and the nearest spike in the
other train, at any given shift, was allowed to range from 0 to
EFTA01075552
5 ms, with any values greater than 5 ms being treated as
exactly 5 ms.
Two measures of significance were developed to determine
the significance of the best match (lowest distance). Using a
bootstrap procedure, we shuffled the intervals within an
ongoing burst, and the resulting burst was similarly matched
against the premotor activity. The distribution of distances
from 1000 shuffled bursts was approximately normal. Across
all neurons and all bursts, skewness values ranged from •1.5 to
0.5, with a mean of •0.4 ± 0.3. Similarly, kurtosis values
ranged from -1.6 to 7.4, with a mean of 3.1 ± 0.6. Bursts were
considered to have a significant match to the premotor activity
if there was less than a 5% probability of obtaining as strong a
correlation by chance. This procedure relied on precise
matches between the ongoing and the premotor activity to find
matches and could not detect ongoing activity that matched
premotor activity only with higher order statistics. The data
also show evidence of compression/expansion of the time axis
of ongoing discharge during sleep as compared to premotor
patterns (see text and Fig. 3B of report). Time "warping" is a
nonlinear phenomenon that our matching procedure was not
designed to detect; hence, our estimate of matching between
bursts and premotor activity is a lower bound estimate.
For the bird with the largest number of recordings, we also
evaluated the significance of matches by matching a unit's
bursts from ongoing discharge to the premotor data belonging
to different units recorded from the same bird. Data from eight
units provided seven of these pairings for each unit. For seven
units, the greatest percentage of bursts matched the unit's own
motor activity, with the difference between this percentage
and the mean of the percentages for the heteronymous
mappings being 8.2 ± 4.9%. For the other site, the unit's own
premotor data provided the worst percentage of matching
bursts (average difference of 11.7%). The premotor activity of
this unit was not apparently unusual; however, the ongoing
discharge of this unit had the fewest bursts (in only 1.7% of
time in undisturbed sleep did this unit exhibit bursts), the
highest firing rate, and was the most regular (lowest standard
deviation of the interspike interval distribution).
EFTA01075553
Technical Artifacts (9)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
almofeaecorn.yu.eduDomain
dantebigbird.udskago.eduDomain
sangersc.ukDomain
www.sciencemag.orgDomain
wwwsciencemag.orgURL
http://vemyWire Ref
ReferencesWire Ref
referringWire Ref
reflectedForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.